Populist measures used to hide a pat on the back for bosses and even the TUC turns against workers. ---- It?s the most wonderful time of the year! Who am I kidding? The weather sucks, plenty of us can?t afford to turn the heating on and to top it off George Osborne?s been smirking in the papers holding up his red briefcase containing all the evils of the world. (That?s Pandora?s box ? Ed.) ---- So what does Ozzy have in store for us this spring to cure those winter blues? The headline being touted is an advanced delivery of the Lib Dems? flagship policy: a raise in the Personal Tax Allowance to ?10,000. This populist move appears to benefit everyone, especially people on low incomes. However, any support for the move should be critical. The impetus for the new PTA is to create effective demand, i.e. getting people spending, which puts the money we?ve saved through lower taxation into the pockets of businesses on the High Street. Furthermore, the package will act as a state subsidy for poverty wages, meaning businesses do not have to raise wages in line with inflation. Interestingly, our politicians of all stripes neglected to inform us of the Office for Budget Responsibility?s calculations that this year real wages (adjusted for inflation) are down 10% since summer 2010. Of course the tax break on earnings also deflects attention away from the hike in council tax, which helps the government direct the blame for cuts to public services onto local government. Noticed your boss looking chirpy this week? It?s not just because he can afford 24 hour heating! Osborne has announced that bosses will be rewarded with a ?2000-a-year cut in National Insurance contributions, amounting to a ?1.25bn tax break. Bosses will presumably have the option of either pocketing the saving or putting more people to work on poverty wages to fuel the company?s profits now that everyone?s got a bit more to spend. Just in case bosses weren?t sure whether or not Christmas really had come early, Osborne ensured no mistake could be made by slashing corporation tax to 20%, which is the lowest rate in the G20. And for the rest of us? 1p off a pint of beer. Cheers, George! Sounds like a joke? Unfortunately it isn?t. This is George Osborne trying to show how in-touch he is with the plebs. Sorry, ?Britain?s hard workers?. Wondering what the hell?s going on? Having ditched the ?Big Society? project, which I?m still not sure most of the front bench ever really understood, the coalition?s new rhetorical device is the ?Aspiration Nation?. Catchy, eh? The idea as it?s presented is that if we all knuckle down, work hard, do ?the right thing?, abide the law, marry suitors of the opposite gender and have well-behaved children (though not too many, you benefit scrounger), we can all be upstanding individuals with healthy bank balances. Who says politicians are out of touch with the real world? First in the government?s blueprint for the ?Aspiration Nation? is to make us all property owners. As we may by now suspect, this is not the kind gesture it may appear to be. The government is shelling out ?3.5bn over three years in shared equity loans ? indicative of serious pump-priming. The idea here is to buck the trend towards private rents, which currently risks increasing demand towards social housing and deflating the housing stock. Of course it?s no problem that house prices are spiralling; the government will just help us take on more debt. This measure has an added bonus for the government; encouraging growth in the ?home-owner? demographic will pay dividends in years to come. Typically conservative, economically-stable and individualistic, who better to vote in the next Tory government? Feeling up against it? Fear not, the trusty Trade Union Council is on our side. TUC general secretary Frances O?Grady said, ?This budget is the wrong answer to the wrong question. We face a jobs, growth and living standards crisis.? Indeed, growth isn?t quite going how the government had hoped ? halved to just 0.6% this year. However, let?s just have a little look at the TUC?s stance on jobs. Recently the TUC announced in relation to the ?job guarantee? programme for young workers, ?Claimants who turn down a job guarantee job without good cause should face benefit sanctions?. It seems our friends at the helm of the union movement are all for Osborne?s ?Aspiration Nation? after all. We should be clear that advocating benefit sanctions supports the narrative of the unemployed as ?workshy? versus the ?hard worker?. This is a shameful piece of divide and rule manoeuvring on the part of the TUC, which serves to reinforce the ideological advancement of theories about the ?culture of dependency?, whereby unemployment is apparently a lifestyle choice. Clearly this does not account for the many valid reasons someone may not accept a job, whether ill-health, childcare issues, or indeed: not wanting that job! I don?t think we should be surprised by anything in the budget. Clearly the government is adopting a pump-priming strategy of cutting taxation and stimulating the housing market, but with benefit sanctions, poverty wages, continued cuts to public services and the proposed welfare reform, it?s going to be another difficult year for the class and a busy year for class-war militants. Pint of beer anyone? -CM.
SPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
zaterdag 30 maart 2013
Britain, Collective Action - association of anarchist communists: Budget 2013 brings us more smoke and mirrors
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten