Once again one thing is clear: the next parliament and the next government will
be farer than ever from the exploited classes. Not even two out of three voterswent to the polls, in some regions barely one out of two, with turnout nationallystanding at 63.9 per cent, a drop of no less than nine percentage points from theprevious election. At the time of writing[Monday 26 Sept. In the morning], thevote count has not yet been completed, but the data, already stable, assign thevictory to the right-wing coalition. In fact, it seems that despite the drop invoters turnout, the right-wing has maintained the consensus obtained in theprevious elections[2018], with just over 12 million votes. If this should lead,as all the official newspapers announce, to a government led by the fascistright, then the military caste, war production and in particular aerospace,Confindustria[Italian industrial employers federation]and the Catholic Churchwill have the prime standard-bearer of their privileges in government.But beware, the political agenda of misery and war that we will have to oppose inthe coming months was already the one of the government led by Draghi. Thatagenda would have been assumed by any government, in the name of "nationalinterest". The official medias and parties have been calling in chorus for astrong government, but since it will not be strong in consensus anyway, we haveto imagine that the next government will be strong with the stick.They will probably try to govern the social conflict with paternalistic handouts,with national unity propaganda, and with the help of the palace oppositionthrough the PD[Democratic Party], the institutional left, and the CGIL[mainunion, close to PD]. It is important to give a different ground to the struggles,strengthening grassroots structures and forms of social opposition.Before passing the baton to the next government, Draghi still has some importanttasks on its hands: the presentation of the DEF Update Note[one of the mainfinancial measures of the year]and the continuation of negotiations to define theEuropean cap on gas prices. The basic policy guidelines on defence, energy andlabour are transversal, as the choices of the various governments of nationalunity that have followed one another in recent years have shown. The last ofthese, which united the Lega, FI, M5S, PD, LEU - with repeated attempts toinclude FdI as well - made it clear to everyone that appeals to vote 'againstfascism' are empty words for the electoral campaign. This is also why the numberof abstainers, 14.8 million, far exceeds the number of votes obtained by anycoalition. But abstentionism is not disorientation caused by the turnabout ofthis or that party. The crisis of consensus mechanisms, even clientelistic ones,together with the general worsening of the living and working conditions of alarge part of the population, and the disappearance of any margin of mediation ofsocial conflict, have caused distrust towards political institutions. Thatdistrust exploded in the last 15 years. Since the 2008 elections, the great aimof the parties in election time has been to gather support from the ever-wideningranks of abstentionists. But if those who govern and those who aspire to governread abstention as a reservoir of votes, as a reservoir of consensus to becontended for, as a passive mass, those who want to radically transform societyin a revolutionary sense cannot but recognise in it an element of change. It isnot certain that this drive for change cannot sooner or later be reabsorbed intothe forms of compatibility of the political system. But non-voting is always achoice, regardless of the reasons behind it. It is an active dimension, therefusal dimension, which already marks the distance from the government, butwhich can also be the basis for further forms of refusal and opposition.The images coming out of Russia, with young people fleeing to avoid forcedconscription and with protests in the cities against partial mobilisation beingharshly repressed, show us that it is possible to reject government-imposedmassacre, that even under the severe repressive threat of an authoritarian regimeit is possible to choose, reject and act. The force of these examples of anti-warstruggle is formidable. They are examples that call us to commit ourselvespersonally, to organise and give substance to our rejection of war and the wareconomy.To tackle the general mistrust in institutions, parties and government, anauthoritarian turn has been prepared for some time now. The organs ofrepresentative democracy itself are also radically revising institutional forms,seeking stability solutions for political power in the face of distrust ininstitutions and increasing abstention. In the name of governability, efficiency,stability and the safeguarding of the "national interest", dirigiste solutionsare being pushed forward, also under pressure from increasingly globallyinfluential autocratic models. The developments of the war in Europe have onlyaccelerated these processes. On all sides, propaganda, in a general climate ofuncertainty and impending disaster, creates the need for the leader and the"strong government". But there are those who do not respond to the call to theballot box, despite the fact that the election campaign has been more than everfocused on the personalities of political leaders, despite the great fears weexperience in these years because of the blind alley into which the State andCapital are leading us, from war to pandemic, from misery to climate catastrophe.There is a part of society that does not participate in the election, that haschosen rejection. For the next government it will be a problem in any case. It isup to us and all the forces moving on the terrain of struggles from below toensure that this rejection of the election is not reabsorbed by some new party orgovernment leader, that it is not conscripted into any army, but that it istransformed into a rejection of war and exploitation, into mass desertion fromthe slaughter into which the next government will want to throw us.Dario Antonellihttps://i-f-a.org/2022/09/29/elections-let-abstention-become-desertion/https://collettivoanarchico.noblogs.org/post/2022/09/26/elezioni-che-lastensione-diventi-diserzione_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten