[machine translation]
Introduction ---- We are facing a new phenomenon. The 3rd round in Brazil was in most of
composition, the frantic search for such governance, giving flesh to the concept of
coalition presidentialism. This key concept in Brazilian politics - if observed
uncritically - enters the neo-institutionalists fallacies. If translated by their
substantive nature, proves to be the condition of government who campaigned alongside 10
parties, although oligarchic hide captions on TV and Radio programs. Now the 3rd shift
exceeds streaks of absurd and deals with the kidnapping of the agenda by right, with a
straight cancha race between the Plateau (or Dilma and Lula, more properly said) and the
neo-liberal opposition, betting the match to see who lines up more confident way with the
prescription of "market confidence resumed." In this unfortunate race, meets predominant
roles of both the media pressure - as we shall see in the discussion below - as the
implementation of the theory of revolving doors, where the pivot is a top executive of
finance in and out of the state apparatus as if it were the extension of their private
activities. The words that follow are not ideological propaganda although not lose sense
of beliefs and normativity. Reinforcement that are not conducive to those who live in a
state of magical thinking, confusing the advertising appeal of political marketing with
the naked politics, albeit with refinements of sophistication, held by the upstairs of Brazil.
Joaquim Levy at the World Economic Forum and the unconditional defense of the Asian
margins applied to market operators in Brazil. The friend of Arminio Fraga march to the
conquest of the Union Finance.
Economic depression media - putting the government against the wall
The National Journal showed a particular matter in the edition of November 21 regarding
the Brazilian economy. In addition to the gloomy outlook, the station's leading television
news not heard any official source, made the panacea to compare the budget and management
of the 7th in the world economy to the daily life of a housewife going to the market (ah
models, these models ah "rational ") and then took as expert sources to three economists
Simon Silber USP, Gustavo Loyola Brand?o (which came with the credit former president of
the Central Bank and not as a member of Trends Consulting) and finally, Antonio Delfim
Netto (with Credit former finance minister, but did not say who was Minister of
dictatorship in three governments). Was made the praise of the primary surplus and no one
conceptualized debt services like unleashed bleeding of Brazilian collective resources.
Of course implies the presence in the absences. No developmental source, people like Luiz
Gonzaga Belluzzo or Ladislaus Dowbor was not heard. The material features more of the same
of what Noam Chomsky defines consensus Manufacture by obtaining consents. The vehicle
points the editorial line of neo-neo preaching (neoliberal, neoclassical,
neoinstitucional) and journalistic manipulation. The editorial line is no problem, but the
absence of contradictory. The horror of the media pressure continues.
Already the Millennium program - the issuing by Globo News cable - collects a series of
type "brainstorm" opposition right for at least four weeks. Among the four panels that
this analyst attended by addressing the political scene, economic, foreign policy and
recently after the bursting of Operation Lava Jet in its seventh phase and the
consequences provided for 2015, there was only one debater - of the twelve gifts - that
had some left alignment.
Curious Procrustean bed as if referenciava Bakunin to the theme of freedom without
equality or proposal egalitarianism statist without political freedoms. The government of
Dilma strides towards the right (as we shall see below) and still defeated at the polls
bring a thesis that points to something very, very dangerous. Professor Bolivar Lamounier
said Rousseff would "legality" (for having won the election), but would not have the
"legitimacy" to take some action. Among these was the decision - seen by the opposition as
suicidal, and apparently such a view is shared by Brazil - to deepen the New Matrix of
economic policy.
The rights that are not in government (political, ideological and financial) see a
reactionary ministerial composition and not content. They want to repeat the maximum
Roberto Jefferson, because they want the body of the State, but unlike "yield to head" -
as would be the modus operandi of Jos? Dirceu period ahead of the Civil House in Lula's
first term - want to reap the Power Executive. We are in the middle of the 3rd round and
the arena is the economic media opinion and exacerbated Fontismo.
The turn right continuing to grow in the second Dilma
In this topic, I note the electoral larceny of a government that already starts against
the ropes and willing to give almost-all to do almost nothing. Merging notes that came out
in Folha and CartaCapital, turn the logic right on the economy would be inevitable. Look
at the nature of expenses, intended to allow the payment of the public debt - higher
current expenditure of the EU budget.
Apparently now left the economic team, at least the country scale newspapers gave for
granted. Iron trio in folders in the economic area, as indicated and supposedly with the
acceptance of the operators is: Joaquim Levy (currently executive Bradesco, but a Chicago
Boy card-carrying and Arminio Fraga trajectory partner); Nelson Barbosa (a developmental,
but that according to the dailies own, likes to tighten their belts in public accounts),
and concluding with the permanence of Alexandre Tombini (the same that comes commanding
the high Selic rate of interest below) in president of the Central Bank.
Among the measures that were being prepared are spending cuts with:
- Unemployment insurance
- Pensions in death
- Salary bonuses.
All this must be to sweeten the mouth of the industry, as the National Confederation of
Industry (CNI) turned eat and sleep the Presidency and the Civil House. The guideline also
citing the matter Sheet (22/11/2014 - signed by Valdo Cruz), is to regain control of
spending - slowly and gradually - Resume cost savings (! Aiming the primary surplus) and ,
according to the Plateau, avoid recession.
The maneuver is simple. Faced with a walling on the political front (institutional),
before the house of cards to collapse with the lingering effects of Petrobras CPI - and
the progress of Operation Lava Jet - the goal would be to broaden the concessions. This
analysis is shared in the Charter Capital article by Andr? Barrocal (dated 11.21.2014),
and is (was) the synthesis of Bismarckism in its new phase. Increase public concessions -
unlocking the infrastructure in key sectors - such as railways, ports and airports more,
the state enters guarantee funds and the growth has as its protagonist the private sector.
That is, if the Federal Police (PF) does not come into action again and damaging the image
and the possibility of active participation of sectors involved with the asset sale under
contract (concessions).
With the political and analytical sincerity that is characteristic of this writing, is the
classic question. Who is taking these decisions? Or, even more direct, whom the president
re-elected listening since not Mercadante - his vizier grain announced - would be in favor
of these statements? Therefore, the concept of background is the classic question of
contemporary political science: - Who rules? Does the president only hear the "advice", or
take into account the indications of the former president who, according to him, was never
left.
Although not want to merge the normative position with a pamphleteer tone, I see these
decisions as more of the same, the already usual position of PT in government to campaign
for left and rule by right. Agreeing with voters on both sides - to whom this writing is
listening regularly - this fact characterizes electoral larceny.
http://www.anarkismo.net/article/27655
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten