France, Alternative Libertaire AL #246 - Red-brown: Do not Chouard in confusionism (fr, it, pt)

France, Alternative Libertaire AL #246 - Red-brown: Do not
Chouard in confusionism (fr, it, pt) [machine translation]

Etienne Chouard, and its association Viruses Gentiles, first gained notoriety for their 
standpoint - for full democracy and against the power monopolized the richest - and 
secondly, undergo movement denunciation campaign fascist! Where is the mistake? ---- 
Baroque definition of Stephen Chouard of the extreme right confuses: "The fascist extreme 
right people, it is the big landowners, big property owners, the ultraprivil?gi?s (...). 
1% against the 99%, that's the extreme right. " Organizations such as the FN, identity and 
all the fascist and Nazi nebula are washed suspicion: "We are invited to lynch so and so 
because he is a fascist, because it is far right. I refuse it (...). Today treating 
extreme right those who have not assent on foreigners, on the death penalty, abortion, the 
Catholic religion in the nation, those who defend the nation are treated far right"[1]

Consequently Chouard defends against the extreme right anti-fascist: "Some watchdogs, 
dirty thought police, say" antifa "but it is FALSE: If you look good, they are attacking 
to genuine antifa: Michel Collon, Jean Bricmont, Maxime Vivas, Viktor Dedaj, Thierry 
Meyssan, good people, brave too, that I am proud to rub shoulders with, among others, to 
my small scale, of OPPONENTS TO WAR COMING, opponents THE EMPIRE training (imperial 
project recognized by Barroso himself facing camera), true humanist I believe "[2]

Freedom of expression according Chouard

Far-right activists are Democrats: "I am sure that many of these young activists - of hard 
right at the beginning of spite of widespread corruption and lack of other alternative - 
are becoming or have already become Democrats real "[3] Chouard many meetings and debates, 
provides on its website the fascists site addresses often considers "interesting" their 
analyzes.

Racist Democrats qualify? Chouard suggests that the problem is not racism, an idea 
supported by people who are part of the Democratic field. This would be a "serious error 
of analysis" . Anti-racism, he "makes a race of" racist ", a kind of sub-human to fight in 
any material due to unpardonable sin, crime of thought".[4]

Freedom of expression is invoked to defend the word of those who -affirment the 
inferiority of some humans (sexism, racism) or attribute them all the evils of the world 
(Semitism, Islamophobia). Remove from its website a link to a site, bunch of insults and 
anti-Semitic and anti-feminist attacks, this is an ultimate attack on democratic values 
Chouard defends.

Pretend to ignore the fascist danger!

This positioning Chouard is facilitated by the complete lack of support or even the 
slightest consideration with regard to those who, because of their skin color, their 
religion, their culture or their sexual orientation, are victims of discrimination.

Chouard is not a "fascist" or extreme right. It seems inconceivable against racism and 
anti-Semitism is expressed in general behind masks to hide their violence. And for good 
reason: that becomes his great project of "real democracy" while some hide their true 
intentions, are played of freedom granted to them to better impose a system in which 
freedom disappear?

Antifascist fight that feigned ignorance of fascist groups who practice racist violence. 
Not only racist and sexist violence has nothing virtual or abstract, but it is a worldview 
driven by groups seeking to impose their ideas by force. Ie as Chouard that the extreme 
right is an invention of the powerful to distract us "real problems" is to give it the 
place it needs to then crush his opponents. As for capitalism, it will accommodate in as 
reactionary, racist, dictators and exploiters have always found common ground.

Chouard, those who follow in his analyzes of the association Viruses and Gentiles are 
objective allies of the extreme right, its egalitarian worldview and its designation of 
hereditary enemies to eliminate. They do, as they defend such views, not their place in 
the social or environmental movement.

AL Lot-et-Garonne

[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vh4H8ei-ASE
[2] http://etienne.chouard.free.fr/Europe/forum/index.php
[3] Much information contained in this text are from 
http://lahorde.samizdat.net/2014/12/08/chouard-sexplique-senfonce-et-renonce/
[4] Blog of Stephen Chouard (29 November 2014)


http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Rouges-bruns-Ne-pas-Chouard-dans