Turkey, DAF - Meydan #23 - "Keenlemyek's" - Hussein mercury (tr)

 Turkey, DAF - Meydan #23 - "Keenlemyek's" - Hussein mercury
(tr) [machine translation] 

One of the reasons we Democrats not, at the end of democracy has led to war or 
dictatorship. But we are not supporters of dictatorship; because many other reasons, as 
well as democracy, dictatorship always evokes desire, provokes a return to democracy and 
thus continue the vicious cycle of the comings and goings between the peoples of the false 
freedom of the open and brutal tyranny. ---- Errico Malatesta, 1924 ---- selection and get 
out of our political agenda has been a great deal. We've missed you. The election debate, 
fortunately this time started a little early! In June 2015 elections scheduled for April 
or May in speakers do like now. So at least the intention of the government in this 
direction. When the intentions of the government in the last process and the relationship 
between the realization of this intention, unequivocally how successful! Early election 
debate, especially done in parallel with the settlement process. Davutoglu, the solution 
process "hope" before the elections will be stressed to the final point. The government's 
solution of a positive or negative result of the policy process, so while it will 
influence the election results, changed course with Hasim Kilic's recent statement of the 
debate floor.

Selection of the Year Package Debate: 10% Dams

Actually threshold discussions, resurfaces every election period "package debates" from one.

In the period until the 1974 coup period, every two years (sometimes even in the same 
year) a changing Bulent Ecevit / Solomon allegedly created by the Demirel government, 
"political instability" One of a normal result of the environment blow if the other 
electoral threshold.

1980 10% threshold, one of the hallmark of impact, debated in political stability in 
democratic regimes polar axis on the other side of a side every election cycle. Personally 
addressed by the AKP's electoral term "guardianship term" associated with the line in the 
removal of this application, all the opposition parties and the ruling party idea! So 
what's being discussed?

The logic of this system, creating Kenan Evren and his friends, the military ideology with 
contrasting fall (possibly military origin) stable one-party majority to be established 
politicians, parliament to send the government a number that can not shake the position 
that parties and Kurdish parties in parliament, the public focused on the prevention of 
possibility.

The current government, military guardianship to settle the critics claiming that the 
electoral threshold, increasing their political power and is not afraid to use the name of 
consolidation / Feel free to debate whether we can see through the dam. An artificial 
majority in parliament, it is a situation where you want to use all the political parties 
to the extent they can use. This political power, legitimacy, claiming that the exchange 
rate on the "will of the nation" can not base what. AKP's position in the debate pack, 
clearly "Stability you take, Turkey grew!" consists of nonsense.

Front of Democratic Regimes and Hasim Kilic

President of the Constitutional Court at a conference organized by the Council of Europe 
Hasim Kilic, he said they consider applications for a change in the force of law regarding 
the 10% threshold.

BBP and SP, the previous reference to the fact that the agenda of the matter, taking 
account of its share on the agenda that the main opposition CHP Istanbul deputy Umut Oran 
moves made by individual applications. K?l??daro?lu, while taking these issues 
increasingly at the heart of the discourse, the issue comes to mind as a sine qua non of a 
new democratic regime, "package debates" are being promoted in a suitable environment. 
Even TUSIAD Chairman Haluk Dincer, made a statement explaining that since the lowering of 
the threshold. "The democratic regime" descriptions of the pro NGOs, it was still not in a 
tone that turn the government, or no longer showing attention to it.

Hasim Kilic, insistence that lowering the threshold for those advocating democracy against 
totalitarian AKP's moves, this election will be grappled with in a single branch location.

That the election agenda, "procedures" to be being discussed around the problem, I was 
greeted by the AKP wing soon. It is hard to return, the government's no-discussed 
"procedural changes" the clearest expression of what that look so hot. Likewise, the AKP 
Parliamentary Constitutional Commission Chairman Burhan Kuzu, announced in relation to the 
threshold, he said what would be the AKP's actual attitude. This attitude is not only an 
attitude formed by g?ndemle? the issue at stake. This is a party that gradually increased 
its power, it was the description of what the ideology.

The Keenlemyek

Keenlemyek's is a statement of the law. "Does not make sense from the beginning" as you 
can to Turkish. So "no provision of" means. Assume that an event occurs. Burhan Kuzu 
removed if the 10% threshold, and they would say the decision of the keenlemyek the 
application; principle of separation of powers or association, the best indicator of how 
much would be useful for a party. Of course, who knows the maneuver! Lamb, continued its 
policy of cutting ahkam party, the Constitutional Court the case of downloading threshold 
'Did you stay, you're going?' also state that from the point does not stand back.

Election agenda began to be spoken through the election threshold, stands in front of us 
already before six months. How many percent of the electoral threshold and the rest in the 
shade of which party wins the elections will discuss political reality, it must be removed 
from the shadows.

Political, economic and social pressures are left exposed to cuts, keenlemyek ediliyork 
ads in political expression to find the point; dam in discussions, the election debate is 
pointless for the oppressed sections. This is the political power will pass up, in front 
of all the political reality of the choice agenda, the main opposition power handling, the 
entire political-economic-social problems are intended to indicate the elections as a 
solution.

We live in times where they are not necessarily experienced in search of legitimacy for 
the protection of the position of the different power structures. Murder of temporary 
workers and the usual agenda that count, which grows with each passing day the massacre of 
women, economic exploitation and corruption, at a time when ecological plunder of 
consolidation; who will seek solutions to all problems in the parliament, there is a big 
need to be reminded of the history of social revolution.

The relationship between political stability and democratic legitimacy of the field 
totalitarian regime, rather than the opposite of each other, is supportive of the 
position. This, comrades, as Malatesta stressed, is a vicious circle. This will destroy 
the vicious cycle of the oppressed keenlemyek has declared the need for a 
self-organization will have the reality of their lives. And a revolutionary anarchist 
movement, it always has been called on the social revolution.

Hussein mercury

hcivan@meydangazetesi.org