SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

dinsdag 26 juli 2016

Anarchistic update news all over the world - 26 July 2016

Today's Topics:

1. RADIO REPORT FROM ANARCHIST MEETING OF STRUGGLE IN
THESSALONIKI, GREECE (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
2. New Zealand: awsm.nz - Labour – 100 wasted years
(a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
3. France, Alternative Libertaire AL - international, Turkey:
The state is the coup; the revolution is freedom (fr, it, pt)
[machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
4. wsm.ie: Theresa May elected but there can be no such thing
as a feminist Tory by Fionnghuala Nic Roibeaird (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
5. Greece, Information from the concentration camps in
Paranesti and Xanthi By A.P.O. (gr) [machine translation]
(a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
6. Czech, afed.cz: Report of the Court of Appeals of Igor
Ševcova (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1




Comrades from Slovenia that participated at the Anarchist Meeting of Struggle in the 
context of No Border Camp Thessaloniki 2016 reported from Thessaloniki in their radio 
emission Crna luknja (Black Hole). They gave basic informations about the camp, activities 
and the content and spoke with members of Anarchist Political Organization – Federations 
of Collectives (APO) from Greece.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvKVhHo2_JQ

http://apo.squathost.com/radio-report-from-anarchist-meeting-of-struggle/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 2




We are in the midst of celebrations surrounding the birth of the New Zealand Labour Party, 
but is there really anything to celebrate for the workers of New Zealand. The fact that 
the working class of New Zealand face many of the same problems today as they did 100 
years ago, in terms of poor housing, low pay, unemployment, and inequality, is perhaps 
proof enough that the Labour Party has failed as the party of the working class. They 
never transformed society, and the gap between rich and poor still remains today with the 
richest 1 per cent of the population owning more than the combined cash and assets of the 
poorest 50 per cent ---- Instead of being a party fighting for workers’ rights, the 
history of the Labour Party in New Zealand, in fact, has been one of a history of 
compromise with capitalism, and anti-working class action. Anarchist arguments of the 
conservative and corrupting pressures that are bought upon labour representatives within 
parliament have largely been observed to be true.

Jim Edwards, the son of the leader of the Unemployed Workers Movement of the 1930s, 
described the excitement felt that accompanied the election of the first Labour Government 
in 1935, when he described how he believed that, “The revolution was happening.” The 
Labour Party immediately set about with plans designed to increase the lot of the working 
class. The unemployed received a Christmas bonus, wage cuts were restored and state 
housing and national health schemes were implemented. The excitement felt by Labour’s 
first electoral victory in 1935 didn’t last though, and the drift away from socialism can 
be viewed through one of its leading politicians, Peter Fraser.

In 1913, Fraser, New Zealand Federation of Labor leader in 1912-13 and Labour prime 
minister 1940-49, wrote, “Industrial Unionism plus revolutionary political action, in my 
opinion, provide the most effective and expeditious means of reaching [socialism].” 
However by 1918 Fraser had begun to moderate his views. Instead of revolution he called 
for “the peaceful and legal transformation of society from private to public ownership and 
the increasing of democratic control over land and industry”. By the early 1930s Fraser 
had divested himself of any previous revolutionary ideals and saw Labour’s main objective 
as a simple one – “jobs for the unemployed.”

Even on the night of their victory in 1935, Michael Joseph Savage, the then leader, 
assured the country that Labour was not going to represent any particular section but 
would govern in the interests of all the people. One of the co-founders of the New Zealand 
Communist Party, Alex Galbraith, later expressed his dismay at how the leaders of the 
Labour Party had become a pillar of the capitalist system and were being used by the 
ruling class to attack the working class. “From class against class to servile bootlicker 
of the bourgeoisie,” he wrote.

The Labour Government struggled to control the workers, who, to the new managers of 
capitalism, seemed to have a never-ending list of demands. In 1945, with the party coming 
to the end of its first spell in power, a Labour Minister, Bill Parry, was driven to 
remark that he didn’t understand why people were asking for more when “everything has been 
done.”

The movement of the Labour Party away from their roots culminated in the Rogernomics of 
Lange’s 1984 Labour Government. Nowadays, it is exceedingly rare to hear any member of the 
Labour Party talk of socialism, instead they adhere to the ideals of neo-liberalism, and 
the height of their political vision seems to be offering themselves up as “nicer” 
managers of capitalism than National.

In its 100 years, the Labour party has, instead of holding a vision of the world’s wealth 
for the workers, settled merely for piece-meal reformism. Capitalism has been viewed as 
something to manage and work with, not overthrow. The result has been the collapse within 
the party of any sense of the class struggle that challenges the legitimacy and values of 
capitalism. The one thing we can take away from a waste of 100 years is that the interests 
of the working class cannot be protected by parliament. If we are to achieve meaningful 
and long lasting change we need to turn our backs on the ballot boxes and political 
parties and take action in our places of employment and our communities, with our weapons 
being strikes, demonstrations, and other forms of direct action, and not a voting paper.

http://www.awsm.nz/2016/07/22/labour-100-wasted-years/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 3




After the failure of the military coup, the sultan Erdogan I triumph. Social movements and 
the radical left remained neutral in this struggle of clans at the top of the state. 
Anarchists DAF tell the reactionary wave in the street. ---- The coup, which was a latent 
dimension of the state policy in our country since the 1980 putsch, openly resurfaced 
after thirty-six, on the night of July 15, 2016. ---- ?Many public buildings were blocked 
for several hours, during military sedition in Istanbul and Ankara. It all began with a 
demonstration of combat aircraft in Ankara and by blocking bridges in Istanbul, then 
continued with the taking hostage the Chief of the General Staff, the roar of tanks and 
shots fire in the streets. Many buildings were hit by F16s and helicopters, including 
Parliament and the headquarters of the secret services. There were exchanges of fire in 
many places between the army and the police. Public Television programs were interrupted 
by the reading of the declaration of the "Council for peace in the country", responsible 
for the coup.

At the end of five hours lasted this attempted coup, more than 100 soldiers, 80 police 
officers and 80 protesters who were opposed were killed. In response, 2,839 soldiers, 
including many high-ranking officers, were detained.

??During the last thirty-six years, the Army has more than once threatened a coup tool of 
oppression, violence and repression. No doubt that for us, the oppressed, it means 
torture, repression and massacre of the people. Obviously, a structure whose power depends 
on these massacres will continue in the name of "safeguarding the indivisible unity of the 
country."

"Holy Day" in defense of democracy

The attempted coup of July 2016 is the result of a power struggle between different 
factions within the state. Maybe there as there are foreign forces in the game. Anyway, 
those who leave are strengthened the government and its administration.

It was the night of the coup a "sacred day" defense of democracy, while government power 
increased further. The party Erdogan, the AKP gets a renewed legitimacy for having "pushed 
the coup."

All night, the TV stations broadcast programs celebrating victory, in the service of 
propaganda RecepTayyip Erdogan. They not only made up his mind, but they have helped to 
get people on the street. Just as the media, the opposition parties in Parliament, which 
supported the AKP in the event, fell into his trap, which is "to prevent others from doing 
politics." Their position "to side of democracy against the coup" evil mask their 
political naivety. Clearly, in the short term, they will call for anything but the 
strengthening of political and state power. They fill the air with their slogans in favor 
of the death penalty while boasting of being "pro-democracy" is not that a sign of the 
impasse in which the opposition parties found ?

The reactionaries are in the street

?With the defeat of the coup, the AKP now has the ideal configuration to perfect the 
ideological transformation of society. "50% who tremble with indignation at home," and 
that Recep Tayyip Erdogan threatened the protesters from Taksim Square in 2013, are this 
time the streets.

Fascist culture, important part of the ideology that the power shall endeavor to spread in 
society, has awakened among those that the State has mobilized the street, presented as 
defenders of democracy ... It is not difficult to guess that this "democratic movement" 
will serve to knock the oppressed. Already short noise lynchings against those conestent 
strengthening of state power. This power struggle within the state, in addition to the 
rising economic and political injustices, not lead to nothing but the perpetuation of the 
oppressive authority of the oppressed.

Neither the dictatorship, visible or invisible, either civilian or military structures nor 
the coup, nor the election of political parties who are the enemies of the people, have to 
do with the will of the people. For us who believe that emancipation can not be achieved 
either by a coup or through the ballot box, the existence of the state is a permanent coup 
d'état against freedom, and our revolt will not stop as an it has not led to a free society.

The state is the coup; the revolution is freedom. We expect nothing of the struggles 
between clans state, our hope is in the revolution for freedom.

Devrimci Anarsist Faaliyet (DAF Revolutionary Anarchist Action), July 17, 2016

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Turquie-L-Etat-c-est-le-coup-d

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 4



Theresa May has just become the UK’s latest Prime Minister and the second ever woman Prime 
Minister. She’s certainly a decent orator paired with a comedian of a speech writer who 
wrote a statement filled with faux concern about making the “UK a country that works for 
all and not just the privileged few” – it’s as if she thinks we don’t know she’s a member 
of the privileged-few-loving Conservative Party, or as she reminded us, Conservative and 
Unionist Party (I’m not sure that’s supposed to make us feel better about the Tories…). 
---- For a woman who only a few weeks ago voted to repeal the Human Rights Act she had no 
problem spitting out some crap about how she’s going to protect black men who are treated 
more harshly by the criminal justice system, not to mention her bringing up other 
statistics that highlight an intersection of oppression that she has mentioned as if she 
is appalled by them (despite belonging to a party that perpetrates them). She didn’t seem 
too concerned about the criminal justice system acting too harshly – or any other 
mechanism for the Tory reign of terror – when she was giving off about Human Rights 
Legislation getting in the way and limiting the powers of government.

What else is in her record as an MP that goes against all the talk she talked today about 
“a union of citizens, whoever we are, wherever we come from”? Oh yeah, those racist 
billboard vans that we saw a few years back that drove around the UK telling people that 
wherever they come from to go home (obviously people that don’t belong to the “precious, 
precious union” for those who are confused by the outrageous contradiction). This does go 
hand in hand with her in 2013 voting against a law that would have made it illegal for 
people to discriminate against others on the basis of “caste” (as the legislation put it).

Her speech writer was clearly told to ignore her actions and everything she has done up 
until now and to tap into the latest trend of feminism – she is a woman after all, it 
should be easier for her to pretend she’s a feminist than it was for Cameron et al. So, as 
expected, she mentioned the gender pay gap. How very good of you Theresa, you’re only a 
member of the party that is responsible for mothers skipping meals to feed their kids. 
You’re a member of the establishment that has seen women queuing in food banks for 
sanitary towels – not to mention that the use of food banks is at a record high.

You’ve made cut after cut against the public sector of which women comprise 65%. Your 
party has seen that women will be hit twice as hard than any other group by your austerity 
measures – that’s right, they’re your austerity measures; you are currently fighting a war 
against women. Of £26 billion you have saved in “Welfare Reform” (read: welfare 
destruction), £22 billion of it has been from women’s pockets, that is a deliberate 
gendered attack.

You’ve made mothers, the primary carers of children, pay through the nose for the 
carelessness of your class. You’ve cut tax credits, reduced housing benefit and frozen 
child benefit and you have wrongly sanctioned thousands of single mothers. Yet you think 
you can parade about in a “this is what a feminist looks like” t-shirt. You think you’re 
off the hook because you took 3 seconds of your speech to highlight the gender pay gap; 
not on our watch.

This is not feminism.

There can be no such thing as a “feminist Tory” – it’s an oxymoron, one term contradicts 
the other.

Feminism isn’t just about ending the pay gap; it’s about class war. It’s about dismantling 
capitalism, racism, homophobia, disablism, and of course sexism. These systems of 
oppression do not exist on their own, however, each one reinforces the other, and in 
examining them and seeing where and how they connect we can see how to tear them down.

No Theresa May, and no other Tory is ever going to dismantle the very system that they 
benefit from. A Tory can’t eradicate sexism, because sexism cannot be eradicated without 
destroying the environment it lives in.

This doesn’t mean we elect someone as Prime Minister who has feminist principals; the 
master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. Women’s participation in the very 
system that has furthered our own oppression will not be the source of our liberation. We 
need to build a feminist society from the bottom up, and that doesn’t start in parliament, 
because feminism is completely at odds with the state. The state: the exploitative, 
oppressive, patriarchal and male dominated state, whose very foundations are our 
servitude, will never be used for our emancipation.

So, Prime Minister, you can take your tokenism and shove it. Don’t you dare call yourself 
a feminist while you wage a war on women and the entire 99%. As we’re as we’re concerned 
this is Thatcher round 2 and neither of you are what a feminist looks like.

Subject: Intersectionality, Feminism, Conservative party

Author: Fionnghuala Nic Roibeaird

http://www.wsm.ie/c/theresa-may-elected-feminist-tory

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 5




On Wednesday, July 20 we demonstrated together with comrades from Greece and many European 
countries to immigration detention centers and refugees in Paranesti Drama and Xanthi. In 
the concentration camp at Paranesti, strong police forces had blocked all access to the 
site and only a small number of demonstrators managed to get into the room and comes into 
contact with refugees and immigrants, who moved that face many food and medical care 
problems. ---- Then we headed to the concentration camp in Xanthi which also guarded by 
riot squads and YMET. In this camp, on May 22, after the anarchist solidarity 
concentration, the cops had beaten those immigrants and refugees have responded positively 
to this move to interrupt the communication channels of the prisoners with the solidarity 
movement and cemetery silence to cover all miseries of power occurring in the camps. The 
safeguarding of A.P.O. block along with other protesters, he arrived at the entrance of 
the camp, where they were lined repressive gangs torturers, he tried to break the cordon 
and to reciprocate a little bit of social counter-violence towards generalized violence of 
the state and uniformed guards. The demonstration After leaving drafted, regrouped and 
stood on the other side of the camp, shouting slogans for solidarity hour as there was 
visible contact with the inmates.

Tomorrow Thursday, July 21 call at solidarity demonstration to refugees and immigrants in 
Thessaloniki, at 6 pm from Kamara.

SOLIDARITY TO REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS

COMMON FIGHTS FOR LIFE AND DIGNITY

Anarchist Political Organisation

Federation collectivity

Related Posts:
SOLIDARITY TO REFUGEES AND MIGRANTS
Political call to Struggle Anarchist Encounter
Poster Anarchist Struggle Meeting
Solidarity with refugees and immigrants

http://apo.squathost.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 6



There is no reason to rejoice. Prague High Court today ruled on the appeal of Igor 
Ševcova. ---- According to Igor judgment forbiden to attend sports, cultural events and 
manifestations (demonstrations, marches) and other events organized by anarchist movement 
for three years. Most people that judgment appears to be milder than expulsion for two 
years, but what is not clap. We have prepared a report on the process yesterday. ---- The 
smaller room have? ---- Long we talked about how it will proceed Court of Appeal and now 
it's here. Since morning runs around the screenshot Ovcácková networks Facebook profile, 
where presidential spokesman Milos Zeman calculates a list of personalities and 
institutions that support the left-wing extremism. He listed there anyone who dared to 
argue about Igor's guilt, including the departments of Czech universities and former 
presidential candidate, philosopher Jan Sokol. It can be seen that using our slogan "we 
are all terrorists," whereby we take so seriously the importance of this absurd term used 
to intimidate society, we are closer to the truth than we ourselves think.

With the approaching fourteen hours grew outside the courtroom people and they came to the 
woman who was going organizationally in charge to let us know that the room is only 25 
seats, and therefore will go one by one under the coordination of judicial guards. True 
capacity pews were 16 tumors. It can not say anything other than, "You're doing the ass, 
is not it ?!" What are you afraid that more people saw with their own eyes as well as 
Czech justice? Or perhaps came the "social bonds" that's Igor Why do I (and several dozen 
of them and had to wait at the door) ?! To "Igor ties" to shorten the time, they went 
around the corner, where a change in custody for another anarchist Martin Ignacák to greet 
him loudly. There they expect none other than good old captain Kavka. The most secret of 
all tajnejch.

Kronstadt in the courtroom

Thus, the trial could begin. The policeman, who was grinning as if he ate four lemons, 
admonished the people in the corridor around them do not hear anything. She forgot scold 
President of the Court of Appeals, Judge Peter PÍŠOVÁ to stop whispering and began to 
speak, so that he heard it. The whole process went fairly quickly. The judge summed up the 
prosecution and judgment of the lower instance. Igor's testimony read and quoted the judge 
Bedrichová the expulsion of two years is the lowest possible sentence, and again did not 
forget to emphasize Igor anarchist jurisdiction and perhaps membership in the "Company 
Alert". When the grounds for appeal, Igor's lawyer Kožoušek pointed out on several 
fundamental aspects, which according to him, the municipal court erred or wrongly decided.

First, it said that the court still acts as if Igor could attack the defense minister, a 
court "unfortunately" did not obtain enough evidence for it to prove it. Whole resolutely 
he pointed out that it transpired that the accused had no relationship with the minister 
nor his family did not even know who is the Minister of Defence. The indictment did not 
have any direct or indirect evidence except strangely (without the participation of 
defense counsel) demonstrated conformity scent. But Igor had cameras record the track 
record of the logs on the Internet profiles, etc. Kožoušek said that the entire case could 
easily be staged, or he could choose to run someone in the family. Further he pointed out 
that the accusation of involvement in the destruction of foreign matter came up five 
months after the event itself, which is sprayed. Police probably knew from the beginning 
it was filmed Igor, but only when they started to disintegrate the case of terrorism, it 
teamed up with shooting spraying.

He also stated that the court talks about the whole event staged Luke Borla, as if he was 
convicted for, and as if the whole thing had to change something. The court also misjudged 
the trips, he wrote that Igor travels through Europe to base guerrillas. He explained that 
it was a study trips, where Igor was with my parents. The judgment says that once 
Barcelona got on the plane and there ends his tracks. At Igor's wittily responded by 
saying that it sounds as if vaporized the entire plane with passengers, but it would be 
enough to look into his waist, to determine where and when he came and how long they 
stayed there. But it would Holt does not cause so conspiratorially. Defending Kožoušek 
then pointed out that the widespread use of the slogan "Resistance lives, the struggle 
continues," is hardly can say that the accused is a member of the Association Alerta. 
Moreover it argued that the tattoo is difficult to prove that someone else prepares 
radicals to clashes with the police and ask for someone to be in the courtroom and showed 
vysvlékal next tattoo is more than humiliating.

In another respect, the lawyer pointed out that deed is not a criminal offense, and hardly 
anyone can shoot at the same time watch and additionally express psychological support. In 
addition, the video has been edited and the time of the shooting had anything Igor 
chanting. As rightly pointed out: "Who's filming, he can not watch." Moreover, it was 
Igor, who put the video together and published. In the last point of defense he said that 
the court should not be much politicized and it should not use belonging to the anarchist 
movement as an argument of social harm. For the actual sentence still Kožoušek said that 
Igor is not for the lowest possible punishment, but rather a very stringent for such a 
marginal offense. "Two years of living here, he learned Czech perfectly, excellent 
student, stood behind him University in Pilsen and Prague's Charles University and intends 
to stay here and continue studying. His mother often come here for business travels and 
because of his age, you have created a lot of good acquaintances and friends."

In the case of the sentence suggested condition or community service. Igor had two time 
lawyer and his second lawyer, Paul Cižinský, he added that such a sentence for a political 
activist from the Russian Federation is inadmissible, and even the deed itself is on the 
edge of the offense and the offense will not be considered. He added that "for Igor 
expulsion would be the end of the study of social and political life and activism." Igor 
still said they did not agree with Judge BEDRICHOV which he recalled that after two years 
they can return and continue their studies. According to Igor, it is clear that after two 
years he had nobody gave a visa, studying him flee and pointed out that the judge does not 
realize how difficult it is for foreigners to the Czech Republic legally get here and 
start studying.

The state prosecutor, she declared that the judgment of the lower instance is in line with 
its proposal and that we must take into account the fact that Igor is a member of the 
anarchist scene, and the offense occurred in addition to the "unauthorized demonstration". 
It has therefore found the appeal as unfounded. The judge dismissed the subpoena a witness 
who was talking about the fate of political activists and deportation to Russia. The only 
witness was summoned Associate Professor Marek Jakoubek, who question whether Igor were 
sometimes problems, he said Igor is the opposite of violent student. Kožoušek eventually 
suggested the complete abolition and acquittal. State Attorney contrary, insisted on 
retaining the judgment and sentence. Judges and lay judges were dressed coat, former 
members of the Communist Party, and so the process against anarchist rather like Kronstadt 
in the courtroom.

You're in Bohemia, so do not jump too!

At half past three was reported by the verdict. The room looked as if the teacher stopped 
playing the piano and who has no chair, must out of business. But there was no chair more 
people than those who are received. And the verdict? Igor cobblers three years may not 
attend or participate in any sports or cultural events or rallies and other events 
organized by anarchist movement, such as demonstrations, marches, benefits, etc. What does 
that mean exactly, we do not know. Neither the lawyers were unsure. It is necessary to 
wait for the written observations and study section.

But in practice, this means that whenever undercover cop or netajnej see Igor in what they 
assess as one of the prohibited, Igor is guilty of obstruction of official power and can 
go sit for three years. Additionally, obviously he gets the prosecutor, in which it will 
have to report in the days of big events, mobilisations and demonstrations. The judge said 
the destruction of foreign property exceeds the freedom of speech, Igor is still a 
supporter of the anarchist movement (the greatest crime and the only thing that can unite 
alleged assault filming graffiti), plus it was undeclared manifestation. So what is there 
what to shoot, knave one.

As the "correct" the judge said, came from a foreign land, and yet here committing crimes. 
But it has become a tool! "We evaluated the circumstances of the accused properly studying 
high school and is a very good student, which is a significant factor. If they were 
deported, it would represent a big hit to his life and was the big question whether he 
could continue studying. "By Peter Judge Píša upheld the sentence. Judgment has not 
changed, only punishment. In other words, he said he understands Igor's ties to the Czech 
Republic, but: Well, Study, work, consume and Latin Mow, otherwise you'll see! Just one 
lot of bonds Igor can not continue to have, because it would be an informer could see and 
say that playing football or taking a stroll with a friend is one of the many activities 
that are not involved.

There is no reason to rejoice

The judgment is definitely nicer than expulsion, but it's still a prison. Inability to 
participate in political and social activities, organize, the threat of punishment lurking 
around every corner, it is for every person who does not intend to settle for the 
ubiquitous hierarchy utter degradation. The punishment that literally uždíbne tweak and 
holds convicted under total control. Moreover, in a world that increasingly resembles a 
prison. Punishments such as house arrest or helping to create the impression that 
everything is somehow okay and more people accept such prison or even such a judgment seen 
as a success, with which should be condemned reconcile.

Extending prison for prison walls but just helping these walls painted over the color that 
is near invisible or acceptable. What the dictatorship of the people he sees as 
unacceptable repression and generally oppose it with disgust, that democracy is perceived 
as something progressive and consider it to be fair. This invisible sebefízlování 
penetration, ubiquitous and invisible control of the prison into our lives creates so 
successful, and people accepted system. We'll see if Igor will try to do something with 
the judgment, he makes it or is it simply abandoning the tour, he will follow my heart and 
see what happens. Hard to say, anyway, it has our full support and solidarity.

If you want to support Igor, negratulujte him to "success" and rather ask him how he can 
help you cope with this difficult situation. But most importantly, change your 
surroundings in a world where no place for borders and prisons, whether they are visible 
or invisible. The environment in which Exclusion Act will be replaced by solidarity.

Taken from:

https://antifenix.noblogs.org/post/2016/07/21/report-z-odvolaciho-soudu-igora-sevcova/
https://www.afed.cz/text/6493/report-z-odvolaciho-soudu-igora-sevcova

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten