WORLD WORLDWIDE GREECE News Journal Update - (en) Greece, protaanka anarchists: For the collaborators and laundromats of the extreme right (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 In a position published in Athens Indymedia by the show "cries from the cells"

there were some references and some characterizations were addressed to our
political core on the occasion of the designation we attributed to Fotis Terzakis
as a "collaborator of the extreme right"[1]. A "category" and a "definition"
which of course does not have us as its starting point, was not formulated for
the first time by us and does not originate from a subjective interpretation of
the specific's words. On the contrary, Terzakis' collaborations are public, they
are undeniable and cannot be denied, no matter how much his interlocutors of any
kind want
The "screams from the cells" position in question was formally and at the title
level centered on the unacceptable invasion of the Indymedia accountability
meeting . Essentially, of course, it had a much broader thematic content and the
editor's arrows were probably evenly distributed in the caustic scale between the
"Ruvikon" and us, a fact that also creates reasonable questions as to her real
intentions and what she ultimately wanted to serve and achieve with publication
of this position.

Although critical accounts are empathetic and undocumented, coming from logics in
which the very value of documentation is questioned and is confused between
ideological indeterminacy, political obscurity and cognitive poverty, we have a
political duty to respond publicly and clearly regardless of where such (unclear)
emanates. )political attacks and what is their political value. Not out of some
respect for abusers and accomplices with far-right, Russophile and pro-Syriza
formations or from a moral and political commitment to public confrontation, the
terms of expression of which have in this case been shaken from the preamble. But
with the goal of cleaning up the mud spewed by such abusers, which can
potentially cause misunderstandings if left adrift in the fields of amoral
vulgarity and political illiteracy. It is also an opportunity to express
positions against "trends" and perceptions that have emerged as a result of the
pandemiccovid 19 and are represented by people who are ideologically unclear,
possessed by reactionary arrogance, petty-bourgeois arrogance and pompous styles
that do not correspond either to the level of their politics or their moral
constitution.

In this case, the attacker of the show "shouts from the cells" accused us because
of the categorical disagreement we expressed with the correlation made by two
"groups", equating the invasion of the Rubicon and what it signified, with the
one that took place in an event that they themselves participated, in which the
speaker was the collaborator of the extreme right Fotis Terzakis. For now, we
will not dwell in detail on these groups that have nothing to do with the
libertarian tradition and anarchist initiatives, nor on the actual intervention
in Terzakis, its political characteristics and those who implemented it. We will
focus on Terzakis himself, the "Interdisciplinary Union for the Defense of
Democracy and Bioethics" in which he also participates in some of its members as
well as other founts of these circles.ndymedia and to Terzakis, then it will be
clear that those who proceed in such anti-dialectical associations are not only
possessed by a deep ideological confusion which they would do well to evaluate,
but unfortunately, it will be clearly confirmed that they themselves, after all,
are conscious launderers of the extreme right.

Also taking into account that public political criticism of an anarchist
collectivity involves the self-confidence of an exhibition that we must
recognize, it is important that there is ample light about which political
subjects are being contested. So speaking of ideological confusions, the
particular one who defends Terzakis as a "comrade leftist thinker" against fellow
anarchists, has always been distinguished by an ideological vagueness, just like
the ideologically undefined types she defends in her text, which apart from
osmosis with the far-right absurdity, at the same time they are advancing in
alliances with pro-war pro-Putinists, such as KED Avantgarde. For us, who have
knowledge, we are not surprised by this stance on the side of the fellow "leftist
thinker" and partner of the extreme right or on the side of these groups. When
ideological confusion meets the postmodern denial of ideology everything becomes
a tangle and eventually "everything is allowed", as long as they oppose
"ideological purity" wherever it comes from, even on the extreme right. Since the
"high processing" of all of these take as the main criterion and connecting link
of the unity between them the "anti-vaccination identity", it follows as an
objective consequence that they all grind them (even the extreme right) in the
blender of conspiracy, ideological confusion and of anti-scientism, seeing
everywhere mysterious and phantom "enemies". Without classes,

Regarding the knowledge of the opposing parties, we must additionally point out
that the voice of the "cries from the cells" did not publish a statement with its
name, to consider whether it "deserves an answer", but used the name of a
"broadcast", which as such is not at all uninvolved in the processes of said
circles. On the contrary, it is an integral part of them and has assumed a clear
role in things, both recording the events of these circles, and now reaching, to
upgrade and evolve into a kind of their vanguard. So the defense he gives them
brings political responsibilities to this choice and to us, it charges us with
the task of responding to the insults he hurled. Undeniably, the key is neither
the investigation of the vague ideological identity of the specific one nor of
Terzakis as a "leftist thinker". As once again a rhetoric of relativization of
whether Terzakis is a partner of the extreme right is being expressed and this
relativization is what leads to the correlations, we will try to make an effort
to dissolve them on our side, in case the laundries stop or at least, to more
comrades realize that if they don't stop themselves, we must stop them.

Entering into this, the editor of "cries from the cells" claimed that it is
"shameless" to characterize Terzakis as a collaborator of the extreme right. The
reason, of course, that he did not quote the slightest argument in support of
this position, according to which to prove how we are "shameless" and Terzakis
slandered, is obvious: everyone concerned now knows what Terzakis is. Even more,
his laundromats also know the extent of his connection with the extreme right and
how he is publicly proclaimed. For those who still don't know, they can read the
founding declaration of the "Interdisciplinary Union for the Defense of Democracy
and Bioethics" co-signed by Terzakis and look for the identity of its
co-founder-members, as well as to monitor the general course of the "Union", its
members and their alliances. He will understand firsthand that Terzakis is par
excellence a partner of far-right, racist and sexist-homophobic formations,
parties and organizations from the entire spectrum of intolerant misanthropy of
the "right-wing" and as such, an enemy of all social, class and political
conscious person. Within this "Union" one will meet all sorts of buds: members of
ANEL, EPAM, "PNYKA 21" and the Hellenic Assembly of the well-known Artemis
Sorras, the owner of billions of the bonds of the bank of the east, with which
would have paid off the Greek debt a few years ago ( He will understand firsthand
that Terzakis is par excellence a partner of far-right, racist and
sexist-homophobic formations, parties and organizations from the entire spectrum
of intolerant misanthropy of the "right-wing" and as such, an enemy of all
social, class and political conscious person. Within this "Union" one will meet
all sorts of buds: members of ANEL, EPAM, "PNYKA 21" and the Hellenic Assembly of
the well-known Artemis Sorras, the owner of billions of the bonds of the bank of
the east, with which would have paid off the Greek debt a few years ago ( He will
understand firsthand that Terzakis is par excellence a partner of far-right,
racist and sexist-homophobic formations, parties and organizations from the
entire spectrum of intolerant misanthropy of the "right-wing" and as such, an
enemy of all social, class and political conscious person. Within this "Union"
one will meet all sorts of buds: members of ANEL, EPAM, "PNYKA 21" and the
Hellenic Assembly of the well-known Artemis Sorras, the owner of billions of the
bonds of the bank of the east, with which would have paid off the Greek debt a
few years ago ( class and politically aware person. Within this "Union" one will
meet all sorts of buds: members of ANEL, EPAM, "PNYKA 21" and the Hellenic
Assembly of the well-known Artemis Sorras, the owner of billions of the bonds of
the bank of the east, with which would have paid off the Greek debt a few years
ago ( class and politically aware person. Within this "Union" one will meet all
sorts of buds: members of ANEL, EPAM, "PNYKA 21" and the Hellenic Assembly of the
well-known Artemis Sorras, the owner of billions of the bonds of the bank of the
east, with which would have paid off the Greek debt a few years ago (sic ).
Dominant form of the founding executives and Moussis Karabeidis, related both to
the Hellenic Assembly and to other nationalist and neo-Nazi formations.
Karabeidis brilliantly presented in the video we quote[2]the goals and
characteristics of the "Union", formulating familiar neo-fascist positions
against the "neo-taxists" and developing "interesting" approaches, full of
"logical" conclusions and "valid" scientific methodology, regarding rapid tests etc.

Another important personality of the "Union" is Nelli Psarrou, who was also
recently invited to the "libertarian collective". According to publications by
Psarrou, the prominent form of the "Union", those who criticize them for
collusion with the extreme right, judging by the signatures of the founding
declaration, are unaware that many of its founding members have left. With this
statement she offers an excellent prompt to investigate herself as an active
member of the "Union". With such an investigation, the searcher will find that
this particular piece of garbage, in addition to being a "Macedonian fighter" in
the nationalist rallies of 2018 and a co-founder of the "Union" with the above
buds, is also an interlocutor of the "Hellenic Network" which in its election
manifesto states as aim to "free Greece and the Greek people from the neo-taxites
and anti-Greek politicians of the systemic and traitorous parties"[3]and with the
infamous "Guardians of the Constitution"[4]. We have the same experience with the
latter, having our fellow member facing heavy prosecutions from their donors for
beating up their members and extremely restrictive conditions in the context of
this prosecution. Finally, Psarrou's allies exist from the entire
far-right-nationalist spectrum, from Velopoulos, to those involved with the
neo-nationalist formation Kasidiaris, such as Yovanopoulos[5]who has from time to
time presented emetic fascist broadcasts[6]together with the former member of
"ANEL " and current parliamentary candidate of the "Greek GTP" James Saunders.

Psarrou, this highly academic "unionist", interlocutor and collaborator of the
entire nationalist, far-right and fascist cesspool, in addition to being an
invited speaker of the "Freedom March" collective, was also a speaker at a very
indicative of the epistemological, ideological, political and epistemological
background of all these events about the "coronavirus hoax"[7]organized by the
aforementioned "hellenism network" with prominent guests. Of course, in addition
to the identity of the guests, the very content of these events is of great
interest, but we will not give in to the temptation to dwell on such a
commentary. We will deal with the absurdity of conspiracy theory with the
required analytical depth at a time of our choosing, in a different formtext and
not triggered by the challenges of its operators.

Another finding that emerges from studying the positions of such extreme
right-wing scumbags, is the way in which they treat, through relativization and
ahistorical clarification, concepts such as "fascism". For her part, Psarrou, who
first taught, has published a series of delusional articles on the ideological
and historical overview of fascism[8]attempting to detach it from its traditional
subjects of performance and to transfer it to those who criticize her for her
relationship with him, as he recently did in a defiant, defamatory article,
talking about "black and red fascism". In a similar way, he responded to the
"anti-fascists" who characterized the rallies for Macedonia as far-right, etc. In
the same direction, Contra also spoke about "fascism". Dystopia in its position
on the intervention in Terzakis and we see in general that the relativization of
terms by such ridiculous people emerges as a key argumentative tool and
constitutes an extremely dangerous politicization of avoiding the criticism
addressed to them, which on the one hand increases the ideological confusion and
on the other hand drains their oil fascists and nazis and even makes them
potential frontal allies on the basis of the various blurred bonds of unity that
can be created from time to time.

These phenomena of the relativization of fascism are by no means new, however, a
generalization of them is observed nowadays, which is progressively integrated
into a dominant point of the times. Every day, the establishment media and the
various political bodies fuel the ideological confusion that results from the
ahistorical relativizations. Thus, every act of "violence" or even non-violent
acts that "suggest" violence are characterized as "fascist": from the
interventions with sprays and stun guns against political figures of the
government, as recently in Domna Michailidou or the attacks on the persons of
Vitsa and Varoufakis .These days, even the neo-Nazi Kasidiaris is talking about
"fascism" and "anti-democratic practices" under the threat and now the final
decision to exclude him from the elections, copying the communication practices
of the golden dawn, which had in the past made candy about of a "legal political
party" that "fascists" criminalize.

The communicative practices of the golden dawn are precisely those that are
employed in the examples we are looking at. In order to justify the unwarranted,
that is, their relations with the extreme right and the fascists, these
formations return the terms falsified. So any violence or threat of it is
"fascist", far-right speech blocks are "fascist" and constitute "censorship" and
"thought police", even violence against fascists is "fascist". The only
non-fascist violence for these pacifist democrats seems to be the democratic
violence of capitalism, the violence of the system, the only legalized and
normalized violence that can be expressed "non-fascistly". So they can unhindered
cooperate with the extreme right, in the context of "democratic pluralism" and
"freedom of circulation of ideas",

In order not to exaggerate, we consider the above to be sufficiently satisfactory
evidence from which the cooperation of Terzakis and the "Union" in which he
participates as a founding member with the entire spectrum of the extreme right,
both organically and at an allied or allied level, can be strongly deduced
dialogue, for which we were characterized as "shameless" by the voice of "Cries
from the Cells". In the same way, the despicable attempts to relativize and
launder such associations and the "ethos" of their defensive argumentation,
which, in order to protect themselves from any answers to their synergy with the
fascists, fraudulently return the term back are evident. Beyond any doubt it also
appearswho are the real shameless people, who, while they associate with the
far-right and conspiratorial mud, give it a foothold, indulge and ossify
ideologically and politically with it, at the same time they have the audacity to
insult anarchists in their fierce defense.

Let us consider at this point two other reports that accompanied the accusations
hurled at the deposition, which was then published about the invasion of the
Indymedia accountability meeting .. The editor from "Cries", justified our
shamelessness, that is, to call Terzakis a collaborator of the extreme right,
with an appeal to "ideological purity" and "critical affinity to the state and
health management of the pandemic". As for the first, we have already positioned
ourselves briefly, demonstrating that the de-ideological, blurred and politically
uncritical view of reality can, on the one hand, find allies in "left-wing
thinkers" who collaborate with the far-right, and on the other hand, oppose the
"ideological "purity" of anarchist comrades and comrades due to their ideological
clarity that does not "mess up" and is not open to extraneous influences and
osmosis.At the same time, the denial and counter-revolutionary revision of
anarchism, the justification of anti-dialectical ideological mixtures of the
anarchist worldview either with the Marxist, or with the liberal, or finally with
the extreme right, always uses as an alibi and cloak the "denial of ideological
purity" so it does not it surprises us. Any criticism of "ideological purity" is
for us a title of honor, because we know empirically when, why and for what
purpose this criticism is presented, always to disclaim the responsibility of
value and ideological monstrosities.

Let's move on to the second part. What is this "affinity" with the state and
health management of the pandemic for which the scream filter abandons us? Did we
participate in the intervention against Terzakis or did we identify with its
political content?Since there is neither on this point any kind of documentation
nor could such a suggestion be drawn from the many dozens of pages that we had
listed the period of prohibitions with analyzes[9], how did he come up and accuse
us of being "relatives" of " health-state management"? How could this position be
based, judging by the fact that we did not deal with "vaccines" when we
characterized Terzakis as a partner of the extreme right, to be able to mobilize
such a reference and include it in an anti-vaccination polemic against in ghosts
of pro-vaccination networks between the Anarchist Saints Anargyro - Kamaterou
Initiative and white-robed scientists in secret dark councils?

As we have already mentioned, in order to draw solid conclusions, full knowledge
of the subjects involved in the public debate is of great importance. Thus, we
should make it known that the voice from the "cries from the cells" already from
the first lockdown had created various pages about the pandemic, prohibitions and
state health management and indeed on these pages, at least at the beginning of
the operation them, they dominated our own texts and displayed banners of our
political core as covers! The adoption of our positions and the projection of the
actions we carried out from these pages reached the level of wondering if they
were ours ( sic). Later these pages slowly slipped into conspiracy theory and the
search for "dark centers" from which the "disciplines" emanated. But this
developmentdoes not negate the fact that if our political core, according to the
claims of the "Screams" is governed by "affinity with the state-health management
of the pandemic" then the voice of the "Screams" who systematically presented the
positions and our analyzes of the "state-health management of the pandemic". So,
here too, coal is the treasure! Nothing can be documented even at this point,
which would at least put us in a condition to analyze or support our positions.
It is not possible to make an accusation of acceptance of the state and health
management of the pandemic while the analyzes of the people to whom you make an
out-of-place and out-of-time accusation like this have been your "guides" towards
the state management of the pandemic.

Somewhere here, the rest of the indictment collapses and the incoherence that
permeates the logic of all sorts of "cries from the cells" is exposed. Before we
proceed, however, it is interesting to note that unsubstantiated incoherence and
petty-bourgeois reactionism appear to be the main weapon of conspiracy theorists
against their opponents (real or imagined). In the case we are studying, a
position characterized us as "shameless" not on the basis of disagreement with a
position we might have been promoting, but by questioning an objective and
undeniable reality: Terzakis' constant association with the extreme right.state
health management! Although in this case the "accuser" got away with throwing an
unsubstantiated slur that backfired and exposed her beyond repair, we ca n't help
but identify it as wretched opportunistic drivel and deliberate politicking by
every conspiracy defender to equate any disagreement with them with thus
acceptance of "state-health management of the pandemic". It is a tactic deeply
coded in the confrontational arsenal of all of them, which shows their political
education and is itself, their code of values.

Continuing, since at the beginning we referred to "philo-Putinist" and
"pro-Syriza formations", we cannot omit the special mention of the Trotskyist
"KED - Avantgarde ", a formation par excellence participating in the delusional
events at the Self-governing Kylykeion of Law, accompanied by the "Cries from the
Cells" that records these gatherings. KED - Avantgardeamong other things we will
remember when in the urban referendum of the SYRIZA government in July 2015 he
suggested the need to guard the process by the "forces of the movement" and in
response to the supporters of abstention, as an informal organ of SYRIZA, he
defended himself in favor of the government by analyzing the reasons why SYRIZA's
counterproposal of 8 billion to the institutions of the international economic
elite was not a "memorandum" ( sic). A few months before, he had publicly
proclaimed to vote for SYRIZA "without illusions"[10]and made sure that the KED
itself contradicted these "illusions" saying that by voting for SYRIZA we save
salaries, pensions, the concentration camps will be closed, etc. As everyone
realizes, these are political prophets, who with their penetrating look into the
future flattened the illusions, voting for SYRIZA in the elections and NOT in the
referendum to save wages, pensions and to close the concentration camps.

No surprise opportunist-ideological scumbags like them would object. If they are
not ashamed of the positions they developed in 2015, if they did not think of
breaking themselves and taking new paths after the fiasco of their systemic
predictions, that is their own issue. On the other hand, we cannot ignore that at
the present time the KED is emerging as a pro-war voice, which is openly in favor
of Putin and the Russian imperialist invasion of Ukraine. An invasion that has
cost thousands of lives to redistribute the map of geopolitical influence, and we
cannot turn a blind eye to positions like these. The KED may be a graphic group
of the left that is politically indifferent to us, just as we can be indifferent
to the postmodern ideological achtama of the ACN that hosts it. However, we
cannot be indifferent to the attitude of collectives and comrades/equals who
still visit or use the specific space and provide it, in this way, with political
coverage. Because the ACN does not just provide hospitality to the far-right and
pro-Putinist Esmo: it is an organic part of the processes and osmosis of all
these elements and a central point of their interconnection. Like "Bioklesoura"
itself, constant laundry of the "Union" and its Because the ACN does not just
provide hospitality to the far-right and pro-Putinist Esmo: it is an organic part
of the processes and osmosis of all these elements and a central point of their
interconnection. Like "Bioklesoura" itself, constant laundry of the "Union" and
its Because the ACN does not just provide hospitality to the far-right and
pro-Putinist Esmo: it is an organic part of the processes and osmosis of all
these elements and a central point of their interconnection. Like "Bioklesoura"
itself, constant laundry of the "Union" and itsContra Dystopia and interlocutor
of KED Diatranoise, she is a co-manager of the space and therefore a co-shaper of
its political operation. It is therefore not possible to have comrades who
condemn the unacceptable synergies with the extreme right and at the same time
disconnect from them, a basic place where these synergies are carried out and the
people who manage it, with the emblematic example of "Bioklesoura".

On the other hand, to be fair, we are clearly aware of the position announced by
another co-managing group of the ACN, the "AKONITO" group. It would be morally
wrong and politically opportunistic to ignore her position, either because of the
enormous borders that divide us ideologically and politically, or because of our
structural disagreement with the ACN. It is true that the AKONITO group published
a position that the analyzes contained in it may not be identical to ours, but in
terms of the essence of what we are dealing with, it really distances itself from
Terzakis, records his associations with the extreme right, expresses its contrast
with his presence in the ACN and quotes an interesting critique of the
relativization of fascism. However, her responsibilities as co-manager of a group
for a set of events and guests who have marched in the ACN are not displaced in
any way and, most importantly, the choice of co-management of a political space,
with a group ("Bioklesoura") that has contracted to flush out the far-right
cesspool , with the last example being the defense in the Macedonian battle of
Psarrou. This choice of cooperation and co-management of a political space
entails responsibilities that are primarily value-based and secondarily
political, ideological, etc.

Coming to the conclusion, we would like to earnestly plead with all the
ridiculous companions of the extreme right, the sympathizers of the
Philo-Putinists and the entire graphic custodianship of their wider allies, not
to catch us in their mouths if they do not proceed with self-criticism, which we
truly hope for in all sincerity or if they do, at least let them formulate
nothing new. The laundry rhetoric in defense of all kinds of Terzakis, the
identification of criticism of conspiracy theory with "acceptance of the state
management of the pandemic" and the delusional ideological ramblings that are
served to us from time to time, have begun to tire. Let us not be fed any more
stale and mutated "arguments".

On the other hand, of course, the ridiculousness of all this is not a sufficient
presumption for indifference to their attitude and role, nor an exculpatory
factor of responsibility. The spaces and groups that provide platform and
hospitality to members of formations such as the "Interdisciplinary Union for the
Defense of Democracy and Bioethics" or Contra Dystopia can no longer represent
the unknown. And therefore they will either proceed with honest self-criticism or
they will be called upon to take political responsibility for their partnerships
and be held accountable. Those who ally themselves with collaborators in the
far-right, racist and misanthropic cesspool cannot complain about the
interventions they will receive or any consequences they may have as a result of
their choices.

And finally, before the fans of conspiracy theory, Terzakis, Psarros, Contra
Dystopiaand of Bioklesiura talk about "disgraces" and unleash characterizations,
it is right for them to look in the mirror a little and reflect on their path as
a whole. Perhaps they will face the reality they have built for themselves and
find the answers to the complete moral depravity they have fallen into. Because a
route shamelessly steeped in "double standards", lying and PR, when it ends up
intersecting with the shamelessness of interacting with far-right absurdity, then
inevitably the detection of the external "shamelessness" will be directed towards
those for whom the the only thing that has to cool is this incomprehensible,
irritating and rigid "ideological and moral purity" of theirs.

INITIATIVE OF ANARCHIST SAINTS OF ANARCHY - KAMATEROU

1
https://protaanka.espivblogs.net/2023/03/24/topothetisi-gia-ta-gegonota-stin-1i-apologistiki-syneleysi-toy-athens-indymedia/

2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f0EN6miPfQ

3 https://www.diktyoellinismou.gr/ekloges-2023-3/

4 https:// www . kathimerini . gr / society /561628144/ thematofylakes - toy -
syntagmatos - i - domi - oi - epidromes - kai - i - stratologisi /

5 https:// www . youtube . com / watch? v = NvU 4 wP 3 OnlE & t =1388 s

6 https:// www . youtube . com / watch? v =5 aY 5 A 082 CM 4

7 https:// derkamerad . com /2021/02/21/% CE % B 1% CF %80% CE % AC % CF %84% CE
% B 7-% CE % BA % CE % BF % CF % 81% CE % BF % CE % BD % CE % BF % CF %8 A % CE %
BF % CF %8 D- covid -19- hoax -% CE % B 4% CE % AF % CE % BA % CF % 84% CF %85%
CE % BF -% CE % B 5% CE % BB % CE % BB % CE % B 7% CE % BD % CE % B 9% CF %83% CE
% BC % CE % BF/? fbclid = IwAR 1 fsrYb 6 Z 2 WTMxdxLKuVHtncXuADMOQB 3 OWGfDniLcz
1 CR 1 aJFd 51 LYmHs

8 https://nellypsarrou.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=496&Itemid=63

9 Those interested in the analyzes and positions we formulated during the period
of the 1st and 2nd lockdown can visit our website and select in the calendar on
the right side, the corresponding months and find all the texts , actions etc

10 https://avantgarde2009.wordpress.com/2015/01/11/7129/

https://protaanka.espivblogs.net/2023/05/11/gia-toys-synergates-kai-ta-plyntiria-tis-akrodexias/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca