FLINK doesn't change anything about his business conduct, but fortunately he
faces more and more resistance. On April 19, 2023, we accompanied S., a FLINKworker, in solidarity with his conciliation hearing before the Dresden LaborCourt. Because nobody has to be alone when everyone is standing together. We gotto know S. in our trade union consultation and spoke to him about his terminationwithout notice by FLINK. FLINK has once again terminated without giving reasons.The reasons only became known at the court hearing and are outrageous to say theleast. ---- The representative of FLINK Lagodinski complained that S. once in theautumn did not show up for his shift without an excuse. S. countered this bystating that he hadn't had a shift that day and that it only appeared in theshift planning program around 7 p.m. in the evening. An error, then, which heimmediately reported to the hub manager, which he was able to prove with emails.But the second reason mentioned really pulls our shoes off as trade unionists: S.was 11 minutes late one day. S. was also able to refute the fact that there hadbeen problems with local public transport and that he had informed the shiftmanager on the way to work. That was the first delay in a year and a half.Exemplary work behavior. But why this termination? As the legal representative ofthe worker RA Feilitzsch suspected in the appointment, there could be aconnection with the fact that S. complained shortly before the termination thathe had not gotten enough shifts in the last two months. On the executive side,non-functioning IT, bad shift planning that violates labor law, non-stophire-and-fire policy, on the employee side, a single late arrival of a fewminutes is enough to deprive a person of their income. To this we say:Termination without notice for FLINK!The judge of the 8th Chamber Zickert saw it similarly. He left little doubt thatthe termination cannot last. S. and his lawyer made the offer to end theemployment relationship by mutual agreement on April 30, 2023 and to be paiduntil then and also a severance payment of 1,500 euros - only fair in view of thelegally untenable termination.The representative of FLINK Lagodinski offered a settlement with a terminationdate at the end of March and apparently had no authority to give more. S. and hislegal representative rightly rejected this far too small offer. So the processgoes on. As the lawyer stated, there is no reason to assume a lawful dismissaland therefore no basis at all to accept a bad settlement.We can be curious as to whether an agreement will still be reached or whether wewill get a judge's verdict in the main hearing in February next year on how wrongFLINK's business practice is. Or, as FLINK's representative promised - and italmost sounded like a threat - that the dismissal would be withdrawn and S. couldreturn to his job. We will continue to monitor this process and report ifnecessary. Unless FLINK changes its brazen and often unlawful business practices,they will not rest. We demand: End the hire-and-fire policy! Finally get yourshop in order! Stop torpedoing attempts at self-organization by the workers!We recommend to all riders and other workers of FLINK:Don't trust FLINK! Document your communication and any irregularities and saveeverything offline! Export your time tracking regularly!If you have the impression that something is wrong, get advice, for example inour trade union consultation hours. If you are fired, you often have a goodchance of getting a severance payment in a dismissal protection process!Get organized with your colleagues, join the union - Riders unite!https://fda-ifa.org/flink-11-minuten-und-du-bist-raus/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten