anarkismo.net: Nonviolence as Compliance by TA-NEHISI COATES - The Atlantic

Officials calling for calm can offer no rational justification for Gray's death, and so 
they appeal for order. ---- Rioting broke out on Monday in Baltimore--an angry response to 
the death of Freddie Gray, a death my native city seems powerless to explain. Gray did not 
die mysteriously in some back alley but in the custody of the city's publicly appointed 
guardians of order. And yet the mayor of that city and the commissioner of that city's 
police still have no idea what happened. I suspect this is not because the mayor and 
police commissioner are bad people, but because the state of Maryland prioritizes the 
protection of police officers charged with abuse over the citizens who fall under its purview.

The citizens who live in West Baltimore, where the rioting began, intuitively understand 
this. I grew up across the street from Mondawmin Mall, where today's riots began. My 
mother was raised in the same housing project, Gilmor Homes, where Freddie Gray was 
killed. Everyone I knew who lived in that world regarded the police not with admiration 
and respect but with fear and caution. People write these feelings off as wholly 
irrational at their own peril, or their own leisure. The case against the Baltimore 
police, and the society that superintends them, is easily made:

Over the past four years, more than 100 people have won court judgments or settlements 
related to allegations of brutality and civil rights violations. Victims include a 
15-year-old boy riding a dirt bike, a 26-year-old pregnant accountant who had witnessed a 
beating, a 50-year-old woman selling church raffle tickets, a 65-year-old church deacon 
rolling a cigarette and an 87-year-old grandmother aiding her wounded grandson ....

And in almost every case, prosecutors or judges dismissed the charges against the 
victims--if charges were filed at all. In an incident that drew headlines recently, 
charges against a South Baltimore man were dropped after a video showed an officer 
repeatedly punching him--a beating that led the police commissioner to say he was "shocked."

The money paid out by the city to cover for the brutal acts of its police department would 
be enough to build "a state-of-the-art rec center or renovations at more than 30 
playgrounds." Instead, the money was used to cover for the brutal acts of the city's 
police department and ensure they remained well beyond any semblance of justice.

Now, tonight, I turn on the news and I see politicians calling for young people in 
Baltimore to remain peaceful and "nonviolent." These well-intended pleas strike me as the 
right answer to the wrong question. To understand the question, it's worth remembering 
what, specifically, happened to Freddie Gray. An officer made eye contact with Gray. Gray, 
for unknown reasons, ran. The officer and his colleagues then detained Gray. They found 
him in possession of a switchblade. They arrested him while he yelled in pain. And then, 
within an hour, his spine was mostly severed. A week later, he was dead. What specifically 
was the crime here? What particular threat did Freddie Gray pose? Why is mere eye contact 
and then running worthy of detention at the hands of the state? Why is Freddie Gray dead?

The people now calling for nonviolence are not prepared to answer these questions. Many of 
them are charged with enforcing the very policies that led to Gray's death, and yet they 
can offer no rational justification for Gray's death and so they appeal for calm. But 
there was no official appeal for calm when Gray was being arrested. There was no appeal 
for calm when Jerriel Lyles was assaulted. ("The blow was so heavy. My eyes swelled up. 
Blood was dripping down my nose and out my eye.") There was no claim for nonviolence on 
behalf of Venus Green. ("Bitch, you ain't no better than any of the other old black 
bitches I have locked up.") There was no plea for peace on behalf of Starr Brown. ("They 
slammed me down on my face," Brown added, her voice cracking. "The skin was gone on my face.")

When nonviolence is preached as an attempt to evade the repercussions of political 
brutality, it betrays itself. When nonviolence begins halfway through the war with the 
aggressor calling time out, it exposes itself as a ruse. When nonviolence is preached by 
the representatives of the state, while the state doles out heaps of violence to its 
citizens, it reveals itself to be a con. And none of this can mean that rioting or 
violence is "correct" or "wise," any more than a forest fire can be "correct" or "wise." 
Wisdom isn't the point tonight. Disrespect is. In this case, disrespect for the hollow law 
and failed order that so regularly disrespects the community.

Related Link: 
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/nonviolence-as-compliance/391640/

http://www.anarkismo.net/article/28136