SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

zaterdag 2 september 2017

Anarchic update news all over the world - 2.09.2017

Today's Topics:

   

1.  anarkismo.net: Not in Germany, not anywhere else: repression
      can't silence us! by Coordination des Groupes Anarchistes (ca,
      fr, it, pt) (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

2.  Poland, rozbrat: New European boundaries in times of crisis
      - Katarzyna Czarnota, Jaroslaw Urbanski [machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

3.  Greece, Anti-fascist vigilance against all fascist
      constructs by Black & Red [APO] (gr) [machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

4.  [Italy] The bankruptcy of Gentiloni By ANA (ca, fr, it, pt)
      [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1





Press release from the Coordination des Groupes Anarchistes, an organization member of 
Anarkismo in France about the recent shut down and ban on the German-speaking website 
Linksunten Indymedia and the house raids that followed. ---- Linksunten.indymedia.org, the 
main alternative information website in Germany, has been banned by the Ministry of 
Interior Thomas de Maizière on August 25th. Exploiting this website and using its logo are 
now considered criminal offences. At least 5 buildings occupied by people from the German 
activist scene have been raided, including the self-organized social center Kulturtreff in 
Selbstverwaltung (KTS) in Fribourg. Many activist and IT materials have been taken and 
anything that looks like potential weapons (knives, sticks , etc) are now seen as evidence 
of radical left violence.

Launched in 2008 and allowing anyone to publish anonymously, linksunten.indymedia.org has 
quickly become the largest German-language virtual space for organization and information 
in the radical left scene. The website currently has about half a million visitors per 
month, and last month almost reached 3 million visitors, during the anti-G20 protests in 
Hamburg.

As the federal elections will be held in less than a month, banning the website and 
subsequent house raids are most likely to be a demonstration of strength for the most 
conservative parts of the German electorate. Even social media accounts linked to the 
German police have criticized the shut down of an «important[platform]to observe the 
leftist scene» (sic).

The information website is also being sued, made more frightening by the fact it is being 
sued as a club, which means that all administrators are considered responsible for 
everything that has been published. According to the information we received, at least one 
person may have been arrested and they are all accused of being members of a terrorist 
association.

This represents a new step in the repression of our activities and ideas in Europe. The 
last time something of this significance occurred was in 1995, when the German central 
power banned the newspaper «Radikal», which sparked many demonstrations all over the 
country, especially in Hamburg. In France, even though some music bands (ZEP, La Rumeur) 
and anti-authoritian information websites (Jura Libertaire, Indymedia Grenoble) have been 
threatened for their lyrics or articles, we have never experienced such brutal repression 
against our means of expression and communication. This attack against a radical and 
anti-authoritarian information platform should remind us of the need to pay special 
attention to the defense of our means of communication in front of State repression.

In Germany, as everywhere in Europe, it is now not enough for liberal governments to let 
far-right groups and parties act as they want, and to use and implement large parts of 
their politics and rhetoric. They are now attacking struggling people's means of 
communication, and repressing anarchist, antifascist, antiracist, feminist, queer and 
union activists. The conservative CDU party isn't stopping its revenge against the 
anti-G20 demos with these actions; they are now demanding the shut down of the alternative 
cultural center Rote Flora, in Hamburg.

Against State repression and attacks on freedom of speech, there is nothing to expect from 
governments and authorities! In all Europe and throughout the world, let's resist, defend 
our means of communication and struggle, express and organize ourselves and fight together 
for the fall of capitalism, patriarchy, racist domination system and State!

International Relations of the Coordination des Groupes Anarchistes,
on the 26th of August 2017

PS. On August 26th, the website published a message in German and English, challenging the 
«governments of the Industrial World» with extracts from the «Declaration of Independance 
of the CyberSpace». «We'll be back soon» and «we will spread ourselves all across the 
world so that no one can stop our thoughts»: rulers, remember!, you'll never get rid of us!

https://www.anarkismo.net/article/30479

------------------------------

Message: 2





Migrating people and the problem of managing it by setting and militarizing borders is one 
of the most important contemporary social and political problems. Establishing state 
borders is an effective tool for preserving hierarchies and social divisions on the 
geopolitical map of the world. In the era of the so-called. The refugee crisis has taken 
on a particular importance, and the way in which European society interprets and defines 
the notion of a frontier will emerge in future for the fate of the next generations of 
migrants and of each of us. ---- In the middle of the so-called. Refugee crisis, in April 
2016, we surveyed the opinions of the inhabitants of selected Oder locations[2]. On the 
other side of the border, in Germany, refugee camps were set up. After the outbreak of the 
so-called. Local media reported that "more and more centers are being established at the 
Polish border", and refugees illegally cross the border, freely entering the Polish side. 
According to press reports, the German government placed over 5,500 refugees along the 
entire Polish-German border, including about 1,200 in Frankfurt / Oder alone, where 3,000 
people were to be sent. In the press appeared first notes on the threat of immigrants.

Most of these reports turned out to be untrue or exaggerated, but 53.7% of the people 
surveyed by our border towns still considered the camps on the other side of the Oder to 
be a real threat. Almost 40% felt at risk of migrant crisis in Europe at all. As a 
consequence, the question of whether the authorities should introduce border controls was 
43.9% responded "definitely yes" and another 19.0% said "yes". Although the "closing of 
borders" would hit the economic foundations of cross-border cities where international 
small trade thrives, and many are hired on the German side, especially in Berlin. In most 
speeches, people easily identified refugees with terrorists, unfortunately based on the 
message present in the Polish public media. At the same time postulating the closure of 
all immigrants in the centers, without the possibility of contact with the environment. 
Conversations sometimes referred to the atmosphere of the 1930s, which today's generations 
are known only from descriptions and archival materials. Nevertheless, fear, crisis and 
ignorance play again in dangerous terrain.
Thus, the effects of geopolitical play: the war and the destabilization of the Near and 
Middle East (also through Poland's participation in the Iraq war), acts of terror, the 
escape of millions of refugees and migrants, affect the social perception of migration and 
the steps to be taken to guarantee safety. In response, European politicians are closing 
their borders and building more and more bars. More importantly, the unwillingness of the 
public to mobilize against immigrants and refugees. Right-wing parties succeed in 
maintaining or occupying power by siding with xenophobic and Islamophobic slogans. It can 
be risked to say that in fear of terrorists and refugees in many countries introduced the 
law of the state of emergency. We have this to do with the simultaneous decline of social 
awareness about what actually happens "behind walls". Not only the number of people 
fleeing armed conflict can be compared to the situation of the Second World War, but also 
the degree of unconsciousness and the permissiveness of what is happening on the other 
side of the border. It reminds the stories of people about the ghetto uprising: "I did not 
immediately realize that the Germans set fire to our house. Only the biting smoke forced 
us to leave the hiding place. Standing on the roof of a burning tenement, I looked again 
at Warsaw on the other side of the wall. People on the other side were watching the ghetto 
fire. How did the Romans of Nero's time see the living torches created from the burning of 
living Christians? " As Mark Edelman recalled, "What was on the other side of the wall? 
People are walking, playing, playing music, the carousel is, people are walking to the 
lunapark, etc. For us it was incomprehensible and we felt we were in a forgotten state. 
"[3]Unfortunately this experience did not prevent Edelman from supporting the war in 
Iraq[4]. Meanwhile, a number of military interventions in Muslim countries have pushed 
people into the mass exodus. Remembrance of the Second World War, so far alive in Polish 
and European consciousness, has not managed to prevent detachment from others and 
pretending that on the other side of the border the problem does not concern us.

Wars of the West produce terror

But illusions give only illusory sense of security against the often created by the 
authorities threat. The terrorist attacks in Europe are in fact the consequence of decades 
of war in the Near and Middle East, which have no effect on the Old Continent and the Near 
East. For an arbitrary period of time, the number of war victims and terrorist attacks in 
the Near and Far East is incomparably greater than the victims of terrorism in Europe and 
the USA. This does not mean justification for "blind" violence - just as there are no 
excuses for American or Russian bombings. Until the war ceases, we must face the attacks 
of fundamentalists and desperate seekers of revenge.
US forces and their allies from NATO in the years 2015-2016 have made aviation attacks in 
Muslim countries in the Near and Middle East, where at least 63,185 bombs were dropped. In 
78% this was the work of the US Army. In recent years, the intensity of attacks has 
increased markedly, and it is important to combine the significant increase in the number 
of refugees from the raids. We will find information on bombings in the Western European 
media like the British Guardian.[5]The bombs are mostly in Syria and Iraq. Exact number of 
victims is not known. It is said that as a result of the raids of tens of thousands of 
Islamists fighting on the ISIS side, rarely mentioned civilians. Officially, Western 
governments (especially the United States) try to maintain the belief that there is a 
minimum number of casualties among non-combatants. In turn, non-governmental organizations 
report hundreds or even thousands of killed civilians as a result of NATO bombing. 
According to one of the portals only between August 2014 and August 2015, Airwars 
activists, an organization of independent journalists following the US-led campaign and 
their allies to Iraq and Syria, documented more than 50 bombings in which "at least" 489 
civilians including about 100 children. "[6]Rzeczpospolita wrote at the end of October 
2016 that as a result of the 13-month Russian bombings, 10102 people were killed in Syria, 
including 4162 civilians (including 1,013 children and 584 women).[7]
Of course the causes of the increase in armed conflict and the accompanying increase in 
the number of refugees are manifold. Desperate people are storming the boundaries not only 
because of the bombing of American, British, Turkish or Russian aircraft, but also due to 
disorganization, economic collapse and starvation. International public opinion seems to 
forget, too,
Refugees are fleeing from acts of Islamic terror, whose victims in the East fall far more 
in the West than in the West. The ongoing war in Syria also has negative economic 
consequences for neighboring countries and the entire region. For example, the World Bank 
estimates that the Syrian crisis has caused Lebanon's GDP to fall by 2.85% in 2014. The 
rise in unemployment and the budget deficit have "cost" this country a total of $ 7.5 
billion in 2012-2014.[9]


Time of Walls and Financial Flows

The policy of separation through the construction of walls and gravestones has always been 
linked to the global tensions and social inequalities triggered by policies developed on 
the basis of certain economic interests. Even historical examples of the "fall of the 
walls", intended to become a prelude to new global liberal orders, were usually 
intertwined with the emergence of new administrative barriers, differing only in form. The 
content remained the same. When the 156 km long Berlin Wall, together with a system of 
fortifications, trenches, dams and mines, was symbolically collapsed, followed by further 
walls of political and economic inequalities - separating the land of Israel and Palestine 
by a concrete wall of about 700 km. The height of about 8 meters with control towers and 
electrical protection system, which has so far consumed about 2.6 billion dollars[10]; A 
steel wall separating the United States, Mexico, Spain and Africa, Kashmir and India, etc. 
Nowadays, in response to the so- Old Continent's refugee crisis is increasingly drowned in 
its grip. Construction of a Hungarian fence[11], high for about 4 meters, with harbors and 
security systems that separates Hungary, Serbia and Croatia. He has so far cost one 
billion euros. Currently under construction is his second part. Kilometers per year 
between Bulgaria and Turkey have absorbed about 4.5 million euros and another 3 million 
euros have been spent on a metal fence with Greek-Turkish fences. Member States, which are 
members of the European Union from spring 2015 to April 2016, have issued a total of 
around 500 million euros per 1200 km of barbed wire fences and walls alone (cost of 
guarding turrets and patrolling of border areas)[12]. Still, people are constantly running 
away, trying to cross the border sometimes several times. This is evidenced, among others. 
The story of Abed, a 16-year-old Afghani: "It's winter, sometimes minus 20 degrees, we're 
waiting here in Subotica, in one of the abandoned factories near the Hungarian border. 
There is no water, electricity, roofs, men no longer take to the camps. (...) I have 
already tried 20 times across the border ... yesterday the border guards caught me again, 
crashed the phone, took off their clothes and poured water. I came back and I will try 
again "[13]. In the winter of 2017, people across the border crossed the hinterlands, 
trying to make further attempts to cross the border.
In the context of the debate on global social inequities, it should be borne in mind that 
the European Schengen Area has primarily opened the boundaries of free circulation of 
capital. Although the treaty also banned border controls on people who are nationals of 
Member States, allowing about 400 million Europeans to travel freely also to non-EU 
countries, the lack of internal border controls was mainly introduced as a necessary step 
for the emergence of a single market, And currency and competitiveness.[14]So the lack of 
borders made the free and equal flow of people realized? Has the treaty initiated 
wide-ranging cooperation on internal security and asylum policy? Not at all. At present, 
contrary to international law and the 1951 Geneva Convention on the Status of Refugees, 
the international right to seek asylum, refugee status or other form of protection for 
migrants is violated.

European state of emergency

The emergence of the Schengen zone has undoubtedly strengthened the co-operation of states 
on the level of capital flow, but as regards the flow of people during the crisis (not 
refugee but economic), its weaknesses are evident. Security policy, scanners looking for 
cars to detect refugees, funding of the fortifications of the "fortress Europe", 
introduction of volatile checkpoints in Schengen countries illustrate that for some time 
we have been dealing with a European unique state.
In this context, we often make division into more or less desirable migrants. Those who 
are better qualified and, according to neo-liberal narratives, are more economically 
useful, have greater rights, regardless of whether they are affected, for example, by the 
consequences of war. On the other hand, those who can be cheap labor and their low 
socio-economic status justify their many rights are often overlooked in the debate on 
administrative regulation of equality of movement. The result of this situation is a 
process that some social scientists and researchers identify with economic racism, 
independent of nationality or religion.[15]At the core of these assumptions there are many 
migration management programs at local and national level. This is mainly the case for 
larger companies and corporations that can bring in workers who are proposing worse 
(working-class) working conditions.
At the same time, refugees bear huge costs of closing their borders, and human migration 
has become a business and a source of many fortunes. The costs incurred by migrants in 
trying to reach Europe in the past 15 years are estimated at € 16 billion (data from 
2015).[16]The profits of smugglers and corrupt authorities are enormous. On the other 
hand, in response to migration, only in the years 2002-2013 the European Space Agency 
(ESA) has allocated € 225 million to 39 projects for the development of unmanned drones, 
heat sensors and odor detection systems. It is not uncommon for taxpayers to pay their own 
money in the "security policy" to smugglers and dictators. One team analyzing immigrant 
relations came to the conclusion that "the Italian government made an agreement with Libya 
and paid for Libyan refugees who did not allow refugees to travel to Italy. Since 2011 
Italian taxpayers have spent € 17 million on Libyan support for trainings, patrol boats, 
night vision and other equipment. "[17]These expenses also cover the costs of the removal 
of millions of people by EU governments.
Poland is forcing the strengthening of the border regime, among others. By working with 
Frontex, a European deportation agency. Its Intelligent Border Control (TALOS) systems are 
created to replace patrolling machine guards. This project was described in a report 
presented to German Spiegel by Spiegel. After one of Frontex's operations at the 
Greek-Turkish border they were ordered to open fire to immigrants fleeing the minefield, 
the Germans refused to execute the orders. Frontex commanders did not acknowledge that 
their actions were against the law in Germany.[18]
In recent years, not only have European countries increased their funding for border 
control. The ineffectiveness of border militarization is also witnessed by the failure of 
US policy. Alice Mesnard, an economist at City University in London, pointed to 
quantitative research on the US, proving the failure of anti-immigration policy. Gathmann 
points out that "the methods of strengthening the frontiers adopted by the 1986 
Immigration Reform and Control Act (ICRA) to seal the border with Mexico have proved to be 
a growing burden for public finances and have contributed to increased cross-border costs, 
The influx of people without the right to stay, who are forced to pick the longest and 
most dangerous road, which makes them more and more dead. "[19]

Limits expensive and leaky

As Spernata Domitru points out in the article, "Is the world without passports a 
utopia?"[20]In 1920-1930 many international meetings returned to the idea of a complete 
abolition of borders. Pointing out the many obstacles to the movement of people and the 
post-war movement of goods. "In 1924, at a conference on immigration and immigration 
organized under the auspices of the Bureau International du Travail (BIT), a request was 
made that the passport requirement be abolished as soon as possible ..." Postponing the 
complete abolition of the passport requirement. It was not until 1963 that the idea of 
abolishing international passports was considered impossible. This happened at the United 
Nations Conference on Tourism

And International Travel[21].

However, it should be borne in mind that under international law, any person applying for 
refugee status or other form of protection may cross the border without a passport or use 
another person's passport to escape persecution. In this case, we can not talk about 
"illegal migration" because we would have been able to receive protection in advance in 
other countries. Despite this, no one is chasing states that (like Poland) are closing the 
frontiers of refugees, de facto breaking the law. The Polish government has refused to 
accept the refugees as part of the relocation programs, thereby closing the borders and 
causing a situation in which people cross the Polish border with smugglers. In addition, 
as alarms, among others. The Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights systematically, with the 
exception of the law, is denied the possibility of applying for refugee status for Chechen 
families trying to cross the border of Poland at the border crossing Terespol / Brest. A 
large part of the people are refused entry, and for more than a dozen months at the 
railway station in Brest they have cheetah families who do not want to return to Chechnya 
because of the threat. The right-wing government of Poland, which identifies every refugee 
with a terrorist (acting exactly as the Islamic terrorists would like it) contests 
international law, treating it as a defense strategy.
In conclusion, now more than 65 million people worldwide (more than after World War II) 
change their whereabouts due to conflicts and violations of human rights. 1/3 of them were 
forced to cross the border for protection.[22]Walling along the borders of Europe is not a 
solution. No territory can be sealed. This is not a discussion even about morality, but of 
economics, because the solutions they simply do not work, and at the same time they absorb 
huge public funds. So a simple conclusion - people will cross borders, and the current 
approach based on border militarization will not be effective if the number of conflicts 
increases (as many researchers and researchers predict), and economic differences between 
regions of the world will continue.

The text was published in the monthly Le Monde Diplomatique - No. 7 (137) July 2017
The text in the abridged version was published in the catalog for Dominique Lejman's 
exhibition "Plot", available from 23 June to 27 July 2017 in the Arsenal City Gallery in 
Poznan.
Photos by Dominik Lejman, "Fence". Foto: Galeria Miejska Arsenal in Poznan

footnotes:
1]The quote comes from 15 pilot interviews conducted by K. Czarnoty on the situation of 
Syrian refugees on the Turkish labor market. Athens 2016.
[2]Research project implemented by the Western Center for Social and Economic Research in 
2016.
[3]Movie Quotes: There was no hope. Warsaw Ghetto Uprising 1943. Museum of the History of 
Polish Jews Polin. Production Year 2017. The video is available at 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MI3bEHjhYds (accessed: 24.04.2017).
[4]S. Zgliczynski, "Dogs of War", Internaete edition of Levi Noga, October 2003, 
http://www.iwkip.org (access: 24.04.2017).
[5]M. Benjamin, "America dropped 26,171 bombs in 2016. What a bloody end is Obama's 
reign", www.theguardian. Com of dn. 9.01.2017, https://www.theguardian.com (access: 
28.04.2017).
[6]"Civilian of warfare", www.altair.com.pl of dn. 5.08.2015, http://www.altair.com.pl 
(access: 28.04.2017).
[7]"Syria: 10 000 victims of Russian bombings in 13 months", www.rp.pl z dn. 31.10.2016, 
http://www.rp.pl (access: 28.04.2017).
[8]CNN Libraly, "ISIS Fast Facts", www.cnn.com z. Dn. April 17, 2017, 
http://edition.cnn.com (accessed: 29.04.2017).
[9]A. Betts, L. Bloom, J. Kaplan, N. Omat, "Refugee Economies. Forced Displacement and 
Development ", Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017, p. 44.
[10]H. Matar, "The Wall, 10 years on: The Great Israeli Project", www.972mag.com from 
dn.09.04.2012,
Https://972mag.com (accessed: 29.04.2017).
[11]M. Dunai, "Hungary bilds migrant border fance", www.routers.com dn: 02.03.2017, 
http://www.reuters.com (access: 29.04.2017).
[12]G. Baczynska, S. Ledwith, "How Europes built fences to keep people out", 
www.reuters.com dn.04.06.2016., Http://www.reuters.com (access: 26.04.2017 )
[13]Interview by K. Czarnoty during a trip with grass-roots assistance by a group from 
Poznan and Torun for nomadic refugees to Serbia in the winter of 2017.
[14]K. Deren, "Development of the Shengen Zones", Foreign Affairs Portal of June 6, 2014. 
http://www.psz.pl/120-unia-eu ropejska / roz war -st ref y-schengen ( Access: 26.04.2017).
[15]On the phenomenon of economic or neo-liberal racism, Ewa Charkiewicz in the paper 
titled "Mothers for sterilization. Neoliberal racism in Poland "and Monika Bobako in an 
article titled" Constructing Class Diversity as a Creation. Polish case after 1989 ". Both 
available on-line on "Think Thanku feministyczny" pages http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl
(Access 26.04.2017).
[16]V. Makarenko, "Immigrants. What does Europe do to not let them in?, www.wyborcza.pl 
from dn.18.06.2015., Http://wyborcza.pl (access: 26.04.2017).
[17]Ibid.
[18]No Border, "Frontex - competence to the limit", Le Monde Diplomatique - Polish 
edition, No. 5 / 63.Maj 2011.
[19]A. Mesnard, "Will strengthening borders help to better control migration?" P. 61 in 
"Migrants, migrations. What you need to know to get your own opinion. " Ed. Helene 
Thiollet., Ed. Karakter, Cracow 2017.
[20]Ibid.
[21]Ibid.
[22]A. Betts, L. Bloom, J. Kaplan, N. Omat., Refugee Economies. Forced Displacement and 
Development, ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017, p.

http://www.rozbrat.org/publicystyka/kontrola-spoeczna/4557-nowe-europejskie-granice-w-dobie-kryzysu

------------------------------

Message: 3





A lasting struggle against state and capital --- After the declassification by the Golden 
Dawn Society itself from the "antisystemic" character that it was supposed to pretend and 
its utmost identification with neonazism, the state is looking for new successors from the 
fascist Space, which will limit their rhetoric to a more patriotic / nationalist narrative 
and will therefore better manage their image. --- The Holy Lodge in Thessaloniki was 
obviously considered a very fitting case. This, of course, does not apply at all, since 
AMUs and other micro-groups that draw their womb from the Golden Dawn and rally around IL. 
Even more emphasize their belief in national-socialism, the Third Reich, Hitler, and so 
on. ---- The state, therefore, always having the need to form a paracetrical court, 
observing the structural weakness of Golden Dawn to successfully mobilize in the city of 
Thessaloniki, sees the Holy Loch its last chance to form a fascist struggle that attempts 
to step in pavement. That is why EL.AS. And in particular the MATs of Thessaloniki have 
been assigned the role of a staff assistant and a bunker of the 15 cathars that are 
assembled each time to attempt the rape of any infant kidnappers or just to wipe out their 
racist and homophobic poison.

The reason why they summon each other is absolutely indifferent even to themselves, just 
picking a theme from the familiar fascist agenda (immigrants, Cyprus, civil war, etc.) and 
all the substance is at stake in establishing the alliance With the police on the street, 
so they can be gathered around somewhere in the city without even being able to announce 
in advance. Police are tangling this alliance, since they did not hesitate to attack the 
last two anti-fascist gatherings in the White Tower area, from which the first attack was 
the capture of three anti-fascists, and the second the injury of companions and guardians 
of guardianship. The cops leave the showcase of supposed neutrality and act as the arm 
that the fascists do not have. But when the cops' detours became possible, the result was 
fascists still measuring teeth in the municipal yard in Oreokastro. Cops know very well 
what the result will be, if they fail to exaggerate themselves in guarding the far right, 
so they are attacking with anti-fascists and anti-fascists.

The struggle with fascism is not exhausted in central appointments, in flamboyant 
announcements and obedient journeys, it is everyday. An integral part of the anti-fascist 
struggle in the city is the anti-fascist concentration that limits the dynamics of the 
fascists, as well as their spatial diffusion. The support of anti-fascist rallies should 
be the self-evident and minimal mobilization of all anarchist and anti-authoritarian 
groupings and organizations, as naturally it should normally be a minimal move, and of 
organizations that generally refer to antifascism.

In the next period, both at the central level with the completion of the Golden Dawn trial 
and at the local level with the outcome of the battle against the Holy Loch, the next 
developments concerning the way of expressing and organizing the anti-fascist struggle 
will be judged. The Charlottesville events, and in particular the murder of Heather Haier, 
reveal once again the criminality of fascists and neo-Nazis at international level, while 
at the same time demonstrating the importance of the victorious outcome of these 
struggles. A common thread unites the struggles worldwide against modern capitalist 
totalitarianism, fascism and neonazism, and a part of these struggles corresponds to us 
and falls on our backs.

NO STEP BACK!

Anti-fascist concentration: Wednesday 30 August 17.00 | KAMARA

TO CLOSE THE WONDERFUL AND ALL THE FASHIC FORMS LONG

FORM WITH THE SYSTEM WHICH GENERATED THE FASHION

Collectivism for Social Anarchism

"Black & Red" |

Member of Anarchist Political Organization

-Omospondia syllogikotiton-

------------------------------

Message: 4





Prime Minister Gentiloni publicly outlined on Sunday, August 20, among other things, the 
upcoming budget law. ---- Inspired by recent data on gross domestic product, said that 
economic growth has returned, claiming that the outcome of Matteo Renzi's government 
policy, the Gentiloni government will maintain. The next challenge would then be "quality 
of growth in terms of employment and against social exclusion"; With this in mind, the 
next budget law will contain limited growth measures, with interventions to promote 
employment, with incentives for permanent and stable employment and an extraordinary 
commitment to active labor policies. ---- This is clearly a propaganda operation, with 
which the government's primary objective is to mislead the exploited, the unemployed, 
those who are mobile, the unemployed, waiting for the renewal of social safety nets, 
promising inclusion in the world of work impossible for All practical effects.

Hundreds of thousands of workers have been affected by the corporate crises, many of which 
are left with nothing and are now exhausting the normal mechanisms of income protection, 
even in the face of a progressive reduction and elimination of some of the measures 
decided by the Government.

While employed workers are substantially stable, Italy is one of the last countries in the 
European Union that has not yet recovered from gross domestic product levels before the 
2007 crisis, despite the cuts and sacrifices suffered by the working classes.

Ten years after the outbreak of the economic crisis, unemployment and poverty only 
increase, and pensions, education, health, and various forms of social assistance have 
been reduced and worsened. Tens of billions of euros have been stolen from the lower 
reaches, without knowing what happened to them. The reckless management of the 
center-right governments, as well as those of the center-left, and those "technicians", is 
there for all to see: we are not faced with a failure, we are faced with bankruptcy, money 
taken Of workers, pensioners, unemployed, and that would be used to ensure a minimum of 
social security were diverted in favor of large industrial and financial groups, military 
circles and clerical apparatus.

Confrontado com o fracasso evidente e o risco de uma revolta social, a partir do 
descontentamento dos trabalhadores das empresas em crise, Gentiloni busca lançar mais uma 
promessa de novos empregos, o que irá resultar em mais uma chuva de financiamentos em 
favor dos capitalistas, ainda com outro corte salarial. Sua finalidade é apenas chegar, 
sem muito choque, ao final de sua legislatura; em seguida, passará a bola para outra pessoa.

However, it would be possible to recover money for social services, care, pensions, income 
of the laid-off and unemployed, cutting off the great works that never end, cutting 
funding and military tax exemptions for the Catholic Church, cutting Interest expenses, 
making the tax reform an instrument of social rebalancing, returning with highly 
progressive direct taxes. These would be measures that a reformist government, a leftist 
government, could do without its contradictions, and probably also satisfy the electorate. 
But all governments can not fail to serve the interests of their early supporters, the 
privileged and exploiting classes.

That is why the condition of the exploited tends to worsen until the arrogance of 
government is brought to an end, until the elimination of the exploiters, by the general 
expropriation of the means of production.

Tiziano Antonelli

Source:  http://www.umanitanova.org/2017/08/23/la-bancarotta-di-gentiloni/

------------------------------

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten