It is now a fact that we live in a surveillance society. When fifteen years old
the pervasiveness of digital control was pointed out, they were held up asapocalyptics. In recent years, however, mass surveillance has been accepted inpublic discourse and recognized as a natural fact. ---- And as in front of allfacts perceived as natural, many@ simply react with a mixture of resignationand/or defense of the status quo: "perhaps being constantly monitored is not nicebut you want to put the convenience of having Netflix which do you offer me filmsthat I will statistically like?". ---- Surveillance remains an abstract themeuntil something nasty happens. It is the others who suffer the repressive aspectsof surveillance. The subversives, the foreigners, the enemy.Then, one day, the Supreme Court of the United States of America reminds us thatlegality is a matter of power relations and not of natural rights: the long waveof the conservative comeback that began at the end of the 70s finally manages toundermine the sentence Roe vs. Wade and Planned Parenthood vs. Casey. The IVG isno longer subject to federal protection and each federal state can legislate on it.We will not go into the examination of the sentence, which refers to interestingand much more complex themes than what is thought in the common imaginary on theUSA present in Western Europe; we will limit ourselves to talking about someconsequences of this fact.Over the last few years, access to IVG has been increasingly restricted in themost conservative states of the USA. But until the decision of the Supreme Courta certain level of access had to be - however - guaranteed. When this - very weak- guarantee failed, the states governed by conservative elites proceeded to banthe IVG tout court. This has made it possible to open criminal investigationsagainst patients who resort to IVG and healthcare personnel who practice it.The opening of criminal proceedings allows the authorities to request access tothe data holders. Thus it happens that a girl from Nebraska and her mother are incourt: the first for having aborted in the 28th week, the second for havingprocured abortion drugs for her daughter and for helping to hide the abortedfetus. Part of the procedure is based, for the tests, on chats that took place onmessenger between the young woman and other subjects @.But the question is much more complex and transcends the specific case. Theparadigm of accumulation of value through surveillance is based on collectingdata and putting it to value. There is no magic. Nothing more and - above all -nothing less: any data is good to be collected, analysed, categorized, sold orused to sell. It has been common practice for years for Alphabet, known to mostas Google, to carry out these operations on any event that occurs in itsecosystem that it offers: mail, space navigation services, search engine, databackup, video entertainment, cloud workspaces . The same thing is done by Meta,or the conglomerate that manages Facebook, Messenger, Instagram, WhatsApp. And onthe analysis services of these companies or other similar ones that offer datainvestigation platforms such as IBM or Amazon, thousands of mobile applicationsare based used for any. The "any" also includes apps that allow you to trackmenstrual cycles.Having systems that can aggregate and analyze the data left on the variousdigital systems allows, for example, to understand if a person has carried outresearch on a possible pregnancy, if he has bought pregnancy tests, if he hasdone research on abortion, if she went to a clinic that offers the IVG service,if she contacted consultants run by pro-choic associations. Systems capable ofoffering this type of analysis, even ignoring judicial mandates but using onlyOSINT capabilities and data purchased from Data Brokers, exist and are now widelyused.Also in the USA it is known that for years the ICE, i.e. the thugs who areinvolved in kidnapping people without documents and deporting them, have beenusing Palantir systems, which perform these tasks precisely.It's not hard to imagine how similar tools could be used to track and monitorpregnant people. It should be borne in mind that in certain states, such asAlabama, it is possible to end up in prison for having "endangered a child" evenif this is a fetus. And you can go to jail while pregnant so that the state canbetter protect the fetus.The attack on reproductive freedoms is not a characteristic of the United Statesalone: just think of European countries such as Poland or Italy itself. And allof this depends on the ability of surveillance.We can draw some conclusions:Surveillance is by its nature everywhere and must therefore be fought everywherethe ability to build a capacity for autonomous action, both individual andcollective, becomes of primary importance, aspects that are - indeed and contraryto the vulgate - mutually linkedbuild defense capabilities of their own capabilities for autonomous actionlearn to use secure means of communication and build secure networksin the absence of this one will either be at the mercy of repression or of theprotection that can become repressionArticle written by Anonymous for the Galatea-FAI Anarchist Group of Cataniahttps://gruppoanarchicogalatea.noblogs.org/post/2022/11/14/il-controllo-della-riproduzione-nel-capitalismo-della-sorveglianza/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.caSPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten