#WORLD #WORLDWIDE #BRAZIL #ANARCHISM #LIBRARY #News #Journal #Update - (en) #Brazil, FAG: Maisonnave dossier - impunity has a last name - by the Gaúcha Anarchist Federation (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 1. DOSSIER PRESENTATION ---- On October 18, 2022, Kaingang and Xokleng indigenous

people retaken the area of an abandoned land on Morro Santana, which would
formally belong to Maisonnave Companhia de Participações , claiming the space as
of traditional Kaingang and Xokleng use and naming the territory as Retomada Gãh
Ré . ---- The company Maisonnave Companhia de Participações filed a request for
repossession, distorting facts and using a slanderous narrative against
indigenous peoples, alleging, among other accusations, that "the invasion was
planned by a legitimate criminal organization".
The Gaúcha Anarchist Federation (FAG), an organization that makes up the support
group for the resumption of Gãh Ré, through this dossier, presents to the public
a series of irregularities, frauds and crimes committed throughout history by the
Maisonnave Group, the true criminal organization that harmed the Brazilian
population in different ways and has always gone unpunished.

THE MAISONNAVE FAMILY AND THE CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MILITARY
Journalist Francisco Oliveira, in 1986, published the book "O Roubo é Livre" with
denunciations about the major scandals of so-called "white collar" crimes,
following on from the reports he had already published in "O Estado de São Paulo"
and "O Estado de São Paulo" and "O Estado de São Paulo". Afternoon Journal. Among
several scandals, the book brings to light the financial scandals and frauds
committed by Maisonnave, Sulbrasileiro, Auxiliar, Comind banks, among others,
which led to the liquidation of these institutions in 1985. Most of the following
facts are narrated in the book.

The Maisonnave family's connection with the financial market spans generations.
In the 1920s, Vinicius Maisonnave founded Maisonnave Corretora, and for years
presided over the Stock Exchange of the Extreme South, headquartered in Porto Alegre.

It was in the 1960s that Roberto de Moraes Maisonnave, son of Vinicius, joined
the family business. With their expertise, Maisonnave started to act as financial
consultants for Montepio da Família Militar (MFM). Founded in 1963 by a group of
army officers, Montepio da Família Militar was a private pension system. Three
years after its founding, the initiative already had over 130,000 members,
including civilians and military personnel, attracted by its generous private
retirement and pension plans, quickly becoming a "money making machine".

The façade of number 120 on Rua Voluntários da Pátria still holds remnants of the
former "Sociedade Maisonnave Representações"

Newspaper advertisement by Maisonnave Distribuidora highlights the history of "46
years of experience in the capital market" and the relationship with MFM
The 1964 Military Coup was an important factor in the growth of the entity, which
was led by generals and colonels. The commander of the Third Army, General
Justino Alves Bastos, was sworn in as the Honorary Presidency of the MFM. On that
occasion, on November 24, 1964, he greeted Montepio, emphasizing his "great
admiration" for the "generous social work" carried out by the MFM: "I even think
that passing through the Military College of Porto Alegre imbues its teachers and
students with a mystical force unsuspected" .

As the military did not understand the financial market, they sought advice from
brokers and specialists. Maisonnave Corretora was one of them, intermediating the
negotiations of banks purchased by the MFM. Roberto Maisonnave was an important
adviser to the military, and José Antonio Carchedi, his employee (and later
partner) was one of the main links between the MFM military and the business
community in the financial sector.

In 1966, Maisonnave SA - Credit, Financing and Investment is founded, with the
merger of MFM and Maisonnave Investimentos
The MFM promised its associates privileges that were historically forbidden to
civilians, such as the high sums provided for in pay, retirement and pensions for
the highest echelons of the military establishment and their families. With the
dream of receiving retirements and pensions worthy of army officers, thousands
joined the MFM daily during the military dictatorship, and with that the entity
started to buy countless banks and companies. But in a short time, the entity
began to present several financial problems (expenses began to be greater than
income) that prevented it from paying the benefits. As the article in Brasil de
Fato points out, leading millions of Brazilians to lose their investment
"deceived by the military" with this private pension experience .

2.2 TRAIL OF BLOOD LEFT IN PARANÁ, FROM WOOD FOUNDED BY THE MAISONNAVE GROUP

The land issue is at the heart of the fraud that links the Maisonnave to sectors
of the business community and the military dictatorship. We see the continuity of
this in the ventures in which the Maisonnave family has ventured. In 1972,
through the logging company Maisonnave Giacomet (which was later called Araupel),
Roberto Maisonnave led the purchase of a property with an area of over 114
thousand hectares of land in southwest Paraná, which belonged to the Ermírio de
Morais family, by US $30 million . Roberto Maisonnave proposed to the MFM the
purchase of the area in partnership. At first the military did not agree, but
they agreed to finance the operation .

The lands had a dense forest of araucaria and yerba mate, in addition to other
hardwoods, which are documented in ADIM/INCRA Process No. 21500.000994/96-91 of
1996. The latifundium is very close to the two largest indigenous lands in
Paraná, the Rio das Cobras Indigenous Land and the Mangueirinha Indigenous Land,
where more than 4,000 indigenous people of the Kaingang and Guarani ethnic groups
live .

The arrival of the timber company in the region intensified land conflicts
between indigenous people and peasants who lived there with the so-called owners
of the area, which came to be considered the largest continuous estate (over
100,000 hectares) that existed in the southern region of Brazil until the 1990s.
1990, evidences the research of Ana Cristina Hammel (2020):

The Estado de São Paulo newspaper, on January 20, 1977, published news of
conflicts between indigenous people and squatters in the Rio das Cobras
Indigenous Land, in Laranjeiras do Sul. In the body of the text appeared, in a
secondary way, the indication of conflict with the logging company.[...]On
February 23, 1977, the same newspaper published an article about the removal of
squatters with the help of the lumber company, which claimed to be the owner of
about 300 hectares of land within that Indigenous Reserve, acquired during the
government of Moysés Lupion. The report also brought the case of Jerônimo,
Kaingang, who was kidnapped and tortured by the head of Funai, in order to obtain
information about the indigenous rebellion.

Cases involving loggers, indigenous peoples and squatters are recurrent. The
documentary Giacomet Marodin: a history of violence and devastation brings a
series of testimonies from people who dealt with the relationship between
squatters and the company. We highlight the violent actions against children and
people who crossed the fences to fish or hunt in so-called company areas. The
documentary also denounces the deforestation of native forests and disrespect for
responsible management of the area.

Hammel's research proves, based on the history, certificates and transcripts, the
passage of a public heritage to the private domain, in a national protection
area, whose social function of the land was disregarded due to the interests of
groups of exploitation of wood for accumulation capital and financial
speculation. Starting in 1973, Giacomet Marodin/Araupel SA made several loans to
banks and financial institutions such as Banco Maisonnave, Banco Sulbrasileiro,
Banco Bamerindus (all of them involved in the frauds that will be narrated in the
next section).

In the deeds and transcriptions of records, the amounts do not always appear and,
in some cases, only what was given as a pledge or as a form of mortgage appears.
Considering the data collected in the deeds, it is not difficult to verify the
presence of financial capital with the land and the resources derived from it as
a counterpart. The amounts of the loans added up resulted in an amount of R$
30,974,582.22 (thirty million, nine hundred and seventy-four thousand, five
hundred and eighty-two reais and twenty-two cents) .

2.2 FRAUD IN THE NATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM

The crash that hit the major financial institutions in the 1980s is well known,
which are very well documented in the Blog Grandes Fraudes , such as
Sulbrasileiro, Comind, Auxiliar, Maisonnave and Brasilinvest, which even today
has former clients who claim to have lost their investments while the owners of
the institutions go unpunished.

In 1971, the National Commercial Investment Bank (BINC) was founded. In return
for services rendered to the MFM military, Roberto Maisonnave received a majority
shareholding in the institution. Similarly, Maisonnave repaid Carchedi for his
collaboration in the relationship with the MFM military by giving him a 10% stake
in the new company. As of 1973, Banco Sul Brasileiro entered the partnership,
eliminating Maisonnave's majority position. In return for the capital invested in
BINC, Roberto and Carchedi were awarded positions on the institution's board,
along with the military. Carchedi had an intimate relationship with Maisonnave
and became known for coordinating a complex corruption scheme involving the MFM,
several banks (Sulbrasileiro, Maisonnave, Habitasul, Auxiliar...),

In 1973, the Maisonnave Group purchased BMG - Banco de Investimento (from Minas
Gerais), which had a Shareholders' Equity of US$ 16 million. In 1974, one of the
first documented frauds by Carchedi took place, with the disappearance of 1353
tons of steel profiles, illegally imported from Argentina. In 1975, Maisonnave
Companhia de Administração e Participações Societárias became Ciapar - Companhia
de Adm. and Part. Soc., with José Antonio Carchedi as one of its directors.

The MFM presented, in one of its most common frauds, the following modus
operandi: they assumed the purchase of undertakings in difficulty and of
questionable viability, incorporating, for example, several banks and bankrupt
real estate projects, using resources that were raised from the money invested by
its associates in their pension and retirement plans.

The money was moved from company to company, and used mainly in the purchase of
real estate, which were fraudulently appropriated. The MFM's relationship with
companies linked to real estate speculation in the city of Porto Alegre was
intimate, involving a complex and nebulous triangulation between banks,
construction companies and real estate companies. Fraud in the purchase of real
estate involved bad checks, the release of funds without the necessary signatures
and loans that were never paid off. These movements escaped the supervision of
the Central Bank of Brazil .

Oliveira's book (1985) documents the corruption and embezzlement scandals
involving Banco Maisonnave and Montepio da Família Militar, as well as Banco
Sulbrasileiro, Banco Habitasul, among other companies that also underwent
intervention and were liquidated. by justice in 1985. With the justification of
saving the banks, loans with public money were made and were never paid back. As
always, we have banks privatizing profits and socializing debt.

For ten years, banks faked numbers to hide that they were broke. Balance sheet
data was scandalously rigged to cover up a bankrupt institution that had no money
to pay its debts. It may well have been the biggest and longest running hoax in
the country's financial history. The Central Bank found several irregularities in
bank accounts, including: approval of credit to companies without requiring the
necessary guarantees, low-interest loans to companies from other financial groups
and accounting for business between companies in the groups to "decorate the
balance sheets".

In 1977 Banco Maisonnave was created with the acquisition of RM Maisonnave Part.
Entrepreneur real estate of the charter of Banco SPI, from SP.
According to Minutes 0626 of the National Monetary Council held on November 27,
1997 (p. 71) we verified that Maisonnave Companhia de Participações was part of
the "Maisonnave Group", which was liquidated extrajudicially after crimes against
the national financial system. The accumulated debt balance of the Auxiliar,
Banco do Commércio e Indústria de São Paulo (COMIND) and Maisonnave banks on
November 27, 1997 was equivalent to R$ 406,046,444.75, according to the same minutes.

The bankruptcy of Maisonnave bank with COMIND and Banco Auxiliar, in 1985, caused
a shortfall of 6,836,000,000,000 (6 trillion and 836 billion) Cruzeiros, money
that at the time "was enough to build 390,851 popular houses, equivalent to about
of 5% of the entire budget of the Union" according to Jornal do Brasil, 11/20/1985:

Clipping from Jornal do Brasil, 11/20/1985
The Auxiliar, Comind and Maisonnave banks borrowed US$455 million from abroad and
the Maisonnave Group also received US$20 million from the Central Bank in a
rediscount line to recompose the payment of investments. Faced with the debt,
Roberto Maisonnave tried to negotiate with American Express with the aim of
making him a partner in the group's Investment Bank. As this negotiation failed
due to the Central Bank's veto to the signature of the protocol, on November 19,
1985, the Maisonnave Group was liquidated extrajudicially (on the same day, the
Comind and Auxiliary liquidations were decreed).

Clippings from Jornal do Brasil, 11/20/1985

Such was the scandal at the time that what happened was mentioned by the
constituents in the National Constituent Assembly of 1987, in the Financial
System Subcommittee and the Tax System, Budget and Finance Commission:

and the "Maisonnaves" of life? And the banks that broke and that, suddenly, the
Executive Branch itself turns, like a loving father, to help a prodigal and
spendthrift son, and lifts him up, and lifts him up .

  The Nation cannot forget that we took a billion Cruzados from the National
Treasury to cover the gap caused by the Brazilian South, that is, by
irresponsible bankers who are not in jail Those responsible for the frauds that
occurred in Haspa, in Colmeia - are not in jail either. I don't want to talk
about the most recent ones here: Maisonnave, Auxiliar, Comind. Administrative
negligence is deceit, it should not also be preserved, especially so that we can
create a modern Nation and, then, yes, speak of freedom. Liberty is not in the
right of the greater to take from the lesser. (Walmor de Luca, 1987). Source:
National Constituent Assembly .

Minutes 0626 of the National Monetary Council held on November 27, 1997
THE CONTINUITY OF THE MAISONNAVE FAMILY ENTERPRISES
After the liquidation of Banco Maisonnave, Roberto started to invest in
electricity projects, and today he chairs the group of companies that operate in
the management of his real estate assets, in trade and representations, mining
and energy.

The Maisonnave Group had influence on public authorities at municipal, state and
federal level, lobbying for the privatization of energy companies, as we can see
in the complaint made in 1993 by then councilor Guilherme Barbosa: "I denounce
from this platform that the Collares Government is negotiating with the group of
Mr. Roberto Maisonnave the sale of State Hydroelectric Power Plants. Wanting to
privatize, therefore, the energy sector".

Roberto Maisonnave himself reports in a book that tells the history of APINE (
Brazilian Association of Independent Electric Energy Producers), the role that
the association of businessmen played in Brasília in defense of the privatization
of public energy companies, such as Eletrobrás:

Banco Pactual saw the market that was opening up, organized seminars on the
market that was to come and, together with Bozzano, Simonsen, Icatu and
Opportunity banks, carried out the first privatization of a state-owned
distributor in Brazil. In order to obtain authorizations for the PCHs from the
then National Department of Water and Electric Energy (DNAEE), I hired
Energética-Tech's consultancy in the person of Mário Menel, its president. We
identify a lot, we form a great partnership, he with the technique and I with the
courage. A law that regulated the independent producer was being discussed in the
National Congress, with a strong participation of the then senator José Fogaça,
from my state.[...]For this work in my state, the help of engineer Edu Machado,
now deceased, was fundamental. With that mandate,

I remember a meeting with most of the associates present, in Minister Rodolfo
Tourinho's room, in general very solicitous with our demands. At a certain point,
the minister raised an issue that in some way offended the corporate interests of
the Eletrobras system. There was an executive among us, already retired from the
sector, who took the floor and began to argue with the minister, defending the
employees of the system; and we didn't know how to get around the situation. That
said, the minister left the room, an incontinent act for which our executive was
harshly reprimanded. At great cost, we managed to get the minister to return and
the executive to recant. Seen today, the incident seems more funny than tense,
but it serves to show how people's values were involved in our journey, aimed at
creating a strong and united association, which spoke for everyone from the
beginning." (Roberto Maisonnave)

In 2001 Marcelo Maisonnave (Roberto's nephew) founded the XP Investimentos
brokerage in the city of Porto Alegre. In 2017, with the 120 million reais it
raised from the sale of its XP shares, Maisonnave created Warren, an investment
platform. In an article about Marcelo Maisonnave, a comment by a citizen harmed
by Banco Maisonnave stands out:

Comment from citizen injured by Banco Maisonnave. Print commentary on the
article: https://www.suno.com.br/tudo-sobre/marcelo-maisonnave/.

This continuity of the family's enterprises continued to carry with it numerous
complaints of irregularities. According to Civil Appeal: AC 70078616489 RS , in
the 2000s, the company Cenebra, controlled by the Maisonnave family, negotiated
the purchase of companies Grapesul and Grapepar, but did not pay the agreed
price. There were allegations that the Maisonnave family emptied Cenebra's
capital, giving it a new name and transferring its management to oranges whose
lives were investigated and who presented themselves as simple people who could
never manage a company of such size. There were requests for the Maisonnave
family to be sentenced to pay R$ 14,920,102.34 .

3.1 THE DEVELOPMENT IN MORRO SANTANA

  At the same time, one can see the continuity of the family's investments in
real estate speculation in the area taken over by the Kaingang and Xokleng in
2022, where plans are being made to build a large real estate development, with
profound environmental impacts and various signs of irregularities.

According to the expression of Dr. Pedro Nicolau Moura Sacco of the Federal
Public Ministry (MPF) the name Maisonnave Companhia de Participações, which
appears on the registration of the property "recalls the banking crisis that
liquidated the private banking system in Rio Grande do Sul in the eighties":

The one for debts with the BNDES, FINAME and FPS was released by the creditors in
1992, by who knows what expedient. The Maisonnave Group never returned to the
treasury the hundreds of millions of reais used to pay its creditors. We see,
therefore, in license plate 31,300 the historical record of a dark time, whose
echoes we hear until today. Yes, the Central Bank never foreclosed on the Morro
Santana property, even if it was only as a symbolic reparation to the always
injured Brazilian taxpayer. Unlike ordinary mortals indebted to federal entities,
the Maisonnave were never bothered by their debts. As a culmination of this dark
past, they have now obtained the necessary authorizations from the Municipality
of Porto Alegre to build, in one of the last areas of preserved forest in Porto
Alegre, a condominium for 2. 500 people. Can we look down on the past when this
happens now? (Dr. Pedro Nicolau Moura Sacco - MPF)

In the 1970s, the farm was part of José Asmuz's Depósito Guaporense SA quarry
complex. Between the 1960s and 1970s, the mining-extractive enterprise resulted
in the transformation of the landscape and was deactivated due to complaints that
served as the basis for the Public Civil Action (ACP) filed by the State Public
Prosecutor's Office, which states that, in the "inexistence of a license for a
large part of of the company's operating time", demanded "strict liability for
environmental damage". In 2017, the mining company Depósito Guaporense SA and its
owner José Asmuz, now deceased, together with the municipality of Porto Alegre,
were sentenced (JUDGMENT 70009570490 2004/CIVIL) to pay compensation for material
and environmental damage, being obliged to present a project for full recovery of
the area, which has never been done.

Analyzing the property registration number 31300, we observe that, still in 1981,
the property belonging to Asmuz - Construções e Incorporações, was mortgaged to
Banco Maisonnave. In 1983, Banco Maisonnave de Investimento authorized the
cancellation of the mortgages on the property and the property, which initially
belonged to Asmuz - Construções e Incorporações, became part of Banco Maisonnave
de Investimentos. Today, it appears that ownership of the property would belong
to Maisonnave Companhia de Participações (successor to Banco Maisonnave de
Investimento SA and Maisonnave SA Crédito, Financiamento e Investimentos,
according to registration). The registration proves the evolution of this debt
over time, with Maisonnave Companhia de Participações as debtor, and as creditors
the Economic and Social Development Bank (BNDES), the Special Industrial
Financing Agency (FINAME),

In 1987, the Maisonnave group mortgaged the property as a guarantee for a debt
contracted with the Central Bank of Brazil, in the amount of Cz$ 782,997,000.00
(seven hundred and eighty-two million, nine hundred and ninety-seven thousand New
Cruzados), which monetarily corrected amount to R$ 206,911,117.14 today (two
hundred and six million, nine hundred and eleven thousand, one hundred and
seventeen reais and fourteen cents).

According to the MPF, if the Maisonnave group had paid the debt, it would not
have recorded the extinction of the mortgage by peremption. Thus, it is very
likely the case of a company that did not pay a large public debt and was not
bothered by the creditor, who did not foreclose on the mortgage. Therefore, the
property, which would belong to the Union if the mortgage had been foreclosed on,
remained with the debtor, free for subdivision.

In consultation with the Environmental Licensing (PREVIAL LICENSE 017974) related
to the development project that was sought to be carried out in the area, we
verified that an unfiling request was requested through the SEI 19.0.000091543-5
process, to verify compliance with the conditions of the Municipal Secretariat of
the Environment Environment (SMAM) of Opinion No. 95/2012 of the Commission for
Urban Analysis and Management (CAUGE), "especially in relation to proof that the
lawsuit with the determination of unavailability of the defendants' assets by the
State Public Prosecutor's Office referring to the areas of Morro Santana (former
Pedreira do Asmuz and surroundings)".

At first, the undertaking was rejected by the Municipal Council for Urban
Environmental Development ( CMDUA), with the contrary arguments of several
counselors, who in meetings stated that it was an area of ecological, historical
importance, with proven archaeological potential, an Area of Permanent
Preservation ( APP), with significant vegetation cover, water resources and
cultural potential:

President Cristiano Tatsch put the rapporteur's favorable opinion to a vote,
which was not approved, receiving 9 (nine) favorable votes, 10 (ten) contrary
votes, and 3 (three) abstentions (Minutes 2541 of March 26, 2013).

However, even with the rapporteur's vote against, the process was redistributed
to another planning region, as stated:

Counselor Euclésio read Article 22 of the Internal Regulations, Paragraph Seven,
to indicate that the process should be assigned to a new rapporteur. The
President informed that the next one on the list, with the vote against the
rapporteur's, was Planning Region One. Process Redistributed to RGP 1 (Minutes
2541 of March 26, 2013).

With the project being sent to a new region (RGP 1), the project was approved
with little debate: "After the demonstrations were over, the favorable opinion of
the rapporteur was put to a vote and was approved, receiving 13 (thirteen)
favorable votes, eight (eight) ) votes against, and 3 (three) abstentions.
Process approved" (Minutes No. 2545 of April 23, 2013) .

Faced with the approval of the project, which was considered rushed - and with
signs of irregularities - many board members expressed concern, requested that
diligence be carried out and that the discussion be redone:

Conselheiro Eduíno (RGP 7)[...]He reported on the Maisonave company process
approved at the last meeting, the quarry, said he was against it, thought that
the discussion should be redone, mentioned complications with the BNDS and
regarding ownership of the area . Conselheiro Jorge (RGP 2) asked to clarify that
his manifestation of the last meeting regarding the questions about the date of
the registrations, 1981, were given as a way of alerting to the possibility of
differences in the size of the land, which could make future approval unfeasible
of the project and licensing.[...]Counselor Heverson (OCDUA)[...]He said that
steps had been taken to the site of the development analyzed by the CMDUA in the
last session, on Rua Natho Henn, and thatthe location has inadequate conditions
for the implementation of the enterprise. He considered it fundamental that the
directors carry out diligences to know the places analysed. Conselheiro Fernando
(IAB) reported on the complaints that occurred the day before, in relation to
notes of irregularities in environmental licensing in the capital.He felt that
the technical staff that evaluates the projects is vulnerable and that it would
be necessary to review the form of approvals by the Council, as a way of offering
greater security to the councilors. He expressed his concern about the situation
and suggested that the CMDUA should speak out on the matter.[...]Counselor
Jakubaszko (RGP 1) suggested that the entire process to be processed by the CMDUA
and which did not obtain a consensual position should have more time for
analysis, taking into account the situation in the city regarding complaints and
possible irregularities.  (Minutes No. 2546 of April 30, 2013 - CMDUA)

Adding to these questions, we observe that the company "Profil - Engenharia e
Ambiente", hired by Maisonnave Companhia de Participações to carry out the
vegetation cover report , is the same company that carried out an Environmental
Impact Study (EIA) declared in part as "false/misleading/missing" by the General
Institute of Expertise (IGP), in a Civil Police inquiry concluded in May 2021, at
the Fazenda do Arado development .

Urban Feasibility Study (EVU). Source: Available at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cUlsL66A9SOxgfMMaNNA4rTbthAEeG1E/view?usp=sharing
In consultation with the CMDUA maps, we discovered that the development area was
considered a Permanent Preservation Area, however, in 1994, the limits were
adjusted and became considered an "intensive occupation area", authorizing
construction on the site.

Adjustment of UTP limits. Adjustment of Permanent Protection Area limits to
"intensive occupation area" exactly at the development site.
Still according to the vegetation cover report, the total land area comprises
15.09 ha, with the fraction of 4.23 ha being located in the Intensive Occupation
Area, and 10.86 ha are located in the Forest Protection Area. Natural
environment. The report analyzed only the fraction of 4.23 ha, located in the
Intensive Occupation Area, which will be directly impacted by the project, and 76
species were identified in this area, 49 native (67%) and 24 (33%) exotic.

  CONCLUSION
The alliance between capital and the state is old. Among bankers, businessmen,
the military, politicians and sectors of the judiciary, the case of the
Maisonnave shows once again that the ruling classes, as needed, unite around a
unified project of power. Moved by unrestricted greed, we know that their goals
are the exponential concentration of money and political power. Its consequences
are the domination, exploitation, destruction and extermination of peoples and
biomes.

Faced with all these issues, relating both to environmental crimes committed by
its former owner José Asmuz and the mining company Depósito Guaporense, and to
crimes against the national financial system, committed by the current owners of
Maisonnave Companhia de Participações, it is worrying that the group has received
Preliminary License to build a large condominium on the site.

This dossier provides solid foundations to support the need for punishment and
accountability of Companhia Maisonnave de Participações for the damage caused to
the population.

All notes, sources and photos used in this document, as well as the full text
illustrated in better resolution, can be accessed and downloaded from this link:
https://we.tl/t-96lMkWUAm0

Gaucho Anarchist Federation (FAG),
December 8, 2022

https://FAGarquista.org/2022/12/08/dossie-maisonnave-a-impunidade-tem-sobrenome
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca