(en) France, Alternative Libertair #222 - Debate: Prostitution - misunderstandings out (fr)

As part of the festival Equals Equals, held a debate on prostitution to explain two 
opposing positions on this issue within the feminist movement.
On a subject that often brings passionate debates and polemics and passions, the 
collective festival tried to put in place a mechanism allowing each party to explain its 
differences, but also to show its points of agreement. The plateau was formed as follows. 
Ga?lle Th?baud member of the group, has ensured the presentation of the evening. The 
sociologist Roland Pfefferkorn, author of an article with a search for objectivity 
different positions [1], was responsible in his speech to recall a number of factual and 
show the complexity of empirical situations. Irene Pereira, author of articles published 
in the journal Prostitution and society, presented the arguments in favor of a position 
calling for the abolition of prostitution. Malika Amaouche, co-founder of Collective 
Rights and prostitution, was responsible for its share of arguments expose justifiants 
recognition of professional status for their opening prostitutes social rights.

The debate between the participants and the audience was held in great serenity and mutual 
listening. He has no doubt helped to clarify points of divergence, but also points of 
agreement. Thus, the two parties agreed on the fact that we should not deny the word of 
prostitutes. However, Irene Pereira stressed that inequality in gender relations and 
capitalist puts a hint of the consent given by the prostitutes at market exchange. 
Similarly, participants in the debate agreed on the fact that there is a strong link 
between many situations of prostitution and economic insecurity. Thus, both parties are 
unanimous on the fact that the improvement of the basic rights of all members of society 
could open the possibility for many women to leave prostitution if they wish. The sticking 
point that remains concerns the granting of rights associated with a profession of 
prostitute. Such a claim would she provide protection to prostitute es an improvement of 
the basic rights of all not offer? This claim may she not extend the liberal legitimacy in 
our society transforming everything into commodities including women's sexuality? Here are 
some points that are still being debated ...

Irene (AL Orleans)

[1] Roland Pfefferkorn, "Around the organization of a workshop on prostitution: an 
impossible compromise" Cahiers du Genre, 2007.