(en) Turkey, DAF - Meydan #23 - Of Revolutionary Anarchists: Rojav Revolution and Kobana Resistance (tr)

(en) Turkey, DAF - Meydan #23 - Of Revolutionary Anarchists:
Rojav Revolution and Kobana Resistance (tr) [machine translation)

Social revolution of the effect is not limited to the impact of the revolution in their 
struggle against political and economic power in the regions where it occurs. To 
understand the impact they create in different geographies, this effect is important in 
terms of view with intellectual and practical changes. Kobani'yi Resistance widely spoken 
as the good, to start the Rojav Revolution discussed in terms of going to see that this is 
what the effect is gaining more importance. ---- The state and capitalism in the face of 
what is happening in Rojava take the stance and attack, this is a case in point is 
expected. But we also need to return to the domestic debate in our face public opposition. 
Likewise, where debates are, to understand what the impact of Rojava point needs to be 
emphasized that an important stopover.

Since the beginning of the process, to understand Rojava of comrades from different 
geographies, resistance, good attitude towards ownership of; Since a long time, so we are 
not accustomed to seeing this in an organized manner was important to remember that 
international solidarity. Thus, we experienced once again that solidarity is our greatest 
weapon.

In this case consisting of solidarity among anarchists in Kobani'yi resistance good, so 
much was inevitable between anarchists all over the world to the agenda.

Anarchist organizations and groups in different geographies, rising thoughts on this 
agenda is to express in different media. Part of this assessment, especially Rojav 
Revolution and incorrect and incomplete information about the Kobani'yi Resistance 
whereas, on the other hand are dealt with reductionist perspective.

Different regions of the anarchist organization can develop different perspectives but 
keep in mind that there may be comments; political criticism of a people's struggle 
struggling for existence in war conditions, this can not be done independently from the 
need to remember again. These criticisms, if taking shape with certain generalizations 
made by a certain bias, thinking about the fairness of this critique ...

First you need to specify the following; Rojav Kobani'yi Direni?i'yl Revolution and 
established a relationship of solidarity is not an emotional relationship. Because 
anarchist organizations, solidarity relations "sympathy" for eating dayand?rmaz. These 
relationships, a political perspective as density and strategies carried out in this 
direction is planned to be developed in parallel. Therefore, solidarity and struggle of 
ownership is not far from objectivity.

Some of the reviews, the mainstay of the criticism against the PKK, while trying to be 
associated with the party's past political tradition, "free municipality" in the best 
applied to fully be the realization of political change and criticism of the Kurdish 
Freedom Movement as being nationalist essence for the location and perspective at the 
moment is found Attempting to create a bias. All this while, with incomplete information 
in a way consciously or unconsciously trying to based on this bias. One of the Kurdish 
Freedom Movement is not a claim that he is an anarchist movement. Therefore, the 
evaluation of the practical implementation of the alleged missing or incorrect, it is 
important to do in this regard. On the other hand, a people's movement "state and critique 
of capitalism" which is so much care can not be ignored in terms of anarchists. This issue 
only Bookchinc "free municipality" s not restricted. Movement, the relationship of 
anarchism and theoretical sense, given as a reference different from Bakunin, Kropotkin 
many comrades; comment from a wide perspective could improve the problematic state. On the 
other hand, this idea also poured practice; libertarian, communal and became a 
non-functioning of the center. This information, rather than citations from articles or 
books that share the same struggle against the political organization is based on a 
knowledge of each other observations.

The cessation of the situation occurring in Rojava what Assad, what were caused by the 
alleged agreement with global powers. Rojava in two and a half years before the actual big 
transformation, the Middle East, the political mobilization of the two opposite poles (the 
junta sequelae are-conservative Democrats) took place in a conjuncture where forced to 
choose one's government. Rojav to, in the Middle East geography "of spring" at a time when 
returned to winter, it spreads all over the people of these two poles is to create their 
own solutions.

Life restructured in Rojava structure decentralized of the social mechanism tried to 
create is devletsizlig made the insistent emphasis on the 
production-consumption-distribution relations in as far a way from capitalism to organize 
occurs, the self-organization to act as guarantor in maintaining social functioning, three 
cantons in the commune of the individual with the decision-making process the importance 
of the functioning of the commune consists of shapes; one can not deny that in our age. 
Especially a person subject ANARCHIST to bet that this operation, how can deny that it is 
a promising experience in order to replicate similar examples in different regions?

Let us again for comrades who insist on understanding. The current operation is not an 
attempt to claim that this is an anarchist operation. However, anarchistic character in 
Rojava functioning, social revolution will be happy anarchists who fought for. This 
happiness, our political goals away from romanticism, our strategy in such a system is to 
understand the relation that live in such an age.

Stateless society practices, social revolution, one can not argue that it is negative for 
the anarchist struggle. Similar practices taking place in different geographies, develop 
in their original conditions. This is the original fight to reduce the importance of 
saying that is not compatible with anarchist principles, based on the theoretical 
arrogance and to demonstrate the practice of a lack of understanding of anarchism. 
Anarchists get rid of this way of thinking that leads to failing in different regions of 
the static position of the movement, anarchism is a way of thinking that reduces the 
intellectual effort.

More reason to be skeptical when searched, the reasons can be created. However, this cause 
to question the reality of the relationship, it is important at every point. Kurdish 
Freedom Movement is wrong to try to define as a nationalist movement. These and similar 
definitions, act by ignoring the transformation; is tantamount to claiming that continue 
the old political structures. With no data regarding how the operation, a perspective 
which is critical articles about the movement only source of information is extremely 
problematic. Because a significant portion of this criticism is voiced by statist 
mentality and extensions. Healthy criticism is made by observation and experienced of 
political practice. Every criticism away from geography and practicality, it contains 
within itself the danger of orientalism.

Is not functioning and the movement in Rojava anarchistic already mentioned. In 
particular, the freedom struggle of Mesopotamia in the centuries formed the Kurdish people 
struggling away from the historicity of this is discussed is another shortcoming. On 
behalf of ideological correctness away from reality, the ongoing struggle of a people who 
for centuries worthless; to fulfill their responsibilities not only revolutionary, well 
that should see whom fall into the same wall.

Class shallow way to detect the perspective of social struggles to make sense to work with 
a purely economic struggle is put between the hierarchy and struggle of the oppressed. 
Indirgeyip only oppressed workers, ignores the rest of understanding power relations, 
which contradicts the history of the anarchist movement. Anarchism's revolutionary 
history; oppressed economically, is full of political and social struggle. The movement 
different centuries to ignore the impact of Europe from the Far East to the liberation 
struggle of Asian people, this effect is supplying class struggle in South America to add 
to the assessment of the practical, the anarchist movement means to ignore the holistic 
structure.

Through the process we are going through is nature litmus paper. Understand the emotions 
involved in the struggle of the oppressed existence, theoretically suitable for the 
mission of the fall mercilessly criticize the experience of going to a stateless society 
perspectives of, directly or indirectly, where it is obvious that equivalent fall.

Psychics are not; After a month or we do not know what will happen in Rojava after one 
year. Close to the revolutionary struggle in giving social geography, which not only gave 
us hope, nourish our struggle in the region in the fight against this social 
transformation at the same time we give, we do not go on more negative or a positive way. 
But we have a revolutionary anarchists. We can not just sit on the sidelines comment that 
follow; take place in the social struggle anarchist revolution we fight for.

Hooray Rojav Revolution!

Hooray Kobani'yi Resistance!

Long live the Revolutionary Anarchism!