(en) Anarkio.net: A-Infos #19 - The property is absurd atrocious! (pt)

The repossession owners to speculators is a great absurdity supported by law and is not 
now. Proudhon in the nineteenth century have broght the terrible realization that property 
as well is a speculative attack on humanity that exists over 6000 years of existence, 
leading millions of people to a life of penury and misery, while a minority holds all the 
world's wealth. ---- Property cumulative destroys freedom, corrupts and denies equal 
access to justice for the basic needs. Abolish it is the means of repairing a historic 
mistake of mankind. ---- There is just speculative property. Stressed (Frisemos) to have 
something to use is different from having to speculation and profit, which is the 
politically correct way of saying theft.

Those who took possession, gave up the right to make its own right, laws that can support 
up to keep the theft called legitimate property.

The legal structure was built giving more emphasis to ensure that property and who has not 
lost without profit proportional, ie more wealth stolen from the robbery that had. Because 
the property is absurd? Because it is necessary for all, then it comes out of the context 
to be something optional, a choice to be a necessity as water, air and can not be owned, 
is a necessity of usage. When about something beyond the necessities, causing damage to 
the other, stopping to meet their needs and hurts the relationship of equality as preached 
in eloquent speeches, but not in practice. In fact, laws and justice meet especially those 
with economic advantage, those usually acquired through exploitation and oppression, 
current or historical.

The changes in the processes of theft of property speculation in total, employers, 
farmers, landowners, businessmen, use this resource as a substitute for other forms of 
cumulative, whereas the production of wealth is made by a workforce passive, subject to a 
harmony of logic work, where a contract miserable, the worker waive the wealth it produces 
for a measly salary and no fair wage it.

To meet the housing demand of our people, will occupy all spaces and redistribute all the 
homes and many homes in this country and we are able and competent manpower to build all 
the houses as needed. But our people are thrown ?escandeio? and meets the business demands 
for more soccer fields than for the homes we need. And that's not invade, there would only 
be an invasion if the space was occupied for direct use. This leads to the property must 
meet to use and does not serve to enrich, or speculation.

It is important to learn the nuances of the capital and speculation that the property is 
absurd, absurd protected by a controlled force will do whatever it takes to ensure the 
unjust right of ownership.

As a millennial error can continue to generate so much suffering to millions of people, 
and these remain on such oppression without fighting? We see scenes of repossession 
speculators the cowards that without the repressive apparatus, neither dared go on site to 
say what it is. While there is an understanding that the property ownership, there may be 
speculative, we will always have this problem, millions without homes, some with million 
homes.

Abolish the property is accurate and should be in the proposal of any serious 
revolutionary movement, because to maintain it is to keep the injustice that afflicts our 
people for a long time.