SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

zondag 8 april 2018

Anarchic update news all over the world - 8.04.2018

Today's Topics:

   

1.  France, Alternative Libertaire AL #281 - Rules: The blood of
      discrimination (fr, it, pt) [machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

2.  US, black rose fed TENANT POWER FROM BELOW: THE LOS ANGELES
      TENANTS UNION (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

3.  [Spain] CGT condemns the Israeli massacre against the
      Palestinian people and joins the commemoration of 'Earth Day' By
      ANA (ca, pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

4.  Spain, nosotras.cnt.es - FIRST OF MAY (ca) (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

5.  Poland, rozbrat: Social Congress of Women - postulates
      rozbrat.org [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   

6.  wsm.ie: How the government were forced to call a referendum
      to repeal the 8th (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1





To have one's first period is in the West at the same time the entry into the dangerous 
world of the possibility of pregnancy and the beginning of the shame related to the female 
sex. In poor countries, it is in addition the beginning of the exclusion, of the social 
life sometimes, of the school often. ---- The rules are the blood from the deterioration 
of the uterine wall that had thickened to accommodate an embryo in case of pregnancy. The 
exit of the uterus is the vagina and it is therefore from it that flows the menstrual 
flow. Quantity, color, thickness and duration are variable between women and according to 
the periods of life. A woman with a functional uterus and ovaries will bleed about 13 
times a year for over 30 years.

An infinite source of prejudices and strange beliefs
Shame remains attached to this bodily function. If men can blow their noses in public 
without worry, take out a simple periodic protection (object that collects blood, sanitary 
napkin, tampon, menstrual sponge, menstrual cup) from his bag and go quietly to the 
toilet, is not done . There is a whole strategy of dissimulation of the object, and asking 
the girlfriends a troubleshooting is done in total discretion. Having a red spot on his 
pants is hard to assume. We talk about his intestinal transit in details, never his period.

Beliefs and prejudices vary from country to country and from time to time. Women, during 
their menstruation, turn mayonnaise or wine, in Japan still today the profession of master 
sushi is not open to women. The major prejudice is that of impurity. The blood of the 
rules is dirty, it's disgusting, and talking about it is just as important. In some 
countries women are isolated during their periods, sometimes in very precarious 
conditions. In others, girls are not allowed to go to school. There is also the belief 
that one should not throw dirty protections with the rest of the garbage on pain of 
causing disease. Sometimes washing is forbidden during menstruation.

Expendable expenses for poor women
The taboo related to the rules also makes it only very recently that medicine is 
interested in endometriosis, a disease of the female reproductive system that makes the 
rules very painful and has long been treated by "  c". is normal to have pain during your 
periods  .

Periodic protections represent a lot of money - 20 euros a month - 10,000 euros for a 
living - and women and girls in poor countries do not have access. They protect themselves 
with foliage, mattress tips or other materials that cause infections, mud. And they can 
not go to school or work. For homeless women, the menstrual period is also very difficult 
to live with. No access to protection, no access to decent toilets, menstruation, 
biological banality, can become an extreme difficulty of life and an obstacle to the 
autonomy of women.

The rules should not be shameful, a source of contempt and a danger to women's health ... 
Let's talk about it, show off our sanitary napkins like our handkerchiefs, give hygienic 
products to the food bank collections, dismantle the ads that show blue blood ! Let's 
explain !

Christine (AL Sarthe)

http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Regles-Le-sang-des-discriminations

------------------------------

Message: 2






The following interview with Tracy Jeanne Rosenthal of the Los Angeles Tenants Union was 
conducted by Jessica Lopez and Cesar Montero and originally published in the 
anti-capitalist and pro-working class paper Salvo. ---- The city of Los Angeles has 
experienced an increasing number of evictions that are linked to the gentrification 
process enabled by the state and landlords. Eric Garcetti, mayor of Los Angeles, has 
spearheaded and favored the development of luxury homes. This has encouraged landlords to 
enter their land into the market of trendy housing, evicting and displacing previous 
tenants in favor of tenants who are able and willing to pay more in rent. Black and Brown 
communities are coming under attack with these practices of displacement which favor 
whiter and wealthier people and make clear that these are current day manifestations of 
colonialism.

As anti-capitalists, it is crucial that we support tenant struggles against landlordism, a 
system in which privatized land is rented to a tenant. The relationship between a tenant 
and a landlord is one that is founded on the exploitation of the tenant and this is why it 
is important for tenants to be at the forefront of building popular power in their 
buildings and neighborhoods.

The following interview is with Tracy Jeanne Rosenthal, a member of the Los Angeles 
Tenants Union / Sindicato de Inquilinos de Los Angeles. The union has been involved in a 
myriad of struggles across LA, most notably the year long struggle against rent hikes in 
Boyle Heights' Mariachi Apartments in which tenants were able to negotiate a reasonable 
rent increase for their units as well as the ability to stay in their homes and 
neighborhood through the use of a rent strike. LATU / SILA is a prime example of power 
from below.

Salvo: Could you share some history about the LATU? How did the union come to be?

Tracy Jeanne Rosenthal: The LA Tenants Union began in 2015 as a response to an analysis of 
gentrification. Gentrification is displacement and replacement of the poor for profit. 
Gentrification is not a natural or inevitable process. Gentrification is human-made, and 
often aided in large part by government policy.

A multi-generational and multi-ethnic research collective, School of Echoes, spent three 
years studying gentrification, through readings, meetings with groups across Los Angeles, 
and reflecting on our own organizing work. But we did not only want to understand 
gentrification, we wanted to stop it. And we recognized that only a mass movement could. 
In 2015, we convened a host of organizers across the city to help found the LA Tenants 
Union. Since that meeting, we have grown to encompass nine local chapters from the 
Westside to the Eastside and Northeast to Southeast.

S: How many members are currently in the LATU? How are most people funneled in?

TJR: We have about 250 dues-paying members, hundreds enrolled in our e-mail list, and 
thousands of online supporters. Most of our members begin as tenants in crisis: served 
with an eviction notice, given an unaffordable rent increase, trapped in slum conditions. 
When tenants come seeking our solidarity casework services, attend local meetings and 
participate in actions that support their and other buildings, through that process, they 
recognize that the only way to fully defend themselves and help others is to build a 
movement of tenants across the city. We also retain members by recognizing that so many 
skills can be put in service of the movement for the human right to housing: language 
skills, photography, talking to strangers, taking notes, making up slogans, brainstorming...

S: The LATU engages in direct action; What are some victories the LATU has seen using 
direct action specifically?

TJR: Our Emergency Response Committee is often our first point of contact for direct 
action. Members of the committee are alerted to an illegal eviction, ongoing harassment, 
or other crisis-in-progress, and arrive on scene to mediate, document, or in some cases 
physically block eviction proceedings. Individual local chapters also use tactics of 
direct action to highlight particular building struggles and structural issues of housing. 
One example from the Vermont and Beverly Local is our campaign to highlight the failures 
of the Housing and Community Investment Department (HCID): by failing to properly inspect 
code violations, guarantee the rights of the rent stabilization ordinance, and manage 
their resources effectively, we assert that they contribute to the displacement crisis 
across the city. By staging protests outside of HCID offices, we have both put pressure on 
individual cases and also were able to present our analysis in a meeting between the heads 
of the department and 100 of our members and members of the community (the full analysis 
is publicly available online). Another example is our organizing of numerous successful 
rent strikes, which have put pressure on landlords to lower hiked rents and fix code 
violations, even in cases when tenants do not have the benefit of rent control to protect 
them. Rent strikes are a crucial strategy that rely on the power of collective bargaining 
rather than state policy makers to bring about immediate change in the conditions of 
tenants' lives. They are also scalable beyond one building.

S: What does the current structure and decision-making process currently look like? What 
are some strengths and weaknesses you have seen with these structures?

TJR: We make decisions by consensus. The goal of consensus is to foster group solidarity 
in decision making, so that decisions come with the force of everyone's participation. In 
the interest of time, consensus can look like a straw-poll or a vote, when gauging the 
temperature of the room. When urgency is balanced with expedience, consensus can be 
difficult to prioritize at all times. LATU has an open membership policy: any tenant, 
broadly defined as a person who does not own or control their own housing, can become a 
member (and we accept non-voting, landlord supporters, too). This means there are 
significant differences among our membership, in terms of racial, class, and language 
differences, differences in analyses of the housing crisis (particularly, those who 
foreground anti-capitalist critiques and those that don't), and differences in preferred 
strategy and theories of political change ("outside" direct action like boycotts, 
protests, and rent strikes vs. "inside" tactics of pressuring policy-makers). Some 
questions we are constantly facing: How do we prioritize the needs and analyses of the 
most effected by the crisis (poor and working class people of color)? How do we maintain 
an intersectional analysis that understands housing struggles as a part of those against 
police and ICE abuse? How can we turn our meetings into sites of education where different 
kinds of people can learn? What kinds of tactics will best support our strategy of scaling 
up the fight against gentrification and displacement? How do we grow? How do we build 
leadership? How do we win?

The LA Tenants Union meets every first and third Monday of the month from 7pm-9pm at the 
United Teachers Los Angeles building located at 3303 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90010. 
If you are a tenant and want to join the fight to build tenant power and get organized, 
visit their website at www.latenantsunion.org and become a member today.

This piece was reprinted from It's Going Down. If you are looking for a useful guide with 
research, organizing tips and examples we recommend "Resources on Tenant Organizing, 
Housing and Gentrification."

http://blackrosefed.org/tenant-power-from-below-los-angeles/

------------------------------

Message: 3






Israel kills 20 Palestinians and wounded 1,500 people peacefully celebrating 'Earth Day' 
---- The General Confederation of Labor (CGT) condemned in a statement the recent violent 
events that took place against the Palestinian people by the Israeli government. ---- The 
anarcho-syndicalist organization denounces that Israel continues to act with total 
impunity, and with the approval of the International Community, against unarmed people who 
claim the right of refugees to return. According to the CGT, "the Israeli government again 
acts abusively against a population whose greatest weapons are stones and their own 
lives." ---- The CGT also joined in celebrating the 'Earth Day', which has evoked since 
1976 the killing of six citizens by Israeli occupying forces during demonstrations against 
land confiscation.

This year there was the convocation of 6 weeks of protests until May 15, the 'Nakba' or 
Day of Catastrophe, when the Palestinian people were subjected to exile by the Zionist 
occupation forces.

The CGT states that all peoples have the right to decide freely and that this convocation 
"is not a war", but a peaceful act of claiming a totally disarmed people that only claims 
their most basic rights. In this sense, the State of Israel can not launch its army 
against defenseless people, let alone consent that the International Community remain 
unmoved by such serious events against a people who only claim the lands that have been 
stolen.

Press Office of the CGT Confederal Committee

Source: 
http://rojoynegro.info/articulo/sin-fronteras/cgt-condena-la-masacre-israel-el-palestino-se-suma-la-conmemoraci%C3%B3n-de

Translation> Sol de Abril

------------------------------

Message: 4






CNT will celebrate a May Day framed in the feminist struggle within the union world
The union will collect and try to put into practice the labor demands of the general 
strike of March 8. ---- Framed within an environment of mobilizations, after the Feminist 
Strike of 8M, the massive demonstrations against the Gag Law, the struggle for the Defense 
of Public Pensions, the protests in Catalonia, among many other mobilizations, CNT begins 
the campaign of dissemination of the May 1st, making women visible as promoters and 
visible leaders of the union struggle. ---- Beginning with the interview with the first 
and only general secretary of a class union in the country, Ana Sigüenza, more interviews 
will be disseminated to compañeras who today hold positions in the anarcho-syndical, both 
at the state, regional and local levels.

Claims will also be made visible in the most feminized sectors, where the struggle for 
equality and rights are presented in a crude and difficult manner. Examples of these are 
the hotel industry, service companies, cleaning or commerce, giving voice to the 
protagonists of these struggles to encourage more women to be courageous and defend their 
rights. In this line, it is intended to hear the compañeras that head their union 
sections, struggles in precarious sectors such as the cleaners of the Pablo de Olavide 
University in Seville, Kellys in Madrid or the meat industry.

With this campaign, first in time after the 8M Feminist Strike, CNT wants to keep alive 
the flame of the protest, to continue throwing a pulse to the government of the gag, the 
freezing of pensions and salaries, labor reforms and the institutional machismo.

Permanent Secretariat of the Confederal Committee

http://nosotras.cnt.es/

------------------------------

Message: 5






The Social Congress of Women took place on March 3 in Poznan. It was initiated by Poznan 
nurseries, cultural institutions and tenants from Warsaw and Poznan. The organization of 
the Congress resulted from the necessity to extend the struggle for higher wages and lower 
rents, which we jointly deal with on the basis of trade unions and tenants' associations. 
This fight is often a direct answer to the anti-woman policy pursued by the local 
government. We treat current attempts to tighten the abortion law as a supplement to the 
same anti-woman policy, but this time implemented at the central level. Therefore, we also 
go out on the street because we are part of a wider women's movement. The list of 
postulates below is not a direct response to government attempts to limit access to proper 
medical care in the event of unwanted pregnancy. However, the lack of such care results in 
a deterioration of our economic position, and this raises our opposition.

1. Shortening the length of weekly working time to 35 hours without decreasing the pay.

In addition to the fact that employees are struggling with professional duties, to make 
matters worse, they do free work at home. In fact, they work much more than 40 hours a 
week. Meanwhile, the continuous increase in labor productivity in the economy allows 
shortening of working time without reducing wages. If the working hours are not shortened, 
only the business gains growth in productivity, and the working people lose. In addition, 
the increase in labor productivity without a common shortening of the working week in the 
long run causes unemployment and poverty. The average annual working time in Poland is 
about 500 hours longer than in Germany and is one of the longest in Europe, which proves 
our overwork. We need more time off work in which we can realize our own needs. In the 
case of female nurseries and other employees in the care sector, it is necessary to 
shorten the working time to 25 hours per week. This level is currently available to 
pre-school caregivers and allows for proper rest.

2. Increasing wages and employment on employment contracts in all facilities financed from 
the local government or state budget.

Increasing the tasks of institutions financed from the self-government or state budget, 
while limiting the number of posts, increases the workload. However, there is no increase 
in wages for more work. Low wages, which are common in municipal institutions, force us to 
"earn" out of full-time work, on weekends and during holidays. This work is sometimes done 
at the same employer but in a different scope of responsibilities. Overworking causes 
health deterioration: injuries, accidents at work, chronic diseases, occupational 
diseases. These problems deepen employment for junk contracts and outsourcing, thanks to 
which institutions cut the costs of their activities, reduce wages and worsen working 
conditions. In addition, junk contracts are used to foster divisions between workers for 
the "better" and "worse",

3. Increasing the number of places in day care centers and kindergartens and reducing fees 
for their services.

Many years of underfunding and cuts in public spending, which reduced access to nurseries, 
kindergartens and other care institutions, directly hit women. Their free or low-paid job 
fills the gaps caused by limited access to services, food or poor housing. In practice, 
for example, older women must work for their adult children, taking care of their own 
grandchildren. The underdevelopment of public care institutions, eg for children and the 
elderly, in fact means that women are being hired to work in households.

4. Including the time allocated for commuting to the place of work in the total time of 
the working day.

The effort related to travel to work is not treated as a job, although many establishments 
operate only by employing people who do not live in their immediate environment. These 
people are forced to long commute because of the lack of employment opportunities at home. 
Several hours of commuting and working full-time make it impossible to carry out all 
caring duties at home, not to mention the right rest. The use of employee transport, often 
subject to control and various regulations, for example in buses transporting employees to 
Amazon's warehouses, can not be used for meals or drinks. Using public transport exposes 
us to fees, which is an absurd situation. Not only is getting to the plant is a waste of 
time and it is only to meet the needs of entrepreneurs, we still have to pay for it. As a 
result, we give our bosses a few to several hours of our lives for free every week, and we 
still have to pay for it many times.

5. Increasing social control over finances and self-government activities.

The city's finances are not transparent to most of its residents. The policy of tightening 
the belt is justified by economic reasons, but the problem is not the lack of funds but 
the way they are divided. Too low wages in institutions paid for by the local government 
actually result from the adoption of specific political priorities and not from the "tight 
budget". Expenditures on social welfare, communal services or culture do not bring great 
profits to business, as a rule they are treated as a loss, and their underfunding is the 
norm. On the other hand, the construction of roads or stadiums makes it possible to 
transfer millions to private pockets and, as a consequence, these expenditures are 
referred to as "development investments". Local politicians in their decisions, for 
example regarding the financing of cultural institutions, are guided by their own taste or 
political trends. In the case of care institutions, the priority is to maintain their 
inefficiency, which can always serve as a pretext to close them. We waste our time 
thinking about the structure of the budget, while politicians use it as a tool to take the 
poor and give the rich. The more obscure the structure of the budget, the easier it is to 
derive millions from it, which reach a few.

6. Enabling trade unions to control labor standards.

Lack of detailed provisions in the Labor Code regarding labor standards enables 
entrepreneurs to increase its intensity according to their own needs. Standards, 
performance indicators, the number of products per hour to be performed at the assembly 
lines, or the number of children in groups in the case of nursery nurses often exceeds the 
physical capacity of the employees. We demand workers' control over the regulation of 
standards, through trade unions or crew representations. Standards can not grow without 
justification (without introducing technological improvements). We demand that the 
exemptions be discontinued on the pretext that the standard will not be met. Labor 
productivity standards must take into account the needs and capabilities of employees 
(especially the elderly or the disabled).

7. Planning work time (eg setting schedules, changes or breaks at work) in accordance with 
the needs of the employees.

Flexible employment is even more stiffening entrepreneurs in terms of work time planning. 
A large part of the plants operate in a 24-hour mode, although there is no other 
justification than increasing profits (we are not talking about sectors that meet current 
needs such as health care). Night work, forced overtime, additional duties, longer and 
longer billing periods destroy our physical and mental health. Especially in the case of 
night work, we demand adjusting the working time to our needs (ie the possibility of 
limiting its length and the possibility to choose working hours), as well as scheduling 
work time at least three months in advance. Unstable hours of work strike with redoubled 
power in parents and people taking care of the elderly or disabled. Short-term agency 
agreements (eg two-week or monthly), where you work half a year or more, are used to 
transfer business risk to working people. These contracts result in extreme uncertainty 
and over-strength work (even when the disease is going through) to "earn" another 
contract. In addition, breaks that are necessary to be able to work all day work should be 
entirely devoted to rest, not for additional business tasks or to reach the place of rest.

8. Universal health insurance for all persons residing in Poland. The abolition of limits 
on specialist medical services.

Widely prevailing unstable employment and the associated frequent periods of unemployment 
make access to free, specialist treatment and rehabilitation difficult. Only persons 
employed under a contract of employment may use the current social security system. People 
employed on junk contracts or not registered as unemployed have to pay a fortune for 
private medical care and medicines. This condition combined with low earnings forces them 
to work beyond strength. Lack of resources for treatment and prophylaxis causes, 
especially among older people, a sudden deterioration of health. Costs resulting from the 
destruction of health through work should be borne by the state and entrepreneurs, not 
workers who are often forced to treat themselves and their relatives with home methods. 
Regardless of whether we are employed under a contract of employment and whether we have 
Polish citizenship, the compulsion of work impresses on our health. Therefore, we require 
permanent, and not limited, access to medical care.

9. Universal retirement at the minimum wage level.

A sudden drop in the amount of income after retirement forces the seniors, if it allows 
their health, continuing work. This problem affects especially lonely people and women who 
are usually less well paid during their working life, so they get lower pensions. Too low 
pensions make it impossible to pay rent or buy necessary drugs, which in the long term 
condemns older people to eviction or early death.

10. Developing communal housing as an alternative to commercial housing, not aid.

The basic problem of today's housing policy boils down to the fact that in the last two 
decades the structure of housing construction has been gradually changing. In 2010, 
socialized entities gave away only 6.6% of all new apartments to use, while developers 
gave them over 40%. The decline in the importance of socialized housing is particularly 
evident in cities. It is in them that developers today put in use 60-65% of total 
dwellings (in 1995 - only 6.3%). At the same time, the privatization of municipal housing 
resources and a sharp drop in their number are taking place. The NIK report revealed that 
municipal authorities meet the demand for social housing at a level of 1-2% per year! The 
development of property development and the collapse of socialized housing, including 
communal housing, only favors large investors, construction companies and banks financing 
private construction. The lack of competition has led to the monopoly of several 
developers, which means over-inflating property prices for sale as well as rental prices. 
The aim of counteracting such a situation is therefore necessary to diversify the real 
estate market and develop urban housing resources. Only an active self-government policy, 
based on the implementation of social and communal housing programs, is able to provide 
decent housing, prevent depopulation of cities and increase in social inequalities. The 
aim of counteracting such a situation is therefore necessary to diversify the real estate 
market and develop urban housing resources. Only an active self-government policy, based 
on the implementation of social and communal housing programs, is able to provide decent 
housing, prevent depopulation of cities and increase in social inequalities. The aim of 
counteracting such a situation is therefore necessary to diversify the real estate market 
and develop urban housing resources. Only an active self-government policy, based on the 
implementation of social and communal housing programs, is able to provide decent housing, 
prevent depopulation of cities and increase in social inequalities.

11. Stop the reprivatization of real estate and repair of social harm caused by it.

Reprivatization involves taking pre-war assets into private hands, including the municipal 
housing stock. In many cities, these properties were created for public loans. In Warsaw, 
after the war, they were rebuilt thanks to free and semi-free work, deductions from 
employee salaries across the country and materials from the demolition of other cities. 
Like once, "the whole nation was rebuilding the capital", now we are all shifting to a 
fortune for several new owners of reprivatized properties. In addition to the 
reprivatization of thousands of tenement houses, the authorities devote tens of billions 
of zlotys to financial compensation to pre-war owners. Putting such large funds out of the 
capital's budget was possible thanks to the introduction of a series of antisocial 
reforms: the town hall privatized school canteens and the thermal energy system (SPEC), 
increased rents in municipal apartments and prices of public transport tickets. For this 
reason, reprivatization appears to be the largest plunder in the history of post-war 
Warsaw. The authorities, however, avoid responsibility for social harms resulting from 
this process. Repair of wrongs should consist in: verification of all property 
acquisitions, restoration of their city, possibility of returning to the municipal 
premises for all tenants from the privatized apartments, withdrawal of privatization and 
increases in public services, as well as reconstruction and extension of the municipal 
housing stock.

12. Debt relief for tenants waiting for the allocation to social premises and forced to 
pay so-called penal rent (compensation for non-contractual use of the premises).

Because the housing stock of communes is too small, the residents, after obtaining the 
right to social housing, are not able to use it. Then, the existing (mostly private) 
premises still live, and the commune pays monthly compensation to private owners. 
Subsequently, the municipalities demand compensation from these residents. No solution to 
the so-called matter Regress (recourse compensation) means that the shortage of social 
housing is paid by tenants. In fact, the right to housing does not apply to them and they 
are burdened with thousands of debt that can not be repaid. The mere expectation of a 
social housing court adjudicated by the court often lasts over ten years. Consequences of 
such a state of affairs can not be borne by a tenant, especially that their right to 
social housing is due to low income and poor financial situation.

13. Introduction of a total prohibition of eviction to the so-called temporary premises, 
which are only a camouflaged form of eviction on the pavement. The introduction of a total 
ban on the treatment of homeless centers run by NGOs and municipalities as substitute 
accommodation.

The so-called. Temporary premises for evictions are usually rooms in employee hotels paid 
for by the city authorities for no longer than a month. Therefore, most often after one 
month, persons evicted are sent to homeless centers anyway. Sometimes the legal guardian 
of partially incapacitated persons, instead of defending their charges, makes it easier 
for the owner to make an eviction. Homeless centers are, as a rule, a shelter in crisis 
situations and so should be treated. Under no circumstances may they perform the function 
of substitute or social housing.

14. Adjustment of the income criterion when granting municipal and social housing, 
abolition of the yardage criterion and introduction of rules for granting social housing 
that meets the real needs of residents and residents of municipalities.

If the commune authorities do not want to fulfill the obligation to provide an appropriate 
number of municipal and social premises, then they define criteria for allocating 
apartments in such a way as to limit the taking into account of the applications of a 
large part of the needy. The income criterion eliminates people who earn too much income 
in order to apply for the allocation of a communal flat. On the other hand, these people 
earn too little to rent a flat on the market. Another problem is the threshold, which hits 
people with low incomes "trapped" in relatively large rental apartments. Ultimately, for 
example, in Poznan, changing the criteria for considering applications resulted in an 
increase in their number and revealed a large group of those in need.

15. Protection of "francomatists". Protection of persons who, due to indebtedness and 
inability to repay mortgage loans, have lost their right to their only apartment occupied 
on the basis of property rights; as a result of transfer of ownership, they become 
homeless and they are not covered by the provisions of the Act on the protection of 
tenants' rights (casus, the so-called frankowiczes).

According to some data, a group of indebted so-called frankkowiczów has about 560 
thousand. people. The problem of debt associated with the purchase of an apartment applies 
to entire families, meaning a much larger number of people. In 2000, the amount of 
mortgage loans taken by Poles and Poles in total amounted to approx. PLN 9.5 billion, 
currently it is approx. PLN 378 billion. Within a dozen or so years, the indebtedness of 
this title increased by nearly 3900%. Often, indebted families due to the cessation of 
loan repayment lose the right to the occupied premises, which is the only place where they 
can meet their housing needs. Loss of financial liquidity of households is mainly caused 
by high mortgage installments (often previously denominated in francs). The reasons for 
this are different, e.g. loss of work due to illness or other circumstances independent of 
debtors. In the case of a lack of liquidity of repayments, there is a bidding and loss of 
the right to the occupied premises. The new owner, on the basis of the act of acquisition 
and misappropriation of the apartment, may, without having to bring the case to court, 
immediately start the proceedings with the participation of the bailiff, who automatically 
evicts his order.

16. Connecting all municipal dwellings to every, extending tenants forced to heat up by 
electricity and introducing real energy price regulation.

Despite the fact that electric heating is the most expensive form of heating, in Warsaw 
alone, almost 70 percent. buildings managed by the commune are not connected to the 
heating network. The condition for obtaining a communal apartment assignment is low 
earnings, but the costs of electric heating are many times higher than the wage thresholds 
determined by the town hall. This situation is particularly difficult for working mothers 
who are unable to save on heating, because they have to ensure the right conditions for 
children. For the negligence of city authorities in terms of providing access to cheap 
energy, they pay tenants, while officials hide their heads in the sand. Until the 
apartments are connected to what should be eased to tenants condemned to drastic heating 
costs, abolishing rental fees. Because the disproportionate heating costs cause the 
tenants' debt and evictions, in their case it is also necessary to annul rent debts and 
stop the eviction. Currently existing energy additives reach 2 percent. real costs of 
electric heating, and therefore electricity surcharges should be started. The 
privatization of the energy sector is the reason for the continuous increase in 
electricity prices, which should be subject to much greater regulation.

17. Introduction of housing support programs for foreigners in economic austerity, 
refugees and asylum seekers.

The Wielkopolska Association of Tenants from 2013 is fighting for the right to housing for 
Roma migrants who, due to poor financial situation, live, for example, abandoned garden 
arbors. The Roma do not have the possibility to register their stay in Poland. 
Consequently, municipal institutions and private entities more often apply illegal 
displacements to them and break the Act on the Protection of Tenants' Rights. Some 
municipalities in Poland are responsible for the displacement of Roma in the European 
Court of Human Rights. Resettlement and illegal demolition are associated with expenditure 
from urban budgets that could be spent on housing development. People who are waiting for 
a decision on obtaining asylum or other form of protection, can not take up legal 
employment in Poland. In addition, they do not have the possibility of obtaining basic 
protection in the form of a flat.

18. Introduction of regulations regarding domestic violence, consisting in the fact that 
the perpetrator of violence is obliged to leave the apartment.

The existing forms of protection of victims of violence are not sufficient in terms of 
protection of tenants' rights. Often victims of violence are forced to leave the apartment 
and many months or many years of waiting for court judgments and the possibility of 
applying for housing assistance.

19. Introduction of a total ban on the construction of housing substandards in the form of 
social containers and barracks, and their use as social flats or temporary premises for 
the poorest.

In Poland, approximately 5.5 million people live in substandard conditions. In 2012, the 
Central Statistical Office, in turn, stated that the average wage of Poland allows the 
acquisition of approx. Half a square meter of housing. It's almost two times less than ten 
years ago. Thousands of people are waiting in the queue for the allocation of social and 
communal premises, while municipalities are increasingly implementing sub-standard 
apartments in the form of barracks, containers or in plywood houses. These activities 
often break the provisions of the construction law. What's more, locating substandard 
housing estates on isolated city outskirts increases social segregation. "Social ghettos 
of poverty" are also a scare used against the so-called "Difficult tenants."

20.Crating the guilty of murder of Jolanta Brzeska and guilty of blurring the traces of 
this crime (policemen and prosecutors).

  http://www.rozbrat.org/publicystyka/walka-klas/4609-socjalny-kongres-kobiet-postulaty-

------------------------------

Message: 6





Now that we have a definitive date of May 25th 2018, the date on which we will get to vote 
to repeal the 8th Amendment it is timely for us to remember how this opportunity to change 
Irish society into a fairer one came about. ---- History is written by those in power, 
therefore this referendum has comes with a heavily constructed backstory that goes like 
this. Leo Varadkar, our funky sock wearing leader, with all his social media savvy got 
together with his wing of the Fine Gael party to progress social change in Ireland. Repeal 
was the next obvious step. The line continues that having witnessed the historic popular 
vote on the marriage equality referendum, the government decided to tackle the thorny 
issue of the 8th amendment. They had not the courage to devise a plan themselves so they 
gave it to the Citizens assembly, hoping that if they came back with something grossly 
unpopular then it was the assembly that could be blamed. I diverge from the script here, 
but it is important to recognise that there is a distinct lack of courage with the elected 
ones. Now, they are now fully enacting the recommendations, because the Citizens assembly 
came back with the obvious solution to deal with the issue. That was to repeal the 8th 
amendment and legislate for safe abortion in Ireland.

That's the Star Wars version of how we got to a referendum, and it is complete and utter 
balderdash. This unappetising swill and spin is hard to swallow for anyone who has been 
working on the issue since the 8th Amendment was brought into existence in 1983. The truth 
is not be to found in the plot lines of this action adventure. Reality is to be found in 
people taking to the streets in protest. Generation of activists have made this an issue 
because they have been aware of the pain, misery, and damage that is caused by having this 
law on the books in Ireland.

When Savita Halappanavar died in a Galway Hospital thanks to doctors delaying an abortion 
because they heard the heartbeat of a foetus, it remobilised campaigners and brought a new 
generation out onto the streets. A crowd or thousands gathered outside the Dáil, on that 
cold autumn night in 2012. Outrage and anger was in the air as this young woman had died 
due to the 8th amendment. What followed was a considered plan, and a massive amount or 
organising, mobilising and energy and determination around the Abortion Rights Campaign. 
This saw ever growing numbers take to the streets for the annual March for Choice. When 
the politicians dithered and set up new committees to examine the issue more pressure was 
applied, like the Strike for Repeal last year which effectively shut down Dublin city. 
Repeal the 8th has been set as a priority by people who have had enough of forcing women 
to travel to the UK and elsewhere to have abortions.

The citizens assembly, when it was presented with the facts, have correctly come up with 
the only way to deal with this issue. Even though it was created as a scapegoat for the 
established political classes, the assembly worked just like a functioning democracy 
should work. Citizens looked at all the facts, listened to all the views and set out a 
clear path for resolving this issue. Repeal the 8th amendment and legislate for abortion 
in Ireland.

The reason why you cannot just repeal the 8th amendment is because the anti-choice side 
have for years contested various cases in the courts to maintain the equivalency position 
of the foetus - as per the 8th. If the 8th amendment was just repealed and was not 
followed up with a law allowing for abortion, they would continue to undemocratically have 
this matter contested in the courts for years. Also since 1983 - the anti-choice side have 
fought for a long time to ensure that there was not another referendum on this.

That is why we are canvassing for a Yes to repeal the 8th and then to replace it with laws 
that allow for abortion. The politicians, they will legislate because they know that more 
people will take to the streets and make it happen.

The 25th May is an opportunity for Ireland end the hypocrisy. The time is long overdue for 
safe medical abortions in Ireland. It came about thanks to tens of thousands of activists, 
over 4 different generations who have been in the streets on this issue. In particular, 
the pressure has increased over the last six years, since the needless death of Savita, 
marking Repeal as a priority change that we wished to see enacted in this country. This is 
societal change and it will come thanks to people on the streets, people canvassing 
support and people voting Yes. It does not get handed down by the leaders because they 
have looked into their hearts and decided it was the right thing to do. That's just a star 
wars script that some spin doctor fits up after the fact.

So get out there and vote, and get out there and convince others to vote Yes. Remember 
that Politicians don't change society, We DO!

---
For more on the long history of struggle on the streets that led to the referendum see 
https://www.wsm.ie/pro-choice

Author: Dermot Freeman

https://wsm.ie/c/how-government-forced-referendum-repeal8th

------------------------------

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten