(en) Organisation Communiste Libertarie (OCL) - When justice is bent on defending the social order (fr)

In a few weeks fell three decisions of the judiciary against the militants, activists and 
ordinary protesters in Paris, Nantes, Tours. The challenge: the questioning of a 
multinational interests in a devastating infrastructure project such as an airport, the 
indictment of the police and the use by police of lethal weapons (which when they do not 
kill, seriously injure and maim for life those they reach) during demonstrations, the 
questioning of racist and xenophobic policy of the French government today. ---- More than 
ever, the legal battle is not separable fighting against the company, its logical tax, 
violence, exploitation, segregation and focus not (including financial) of those who s' 
opposed. ---- Three examples among others. ---- The conviction of 14 militants Collective 
Ile-de-France airport against Notre-Dame-des-Landes and a new complaint against a militant 
of the group.

Peter's testimony, the Nantes student who lost an eye after a shooting flash-ball there 
six years and has been unsuccessful in his appeal;

The release of two comrades, JC and Muriel de Tours (Thirst collective utopias) Cassation 
rejected in the month of June.

Press the Collective against airport Notre-Dame-des-Landes Ile-de-France:

The Pinault are bent:
a new complaint against an activist of our collective

Our friend, who is one of 14 militant.es condamn?.es June 24 for having invit?.es in the 
castle of the shareholder Vinci, relayed on his blog, after the verdict, a statement and a 
poster the Paris collective fight against the airport in Notre-Dame-des-Landes. She is 
summoned to appear Nov. 8, 2013 before the 17th Criminal Chamber of the Paris Court. It 
was followed by Pinault father and son for defamation. The defamatory elements according 
to the civil party: a poster of Fran?ois-Henri Pinault vampire with lambs on the head, and 
the following passage from the press release: "Pinault polluter, thief, expropriation" .

Redial previous facts:

On January 27, 15 people were invited to the park for family castle multibillion Fran?ois 
and Fran?ois-Henri Pinault to denounce their responsibility in the project to build the 
airport in Notre-Dame-des-Landes. The Pinault family did not appreciate the picnic 
protest! Put / are in custody for 45 hours, the pique-niqueurs/ses were accus?.es of 
trespass, death threats, and some of them / it, refusal to submit to sample DNA 
identification.
On June 24, the high court of Versailles condemned inculp?.es 14 to 2 months suspended 
sentence to a fine of 5600 euros, 1250 euros in legal fees, 1 euro fine in favor of the 
plaintiff. The seals were confiscated, and the demand for non-inclusion in the criminal B2 
denied. The condamn?.es appealed this decision, they await a trial date.

RDV 8 November 2013 to 13 h 15 before the 17th Criminal Chamber, Chamber of the press 
tribunal de grande instance of Paris to support our fellow accused of defamation.

Rennes, October 11, 2013:
travesty last episode
Non-story of deliberate appeal trial

Friday, October 11, 8 pm

Large droplets and rain and a cold wind welcomed us in Rennes metropolis. Already this 
fall. This is the sixth fall since I've been hit hard in the middle of a crowd of 
demonstrators students: a masked police had adjusted the barrel of his new weapon on my 
face. That was in 2007. I was 16.

The gunman, Matthew L?glise is a repeat offender, he had volunteered to test the LBD then 
experiment. One of his golf experience: the marches of students. Matthew L?glise had 
continued to parade in uniform, armed, in Nantes streets in the months and years that 
followed. To summon the police after several years is already the result of a bitter 
struggle, long-term. I encountered the Kafkaesque wall of the French state, much more 
armed, strong and organized than me.

In March 2012, the Court of Nantes, black, gloomy, stretched by a multitude of blue vans, 
had pronounced the acquittal of police shooter. "He was only following orders" We appealed 
against this map White Nantes a judge offered to all policies to maim with impunity. 
Offering a favorable precedent for flash-ball shooters.

More than a year later, in June 2013, I pleaded not through, opposite the judges of the 
Court of Appeal of Rennes. I recalled that the police had lied to countless times, 
destroyed from the evidence (minutes of gunfire, police at the time of shooting films), 
but my case was not isolated. He was part of a whole, a safe offensive militarization of 
police impunity guaranteed. Dozens of people have been seriously injured or killed since 
my injury in 2007. This court she will be less subject to the terror exercised by the 
Nantes police? Deliberate then announced for October 2013.

"We are in a state of law" This is the argument belched a uniform to justify the roadblock 
set up by his colleagues to help us - me, my friends, LDH civil party - attend the 
deliberations of the case. I find a curiosity which I had never heard of: the deliberate 
behind closed doors, where it prevents the complainants to attend hearings concerning them.

The Rennes judge makes a deliberate illegal. And all this in the name of law. The police 
claim that there is no place, as they had already claimed the hearings that preceded: they 
lie. They bring before us many, while blocking us. The journalists had - for some - more 
than I could have some on my own business.

"I do not give a fuck" , adds the same officer when I warn you that I will find this new 
judicial masquerade, intimidation, contempt that we are undergoing. Obviously, orders were 
given to: Filter intruders. Others can go, not us. We're stuck in front of the security 
gate of the court by the police. I could reasonably have expected the cowardly decision to 
confirm the release of the shooter. I had not imagined by against judges may need a 
curtain of police to prevent a complainant attends the decision is concerned. A policeman 
raises his major in our direction. His colleagues are hilarious. Until the end, on the 
bottom as on the form: pathetic.

"The Court of Appeal upheld the acquittal of Matthew total L?glise" This is ultimately a 
secretary who then confirms me that I had to force the portal to get to the beginning of 
an information. It is now nearly 10 hours, deliberate were read a long time. The argument 
the judge will not give me that day, I would not know its content, I missed the deliberate 
for "security reasons." After cynicism, humiliation and police impunity reigns. A huge 
machine trying to destroy a second time those trying to survive the assault by security 
forces. We find the same practices, the same lies, the same intimidation in the various 
cases of flash-ball - and police violence at large. It is found that the injured judged 
accused. This is double jeopardy. We must keep our heads. Without illusions.

Sarkozy's police mutilated me. Socialist Justice today confirmed the acquittal of police 
shooter. Meanwhile, the successive Ministers of Interior offered hundreds of these "guns 
for military use" - according to the official terminology that categorizes these objects - 
that are the LBD. The mutilated multiplied.

A part of the fight continues the tribunal to convict the chain of command of the police, 
the state has armed the shooter. This will not be worried. This is a page turns.

A thought for tou-te-s-are injured by police weapons. The last - to my knowledge: Salim, 
14, in Trappes this summer.

Neither forgiveness nor oblivion,

Pierre

TRIAL OF 4 OF TOURS: THE RACKET If AMPLIFIED!

The Supreme Court delivered its judgment. On the one hand, justice (class) prohibits:

* To individuals, structures to publicly report their suspicions about possible abuses, 
excesses on the part of the administration, police and gendarmerie;

* To make historical comparisons to analyze the current developments in the light of 
experience, including the Petain regime. It should be noted that a comparison is not an 
amalgam. There is no question that Sarkozy is Petain, etc.. Compare is to take into 
account historical experience that brings us, in this case, the Vichy period, to examine 
our past to affect the present and try to consider different futures. Make comparisons and 
alerting is more than necessary;

* To rebel against racist and xenophobic policies of the state. For example, how to 
describe the decision of the Ministry of the Interior ordered through the circular of 5 
August 2010, the hunt for Roma? How is it that no official (administration, police and 
gendarmerie) has refused to carry out this illegal order? These questions are still 
relevant. The hunt for Roma has not stopped, quite the contrary. Valls is a virtuoso in 
the field than its predecessors.

On the other hand, the justice (class) allows

* Minister to censor an opinion that the mind;

* The state to treat people differently according to whether they are leaders or peasants. 
Only personnel policy caste may be considered defamatory remarks. This confirms that 
political criticism should be made by professionals that are elected officials and party 
leaders recognized by the system. Could this not lead to the prohibition of 
anti-capitalist ideas as anarchism?

The Criminal Court sentenced Tours had 3 of the 4 accused of Tours 500 ? suspended fine 
each, ? 300 in damages each ? 3,000 collectively to pay the plaintiff. The Court of Appeal 
added ? 3,000 to collectively pay the same qualified recipient "victim" (that is to say, 
the Minister of the Interior Hortguevalls) and ? 120 each for costs. The Court of 
Cassation has extended this long list: ? 2,000 payable together.

For quoting Vichy it comes to a total of ? 9,260. Each letter of this famous spa town so 
worth ? 1,852. It is expensive prose! It is not sure that Mr. Jordan has had the 
opportunity to become a gentleman in the room rate. The support committee 4 Tours can 
immediately pay the additional ? 2,000. We must therefore again appeal to solidarity.

On 21 June 2013, the prefect of Indre-et-Loire the question arose whether it would have 
been Jean Moulin Papon or when the Vichy regime was rampant. Leave this question haunt his 
mind and see what he actually ordered these last days:

a father is separated from his children and locked up in a detention camp;
a family of eight people is called to a police station to try to expel him.
There are a few months, the same prefect sent cops in college where there was the 
commemoration of Jean Moulin June 21, 2013. One day he sends cops and another he raises 
existential questions. How strange. Officials would they blockages about historical 
comparisons?

Papon and Jean Moulin? We leave you the answer, sometimes it official solicit his Minister 
for complaint.

Following the assassination of Clement Meric, many are realizing that right-wing 
organizations are dangerous physically, politically and ideologically. The government 
looks to ban them. This will not prevent their ideas continue to spread. This is, among 
other things, the daily fight against racism and xenophobia state we can expect on store 
shelves museums the memory of those obnoxious structures.

We can not ignore the history. We will have to confront a fundamental question. How is it 
that the passage of the Third Republic, the Vichy regime is a smooth one in the 
administration, the police, the gendarmerie and justice? The xenophobic, racist 30s did 
she not helped facilitate such passage?

We accept no conviction. We will go to the European Court of Human Rights. We'll ask him, 
among other substantive issues that we have never ceased to raise in court.

Tours on 24/06/2013

Jean-Christophe Berrier and Muriel El Kolli the collective THIRST FOR UTOPIES

soifdutopies@yahoo.fr