Update: anarchist news and information from all over the world - 10.12.2019

Today's Topics:

   
1.  France, Union Communiste Libertaire UCL - On the 5th, the
      6th on the 7th and then after ! (fr, it, pt)[machine translation]
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
2.  Canada, ucl-saguenay, Collectif Emma Goldman -
      [France]Lentillères Free District: Victory is just beginning
      (fr, it, pt)[machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
3.  Greece, Announcement & Call of APO on March 6th in Athens,
      Thessaloniki and Patras [machine translation] 
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
4.  [Spain] What happens in Catalonia? Anarchopurists Go
      Home...! By ANA (pt) [machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
5.  France, Union Communiste Libertaire AL #299 - Climate: What
      political posture to the theories of collapse ? (fr, it,
      pt)[machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
6.  France, Union Communiste Libertaire UCL - State of the
      fights n ° 1, Balance sheet and outlook for December 5 (fr, it,
      pt)[machine translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
7.  freedom news: French anarchists on the strike for pensions
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
8.  Czech, AFED: Exarchia: a little different celebrated
      anniversary -- International Student Day in Greek [machine
      translation] (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)
   
9.  anarchist communist group ACG: Rebel City issue 12 out now!
      (a-infos-en@ainfos.ca)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1





On December 5, an inter-union CGT, Solidaires, FSU and FO called to strike to refuse the pension reform. In several sectors (transport,
chemistry, energy, education, etc.), union federations propose the renewal of the strike the next day. ---- For 30 years, capitalists, with
the help of governments and the state, have been cutting off social protection. This has created misery and precariousness for the workers.
---- Reform to break social protection ---- The pension reform promoted by the government, such as the unemployment insurance reform, is a
new stage in the social breakdown. It undermines the basic principles of a pension system still functioning, despite the latest reforms,
thanks to inter-generational solidarity and strengthens the logic of individualization, that is to say, everyone for himself.

This project will break the few mechanisms for correcting the inequalities, insufficient, that exist in the current system. And the pension
amounts, with a point system, will be at the mercy of the economic decisions of the next governments, and will inevitably fall significantly.

Yet money, there is ! The employers are getting richer.

Let's get angry
For a year, the Yellow Vests have proved that an ever larger part of the population no longer accepts that some grow fat on our backs.
Stranded undocumented migrants do not accept that bosses take advantage of their situation to exploit them. Strikes broke out in many
sectors against increasingly aggressive bosses and state.

The hospital staff is still struggling. The mobilization against violence against women on November 23 was historic. Resistance is organized
against student precariousness.

In recent weeks, the calls are increasing, including to extend the strike the day after the 5. The Libertarian Communist Union supports
these calls and calls all employees to debate in all companies of the renewal of the strike. Our activists will work for a successful
renewal and for decision-making by the workers themselves.

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Le-5-le-6-le-7-et-puis-apres

------------------------------

Message: 2






The free district of Les Lentillères was born from a demonstration fork in hand in 2010, in Dijon, after which hundreds of people cleared
and cultivated abandoned quality land threatened by a real estate project. >From there was born the Pot'Col'Le, an open and collective
gardening dynamic based on the exchange of knowledge. The Jardin des Maraichères, managed in an unpaid way, allows to feed non-profit weekly
markets at free price. At the crossroads of these two large parcels, dozens of small allotment gardens intermingle. In the middle of all
this, busy farms, a dynamic of building cabins and maintenance of places open to all for the walk, for workshops of exchange of various and
varied knowledge, concerts or atypical festivals . From all this is born a colorful district,

Communiqué of the Lentillères

The victory is just beginning

The mayor of Dijon announced Monday, November 25 that the Lentillères were to be banned from urbanization. The eco-neighborhood project we
have been fighting for 10 years will never see the light of day!

This is a first victory against the deadly urbanization of Dijon, and we celebrated Monday night under the windows of the city council.

But the mayor also announces that he will " ask for the evacuation of all those who illegally occupy this land " stating that " can make
there shared gardens or market gardening those who register to have a lease ". Later, he dares to complete: " I did not say it because I did
not want to please the anar", but I had planned it from the beginning. "

It is therefore not to please the anar 'he has repeated during all these years that the project would be made ...

In any case, he is not afraid of contradiction, threatening to evacuate the people to whom he has just given reason. These lands would have
been concreted for a long time by Dijon Métropole if they had not been occupied illegally.

This illegality remains a precious means of resistance, at a time when the PLUI continues to draw asphyxiating urbanization, still planning
to destroy hundreds of hectares of agricultural land in and around the city, while densifying the agglomeration.

For our part, we have never waited for ecology to become an electoral issue to reinvent our relationship with the land and the territory.
For 10 years, we have concretely built in this free neighborhood and self-managed food autonomy that flatter elected officials.

A new phase of the fight for its preservation is opening. The Quartier Libre des Lentillères will live with everything that is built there:
its exceptional and collective agriculture, its incredible festivals, its houses which allow a hundred people to take care of this place
every day, its quality of refuge for the exiled, his collective reinvention of a neighborhood life.

Two years ago, we agreed on a 6 point "compass" that would allow us not to lose the north. We reaffirm them today with force:

- Land, territory, gardening: Since 2010, we preserve these lands. Projects are born over the seasons, desires and meetings, we will
continue to cultivate them in many ways and out of the ordinary.

- Housing, buildings, common, common: The Free District of Lentillères is a full neighborhood, inhabited today by a hundred people. These
lands are integrally linked to the life that is invented there, their preservation requires that they remain inhabited, worked and shared.

- Political Autonomy and Diversity: The Quartier Assembly is the expression of our political autonomy. It is the privileged link of our
collective elaboration. Our "us" expresses infinite and irreducible differences, held by a common ethic, subordinated to no institution.

- Economy: We refuse that the capitalist market economy determines our links, our projects, our ideas. We will not sacrifice the meaning of
what we build by subjecting it to its requirements.

- Ethics and toc: We do not want to make politics a sphere separate from our daily lives. We want the struggles against sexism, transphobia,
homophobia, racism and other systemic oppressions to be part of our actions and actions by trying to block and act against any behavior that
perpetuates them.

- Links: We do not want to make the Lentillères a place where it would just be good to live in one between-ones. We are proud of the bonds
of support and friendship we are weaving. We also know that we are not unanimous. We will continue to take the risk and fight alongside all
those who stand up for their liberation and that of the earth.

The victory is just beginning!

Free Quarter Lentillères

Site of the Free District of Lentillères, here .
https://lentilleres.potager.org/

http://ucl-saguenay.blogspot.com/2019/12/france-quartier-libre-des-lentilleres.html

------------------------------

Message: 3





The flame of rebellion is always alive in the struggles against the beast of power, in the struggles for emancipation and the social
revolution ---- Eleven years later ... on December 6, 2008, the day of the murder of Alexis Grigoropoulos by the special guards E. Corconea
and V. Saraliotis in Exarchia and the outbreak of the December social and class uprising. ---- Eleven years later... civil justice, through
the release of the cop-murderer Corconea and the acquittal of Saraliotis's accomplice in the murder of 15-year-old Alexis Grigoropoulos,
turns a blind eye to state repression by attempting to impunity of the repressive forces while at the same time the state sends clear
messages on terrorism and disarmament of society.
11 years later... state repression and terrorism, the murderous repressive mechanisms of the state continue to be the spearhead of state
policies for disciplining those who fight and subjugate the whole of society. From the dozens of labor-related murders to wage labor,
anti-union laws, vicious assaults on struggling youth and university asylum to invasions and evacuations of self-organized and occupied
places of life and struggles, endings - refugee and migrant concentration camps.

Power fears that new conflict rounds will emerge in the near future. I do not forget that the flame that sparked the biggest uprising in the
country's modern history was lit by anarchists in Exarchia in December 2008 and spread throughout the country after the assassination of
Alexander Grigoropoulos by the murderous police mechanism of democracy. Thus, since the summer a new repressive campaign of the state (which
is a continuation of the operation to dismantle social and class struggles and squabbles during the Syriza regime) has been under way
against the anarchist movement in the occupied spaces of struggle, self-organized housing structures for refugees and migrants, in the world
of solidarity, social and class resistances.

A campaign that represents the spearhead of the state and bosses' attack on the pragmatic strata of society, aimed at terrorizing and
disciplining them, for the unimpeded spread of state and capitalist barbarism. The purpose of the fractured state violence and the
ideological propaganda that accompanies it is to get revenge for the November and December days that kept society alive against its
cemeteries. It is to strike the Exarchies, which are a permanent barrier to power planning, the university asylum that has long served as a
meeting point for the fighters, and the occupations as centers of spreading social-class self-organization, resistance and solidarity.
Through these blows though,

The blood that is shed is not rinsed with the auspices of the Greek Police, the memory is not rubbish, to be thrown into one of the
thousands of souls dumped by the authorities in the midst of oppression and violence. The whole earth boomed against its forces. In Chile
and Bolivia, in France, in Syria and in Palestine, in Turkey and in thousands of places, the desire for freedom is still a daily battle. To
sail from the bays of revolt, into the open sea of total social and class counterattack and emancipation. To overthrow the aging world of
fear, submission, poverty. To live the only life worth living, of the struggle for the Social Revolution.

ON THE OUTCOMES OF THE SPONSORED EXPERIENCE IN ORGANIZED AND CONTINUOUS STRUGGLE FOR SOCIAL REVOLUTION

For the Society of Equality, Solidarity and Freedom

For Anarchy and Liberal Communism

CONCENTRATIONS - PREPARATIONS OF PREPARATION DECEMBER 6

ATHENA

PROPYLAIA, 18.00

THESSALONIKI

-CAMARA 12.00

-KAMARA 18.00

PATRAS

- ANNEX 12.00

- ANNEX 18.00

Anarchist Political Organization-Federation of Collections-

http://apo.squathost.com/

------------------------------

Message: 4






I just read in November's CGT magazine " Catalunya " two articles that fit nicely with the tone the newspaper has maintained since the
"Government decided to call a referendum on independence in October 2017". ---- These articles commemorate the spectacular and vigorous
response that was given on the streets to the condemnatory sentence of a part of the Government, the President of Parliament and the two
main leaders of the two great Catalan nationalist organizations. ---- Both welcome the courage, the strength, the determination of this
popular response to the Spanish state and the repressive forces that depend on it and the Generalitat. Not only is the anarchist presence
justified in these mobilizations, but participation is celebrated, it is called to intensify it, and the supposed inhibition of anarchists
enclosing themselves in "their ivory tower" is disqualified, who do not assume the contradictions of all struggles. and taking refuge in
"anarchist purity":  Anarchopurists Go Home  conclude one of two texts with a certain residual flavor to  Yankee Go Home  of bygone times.

However, the fact that referring to the defense of " anarchist purity " to explain why he would not be involved in the current mobilization
reveals that nothing (or little) has been understood about the talents that encourage anarchism. No one who claims to be anarchist and
minimally consistent would base his refusal to engage in current mobilizations in the concern to preserve the  purity of anarchism , for the
simple reason that anarchism  is radically antithetical to any claim to purity .

The claim to preserve the purity of anarchism is utterly absurd for any anarchist because anarchism is constitutively impure. It is mestizo,
diverse, multifaceted, changeable and inevitably open. The idea of purity is typical of the most reactionary approaches in all areas, from
religion, to supposed races, ideologies, cultures, etc. etc. Therefore, to think that if a specific mobilization is criticized in the name
of  "anarchist purity"  indicates, I repeat, that anarchism has not been understood.

To criticize current mobilizations for " anarchist purity " or confinement in the " ivory tower " is a convenient and easy way to avoid
political debate about these mobilizations.

Is it possible to disagree politically with anarchist involvement in current mobilizations without the absurd concern of preserving
nonexistent anarchist purity,  or why it is preferable to contemplate things from an alleged  ivory tower? Of course it is and of course
there is no shortage of arguments to oppose those who defend, celebrate and encourage this implication.

He wrote in a recent text: "No matter how beautiful the barricade flames and the outrageous police shots are, we should not allow these
flames to keep us from seeing the deceptive roads they light, nor let these shots keep us from listen to the teachings provided by the long
history of our emancipatory struggles . There is no doubt that burning containers, throwing objects or cocktails at the police, blocking
highways and railway stations, are forms of struggle that excite us when they manage to break the prevailing passivity and submission and
arouse solidarity.

But is it not appropriate to ask us who are the ones who design the strategies and articulate the means to make these mobilizations
possible? Ask us how and why they do it? To achieve what ends? Should we not ask ourselves, for example, about the supposed horizontality of
the decisions that articulate the mobilization of the Democratic Tsunami?

Is it sufficient for a mobilization to take place and to adopt striking forms of confrontation that we should join it? Was our place in
Maiden Square, no matter how massive and popular that revolt was and no matter how repressive the Ukrainian authorities were? Does anarchism
have the tools to decide in a  genuinely autonomous way  how, when, and to achieve what ends we should engage in the struggles?

In the face of the mantra that the important thing is to fight and we will see later where it leads us and what effects it produces, it may
be worth recognizing the importance of thinking about these issues and discussing them without resorting to disqualifications that make
analysis difficult, reflection, discussion and the full legitimacy of eventually adopting a strongly critical stance towards anarchist
involvement in the current mobilization.

Barcelona, late November 2019.

Tomas Ibáñez

Translation> Liberto

anarchist news agency-ana

------------------------------

Message: 5






The previous issue of Alternative Libertaire gave some pointers on the theories of collapse that are flourishing right now. How to answer
it? On the left, the temptation of denigration, even of denial, is strong. But is this the best way to deal with the subject? ----
Anti-capitalists have been saying for decades now that in a finite world the illusion of infinite growth will sooner or later lead to
disaster. "Human activity is approaching limits sustainable by the ecosystem" Earth " , wrote Alternative libertarian in his manifesto of
1991. Very heavy threats weigh on the planet. There is a contradiction between the maintenance of a productivist capitalist economy and the
survival of humanity." ---- Thirty years later, this radical statement has become perfectly commonplace. The accumulation of scientific
reports on resource depletion, species extinction and global warming gives reason to anticapitalists, but paradoxically can also embarrass them.

For if the idea that capitalism must be destroyed before it destroys the planet is easy to sustain, the urgency of the situation leads
almost immediately to a subsidiary question: if we do not succeed in destroying capitalism in time, what will happen concretely? The end of
life? The beginning of survival? Will all political action, all revolutionary possibilities be reduced to nothing?

Refuse all dogmatism
This questioning is rising in society, and its most visible symptom is the success of collapsology - which presents itself not as a
doctrine, but as a "transdisciplinary exercise in the study of the collapse of our industrial civilization and of what could succeed him" .

Because it has quickly become an arena of diverse theories, collapsology carries its share of flaws: millenarianism; to-what-bonism ("what
good is to fight, everything will collapse") ; survivalism ("I barricade myself with cans and weapons") ; ecofascism ("we need an
authoritarian state to ration the population" ... so that a privileged caste can continue to over-consume, it is implicit) ; fatalism
("there is nothing left to do but to prepare spiritually for the end of the world", coaches are beginning to make a business).

However, collapsology can not be reduced to this, as the left press too willingly does. It does not only generate negative postures or
resignations. The creation of resilient communities in the countryside for example, which at least have the merit of being based on mutual
assistance.

Eco-anxiety is legitimate; anticapitalists should be able to provide answers rooted in a revolutionary strategy linking spontaneous
tendencies and mutual aid to a global political project. Without falling into the prophetism of an inevitable collapse of the economic and
social circuits; without postulating either, to reassure themselves, that they will resist everything, always. There is, in libertarian
federalism, all the elements necessary for an ecological and united society.

Guillaume Davranche (UCL Montreuil)

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Climat-Quelle-posture-politique-face-aux-theories-de-l-effondrement

------------------------------

Message: 6






It's a successful December 5, very promising, with massive demonstrations, including in small and medium cities. Sometimes with
participations never reached since 2010 or 2003. the interior declares 800 000 protesters, the CGT 1.5 million. ---- We are clearly at the
beginning of a major social movement and scale. Nothing is done yet, but we will do everything to make this month of December hot. ---- This
state of struggle, produced by the UCL on the basis of feedback from its groups, will feed all and all the activists of the strike in
information and analysis to share, discuss on the workplaces, in the GA, the meetings. He is public. Make it happen !

https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Bilan-et-perspectives-du-5-Decembre

------------------------------

Message: 7






The following statement from France's anarchist CNT-AIT union analyses the nature of yesterday's general strike, which has brought out
millions of people and affected everything from schools and transport to legal services and hospitals. ---- The battle for pensions begins.
But this is not a simple union battle for the defence of social gains, let alone a corporatist conflict between certain sectors of
"privileged" workers - it is a crucial battle for a choice of society, for a choice of life. ---- Retirement is not only the worker's right
after a life of hard work, it is a time removed from work, its hierarchical constraints, its rhythms, the oppression of others, hardship.
Unfortunately, access to this just reward, this inalienable right, seems impossible for workers in many countries of the world.
Today in France, pensions are financed by capitalist wealth (sales of industrial production) created by labour (employee contributions and
so-called "employer" contributions, a usurped name only representing part of the strength of the labour force's collective work). But recent
technological developments - automation, robotisation, computerisation, etc - mean these riches are more and more produced by the "work" of
the machines, minimising human activity. The latter becomes an inessential element to the reproduction of capital and therefore, the number
of active workers necessary for the production is in free fall.

Arguments put forward by Pierre-Louis Bras, chairman of the Pension Advisory Council, for example (which looks back at the latest updated
demographic and economic forecasts) blaming "the significant increase" in life expectancy by 2060- 2070, or the "steady decline "in the
ratio between the number of "assets" (working people) and of retirees, do not hold. Indeed this dominant reasoning omits the fact that the
demographic curve relating to younger generations shows a decline in birth rates and therefore compensates for the increase in retirees.

What matters for the financing of solidarity (pensions, unemployment insurance, health ...) is the ratio between the number of people of
working age (contributors) and the number of those who are too old or too young to work (beneficiaries), to which we can add the young
people waiting for their first job, unemployed workers, homemakers ... moreover, labour productivity continues to increase (although there
may have been a slowdown at the beginning of the new millennium). If growth continues at the average pace of the last century (2% per year)
then in 40 years an asset will produce, at the same time, 2.2 times more than at present - largely enough to compensate for retirement
pensions with contribution rates unchanged.

A final, important point: the deficit announced by the State by 2025 is not due to an explosion of expenditure, which has in fact been
relatively stable, but to a decrease of income provoked by our laws, a lowering of social contribution resources and an accumulation of
exemptions. What various successive governments continue to propose and even impose is a new reform that will help move the current
pay-as-you-go (PAYG) system to a generalised system of funding managed by the Stock Exchange. That is, by purchasing securities
corresponding to either a subdivision of the capital of a company (shares), a government bond (bonds) placed on the market, or the purchase
of private debts (credit). Our pension would therefore be paid in anticipation of a hypothetical future of rising work[1].

The homogenisation of pension funds towards a "points" system is one of the steps towards so-called "necessary" capitalisation - currently
most people can retire with relatively similar purchasing power, but with a points pension, the State can reduce payouts to force the future
pensioner to supplement his public pension with a private one - in short, what the State has always done, create a deficit to justify
exploitative measures.

Indeed in the capitalist system based on the accumulation of money, the growing needs of companies in constant competition with each other
on a global level require increasingly heavy investment to produce more and more cheaply. This implies a diminution of the value of the
commodity produced and therefore necessarily of its surplus value which, it should be remembered, is only provided by human labour. And, to
recover the maximum amount of money, the employers, the shareholders and the State "tackle" the wage bill and employee social contributions,
including those for the financing of pensions.

But the current system of retirement, presented as a "social acquis", is also for us deeply unfair, unequal, unfair! Unfair because some,
most often women, (who have died in the most painful jobs) touch paws ... while others (at the most rewarding jobs), comfortable retreats.
Inevitably because some, especially those who are in power (military, cops), can leave after 15 years of service, receive a pension and
accumulate with a new job ... while others have to wait 62 years and even longer to be entitled to a "decent" pension ... because they lack
quarters of contribution. Unfair because anyone who reaches retirement age should be provided with sufficient means to ensure a decent life
regardless of the number of quarters paid.

Why not fight in the name of equality and equity:

For retirement to be 55 for everyone regardless of the number of years of contribution, with immediate receipt of a pension?
For a single monthly pension of €2,000, regardless of previous salary and the number of years of contribution. And because it would be
profoundly unfair that those who have received high wages, on the grounds of long studies and through social financing of the education
system, receive higher pensions than those who financed their studies by going to work very hard.
Why not fight too in the name of freedom:

For the possibility, for those who wish, to continue to work beyond 55 years, a pension would be paid to them only in complement to reach
€2,000 per month.
But, we know that, by its very essence, the alienating political and economic system that is capitalism - and its tool of coercion: the
State - based on the exploitation of the living and the endless accumulation of money, does not allows and will not allow any sharing of the
global wealth we all produce, and that as long as this is the case, political and economic structures will not evolve (an oyster shell can
only give a pearl!).

Our fight will only succeed when we have the guarantee of justice and equity, which only Liberty can offer us! Not the one defined in our
textbooks, no! True social freedom, that of others who extend mine to infinity, that by which we can choose our activities without
constraints, by free association, that which will allow to manage our own affairs by district, village, commune, "region" ... a borderless
world that paves the way for self-help as a cement among its nested entities.

So what to do? Let us question our social memory, the experiences of those who, before us, led effective struggles. An observation:
everything that was won was by the strike. More precisely, let us recall what happened in June 1936[2]. The working class innovated by
directly attacking the ownership of the means of production by the occupation of workplaces (preventing scabbing), by an grassroots
organisation making self-imposed demands (thus preventing control by institutional "reformer" unions), all sealed with enthusiasm and joy by
a mutual aid contract. So, sail in the wind! heading towards anarchy! First stop: the strike!

And "happy, arm in arm  " (as the song says), what if we occupied our places of work? It is through direct action that we will succeed in
safeguarding our social achievements! Who knows, if beyond our borders other workers do the same, we could usher in the direct management of
our collective inheritance with mutual aid and finish with social classes, employers, the wages, the State.

In short, abolish work!

At present, there are three "formulas" of pension funds: the "defined public" pension fund guaranteed by the State with the tax regulator,
except in case of bankruptcy; the "defined private" pension fund with insurance as its regulator and its limits, its reserve rate; finally,
the "defined private" contribution without guarantee, generally offering a high yield but more risky.
The Matignon agreements were not a gift offered to the working class to reward it for having voted, but a hastily set up fire by the
employers and the newly elected Socialist Blum government, supported by the CGT and leftist parties animated by the same concern: to try to
bring back the torrent of the strike (they succeeded, but with difficulty).

https://freedomnews.org.uk/french-anarchists-on-the-strike-for-pensions/

------------------------------

Message: 8






On Sunday, November 17, it was 46 years since the uprising at the Polytechnic University of Athens against the military junta regime and
against "state and capital". This year's anniversary was marked by demonstrations in various cities in Greece and clashes of anarchists with
the police. ---- The ruling clique was prepared for demonstrations in the capital by sending more than 5,000 cops to the streets, leaving
garbage containers around Athens's Exrachia neighborhood to prevent the demonstrators from burning burning barricades. It also closed three
metro stations and introduced a 'special regime' on the main avenues. The atmosphere was aggravated by the previous evacuation of the sqaars
in Exarchy, especially those for refugees, and the placement of heavy-armored men at the University of Economics.
Two large demonstrations took place in Athens on Sunday: one at noon and one in the evening. The exarchy was almost entirely occupied by
robocopes and water cannons, and under the supervision of helicopters and drones. After the demonstrations, clashes occurred not only in
Athens, but also in Thessaloniki and Patras.

In Athens in the morning, anarchists from the Rubikon group "visited" the house of the Minister of Economy Adonis Georgiadis, a former
member of the ultra-right LAOS party, who said that "refugees would make life uncomfortable". He had been arrested all day in the Exarchy,
but in the evening there was a real struggle: hundreds of protesters throwing stones and molot on the cops (punishment for using them was
recently increased from five to ten years). The cops used tear gas and stun grenades, and they beat up everybody who got their hands in
their blood. There were many wounded and there was an atmosphere of police terror in the Exarchy.

Eventually, police gathered 52 protesters at Polytechnik and the next day 32 of them were officially arrested. When they were brought to
court, solidarity actions took place and bottles were thrown at the cops.

Source: http://blogyy.net/2019/11/18/lendemain-du-17-novembre-2019-a-athenes-un-gout-de-sang-dans-la-bouche/

https://www.afed.cz/text/7077/exarchia-trochu-jinak-slavene-vyroci

------------------------------

Message: 9






Rebel City, London's Anarchist paper, is jointly produced by a collective including London Anarchist Communist Group. No.12 is now out, a
bumper 16 page full colour edition with articles on: Are You An Anarchist?; Climate change is not a single issue; Silvertown Tunnel; Global
working class fights back; Hong Kong; A Sideways Look; Sport; CWU dispute; Land reform; Taking back control at the grassroots; Staying
grounded in Essex. Get it from Housmans, Freedom Bookshop, 56a Infospace, DIY Space, May Day Rooms, Feminist Library, LARC or from a street
distributor! The digital version can be downloaded HERE
https://rebelcitylondon.wordpress.com/2019/11/29/rebel-city-no-12/

https://www.anarchistcommunism.org/2019/12/05/rebel-city-issue-12-out-now/

------------------------------