Today's Topics:
1. US, black rose fed: ON MAGICAL THINKING VS SOBER ANALYSIS OF
THE OCASIO-CORTEZ VICTORY IN NY (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
2. France, Alternative Libertaire AL #284 - Interview, Yannis
Youlountas (libertarian filmmaker): "A symbolic removal of power,
before its political destitution" (fr, it, pt)[machine
translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
3. [alter-ee] Armed political police attack an informal
anarchist get-together in Belarus (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
4. US, black rose fed: SURE, WE CAN ELECT THE OCCASIONAL
DEMOCRAT PROGRESSIVE. THEN WHAT? (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
5. levante cnt-ait: CNT-AIT INFORMA + press release DEMAND for
IMPOSTORES (ca, it) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
6. Britain, brighton solfed: Brighton Solidarity Federation
wins a campaign against Brighton Hotel! (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
We reprint this post as part of our ongoing efforts to critically look at left
electoralism and to pose an alternative vision of movement building and popular power from
below. In this piece Black Agenda Report editor Bruce Dixon gives a critical assessment of
the primary victory of New York congressional candidate Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez which
stands in contrast to pieces such as "Why Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Won" by Jacobin
magazine. This a more detailed follow up from "Sure We Can Elect The Occasional Democrat
Progressive. Then What?" ---- By Bruce Dixon, Black Agenda Report ---- Being the only
sober guy at a victory party isn't fun. After writing earlier this week that we can
sometimes elect progressives but we can't hold them accountable, friends and comrades are
all over Facebook accusing me of negativity, saying I got no analysis and I'm a magical
thinker. I dunno, let's see.
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez won the NY 14th district Democratic primary earlier this week with
only 16 or 17 thousand votes, a strikingly low number that wouldn't carry most such
primaries. According to Democrat chairman Tom Perez, she has no Republican opponent in
November, so she's in. That's a victory for sure. At least for a while, she'll be able to
put out her message which includes abolishing ICE, free tuition and Medicare For All in
places that till now have rarely given a professed socialist the mic. That's a good thing.
But there are four points to look at here, which I touched on in my previous piece and
posts on Facebook. I'll dive into them just a little deeper here.
1. THE OCASIO-CORTEZ NUMBERS AND WHAT THEY MEAN
Historically NY authorities have rigged primary elections for low turnout. You can only
vote in a NY primary if you're pre-registered a party member months in advance, so only
271,000 voters were eligible in the first place. The low 13% turnout in that contest was
actually higher than in some neighboring NYC districts. The engineering of low turnout
primary elections allows Machine politicians to monopolize their party's nominations by
getting out their relatively small and dependable vote and not getting the masses too
excited over much of anything till the November general election when their numbers are
needed to defeat suburban and upstate Republicans. Except for New York's partisan
registration it's the same system used by the Daley Machine in Chicago until 1980, when we
broke it open to elect Harold Washington in 1983.
Still, 16 or 17 thousand votes in a congressional district of 750,000 is far from a
socialist landslide. Winning a congressional seat with that small a vote is a rare feat
made possible by some local features that seldom occur outside New York City. While the
Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez crew no doubt worked their asses off to get what they got, the
same money and effort in most other places would not have done the trick in a
congressional race. The 14th NY CD was a target well chosen by the folks at Brand New
Congress , whom Ocasio-Cortez says asked her to run.
That's running and interpreting the numbers through the lens of history, and applicability
to other contests, not negativity or magical thinking.
2. JOE CROWLEY PRETTY MUCH GAVE UP THE SEAT
After 10 terms in Congress and with lots of corporate friends, Joe Crowley knows he can
start at seven figures, at least six to twelve times his congressional salary plus bonuses
as a lobbyist. That had to be a powerful motivation not to campaign too damn hard, and
another circumstance unique to this particular contest.
The career path from legislator to well paid lobbyist is also not magical thinking, it's
an American tradition. Ignoring this tradition and its likely effect on Crowley's campaign
might be magical thinking though.
3. DEMOGRAPHICS MATTER, MESSAGING MATTERS
Ocasio-Cortez correctly portrayed Crowley as an arrogant lazy white boy deep in the
pockets of corporate contributors allegedly representing a majority Latino district. That
was a necessary and highly potent message needed to raise turnout enough to make the
difference in a contest with historically low voter participation. A former Bernie
campaign staffer, she also ran to the left of most Democrats, campaigning on free college
tuition, Medicare For All, unambiguously denouncing the Gaza massacres and jumping with
both feet on the massively unpopular Trump policies of tearing families apart at the
border. This too is classic US left electoral strategy aimed at raising turnout among the
folks who ordinarily pay little attention to elections, a tactic the electoral left has to
repeat everywhere.
The phenomenon of white politicians representing minority districts is not as common as it
was a generation or two ago. Neoliberal black and Latino politicians have moved into most
of those spaces, and are far less vulnerable to attack purely on representational grounds.
So that part of the Ocasio-Cortez playbook is not something that leftists will often be
able to duplicate.
Assessing the relative importance of demographic factors and the messaging they enable is
not magical thinking. Gauging the applicability of the strategy that achieved victory in
the NY 14th CD to other contests across the country isn't legerdemain or sophistry either,
it's the kind of common sense we must employ if we intend to achieve leftist victories
elsewhere.
4. US LAW AND CUSTOM MAKE CANDIDATES ENTREPRENUERS, NOT RESPONSIBE TO ANY LEFT
CONSTITUENCIES OR INSTITUTIONS
I caught flack too for pointing out that under US law and custom candidates and office
holders are free to do pretty much do what they like. This is true even in the Green
Party, let alone the Democrats. Political campaigns are top-down affairs in which the
candidate gets the final word on everything. Anybody who's actually worked a campaign
knows this.
While there are no institutions under US law and custom that can hold leftist candidates
and officeholders accountable to left constituencies or organizations, it's a fact that
there are a galaxy of institutional levers and pressures operating inside the Democratic
party aimed at flipping progressive elected officials rightward.
In my previous piece and Facebook posts I never touched on how socialist Ocasio-Cortez is
or is or is not, nor on her foreign policy stands if she has any, which Berniecrats
frequently don't, something that ought to make us a little uneasy. Bernie Sanders calls
himself a socialist too, just with an imperialist foreign policy. I did say that
progressive candidates and officeholders do sometimes flip, a little at a time or all at
once, and when they do we have no institutions with which to punish them. "Feet to the
fire" and "holding them accountable" are actually the phrases of magical thinkers because
no means have yet been devised which enable the left to do those things.
I got in trouble for observing that while we can elect progressives from time to time we
cannot compel them to remain that way. Until we figure out how to build institutions that
can, we are at the mercy of their individual moral and political compasses. The need to
develop left institutions to which progressive candidates can be held responsible is an
acute one, which the Nation in its slavish devotion to the Democratic party predictably
ignores. Noting this truth got me accused of being a petty, lazy purist and ultraleftist.
Oh well. Sober analysis may not be what some people wanna hear at a victory party where
everybody's popping champagne corks, dancing the electric slide and toasting the universal
lessons of the Ocasio-Cortez victory without the bother of real analysis.
Being the sober guy at a victory party kinda sucks that way. But real talk, we're all
gonna have to sober up eventually and figure out which parts of the Ocasio-Cortez playbook
are peculiar to and which ones are applicable outside a majority Latino New York City
district, and we have yet to devise any means of holding progressive politicians truly
accountable. Those who think we don't need critical analysis or institutions to enforce
accountability are the magical thinkers.
Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report where this article originally
appeared.
If you enjoyed this piece we recommend the similarly themed pieces: "The Lure of
Electoralism: From Political Power to Popular Power." Additional articles can be found in
our "Electoralism" and "Strategy" tags.
http://blackrosefed.org/dixon-sober-analysis-ocasio-cortez/
------------------------------
Message: 2
On the occasion of a projection on April 22 in Chalon-sur-Saône, AL Dijon went to meet
Yannis Youlountas who was roadshow of its 3 e film, Love and Revolution. He gave us a
video interview. Here are some excerpts: ---- Libertarian alternative: Is there a
continuity between this film and the precedents you have made[1] ---- Yannis Youlountas:
Yes, it is obvious filiation especially in terms of characters, the field, in this case
the social movement in Greece in its diversity, with of course a little more anarchists
than others, but it must be said that they are fairly well represented in Greece. ---- No
longer live as slaves was a rather spontaneous film, for which " we turned the wheel of
the camera in video mode ", to switch in the cinema because the photo and the articles
were not enough any more to account for this that was happening.
For I fight so I am, we proposed a parallel with Spain, Catalonia and Andalusia in
particular, but we made some progress at the technical level I think.
We wanted to get back to basics with this third film because, often, people have a deadly
and violent vision of the revolution, while it is power, society and especially capitalism
that are violent and deadly. . So, we wanted to show the opposite situation in reality:
there are people who fight for life, the human, the earth ; and this society, on the other
hand, is deadlocked. That's why love and revolution is so important to us.
In the face of Syriza's betrayal, what is the reaction of social movements in Greece ?
They are more radical than before that's for sure. This experience was obviously useful
because it made it possible to unmask a political strategy that was once again in an
impasse and wasted time on the social movement in Greece, which chloroformed the
struggles. After that, it does not mean that the places were no longer working:
occupations, initiatives of all kinds, including solidarity (self-managed medical
dispensaries, free social kitchens) worked of course. In particular, we welcomed migrant
women and migrants who came in large numbers from the summer of 2015, precisely after the
capitulation. But it was only in the autumn of 2016 that the social movement was really
much more powerful, active on many issues, for example against seizures of housing.
The social movement has therefore taken its autonomy ?
That's it. In fact, autonomy is to no longer believe in ourselves, that is to say in our
capacity to take control of our own lives, to organize, to struggle, to resist and to to
be in solidarity because solidarity is part of the struggle. " The only way to save
yourself is to fight to save all others " said Kazantzákis [2]and it is valid on the
ground in Greece with the migrants who allow us to build a new International, between
Greeks and with solidarity people who come from the rest of Europe to help on the spot.
All of this is coming together on a front line against the hardening of capitalism and the
hardening of authoritarian society.
And against the hardening of the social movement, what is repression ?
In Greece as in France, there is more and more violence of power and of course also
violence from its police auxiliaries, the Fascists. They are everywhere in the service of
power while claiming to be an opposition to it, they are the spare wheel of capitalism and
also the means of diverting anger towards scapegoats.
Here are some concrete examples of the links between police and fascists: during the first
film, we showed a self-managed place (Synergie), which was destroyed by the fascists
shortly after the shooting. At the time of this violent action, the fascists were preceded
by four police motorcycles who left after the destruction and the beating of our companions.
Second example: Pávlos Fýssas " Killah P ", an anti-fascist singer, was murdered by
neo-Nazis on 18 September 2013, and witnesses confirm that the police were present even
before the murder at the scene of the crime and that they discussed with the murderer.
That's why it's really important to fight capitalism and fascism at the same time. These
are two struggles that are complementary and inseparable [3].
And actions on the side of the revolutionaries ?
In the red neighborhood of Exarcheia, squats have been multiplied since September 2015
because of the arrival of migrant women and migrants, with the aim of offering them
something other than the atrocious camps that were built, especially under French
influence. following the visit of Bernard Cazeneuve to Greece, who, after the EU - Turkey
agreement, launched the transformation of hotspots into detention camps and even detention
camps.
There is of course the anti-fascist struggle which is very important, there is a[...]group
that participated, with the self-managed medical dispensary, in the reconquest of the main
Fascist district in Athens[...]. And even if recently there have been incendiary attacks
against this local [4], the neighborhood is at least well maintained.
There is also the group Rouvikonas (Rubicon in French), named after a river that should
not be crossed in ancient Rome otherwise it was the beginning of the end. This is a little
bit what is said by this group: the power has gone too far, the offensive will be total
even if for the moment it is not the direct action of the 1970s or the end of the 19th
centurycentury, so no physical attacks on power. But on the other hand, there is an attack
at the same time material and symbolic against the power. Material with the destruction
for example of the files of the over-indebtednesses[...], then at the same time a symbolic
attack which is very important too, because the power, it is above all a symbolic
representation which leads us to the servitude voluntary, with people who are placed on a
pedestal, who are sacralized under the pretext of a decorum, a set of regal traditions
that make one submit to them.
So, to remove power politically, it starts with the destitute symbolically, to desecrate
it. There are not only situations of very hard crises that lead the oppressed to question
themselves, it is not only the critical time that leads to the time of criticism, it is
also the social imaginary which is working, especially in our relationship to power and
those who decide in our place of our lives.
This relationship to power is also played with the mainstream media ?
Yes. In Greece, the report to the media of power is even more firm and radical than in
France. I think there is a big difference, although of course many people are boycotting
the power media, and that's good. In Greece, most groups do so. Rouvikonas, in particular,
instrumentalises the media of power in the following way: he does not frequent them but
puts on line regularly his own videos in relation to the actions he leads, also attacking
very important places of power (which can not not hidden beings of the public), putting
online also releases on Indymedia. Therefore, the power media in particular can not hide
these events and in addition, as Rouvikonas has always delivered the images to illustrate
his words and well, they use the only images that exist,
A parallel to be made between Greece and France ?
In Greece, I think that the two most powerful phenomena that we see today, it is
especially this radicality in the direct action and this new internationalism with the
migrants and the migrants and the people in solidarity. It's a little bit that maybe
missing today in France, it's this meeting of people from all over, even if, on the Zad
for example, we can find that. In France you have a very interesting opportunity because
you have a character at the head of the state that is really the caricature of what is
actually power. That's good, you do not need to unmask the power since he himself is
unmasked, he is identified as such. Macron is the very archetype of today's leaders in
finance, economics and politics. And he's pedantic, he's arrogant, finally he has exactly
the character trait that allows him to criticize and make fun of him. And finally he chose
to attack everyone at the same time and that is very good because usually, the power
divides to better rule. There, at the same time, he attacks self-managed houses for
migrant and minor migrants, especially in Brest. [5], he hit the zadists, he hit the
students, the pensioners.are struck in the wallet too, the railwaymen, the postmen and
many others, the social security that affects still everyone, it's really an interesting
opportunity to create a convergence of struggles against power in general.
Interviewed by Thomas and Gabriel (AL Dijon)
[1] Do not live as slaves anymore in 2013 and I fight so I'm in 2015, also available for
free on the Internet ?
[2] Greek writer known for his novel Alexis Zorba
[3] " Greece, plays reveal the close links between Golden Dawn and the police ",
Liberation.fr.
[4] Since this interview, the Greek fascists have again attacked, to follow on the blog of
Yannis: blogyy.net
[5] Brest.mediaslibres.org
http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Yannis-Youlountas-cineaste-libertaire-Une-destitution-symbolique-du-pouvoir
------------------------------
Message: 3
Several people were charged with illegal usage of forest resources and distribution of
extremist materials after political police with support of task forces attacked an
informal anarchist encounter. Around 20 participants were at the camping site at that
point. ---- On Saturday 30 June special task force of police attacked the camp shooting
into the air. After a few minutes all the activists were forced on the ground by a crowd
of people armed with machine guns and shotguns. ---- They were accompanied by chiefs in
plain clothes but wearing masks. When anarchists started asking about the reasons for this
circus one of the cops said that they had a report that somebody was illegally cutting
trees in the area and shooting in the forest. Other cops were answering, "you are not
stupid, you understand yourself why you are here".
Tents were searched for illegal materials. Merchandise from several
groups was confiscated under the pretext of distribution of extremist
materials. All activists were put on their knees and filmed by the cops.
Some of the anarchists were beaten up several times for asking questions
or refusing to do what cops wanted. The cops were trying to push at
least one person to give false testimonies and when the person didn't
agree, he was also beaten up. During 7 hours people couldn't eat or
drink, going to the toilet was the whole endeavor. During the whole
period of raid it was raining and people had to stay on wet ground, the
most impudent were put under the rain as a punishment.
In the end the police left the forest without any detentions giving
everyone a subpoena to an interrogation about extremist materials that
were seized. It is expected that repressions will continue and those
repressed will need money for the lawyers. A lot of "extremist"
materials were confiscated and will never be returned which is a huge
financial damage to those organizing local distros.
Those willing to support the Belarusian anarchists can donate to
Anarchist Black Cross Belarus - donation options
https://abc-belarus.org/?page_id=8661&lang=en
It is not the first time Belarusian political police with support of the
special task forces go to the forest to take care of illegal gatherings.
In 2016 cops raided a punk concert in the woods, confiscated all the
equipment and detained dozens of people.
https://abc-belarus.org/?p=11689&lang=en
----------------------------------------------
belarus, pramen.io: Anarchist informal encounter attacked by political police
Several people were charged with illegal usage of forest resources and distribution of
extremist materials after GUBOPiK (Main Directorate for Combating Organized Crime and
Corruption, - a branch of Ministry of Internal Affairs, which executes the functions of
political police in Belarus) supported by special task forces attacked an informal
anarchist meeting. According to the ABC-Belarus reports, there were around 20 participants
at the camping site. Below you can read the first-person evidence of one of the
participants of the camp.
"JUST ANOTHER THREAT SHOW
The journalists must be tired of writing about the anarchists being arrested, beaten up,
etc. So I'm really sorry, dear colleagues, for this having happened again, yesterday, 30
June, when 17 young men and women of anarchist views met for an informal meeting on the
outskirts of Krupki (Minsk district, Belarus), looking forward for interesting discussion
and camping in a nice company of comrades.
Having found a beautiful glade in the forest, we pitched our tents, organized an
improvised kitchen, put up the canopy, and began our activities.
About 3 p.m., when we were preparing to the next discussion, we suddenly heard the
sub-machine gun burst, and people in masks in body armor and with a variety of weapons
arrived, shouting "Everybody down!!!", - they made everyone lie on the ground. - The
police operatives - also masked - came after them.. They started filming us, asking for
our names and reasons why we were here, in which quantity, whom had we come with.
The most ridiculous were the policeman's attempts to prove that they had come... because
of the illegal felling of trees!
‘Who was engaged in logging? Whose saws and axes are these? Do you know how old are these
trees?!' - That was said about two dry pine trees that we used as banks.
Time to time they were beating those who disobeyed the orders or just was looking to the
sides whilst lying down. Not everyone of them showed their documents. One man from the
environmental inspection, and another one who was wearing the mask, showed their identity
cards of the members of SOBR (Rapid Deployment Special Force - the special unit of Ministy
of Internal Affairs). The policemen in masks refused to show any documents, but I'm sure
it were the operatives of GUBOPiK (Main Directorate for Combating Organized Crime and
Corruption, - a branch of Ministry of Internal Affairs, which executes the functions of
political police in Belarus).
If talking about me personally, I was beaten two times: when I tried to run away from the
SOBR guys, and when the guys from GUBOPiK took me aside "to talk a bit". Nevertheless,
they hit me not very painfully, probably having had received the order not to be too
cruel. That "special operation" lasted seven hours, six of which I spent in handcuffs,
mostly lying on the ground face down, under the rain. I was taken aside for two
"conversations", the main sense of which was: ‘For what a f**k have you returned, get out
to you Europe or we'll find a way to deal with you'. Surprisingly, they mentioned my
articles, swearing. One of the GUBOPiK operatives also said, anyway: ‘We can find you
abroad too', and added that I was ‘slander my motherland for money'.
For a most of time we were lying face down on the ground, waiting for arrival of various
services and officials or for being called for inspection of our tents. The rain and the
cold were the main problems. Some of us were made to knees, somebody was made lay down on
the wet grass. Not mentioning such "small points" as constant insults, threats, kicks and
stepping on lying people. One of our comrades was discovered to be having the stickers of
the anarchist group ‘Pramen' (‘The Ray') - they took him aside and tried to make a video
with him telling about that stickers. He refused, and they began to beat him. As soon as
we noticed it and raised a cry, they stopped.
Then our things were inspected. The inspectors arrived with witnesses who were the guys
from local Open-type penal colony (i.e. people totally dependent from the cops). At the
end we counted and came to a conclusion that during the day our camp in the forest was
visited by at least 40 cops.
Finally they drafted protocols onto 2 people from our group (about "The distribution of
the extremist materials" and "Illegal vegetation removal"), and confiscated the anarchist
brochures and stickers.
From the very beginning we were sure that we were facing minor detention, as it usually
happens after the riot police assaults anarchist events, being morally prepared to that.
But, to our surprised, the SOBR and GUBOPiK left around 21.00. Then the inspectors left us
too, having handed us documents ordering us to appear in the court the 6th July. Finally,
at about 10 p.m., we were left alone in our destroyed camp in the forest.
Here are the top cops quotes:
"Fucking burnouts and drug addicts!"
"Is this your tent? And what if we find the woman stuff there, ha-ha?"
‘Dziadok will f**k away to his Europe, and you all will puff for him!'
(To the young comrade): ‘It is Dziadok who invited you here? What did he promise to you?'
"Just tell us who were cutting the trees, and we'll free you!"
(The investigator, on the phone): "How can I ask for their documents, they are all masked
and with machine-guns!"
There were positive sides of the situation also. Noone of us gave a written explanation to
the police, despite they demanded it. Neither anyone has told them anything beside their
identity information. ‘What were you doing here?' - ‘Relaxing'. - ‘Whom do you know here?'
- ‘Nobody'. In spite of the threats and beatings, everyone's behavior was decent.
Now my condition is not good enough to draw large-scale conclusions. I'll just tell one
thing: Ok, we were left beaten and humiliated; well, the police managed to have got
informed about our closed meeting and to disrupt it. But they couldn't do anything with
our solidarity, with our belief in our ideas. We have already survived a lot of things,
we'll survive it too. Without any pathos: that hounds haven't achieved anything.
After a bit of sleep and treatment, I'll continue sharing my thoughts."
Source: http://fb.com/happymikola (with few explanatory notes and additions).
Allegedly, the one who have leaded the SOBR and orchestrated the beating, interrogations
and humiliations of the activists was Michail Bedunkevich - the chief of the 3-rd bureau
of the GUBOPiK ("An anti-extremist bureau"). Previously he was involved in threatening
anarchists and antifa, and falsificating criminal cases against them.
During the crackdown, a lot of "extremist" materials were confiscated and will never be
returned which is a huge financial damage to those organizing local distros. Those willing
to support the Belarusian anarchists can donate to Anarchist Black Cross Belarus.
It is not the first time Belarusian political police with support of the special task
forces attack anarchist events in Belarus.
- June, 2017. Riot police attacks the visitors the punk-concert in Baranovichi. 3 ppl got
5 days in prison.
- August, 2017. Riot police attacks the lecture of Russian antifascist Alexey Sutuga in
Baranovichi. 15 ppl arrested.
- October, 2017. Riot police attacks the lecture of Russian anarchist Pyotr Ryabov. 20 ppl
arrested.
- October, 2017. Riot police attacks the antifascist concert in Minsk. Around 50 ppl arrested.
https://pramen.io/en/2018/07/anarchist-informal-encounter-attacked-by-political-police/
------------------------------
Message: 4
We reprint this post as part of our ongoing efforts to critically look at left
electoralism and to pose an alternative vision of movement building and popular power from
below. Here Black Agenda Report editor Bruce Dixon bravely pushes the logic of elections
when he states: "What we rarely bother to think through is what we actually GET when we
win." We also recommend a more detailed follow up on Ocasio-Cortez's victory by this same
author, "On Magical Thinking VS Sober Analysis of the Ocasio-Cortez Victory in NY." ----
By Bruce A. Dixon, Black Agenda Report ---- Yesterday Alexandra won a NYC Democratic
congressional primary in a majority Latino district against the arrogant right wing,out of
touch white head of the Queens Democratic party, who hadn't even seen a primary challenger
since 2004. The white guy was so deep in the pocket of corporate contributors that he was
one of the few favored to succeed or oust Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi. That's how the
two parties choose their leaders in every state legislature and both houses of Congress -
they're the ones who bring in the most donations from wealthy corporations and individuals.
Ocasio-Cortez campaigned on single payer health care and free college tuition. She
denounced the latest massacre in Gaza. She says ICE ought to be abolished, and the day
before the election she was at a South Texas immigrant detention center. She's a young
working class Puerto Rican woman who reportedly refused corporate cash and was working a
real job, waiting tables at the beginning of her campaign. She's a DSA member and
professes to be a socialist. And now she's the Democratic nominee in a New York City
congressional district. What does it all mean?
What Does It All Mean?
For a lot of people on the left, it's an occasion for celebration. I can understand that,
I worked my behind off in campaigns against the Daley Machine in my native Chicago for a
quarter century. We elected progressives to the city council, county offices, the state
legislature, to Congress in 1983 and in 1987 the mayor's chair. I helped register hundreds
of thousands of people to vote. I and the folks I worked with imagined that we could build
a movement that might transform the Democratic party from below. It didn't work out so well.
It turns out that both elected officialdom and the Democratic party are institutions, and
institutions change individuals way more often than the other way around. Some of our
folks backed away from their commitments little by little, others frankly flipped, some
were isolated and outlasted till they could be outspent. Despite the phrase being on
everybody's lips, we never figured out exactly how to hold anybody's "feet to the fire,"
to enforce any sort of accountability.
We were and still are at the literal whim and mercy of our candidates and officeholders.
When Chuy Garcia ran for Mayor of Chicago he refused to stand up in front of the Homan
Square black site and denounce the thing. He even called for the hiring of a thousand more
Chicago cops, and his movement supporters were utterly unable to talk him into the first
position or out of the second. Even the Greens are not immune to this phenomenon. When
Jill Stein chose to back away from a 2016 ballot access drive in Georgia and North
Carolina there was nothing Greens in those states could do. Nothing. So exactly what does
holding a candidate or office holder accountable look like? Do any means currently exist
which enable us to do that? Maybe not. Maybe this is something we've yet to build.
When We Actually Win
Late last year, in a two day Movement School session in Jackson MS, Kali Akuno, the
co-founder of Cooperation Jackson observed that in Jackson the movement forces proved they
could elect a Chokwe Lumumba, the father and the son, mayor. But several years and
multiple elections into the project, they still didn't know what degree of support there
is in Jackson for their agenda of radical economic transformation.
We figured out years ago how to win elections under the right circumstances. Ocasio-Cortez
was a Puerto Rican woman running against a lazy white incumbent in a majority Latino NYC
district, and she built a competent organization. It should have been surprising if she'd
lost. Her expressed views on most issues are laudable. What we rarely bother to think
through is what we actually GET when we win.
When we're victorious in executive branch offices like mayoral elections, our candidates
actually become responsible for administering the austerity and cuts. That's what's
happening in Jackson MS and Newark NJ, to name just a couple places. We've been electing
progressives here and there for a long time now. It's time to ask whether our ability to
elect progressives has far outstripped our ability to exert real pressure upon them. Are
we transforming the Democratic party, or are we merely legitimizing it, and launching yet
another glittering career?
I don't pretend to have the answers. But these are questions which ought to be asked. And
we can't be too thirsty to ask them.
Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report where this article originally
appeared.
If you enjoyed this piece we recommend the similarly themed pieces: "The Lure of
Electoralism: From Political Power to Popular Power." Additional articles can be found in
our "Electoralism" and "Strategy" tags.
http://blackrosefed.org/dixon-electing-progressives/
------------------------------
Message: 5
For some time now, there have been two organizations in Spain that seem to share a name,
since one day they were one and the same, but whose trajectories have been distanced. This
is the CNT (formerly CNT-AIT) and the CNT-AIT that holds the right to carry the initials
of the Anarcho-Syndicalist International, the International Workers' Association. ---- The
time has come to make known to wider sectors of the population the circumstances that gave
rise to this difference and the premeditated distancing of the basic principles and
statutes from the executive committees of the CNT, generating the situation in which the
anarcho-syndicalism in our country, represented today in the CNT-AIT. ---- Broadly
speaking we could say that the organization that today calls itself CNT to dry began its
deriving centralist, hierarchical and pyramidal for more than ten years. The CNT's own
proportional voting system - whereby the unions with the most affiliations had more votes
when making decisions - greatly facilitated this state of affairs, since it began by
encouraging the unions to always be large cities those that will take forward their
proposals to the detriment of the proposals of the unions of minor localities. The system
was completed by increasing the minimum number of members needed to form a union, thus
converting many who had previously been into "confederal nuclei" incapacitated for voting
and making decisions within the organization.
This CNT began to organize itself in such a way that preponderance was given to the
committees, instead of the assemblies and the traditional statutory processes that
guarantee the horizontality in the taking of agreements. From our perspective, when the
agreements emanated from these committees or the agreements taken by the force of the vote
are mandatory for all unions in the organization, we are talking about authoritarianism
within an organization that is called anarcho-syndicalist, horizontal and egalitarian.
These committees expelled, disaffiliated and, in general, embittered the lives of many
unions, in an anti-statutory way and, unfortunately, never tried to raise them again in
the places they left devastated.
Anyone can see that, in practice, the CNT has increasingly become a service union that
seeks to continuously increase the number of members, an affiliation that is not a member
of the organization but that is limited to contributions and that, for Through a
contracted legal cabinet, their conflicts are resolved - thus opposing the
anarcho-syndicalist premise of direct action. To this we must add that the workers of this
technical cabinet are hired by the CNT in the form of self-employed workers but, by
working exclusively and having a monthly equal, automatically become false self-employed
workers, being actually salaried employees of the organization. Other functions within the
organization are also remunerated, for example, the work within the FAL (Anselmo Lorenzo
Foundation for Libertarian Studies) through the hiring of a cooperative that is no more
than a fiscal umbrella to hide direct contracting. We do not know exactly how many people
are living exclusively from working for the CNT or for the FAL and we do not understand
why CNT considers that they are not "liberated union members".
We know that the FAL, an organism belonging to the CNT, contravening another of the
anarcho-syndicalist principles, has received state aid in accordance with the provisions
of the regulatory bases for granting public subsidies from the Ministry of Culture. For
this reason we understand that CNT is not against subsidies as it perceives them (see for
example this BOE https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2007/07/05/pdfs/A29139-29141.pdf ) .
And, although it is an odious issue, we should talk about the economic embezzlement that
is occurring in the CNT by certain individuals for their personal interests: travel and
stays are paid in large hotels and there are even accusations that there have been
robberies direct to the accounts of the organization by secretaries. To this we must add
another form of embezzlement, through the hiring of their own companies that invoice their
work, whether it is in the realization of audiovisual material or in the reform of premises.
This way of working has meant that almost all the legal and pro-prisoners fund was wasted,
originally intended as a box of resistance and support for prisoners and that has now been
used to "liberate people". Another fund that has been squandered and has practically
disappeared is the equity fund, which should have been used to help the new unions to have
a place but was never used for this purpose.
To finish explaining this drift we need to talk about the AIT. In recent decades, the CNT,
or rather its committees, have been continuously boycotting this international, engaging
with other unions outside the AIT to form a parallel international, wanting to impose a
voting system to make agreements. that would make the IWA dependent on the decisions of
only three sections or blocking the money from the quotas that is contributed to the AIT
behind the backs of the CNT's own unions. Until these actions led to the exit agreement of
the CNT of the International Workers' Association, recognizing the facts for which the CNT
voluntarily and deliberately remained outside the AIT.
It seems extensive, but it is only a summary since, for these practices and for many
others, it is for what a considerable number of unions have been responsible for
maintaining the CNT-AIT and restructuring the damage done from the committees of that CNT
unrecognizable in its principles and traitorous to its own agreements and statutes.
Federated unions after a congressional process outside the CNT of the committees that we
do not recognize, breaking all relations with it and restructuring the CNT-AIT, an
anarcho-syndicalist organization attached to the AIT (International Association of
Workers) and that in its principles and practices is akin to and coherent with anarchist
ideals and principles. We continue to be, therefore, the CNT-AIT, a recognized historical
continuation of the National Confederation of Labor attached to the IWA since 1922.
All this situation could have continued to go unnoticed for the working class in general,
but for the last occurrence of the very executive committees of that self-styled CNT: sue
several unions of the CNT-AIT for the simple fact of existing and performing union and
social action, sheltering in the legal excuse of a "fraudulent use of acronyms and damage
its image and expansion". They have also sued the Libertarian Ateneo de Albacete, we
understand that having a close relationship with CNT-AIT Albacete since they share a local
space, and has demanded nominally several anarcho-syndicalist comrades from Cádiz. These
demands not only seek the disappearance of anarcho-syndicalist organizations, they also
ask for a compensation of € 50,000 to each defendant union and the compas of Cádiz,
From our perspective it is incredible that an organization continues calling itself
anarcho-syndicalist going to the courts to attack, through the state repressive apparatus,
anarcho-syndicalist unions for the simple fact of existing. And it definitely confirms to
us on which side this "split of the committees" is placed, self-styled CNT to dry in this
class struggle.
We believe that it is a matter of anarchist ethics to bring these facts to the attention
of the whole society.
You can find the CNT-AIT in the following places:
Granada - Torrelavega - Cádiz- Chiclana - Guadix - Madrid (Construction) - La Puebla del
Río - Lanzarote - Lugo - Motril - Tarragona - Reus - El Vendrell - Elda - Castellón -
Alcoy - Albacete - Marina Alta - Sagunto - Gandía
PRESS RELEASE
It is a little known fact that there are already two organizations in this country that
seem to share a name, since one day they were one and the same, but whose trajectories
have been distanced. This is the CNT (formerly CNT-AIT) and the CNT-AIT that holds the
right to carry the initials of the Anarcho-Syndicalist International, the International
Workers' Association. The time has come to make known to wider sectors of the population
the circumstances that gave rise to this difference and that have generated the situation
in which anarcho-syndicalism is found in our country, represented today in the CNT-AIT.
The dispute that gave birth to this division was born as a result of the internal drift of
the CNT, which was on its way to becoming a centralist organization in a gradual break
with federalism. An organization whose agreements, more and more frequently, were adopted
from top to bottom, decided by their different secretariats and not by the assemblies of
the unions, which breaks any principle of horizontality and transforms the CNT into a
hierarchical and pyramidal organization. While the accounts of the organization were being
emptied for the benefit of personal interests, we proceeded to the repeated expulsion of
anarchist colleagues and unions that opposed this drift, with the intention of carrying
out an ideological cleansing in the CNT.
To all this must be added the continued boycott of CNT against the AIT (International
Association of Workers) when it was adhered to it: stoppage of financial contributions,
repeated breach of agreements, concealment of information, conspiracy behind them with
other trade union organizations from other countries to take away their strength,
manipulation attempts to alter the voting system, etc. Finally, the IWA agreed to the
departure of the CNT from its ranks, recognizing the facts for which the CNT voluntarily
and deliberately remained outside the AIT. denying themselves the right to carry their
initials.
But many of the CNT unions have taken the responsibility to maintain the CNT-AIT and
restructure the damage done from the committees of that CNT unrecognizable in its
principles and traitorous to its own agreements and statutes. Federated unions after a
congressional process outside the CNT of the committees that we do not recognize. Since
the restructuring of the CNT-AIT, which brings together these unions, is consistent with
the principles of anarcho-syndicalism and respects and accepts the principles of the
Anarcho-Syndicalist International, the IWA formally welcomed them into its ranks and,
therefore, enjoys the right to show off in its acronyms those of the International. It
remains, therefore, the CNT-AIT, a recognized historical continuation of the National
Confederation of Labor attached to the IWA since 1922.
In recent times, CNT has sued several unions of CNT-AIT under the legal excuse of a
"fraudulent use of acronyms and damage their image and expansion." He has also sued the
Libertarian Ateneo de Albacete, we understand that having a close relationship with
CNT-AIT Albacete as they even share local, and has sued nominally several
anarcho-syndicalist comrades from Cádiz. These demands not only seek the disappearance of
anarcho-syndicalist organizations, they also ask for an indemnity of € 50,000 to each
defendant union and the comrades of Cádiz, which can represent serious difficulties for
the anarcho-syndicalist comrades who could not assume this amount.
These are the different locations where CNT-AIT unions can be found:
Granada - Torrelavega - Cádiz- Chiclana - Guadix - Madrid (Construction) - La Puebla del
Río - Lanzarote - Lugo - Motril - Tarragona - Reus - El Vendrell - Elda - Castellón -
Alcoy - Albacete - Marina Alta - Sagunto - Gandía
https://levantecntait.wordpress.com/2018/07/02/cnt-ait-informa-nota-de-prensa-demanda-de-los-impostores/#more-609
------------------------------
Message: 6
Brighton Solidarity Federation Hospitality Workers have successfully concluded a campaign
against a hotel in Brighton. Brighton SolFed had been working with a former employee for
payment of unpaid holiday pay, as well as compensation for dangerous working conditions
which have had a serious impact on this worker's health. ---- The worker was only
contracted to work 20 hours a week, but was regularly pressured to work up to 40 hours,
doing work that went far beyond their job description. In addition to his usual duties of
taking care of linen and rubbish, he was given sole responsibility in evenings for the
duties of a room attendant and dealing with all the requests made by guests, acting as
luggage porter, cleaner of bar and brasserie toilets, and responsible for dealing with
dirty clothes in the kitchen.
This extremely physically demanding overwork was compounded by various failures in health
and safety, including being expected to push a broken rubbish cart for 6 months, despite
this issue being raised with management, which has caused a long-term back injury. This
was only acknowledged when he recently submitted a GP letter confirming this. He was not
provided with safety gloves for six months and was expected to handle cages without
protection.
To add insult to (literal) injury, he was only awarded holiday pay for the contracted 20
hours of work, effectively missing out on half of his holiday entitlement. The disregard
for not only this workers personal health and safety, but also basic legal requirements
around his holiday pay is shocking.
Brighton SolFed organised with this worker and got the pay and compensation that they're
owed after only one picket. Clearly having their working conditions subjected to the light
of day was too much for these bosses to handle! This is yet another case to make hotel and
restaurant bosses think twice before subjecting more workers to these degrading,
exhausting and dangerous conditions.
The ease and speed with which this case was won further demonstrates the value of
anarcho-syndicalist unionism. As the worker puts it, "I've never been in contact with
unions or had been associated with any group. The problem of many of us[have]to take the
first step to contact them, perhaps we don't do it because we believe that they won't be
more than words and will not have an effective result... Solfed have[all the
information]and know to handle it in an action process that they have organized, being
very prepared people; their own safety and firmness creates in you a self confidence...
During our meetings I felt that they also trusted me and that is why they supported me
throughout the process, knowing that they were acting in my name being sure that it was
worth it.
"It is obvious that a job is important, but people are more important, and If someone
feels mistreated in a work environment it is best to leave the job, but not before having
fought... and that's what Solfed is for."
Don't let bosses get away with these criminal conditions. Unionise! Organise! Fight Back!
Get in touch with Brighton SolFed: brighton@solfed.org.uk
http://www.brightonsolfed.org.uk/brighton/brighton-solidarity-federation-wins-a-campaign-against-brighton-hotel-0
------------------------------
SPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Donations
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten