SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

zaterdag 25 mei 2019

Anarchic update news all over the world - Part 2 - 25.05.2019

Today's Topics:

   1.  Russia, Avtonom: The USSR is a country of great lies by
      Michael Shraibman [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1





I am always very surprised when, in response to criticism of the USSR and Leninism, I hear 
something about the "machinations of the liberals." In fact, supporters of self-governing 
(anti-authoritarian) socialism and anarchism have their own reasons for deeply loathing 
the USSR, Lenin, Stalin, the Bolsheviks, their own criticism of this system and their own 
tradition of fighting it. Although anarchists, maximalist Socialist-Revolutionaries, and 
Left-wing Social Revolutionaries - supporters of self-governing socialism - did not 
immediately understand the nature of Bolshevism, and some even turned to the Bolsheviks, 
many of them joined the struggle with the system. ---- Anarchists and other movements took 
part in the uprisings against the Bolsheviks, including the Kronstadt in 1921 and, 
naturally, the Makhnovshchina.

The maximalist Socialist-Revolutionaries led by Aaron Zverin in 1919 prepared battle 
groups to destroy the Bolshevik elite and took part in this struggle along with the 
organization of the Anarchists of the Underground. At the same time, the maximalists 
continued to exist legally, thanks to a cover-up - they told the Bolsheviks that they were 
creating fighting groups solely to fight the whites, against Denikin (however, they 
actually did this as well).

The Left Social Revolutionaries (PLSR) created a deeply echeloned system to combat 
Bolshevism from 1919 - the Overground and the Underground. The overfield was legal and 
integrated people prone to open polemics and unfit in underground fighting. The legal 
organizations of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia declared their break with the 
supporters of armed resistance to the Bolsheviks and that they confined themselves only to 
verbal criticism of the regime. The underground also engaged in organizing strikes, armed 
clashes with the Bolsheviks, participated in the anti-Bolshevik uprisings. But in reality 
there was no real gap between the Left Social Revolutionaries. At least many organizations 
of the Nadpolya rendered assistance to the activists of the Underground by providing them 
with money, housing, supplying them with documents, etc.
***
What was the reason for this attitude of social revolutionaries, supporters of 
self-government and socialism towards the Bolsheviks? Why did they go to actions of direct 
action against the Bolshevik regime, as, once, and against the Tsarist regime? It was not 
only that anarchists, maximalists, and many left-wing Social Revolutionaries believed that 
only direct, arbitrary action could psychologically prepare the masses for a 
self-governing revolution. It was also in another. Bolshevism eliminated the system of 
elections to the Workers' Councils, introduced the most severe system of exploitation of 
workers, suppressed the movement of ethnic groups for local self-determination or 
federalism. In addition, he destroyed freedom of speech and assembly (the Left SRs of the 
Nadpolya held out only until 1923-1924).

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was neither Soviet, nor socialist, republican, nor 
allied. Not in any sense. It was a country of great lies, by definition, the left 
communist Ante Ciligi.

Yes, there was no socialism in the USSR, because exploitation was not destroyed there 
(appropriation of the labor of others): property and power belonged to the state 
bureaucracy, on which the entire population worked. All plants and factories belonged to 
the apparatus of the state bureaucracy. It was she - the centralized bureaucracy of the 
party and the state - that appropriated what was produced by the collectives of workers 
(while part of the appropriation was invested in expanding production, as any capitalist 
does, and the other part was spent on the privileged existence of the bureaucracy and on 
the wars she waged).

But in the USSR there was no Soviet power, republics or union either. In the USSR there 
were no Soviets and Soviet power. The Soviets - inter-factory strike committees elected by 
factories and factories, and then workers' self-governing bodies - were destroyed by the 
Bolsheviks in 1918-1921 Bolsheviks and by dispersing unwanted Soviets). The ruling party 
was thus completely anti-Soviet.

There was no republic in the USSR, as there were no elections to the authorities (for what 
was when the only candidate from the ruling party was proposed could not be considered an 
election). In the USSR there was a dictatorship, autocracy of one (communist) party, which 
itself appointed to lead the country. Elections with alternative candidates were extremely 
rare and only in some rural regions in the 1920s, as well as during the Perestroika era 
during the years of Gorbachev's rule.

And finally, the word "union" implies a voluntary association, federation or association 
of autonomous subjects, whereas the USSR was a centralized empire, which was ruled from 
the Kremlin. The Kremlin, the Politburo of the Central Committee of the party, controlled 
the army, the party-state apparatus, the ministries, and centrally controlled the economy. 
And they did not enter there, in the USSR, voluntarily numerous peoples from Georgia to 
Ukraine and from Lithuania to Turkestan, but, on the contrary, were incorporated into the 
USSR at various times by force, occupied and subjugated by terror and the destruction of 
local national movements or movements for local autonomy, including even local national 
Bolsheviks.
***
Thus, supporters of self-governing socialism and anarchism are enemies of the USSR and 
Leninism not at all because they have heard enough of the liberals. They have their own 
reasons for this and their own history. And these reasons are rooted both in the nature of 
self-governing (anti-authoritarian, anarchist) and federalist socialism, and in the nature 
of Bolshevism - the anti-socialist, exploitative, imperial and anti-Soviet system.

Note.

Texts of anarchists, left Social Revolutionaries and other supporters of self-governing 
socialism against Leninism

1) Vsevolod Wolin. Unknown Revolution. http://library.khpg.org/files/docs/1359107336.pdf

2) Otto Rühle, the main questions of the organization. 
https://avtonom.org/old/lib/theory/leftcom/ruhle2.html

3) An open letter to Maria Spiridonovo (leader of the Left Social Revolutionaries) of the 
Central Committee of the Bolsheviks. https: 
//litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%A4/feljshtinskij-yu-g/otkritoe-pisjmo-m ...

4) Ante Ciliga. Russian revolution and the causes of its degeneration. 
https://avtonom.org/news/russkaya-revolyutsiya-i-prichiny-ee-vyrozhdeniya

------------------------------

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten