It costs nothing to cause the death of a worker. This is demonstrated by the
sentence on Luana D 'Orazio, the 22-year-old worker, killed by a machine in afactory in Prato, while she was working on a warper whose safety grids had beenremoved to make her go faster. ---- The murder - because that's what it is - tookplace on May 3, 2021 in Montemurlo (Prato) by means of a warper, in the companywhere she worked. The death occurred due to crushing of the chest(thoraco-pulmonary fracture polytrauma): a horrible and painful death. This iscaused by the absence of the protection grid; keeping it lowered would havecaused a slowdown in production, but protected the lives of those involved. Theowner had given instructions to block the safety gate to increase production! Theappraisals have ascertained the facts, verifying that a thick spider web on thesliding gear of the gate shows that the protection grid had been constantlyinactive for some time.The owners of the company chose the shortened procedure and the trial that tookplace ruled that having implemented a violation of the most elementary safetyrules cost the owner of the factory two years in prison and a fine of 10 thousandeuros and a year and six months to her husband, (both with the benefit of theconditional), for not having respected the accident prevention regulations,creating the conditions for the warper to swallow and crush Luana. Theprosecutor, as the Code of Criminal Procedure allows, accepted the defendants'proposal to impose the obligatory plea bargaining on the parties.The bosses like to say that sentences are not judged on the basis of theindignation they produce. The sentence of the Court of Prato is not onlyindignant, but it is unjust because the law that allows the deaths at work to beconsidered victims of accidents and not of homicide is unjust.But security costs money and the bosses invent that the life of a worker / workercan end by "fatality", because the life of those who work is worth much less thanlost earnings.Unscrupulous entrepreneurs, parties and business organizations that opposed thecreation of a national prosecutor on accidents at work, as proposed by the formerprosecutor Raffaele Guariniello of Turin, had proposed to build the murder ofLuana and who have opposed the tightening penalties for those who violate safetyregulations, who do not hire inspectors to supervise the application of safetyregulations.Avoiding deaths at work should respond to a consciously disregarded collectiveinterest to promote profit and guarantee impunity for those who take advantage ofthe need to work of so many women and men. The ultimate result of all this is aan obligatory plea bargain that cries out for revenge and that without theconsent of the politicians, the assent would never have become a law andtherefore a sentence. Today everyone knows how little the life of a worker whodied at work is worth, when the life of the three dead is worthday at work. If the penalty is to be a deterrent, the Prato sentence insteadbecomes an endorsement of criminal behavior that will continue unpunished.The day will come when you pay dearly and pay for everything!Political Growthhttp://www.ucadi.org/2022/10/31/omicidi-impuniti-luana-assassinata-a-prato/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten