September 14, 2022, the day of the assassination of Jina (Mahsa) Amini, marked
the beginning of a revolutionary period in Iran. As the protest continues,Somayeh Rostampour, a doctoral student at Paris-8 University, returns forAlternative Libertaire to the origins of the movement and its deeply feminist andintersectional orientation. ---- Jina (Mahsa) Amini, a 22-year-old young woman ofKurdish origin, killed by the morality police for "indecent dress",simultaneously crystallized several oppressions in her identity. As such, therecent uprising was distinguished from previous ones by an intersection of class,ethnicity and gender. Her funeral turned into a public protest demonstration withthe slogan "Woman, life, freedom", inspired by the struggle of Kurdish women inRojava. He was chanted for the first time that day by the angry residents ofSaqqez, his hometown in Kurdistan, who came bravely on that historic morning tothwart the government's plan to secretly bury Jina.This slogan is the legacy of the Kurdish women's movement of Turkey, a regionknown to Kurds as Bakur, strongly influenced by the political philosophy proposedby the founder and charismatic leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK),Abdullah Öcalan . Since 2013, this slogan has been reused in Rojava and then inother regions of Kurdistan and even in many cities in Latin America, Europe andthe United States. Pro-PKK women (both guerrillas and civil political activists)were the subjects who gradually made "Jin, Jiyan, Azadi" the most central sloganof this movement by bringing an intersectional vision: both against thegovernment but also against the local capitalist patriarchy and even theirorganization. It also makes it easier for the slogan to travel across borders."Woman, life, freedom". Since 2013, this slogan has been reused in Rojava andthen in other regions of Kurdistan and even in many cities in Latin America,Europe and the United States.Herzi PinkiAN INTERSECTIONAL UPRISINGIn direct contrast to the murderous and repressive male-dominated structure ofthe Islamic Republic, which denied any form of freedom to various groups,especially women and queers, ethnic or environmental activists, or othermarginalized groups like the workers, "Jin, Jiyan, Azadi" acts as a unifyingalternative that encompasses plural oppressions. Iranian society has been slow toaccept that gender and ethnic oppression is not only the problem of thoseconcerned, but an absolute necessity for a democracy based on social justicethroughout the country. Getting rid of class oppression is deeply dependent onthe simultaneous resolution of other forms of oppression that have made somepeople, including the Kurds, "minority" or even "inferior". The revolutionaryuprising of Jina was able to make these fractions visible and thus make them amain subject: the marginalized peripheries become the center of the uprising.It should not be forgotten that for years left-wing forces in Iran not onlyignored the "Kurdish question" and more broadly the demands of nationalminorities for the right to self-determination, but they also denied theimportance of feminism or the need to make it a priority. At the same time,Kurdish nationalists have also tried to fuel the myth that patriarchy does notexist in Kurdistan, and that if there is violence, it is mostly rooted in stateoppression. central colonialist, who denies the existence of the Kurds. It isindeed the intersectional aspect of the recent uprising that changes the dominantmasculinist discourse in favor of a feminist narrative.CROSS-BORDER REALITIESOn this point also, there are similarities between the situation of Iran and thatof Turkey, also provoking revolts in both cases: daily life and private spacesunder the control of the oppressive patriarchal ruler are in crisis in the formof a permanent state of emergency and women are the pioneers of change becausethey are the first victims. It is therefore possible to trace the struggles ofKurdish women across borders. It was state authoritarianism in particular thatcreated a similar socio-political condition for Kurds in two countries. With theestablishment of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the attempt toIslamize gender-related fields, this similarity has increased day by day.A LONG-STANDING POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT From the beginning of the revolutionary uprising in Iran, Kurdish women played avery important role. They paid the price: at least five Kurdish women were killedby the oppressive forces of the regime, hundreds injured and arrested. Theseresistances and the magnificent performance of Kurdish women on the day of Jina'sfuneral in Kurdistan (starting point of the uprising) by waving their headscarvesand transforming the symbol of state oppression into a flag of feminist struggleare in the same way the result of an organizational tradition in Rojhelat(Kurdistan located in Iran), transmitted from generation to generation despitebrutal repression. The seeds of the struggle for emancipation that were plantedin 1979, in a process that has remained unfinished, have germinated today fourdecades later in Kurdistan and have benefited the whole of Iran.Consequences of politico-economic marginalization, in Iran as in Turkey, the actsof national oppression by the central government on the Kurdish people have ledto collective reactions in the form of various movements with a hegemony ofKurdish nationalists and socialists. In both cases, the militancy of theseorganized forces, which notably emerged in the power vacuum and politicalopenness caused by the fall of the Pahlavi regime in 1979, paved the way for theactive presence of Kurdish women in politics. Some movements, like the KomalaMaoist Party (1979-1991), although in a small but pioneering way, also provided aplatform for Rojhelat women to enter the political or armed fields (even beforethe PKK) .And, during the demonstration of March 8, 1979, several thousand women inSanandaj, Marivan or Kermanshah protested against compulsory hijab with sloganslike "No headscarf, no humiliation, death to dictatorship", "We did not make arevolution to go back". The nucleus responsible for the successful preparation ofthis demonstration created soon after, at the beginning of the year 1980, theCouncil of Women of Sanandaj whose members were mainly drawn from varioustendencies of the left. These activities laid the foundation for the progressiveand radical tradition of March 8 in Rojhelat, which continues to this daycontinuously and in different forms.Historically, men have been the main actors in Kurdish nationalist movementsaccording to a patriarchal vision according to which the fatherland wasconsidered as a woman whom men had to protect as their property. But, with thegrowth of radical and socialist movements in Kurdistan, and, in particular,during the last two or three decades, this discourse has been graduallymarginalized and replaced by egalitarian and progressive ideas. This newpolitical position is built at the heart of several intersectional fields ofoppression and exploitation that women face: with the patriarchy of Kurdish andnon-Kurdish men, fundamentalism and the structural oppression imposed by theregime in place, Iranian chauvinists and centrist (often nationalist) feminism,as well as homophobia and racism. Thanks to these efforts, women have become oneof the main pillars of the struggle and resistance of the revolutionary movementof Kurdistan as evidenced by the Jina uprising.Somayeh Rostampourhttps://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Kurdistan-Pionnieres-d-un-soulevement-revolutionnaire-feministe_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.caSPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten