(en) WSM.ie*: The experience of the Social Solidarity Network by Andrew Flood

The Social Solidarity Network came into existence in the Autumn of 2009 in Dublin as an
initiative of the Workers Solidarity Movement. It faded out of existence a few short
months later and never amounted to all that much in the interim beyond a couple of
meetings, a leaflet distribution at a mass ICTU march and a badly organised and executed
protest at the Dail on budget day. Nevertheless there are some useful lessons (mostly of
the ?how not to do it variety?) to be taken from its short existence. ---- Origins of the
Social Solidarity Network?? ---- The idea for what came to be called the Social Solidarity
Network originally came from a member of the Jack White branch of the WSM in Dublin. The
basic concept was to try and draw RAG and Semora Spraoi into activity around the crisis
through the formation of a network that could then also pull in others from the
libertarian mileu.

RAG is the Revolutionary Anarcha-Feminist group, a small collective of anarchist women
active in putting out an annual magazine (the RAG) and organising meeting and fundraisers
in connection with this. Seomra Spraoi (Seomra) is a libertarian orientated social center
in Dublin organised by a small group of people but with a very much larger number using
the space in one way or the other.

The WSM had debated a proposal to launch something like the SSN based on the then defunct
model of the Grassroots Gathering at a national level as part of the Capitalist Crisis
position paper debate but that proposal was voted down at national conference. There had
been a Grassroots Gathering in Cork in the Autumn of 2008 where WSM members first tried to
raise the concept of a libertarian front against the crisis but little interest had been
shown in the concept at the time. This had caused us to lose interest in the Gathering as
most of those involved seemed unable to break from routine issues and recognise the
extraordinary period we were entering.

The proposal to once more try to launch something similar to the Gathering was rejected in
part because the Cork comrades felt that there was no potential for such an initiative in
Cork. This didn?t preclude a Dublin only initiative but we could perhaps have done with
more discussion before floating the idea outside the WSM and hence more co-ordination once
this happened.?

Development of idea
At an early point the development of the idea fell to 1st of May branch, possibly because
it was 1st of May members who made the first meetings to discuss the network formation.
RAG & Seomra Spraoi were contacted and both indicated they were interested in the
proposal. There were maybe three attempted planning meetings (not all of which were
successfully held) that developed the idea of launching a network via a one day gathering
in Seomra Spraoi. In hindsight a problem was that attendance at these meetings was pretty
haphazard in terms of both RAG and Seomra, I'm not sure either sent a delegate to all
meetings and the specific people who attended changed from meeting to meeting. This meant
there was very little continuity of process from meeting to meeting outside of the WSM
involvement. The decision was taken to go ahead with a one day event.

??Launch?
The initial gathering took place in Seomra Spraoi on October 3rd 2009 (see program in
Appendix). Perhaps 40 people took part but there was a very low participation from either
RAG or Seomra. However quite a large number of new faces and in particular Maynooth
students turned up which meant there were just about enough people present to make it look
like the SSN might be something that could be built into something worthwhile. This
however was really the point that WSM should have reconsidered what a workable structure
for the SSN could be as it had become clear that Seomra and RAG participation in the
decision making process would not be significant.



From this launch one intention was to divide people into distinct sectors (students,
unemployed, workers) and for each of these sectors to organise concrete outreach activity
as part of building the network. Although plans were lain at the first meeting for each of
the sectors I?m not sure any of these were actually implemented - except for the Maynooth
student group.

??Development and activity?
There were probably three or four Dublin meetings of the SSN after this date (19 October,
6 Nov after ICTU demo, 1 December ). With the exception of Maynooth the idea of
organizing activity in 4 distinct sectors evaporated. The SSN did however agree the text
of a leaflet and 7,000 copies of this were produced with 5-6000 being distributed at the
Irish Congress of Trade Unions anti-cuts demonstration on 6th November - the demonstration
itself attracted tens of thousands. Upwards of twenty people took part in the distribution
on the day.

A meeting after this demonstration only really attracted those already involved and a
couple of people who had been around the left for years, maybe a total of 30.??The two
subsequent meetings which were to discuss a SSN strategy (two WSM members had prepared
drafts, see appendix) were poorly attended but did decide to call a protest for the Dail
on budget day (see Appendix for announcement). The WSM paid for a couple of hundred full
color A2 posters 100 of which were actually put up by two WSM members.



The event was attended by about 40-60 people who had probably turned up for that event but
the SSN had not put any thought into what to do when that (small) number of people arrived
so we just stood around for a while before heading to the pub. The Facebook event notice
had 169 confirmed guests and 186 might attends which is quite a high number so there was
no excuse in terms of thinking in advance that no one would come although this also made
it clear that numbers would not be huge. The SSN planning, in so far as it had existed,
had however assumed much large numbers - something of an angry mob. That things were
allowed to (not) develop in this way was a huge failure on the part of the WSM which
should have intervened to ensure that at the very least one or two speakers were organised
for the night.??

That was the last attempted SSN event called before the WSM called a meeting to discuss
the future of the SSN in late February. 11 people attended, 4 WSM, 1 RAG, 1 ISN, 1 Seomra
(plus 2 people involved in Seomra and one of the other groups already listed), 3 Maynooth
(where they had built a group around FEE using SSN as a name as well) and 1 other
person.??No formal minutes were kept but basically 11 of us spent almost two hours
discussing the Social Solidarity Network and a range of views about why it hadn't worked
out as people imagined and what if any future it had were expressed. There wasn't
consensus on either of these, if fact there was a wide range of views on what it should
have been as well as if and why it didn?t function.

??The decision we came to was that this meeting represented a phase change in the SSN, the
point at which we acknowledged that the original plan for how the SSN would develop had
not come about. The email list would continue to exist and people were free to continue to
use the name / organise events under the SSN name. Two concrete ideas that individuals
might pursue were to hold a regular social / information exchange and to use Seomra Spraoi
to invite in speakers from (community) organisations to talk about their struggles.

In reality the SSN ceased to exist around this point with only Laurence V attempting to
call a couple of follow on meetings which appear to have had a tiny attendance and out of
which nothing came. In retrospect it might have made more sense to have a formal vote on
winding it up but we (WSM) were reluctant to suggest this in advance of the meeting.

Analysis?
With hindsight its obvious that the original concept of the SSN as a network of groups was
never a runner as neither RAG nor Seomra Spraoi had the commitment / energy to put in the
time that would have been needed if it was to be more than a WSM 'front'. However enough
people turned up at the initial meeting and at least one of the follow up meetings to make
it appear that there could be the potential for the SSN to grow. Effectively this shifted
it from being network to being a WSM initiated campaign, a shift we failed to acknowledge
and take responsibility for.??This was most visible in terms of the budget day protest.
We failed to make sure something had been arranged for whatever number of people turned
up, even at the level of a brief 'thanks for coming' speech. So although people
politically close to us did respond to the promotion work and turn up the complete lack of
anything happening reflected badly on us.

In general I think we fell between the two stools of not wanting to run the SSN but also
not wanting to give up on it. We should have decided that either it didn't have potential
or we should have come up with a collective plan for what it should do, argued this at the
meetings and took on much of the responsibility for making sure these things then
happened. Instead we did neither.

Also with hindsight a problem that existed with the initiative was that we didn?t have any
idea of what to do with people who were interested in it beyond telling them to turn up
for the next business meeting. In campaigns that are intended to be broad initiatives this
is a significant failure as many more people may be interested in working with the
initiative but unwilling or unable to sit through regular business meetings in order to do
so. This same problem can be seen in other broad campaigns we are involved in including
Shell to Sea.

The feedback on the first draft of this text concentrated around my use of the word front
in scare quotes above. Front has different meaning in different contexts but in Ireland it
tends to be very negative, basically meaning an organisation that pretends to be open and
independent but is really tightly controlled by one political organisation with the
primary purpose of recruitment. The problem WSM had with the SSN was that although this
was not what was intended there was a clear danger that the SSN could become a de facto
front. Because members were rightly concerned about that they were very reluctant to drive
activity in the SSN in a co-ordinated manner.

The following year we saw a variation of the experiment with the 1% Network experience
where again attempts to involve Seomra and RAG resulted in only minor involvement, this
was also the case with the ISN which was only slightly more active. This time around
though the active involvement of eirigi prevented the de facto development of something
that could have looked like a front. But more importantly the 1% Network was organised not
on an assembly basis but rather as a committee of delegates from the groups involved (in
practice just the WSM and eirigi). Eirigi are a socialist republican group that broke from
Sinn Fein around 2004 and who have a critique of the top down command structure of the
republican movement. WSM members had been working with eirigi members in Shell to Sea for
some time at the point where the 1% Network was launched - a later article will discuss
the experience of the 1% Network.

In the 1980?s and the 1990?s the WSM became used to broad work where we were one of a
range of organisations involved and most often one of the smaller organisations. Since
2002 this has quite often not been the actual situation we faced, its quite often been
more like the SSN experience where we are the only properly organised group. With the
various Grassroots Gathering initiatives of the 2002-2004 this wasn?t such a major problem
because the WSM was numerically much smaller than the ?movement? forming the network so
we?d seldom make up more that 20% of the people at any particular meeting. This gave
enough potential for the emergence of a spontanoeous opposition if we suggested something
sufficently at odds with everyone else so that we didn?t have the fear of pushing
particular ideas. In retrospect however in the Grassroots Gatherings both the major
initiatives and the details of how these were carried out were mostly brought by WSM to
meetings.

The effective end of the Grassroots Gathering saw the major focus of activity shift to
Shell to Sea which initially was a return to the safe familiar ground of working in a
broad coalition that involved much larger groups like Sinn Fein and even the Green and
Labour parties and where we could play the role again of the combative minority. But this
meant that when it came to return to libertarian organising we failed to confront in the
meantime the problem of being the only organised poll. By the time of the SSN the WSM had
grown considerably and the movement had shrunk to the point where we would spontaneously
have a large percentage of people at assemblies being WSM members. Something we hadn?t
worked out how to deal with beyond being ultra careful not to dominate meetings basically
by refusing to organise to bring ideas to those meetings after collective discussion.

In conclusion the SSN was largely a collection of negative experiences and failures but
often you learn more from these then anything else. The process of formation was badly
handled internally by the WSM and our intervention within the SSN was weak and failed to
provide the essential support that was needed at particular moment, in particular the 2009
Budget protest.

Some key questions that arise for the WSM from the SSN experience include
1. How such initiatives are agreed internally and once agreed how we mobilise our own
membership and resources to support them.
2. How we deal with situation where we are the major pole and a significant percentage of
the membership of such initiatives. This is likely to be the situation with any
libertarian initiatives we launch.
3. What sort of organisational structures should we advocate that allows for democratic
decision making, reliable implementation of decisions reached and engagement possibilities
that can reach beyond those people with massive commitment to an issue.

There are also significant issues here for those we work with around recognition that the
WSM is often the motor that can drive new initiatives but that if we do so there is a
danger of that role being resented as being controlling. It?s useful that everyone be
aware of this as an issue and also aware that the light touch approach we adopted in
relation to the SSN did no one any favours in the end.

(A note on this text: This is very strongly based on a draft internal report on the SSN
published internal to the WSM in late 2010/early 2011. It has been slightly modified for
external publication in August 2012)

WORDS: Andrew Flood



Appendices


Social Solidarity Network - Building a Network of Resistance: Invitation to meeting Sat
3rd Oct

Job losses, wage cuts, cuts in essential public services, pension levies..... Our living
standards and our social services are under huge attack.

Mainstream media commentators and some politicians would have us believe that there is no
alternative, that we have all been living beyond our means and that we have to tighten our
belts in these recessionary times.

But we do not have to accept their reality. We do not have to accept that people on
minimum wage, unwaged workers, those on social welfare, low-paid civil servants or working
class people in general should be the ones who pay for the economic crisis. We do not have
to accept that our health, education, infrastructure and social welfare services should be
slashed in order to bail out the banks and the property developers.

Huge numbers of people recognise that we are being sold a lie. Huge numbers know that the
attempts to create divisions between public and private sector workers and between
different groups of ordinary people are an attempt to weaken us.

Communities all over the country have organised to resist hospital closures, cuts in
hospital services, education cuts and other attacks on social services. Senior citizens
fought valiantly, and ultimately victoriously, to retain the right to a medical card for
over 70's.

Communities and workforces all over the country are organising resistance to threatened
attacks and cutbacks. Groups such as Waterford Crystal workers, Visteon workers in
Belfast, Thomas Cook workers, Custom House cleaners in Dublin, Marine Terminals Ltd.
Workers (Dublin port) and Mr. Binman workers (Co. Tipperary) and many more have fought
back against job losses and attacks on working conditions.

The Social Solidarity Network is coming together to provide a forum for workers and
communities to unite to resist the attacks, and to build links across the many struggles
which will break out over the coming months. On Saturday 3rd October we are holding a
meeting which will provide a chance for people to come together and share their personal
experiences, explore the economics of the crisis and plan ways in which we can build
resistance.

We have identified 3 main areas for discussion ? Workplace Resistance;
Unemployed/Unwaged/Community Resistance; Education Cuts resistance. In each of these areas
we want to explore how opposition to government cuts can be encouraged and co-ordinated.
These are of course only our ideas and we are open to suggestions for alternative or
additional workshops.

We hope that you will come along on the day, share your views and help to build a network
which can share skills, knowledge and experience and which can help to bring reality to
the old maxim that ?Unity is Strength?.

Social Solidarity Network
Building a Network of Resistance
Saturday 3rd October 2009
Seomra Spraoi, 10 Belvidere Court, Dublin 1 (off Gardiner Street - see
http://www.seomraspraoi.org:8080/Plone/copy_of_contact-us for map)

Timetable
12:30pm Tea/Coffee/Registration & mingling ? including film showing
1:30pm Short introduction to the day followed by breaking up into groups of 10 or less for
30 minutes discussion on how people are effected personally (work, dole etc), what if any
involvement they have had in resistance, what problems they have faced in that involvement
(or what has stopped them being involved) and what they think might be possible for them
to do. Followed by feedback.
2:20pm Break
2:30pm Introductory session on the economics of the crisis - 20 minute presentation
followed by breaking up into groups of 10 or less to discuss
3:20pm Break
3:30pm Building Resistance ? short leadoff followed by breaking into 3 groups

a. Workplace resistance
b. Unemployed /Unwaged/ Community resistance
c. Education Cuts resistance
Discussion on how we should organise ourselves / what is the first step
4:30pm Final session. - reportbacks from each group, discussion of how best to proceed -
future meetings, organising etc. Attempt to come up with some concrete proposals and agree
core principles.
5:15pm Meeting concludes
6:00pm Food will be served
7:00pm Film Showing
9:00pm onwards Social evening ? Chill out, relax, make new friends and discuss the events
of the day in the convivial atmosphere of Seomra Spraoi.

This event is jointly organised by Workers Solidarity Movement (www.wsm.ie), Revolutionary
Anarcha-Feminist Group (http://ragdublin.blogspot.com/) and members of the Seomra Spraoi
collective (http://www.seomraspraoi.org:8080/Plone) . It is open to all and aims to
provide a space in which people can come together to support each other in building a
network of resistance to government attacks on our living standards. This network will be
built in an open, decentralised and fully democratic manner and will operate along
non-hierarchical principles.

Please come along, share your experiences and help us to build the network.

For more information please contact us at socialsolidaritynetwork@gmail.com or text/ring
Greg on 086 or Julian on 085

This is a family-friendly event. Contact us at above Email address or phone numbers for
details of arrangements for children



SSN Leaflet for 6th December ICTU march (7000 produced, 5-600 distributed))
Time To Get Organised
The government is trying to make ordinary people pay for the financial crisis. NAMA will
bail out the property developers and wealthy bankers who caused this crisis to the tune of
up to ?90billion. This will be done by savaging public services, slashing the wages of
ordinary workers, throwing lots more workers on to the dole and cutting social welfare.

It doesn?t have to be like this. There are plenty of other ways in which the money could
be raised. But these would involve challenging the status quo and demanding that those who
benefited from the Celtic Tiger be made to pay the price now.

Where has all the money gone which changed hands during the property boom? Even if the
value of overpriced land has dropped in the last few months, the property owners who sold
the land at inflated prices still have the money somewhere. Even if they?ve lost a portion
of it on the stock exchange there are still vast sums of money out there, the problem is
it?s in the hands of a small number of people.

In fact the richest 5% of the Irish population owns 40% of the wealth. This amounts to
property and assets worth ?400billion. Indeed the richest 1% of the population made about
?75billion during the Celtic Tiger years.

One day of marching will not be enough to bring about meaningful change. Ordinary workers
whether working in the public, private or community sectors, the unemployed, homemakers
and all who care about building a decent society need to get organised and fight back to
defend our public services and our wages and working conditions.

The Social Solidarity Network is a grouping of people who have come together to provide a
forum for workers and communities to unite to resist the attacks and to build links across
the many struggles which will break out over the coming months. We hope this Network will
become a means of actively continuing to resist cutbacks in all spheres of life.

We want to expand the Network as widely as possible. Please join in an open discussion
after today?s march to take part in building those links and developing a unified campaign
to make the ones who created the crisis pay for it.

Notes from Social Solidarity Network Meeting Tuesday 1 December

-1- Talked about the low turn out at the meeting and wondered if people on this list are
still interested in being active as Social Solidarity Network. It would be good if you can
respond with any thoughts and ideas on this. We had a bit of discussion around organising
things differently and what the sub groups were doing. The main thing is that it would be
good to get some responses on the mailing list.

-2- Budget Day - Wednesday 9th December
There are some protests being organised: Trade Council, Shell to Sea, INTO and some other
groups are organising protesting outside the Dail at various times on Budget Day
We'd like to organise a demo outside the Dail to provide a space for people who will want
to protest this budget,and hopefully we'll get some media attention
Decided to gather at the Dail between 5pm and 7pm
"Show You're Angry; Make Lots of Noise"
We're encouraging people to be noisy in their reaction to this budget - bring noisy things
... and make some noise!
It was decided that we would try to promote the event through 'official' circles - ie
unions and CDPs etc as well as the usual avenues
Can everyone on this list circulate a notice of the Budget Day event to people you know,
work with etc and can someone take on publicising it on line.
Mark is co-ordinating banner making for the event - suggested slogans "Tax the Greedy Not
the Needy" and "Reverse the Cuts Make the Rich Pay". Banner making will happen in seomra
spraoi and he'll be in touch with times.
We discussed the idea of organising a meeting to advertise at the event but decided
against it. Instead we will try to get contact details from any interested people. We will
have a desk where anyone interested can sign up to the mailing list.
Hopefully see some of you next Wednesday - with whistles, pots and pans, bag pipes...



Workers Solidarity article on SSN


Social Solidarity Network formed
The government has inflicted growing hardship upon workers and communities across the
country, spreading the ethos that we should all commit to sharing the pain. This has been
perpetuated by mainstream media, as ?sharing the pain? has been portrayed, as the only way
out of this crisis. The Social Solidarity Network (SSN), however, believes otherwise, and
wishes to provide people and communities with an open forum that can serve to resist these
attacks and to share and spread information among individuals and groups affected. The SSN
aims to make links between different struggles (from workplace and community organising to
resistance to educational cutbacks and unemployment) so that a network of resistance can
successfully be built.



We had our first meeting on the 3rd of October in the Seomra Spraoi social centre. It was
a positive day that saw around 40 people coming together. It involved the sharing of
experiences, much discussion about the crisis and potential ways of resisting its effects,
film screenings, dinner and an evening social event.

This was followed by a second meeting on the 19th of October, which focussed on continuing
previous discussion and furthering the growth and potential of the network. Much attention
was given to building for the ICTU national demonstration on November 6th, as it was seen
as an important way to show the government that Irish people won?t just lie down and
accept cuts to vital social services and as an indication of the mood for a fight back.

With this in mind, the SSN leafleted the march in Dublin and held another meeting in its
aftermath to plan future actions. This network is still in its early stages and its
success will depend on getting large numbers of people involved. If you are interested in
knowing more about the SSN and/or getting involved, please contact
socialsolidaritynetwork@gmail.com

Budget day: "Show You're Angry; Make Lots of Noise" (from Facebook)
The Budget is going to be a massive attack on ordinary working people and the poor across
Ireland. Lets show our anger in huge number outside the Dail on Dec 9th as they waffle
within. The Social Solidarity Network is joining the protests that day at 5pm to demand
"Reverse the Cuts Make the Rich Pay" and "Tax the Greedy Not the Needy".

Other organisations have already announced protests at the Dail that day including the
Dublin Council of Trade Unions, Shell to Sea and the INTO and we are sure more will
follow. We'll be joining these during the day and would encourage others to do the same as
we build towards a massive protest between 5 and 7pm. We hope to see you there.

SSN: ?Show You?re Angry. Make Lots of Noise?
Press Statement issued by Social Solidarity Network

Budget Day: ?Show You?re Angry. Make Lots of Noise?

Campaigning Group Social Solidarity Network (SSN) has called on people to come to the D?il
on Budget Day this Wednesday at 5:00p.m. to show their anger at ?government attacks on
ordinary working people and the poor across Ireland.?

?This budget will be a disaster for ordinary people,? said SSN spokesperson Mark Malone.
?The government has made it clear that they are going to make ordinary people pay the cost
of the financial crisis.?

?We can expect huge attacks on the living standards of ordinary people in this budget,?
Malone continued. ?While those who benefited from the Celtic Tiger get away scot free, the
rest of us are being asked to pick up the pieces. But the rich must be made to pay for the
crisis they created. So we?re asking people to rally under two slogans - "Reverse the Cuts
Make the Rich Pay" and "Tax the Greedy Not the Needy".

?We?re also asking people to come prepared to make lots of noise. It?s time that we let
the government know the level of anger that there is in the country. So people should come
and join our protest in huge numbers and show our anger outside the D?il as the
politicians waffle inside.? Mr. Malone concluded.

The SSN protest is just one of a large number of protests planned for the D?il on Budget Day.

The Social Solidarity Network is a grouping of people who have come together to provide a
forum for workers and communities to unite to resist the attacks and to build links across
the many struggles which will break out over the coming months.

Statement concludes
Confirmation and further information from Mark Malone 085



Proposed statements on crisis


Gregors proposed statement

We don?t have to ?Share the Pain?

There is ANOTHER way.

The government plans to cut ?4billion from this year?s budget ? one-third by cutting
public sector pay, one-third by cutting social welfare and one-third by cutting public
services.

ICTU?s 10-point plan ?There is a Better Fairer Way? accepts that we all have to ?share the
pain? and fails to address the fundamental fact that the wealthy must be made to pay for
the crisis.

But a radical agenda is needed. There is another way ? The wealthy must be made to pay.
Here are just 3 examples of ways in which this could be done. There are plenty of others.

Why not

1. Impose a wealth tax

The top 1% of the Irish population owns 34% of the wealth. The asset base (excluding
residential property) of this tiny number of people rose from ?25billion to ?100billion
between 1995 and 2006. (source: Bank of Ireland Wealth of the Nation report). Even a
modest 40% tax on this massive wealth would raise 10 times the amount of money the
government needs to find this year.

2. Put a cap on all salaries in both public and private sectors

775,000 workers in the Irish workforce earn an average of ?15,000 a year or less - that's
?290 a week. Another 400,000 are on an average of ?25,000 - ?480 a week. Yet, 1,447
people earn an average of ?2.3million (?44,230 per week). (source: Gene Kerrigan, Sunday
Independent 8th March 2009) Would it really hurt badly if everyone had to manage on a
maximum income of ?100,000 per year (that?s ?1,920 per week ? not exactly poverty wages)?

3. Take Ireland?s reserves of gas and oil into state ownership

Gas and oil reserves worth at least ?420billion have been discovered off the Irish
Atlantic coast. The Corrib gas field alone is worth over ?30 billion. Why not
re-negotiate the generous licensing terms signed by Ray Burke in 1987 with Shell and other
oil companies and use these resources for the benefit of the Irish people?

Marching and complaining is not enough. To build a campaign aimed at making the wealthy
pay we need to:

? Organise for a national strike which will unite public and private sector workers
under the slogan ? ?There is ANOTHER way. Make the wealthy pay?.

The first step in building this is to have a one-day strike BEFORE the December budget to
let the government know we are serious and to respond immediately with strike action if
wage cuts are included in the budget. Failure to strike before the budget will be seen by
the government as a sign of weakness.

? Organise within our individual unions for an end to so-called ?social partnership?.

?Social partnership? has never been in the interest of workers. The last year of
so-called ?talks? has been a way for the government to string the unions along while
planning their attacks on us. Now is the time to end this farce.

? Help to organise rank and file networks within individual unions and across
unions. We need to take control of the unions in the interest of ordinary members. Trade
union leaders on massive salaries cannot represent the interests of their members. Trade
unions are our organisations and we need to organise to take control of them.

? Support workers who are not unionised to get organised and join a union. An
effective national strike will need to include all workers in the public and private
sectors. It is in all our interests to support and encourage all workers to join a union.

The leadership of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions have shown by their actions that they
cannot be trusted. The challenge for all trade union members is to get actively involved
at a local level in organising the fightback.



Andrew?s Proposed statement



We are told that there is no choice but to cut wages and drive down the living conditions
of the unemployed and others dependent on social welfare. This is a lie. Here are three
simple ways that enough money could be raised to stop every proposed cut.

Short term

A 90% tax on earnings over 100k would raise 2.1 billion

A cap on public sector wages at 100k would raise 450 million

A 5% wealth tax which excludes farming land would raise 8 billion

These three steps alone not only raise / save the 4 billion proposed in the budget they
raise an additional 6.5 billion for a massive job creation program which could be based on
filling the needs of people in Ireland for decent health, education, housing and communities

In the longer term there is the equivalent of 10 billion barrels of oil off the Irish
coasts. This is almost been given away to Shell and other companies at the present. If
the government took 70% of this, the rate Russia, Angola and Nigeria among other
countires do, this would see 294 billion coming in as these fields are developed.

----

To force the adoption of the program above we need a huge fight with the government and
employers. The more organized and united we are for the fight the less it will cost us
and the quicker they will have to give in. This fight is the fight of workers, the
unemployed and the community, it is not the fight of the union leadership. They may be
with us at different stages or they may be against us so the fight has to be in our hands.

Building the resistance

If your in a union talk to people you work with who are not members about joining. Keep
talking to them about this until they join.

Push for regular meetings in your workplace of all union members to discuss how to respond
to each development in the crisis. Don't leave this to union reps.

If your union rep doesn't consult the members or is conservative have a recall meeting and
elect someone else.

If your not in a union start to talk to your fellow workers about organising. Talk to
those you trust first and when enough agree met up and decide which union to approach.
Keep meeting as a group, joining a union will help legally but you are the union so don't
expect 'the union' to fight for you. A union is only as strong as its members and only
retains that strength as long as you keep creating it.

Organised workers need to

- organize networks within big workplaces that cross union boundaries and which even take
in unorganized workers so when we go out we all go out together

- organize rank and file networks within each union and across the unions so that
organised workers can collectively provide an alternative leadership to the union heads

- break down the divisions the media have been creating between private and public sector
workers, between workers and the unemployed by building networks with community activists,
unemployed activists, students and anyone willing to stand up and fight back

If your not working this means you can play a part by organising in your community, or if
unemployed organising a local unemployment action group or if a student organising a
student resistance group. Everyone has a part in this fight.

What will victory look like?

We cannot answer this exactly. We can say the employers and government will not give in
easily. They will be forced to give in by national strikes of all workers and widespread
civil unrest. As we fight we will organize, if they hold out too long and as we gain
confidence we may collectively decide we don't just want bread, we want the whole bakery.

Calling of Future of SSN? -email (Feb 16 2010)


Dear Friend

As you know the Social Solidarity Network hasn?t met since just before
the Budget. Our last public event ? the ?Make Lots of Noise? protest
on Budget day was far from a success.

Members of the Workers Solidarity Movement who were active in the
Social Solidarity Network have been discussing whether it has a future
and have come to the conclusion that it seems that at this time at
least there is very little enthusiasm for building the SSN, and thus
very little prospect that it can be built to become the sort of
organisation that we had all hoped.

Obviously, however, the SSN has a very much wider membership than the
WSM so we feel that it would be useful to have a meeting to discuss
whether or not others agree with us or whether there is a level of
interest among activists which could be used to develop SSN into a
political campaigning group with some real bite. We are suggesting
that a meeting be held in Seomra Spraoi on Tuesday 23rd February at
7:30pm to facilitate this discussion. We hope this date will be
suitable for any of you who wish to attend.

It would be helpful if you could respond to this Email to let us know
if you are planning on attending this meeting or whether you have any
views on the future viability of the SSN.

Thank you.
Yours fraternally
Gregor Kerr



Report back on Feb 22 2010 wind up? meeting


No formal minutes were kept but basically 11 of us spent almost two hour discussing the
Social Solidarity Network and a range of views about why it hasn't worked out as people
imagined and what if any future it had were expressed. There wasn't consensus on either
of these.

The decision we came to was that this meeting represented a phase change in the SSN, the
point at which we acknowledged that the original plan for how the SSN would develop had
not come about. The email list will continue to exist and people are free to continue to
use the name / organise events under the SSN name. Two concrete ideas
that individuals might pursue were to hold a regular social / information exchange and
to use Seomra Spraoi to invite in speakers from (community) organisations to talk about
their struggles. If your interested in helping with either post to the list saying so.

------------------------------
Bron : a-infos-en@ainfos.ca