en) US, WSA, ideas and action - Libertarianism is a Type of
Socialism, NOT Classical Liberalism By Geoff
Libertarianism is a socialist political philosophy which has its roots in the socialist
workers' movements of the 1800s and 1900s. It is especially associated with ideas that
came out of the First International (IWA - 1864-1876), especially those of Joseph
Proudhon, Karl Marx and Mikhail Bakunin. It was upon these ideas, as well as some of those
which came later like those of Peter Kropotkin, that the libertarian syndicalists in Spain
formed the CNT union in the early 1900s, with the goal of creating a libertarian
(socialist) and workers' self-managed society. What this means is they wanted emancipation
of the working class, recognizing that class struggle comes as a result of resistance to
management power over workers, because business owners' aims are profit-based. This means
that managers will submit workers to rigid control in the workplace, cut corners and
compensation, heap stress on them, etc., in order to maximize profit.
The inequitable distribution of wealth that comes as a result of wage labor creates an
economic, political and social power imbalance, since in the market your vote is your
dollar, and wage labor in the workplace is an apparatus to give a minority of people more
votes in the market than the rest. Libertarians historically wanted to replace these
conditions with workers' self-management and create a socialist society where people have
control over their own work and in all economic planning and decision-making, as arranged
through popular associations like unions, assemblies, councils and federations. There are
various concrete proposals for these types of economies from people like Cornelius
Castoriadis, Peter Kropotkin, GDH Cole and others.
In the 1962 book "Capitalism & Freedom", Milton Friedman says: "The rightful and proper
label is liberalism...liberalism emphasized freedom as the ultimate goal and the
individual as the ultimate entity in the society. It supported laissez faire at home as a
means of reducing the role of the state in economic affairs and thereby enlarging the role
of the individual; it supported free trade abroad as a means of linking the nations of the
world...". The word "libertarianism" became associated with right wing classical liberals
in the U.S. in the 1960s and 1970s who sought to use the word for political opportunism.
In "The Betrayal of the American Right", Murray Rothbard said, "One gratifying aspect of
our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had
captured a crucial word from the enemy...'Libertarians'...had long been simply a polite
word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the
communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over..."
An easy way to understand the major differences between libertarians and classical
liberals is that libertarians prioritize positive liberty whereas classical liberals
prioritize negative liberty. Positive liberty means having control over the decisions that
affect you (self-management) and having access to the resources to fulfill your potential.
Negative liberty means merely absence of external restraint. Because the employer doesn't
put a gun to your head to take a job, you're supposedly "free" as far as the liberal is
concerned. But in reality workers face a denial of positive liberty because they are
forced to work for employers to afford access to resources they need to live their lives,
and have no direct control over their own work or over economic planning decisions which
affect their lives.
They also do not have direct control over how negative market externalities, like
pollution, climate change and systemic risk, affect their lives. The freedom classical
liberals desire includes the freedom to do things like exploit workers and pollute the
earth. This contrasts starkly with the freedom desired by libertarians which is to create
a political economy where people have direct control over their own work and over economic
planning, as well as access to everything they need to fulfill their own potential.
Classical liberals' prioritization of negative over positive liberty is taken to very
extreme ends. Murray Rothbard said "...the parent should not have a legal obligation to
feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts
coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights... the parent should have
the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die..." It also led Ludwig von
Mises to be an apologist for fascism: "It cannot be denied that Fascism and similar
movements aiming at the establishment of dictatorships are full of the best intentions and
that their intervention has, for the moment, saved European civilization. The merit that
Fascism has thereby won for itself will live on eternally in history."
Fredrich Hayek, in regards to the dictatorship of Pinochet in Chile, said: "...a
dictatorship may be a necessary system for a transitional period. At times it is necessary
for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power. As you will
understand, it is possible for a dictator to govern in a liberal way. And it is also
possible for a democracy to govern with a total lack of liberalism. Personally I prefer a
liberal dictator to democratic government lacking liberalism." Coincidentally, Milton
Friedman was an unofficial economic advisor to Pinochet as part of the "Chicago Boys"
economics group.
To conclude, classical liberalism, which prioritizes negative over positive liberty, leads
to extremely despotic anti-democratic and anti-working class advocacy. This stands in
stark contrast to libertarianism, which prioritizes positive liberty and has its roots in
the socialist tradition. The word "libertarianism" in the U.S. was usurped by classical
liberals for political opportunism, so it is important for actual libertarians, like those
of us at WSA, to show this opportunism for what it truly is, and reject any and all
association the word "libertarian" has with classical liberalism.
http://ideasandaction.info/2015/08/libertarianism-type-socialism-classical-liberalism/
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten