Deformation of intellectual capital ---- Today's democratic capitalism is built
in the material, but also the mental sphere. I don't have to explain at lengththat the basis of any spirit building is education and family. When a child isexposed to targeted democratic education, he or she is regularly overwhelmed withinformation about how the state should function. ---- In addition, education andthe family act in the same direction that if a child raises objections to thesystem (from objections that we learn how a state should work, which does notwork in reality, to that this state system excludes the privileged, whichsubsequently argues that this is how the world works, that these objections arejust an adolescent outpouring of a minor, and that democracy is not perfect, butit is the best we have. As soon as one begins to consider these argumentationfouls as adequate arguments (which happens because the child will not want to beconstantly "plagued" by defamation), "puberty" ends.This system builds a democratic empire for children from school age right intheir psyche. The process during which a child resists this indoctrination iscalled puberty. After accepting arguments, the adolescent resigns to the defenseand the psychic empire can then develop without restraint.But if we ignore the foul arguments and insist on answering our questions, wewill find that few can answer them in a way that makes sense. However, even theperson who can do it must admit over time that what he describes is just autopian vision with which democracy was created.At this moment, chaos arises in man. His critical thinking attacks the system ofhis democratic psyche and reveals his absurdity. We can call this process thedeformation of intellectual capital. However, it is a process full of depression,helplessness and too much thinking about the world around us, which the state hasdone for us so far. It is a time when a conscious person breaks down his mentalgolden cage without being sure that a better life awaits him. All he wants isreal life. However, this struggle must be waged by man himself.Subsequently, many people will find out how difficult the journey is. He istherefore trying to rebuild the old comfortable empire. We could call this mentalburnout.The man who successfully fights this fight is alone among what is left of theempire. Only he and his critical thinking remained. It sounds pretty pessimistic,but only until you start building your system of life. He becomes an anarchist,ie an independent individual driven by the desire to live freely, includingletting the people around him live freely.Sources of political thoughtIf we took a closer look at the world of politics with a human view, we would seean incredible amount of currents (which are different information, politicalparties, directions, etc.). However, this number of currents of thought isusually divided into two major sources. We could call them hierarchical thinkingand critical thinking.Hierarchical thinking places us in this world. It definitely gives us a place andcompetencies here. He gives us servants, but also rulers. Hierarchical thinkingputs humility in our heads in front of someone whom someone has told us deservesour humility more than others. Simply put, it puts a hierarchy in our heads.Critical thinking is trying to get us out of this world. He looks at us asindividuals. He takes away our servants and masters. Mainly because it raises aquestion that hierarchical thinking has long destroyed: "Why?" A crucial questionthat we regularly recall in the world about our critical thinking. "Why is thishappening? Why isn't it different? "Questions that only critical thinking cananswer. And the answer is, "Ask for hierarchical thinking!"In this way, we can easily not only map our political views, but also verify thatthey are good for us.If a person develops only hierarchical thinking in himself, then he is fullydevoted to the man who is destined for him as a ruler. He becomes as fascist aswe know them. He is a servant, the other is a leader, or he is a leader, theothers are servants. Why? No why. That's how the world works. Try and maybe youwill one day be a leader.A person who has to some extent developed every part of his thinking becomes aDemocrat. If someone says that there is only chaos among the spreaders ofanarchy, he obviously never really knew the defenders of democracy. But the mainproblem for Democrats is that they can be seen to have developed criticalthinking, to remove unpopular and undemocratic authorities from the governmentout of their zeal. However, their struggle goes the farthest to a peacefuldemonstration (which we know from experience will not cause anything on its own)and in the final every four years to elect another authority, from which theyonly promise not to be such an unpopular authority.According to this division, a person with fully developed critical thinking canbe expected to be called an anarchist. However, this is not so easy nowadays.Because we live in constant democratic propaganda. However, this propaganda isfurther insured by the fact that once a person has a non-democratic opinion, heis exposed as a deterrent to a person who has succumbed to other propaganda. Thissituation is so unsustainable for man that he prefers to join the Democrats.There are very few people who can withstand this and separate themselvescompletely from their hierarchical thinking. Subsequently, they are educated intopics that occur outside the democratic world. (That's also why Democrats have ahard time meeting anarchism.) We can only call some of these people anarchists.DemocratsAs I have already mentioned, the man who says that there is only chaos among thesupporters of anarchism has never properly dealt with relations between democrats.Proponents of so-called direct democracy are the first to offer ourselves. Themost absurd democratic direction, which clearly leads to a situation in which thepeople will elect their autocrat. He will have complete control of the stateduring his term (if he wants to; however, if you are an autocrat, you will notgive up control of the state).At the other end of this world is parliamentary democracy. A system that the topofficials guard other officials who prevent the chief from enforcing laws that goagainst the constitution. This paradigm is theoretically forbidden to criticize.However, the ruin of the paradigm is stigma, and in many cases, practice is theruin of theory. The main problem is populism, which makes it difficult forauthoritarians to occupy most of the seats that control the interests of thepeople, but also their freedom.Therefore, it is perfectly understandable to blame the Democrats for their lackof self-reflection, which is manifested, for example, by condemning communism,because the same factor that made communist states authoritarian turned thevision of free democracy into populism, robbery I admit.The text was created in response to the booklet Anarchism for Beginners based ondebates that were conducted with other anarchists and those interested inanarchist ideas.https://www.afed.cz/text/7506/kriticke-a-hierarchicke-mysleni_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten