The following text is addressed to the world of work and the youth of the western
suburbs and beyond. It will be shared as part of our consistent anti-electionactions. ---- In view of the May 21 parliamentary elections, we anarchists mustagain remind ourselves that the freedom to elect bosses does not abolish eitherthe masters or the slaves. In yet another electoral contest, without ignoring itsparticularities, we will sound the alarm and to the entire working class, thelower social strata, to every unemployed person and to every youth we will say:A) Voting for the ruling parties is complicity.B) The support of communist parties is in reality an entrapment and an embankmentin popular radicalization. It leads to the support of bankrupt ideologies andproposals which where implemented did not emancipate the working classes and thepeople.C) Supporting "smaller parties" neither questions nor opposes the rotten economicand political system that crushes our daily life and work.D) There is no anti-system voteHere are 6 + 1 reasons for abstaining that we urge everyone to consider andcritically evaluate before deciding whom to support in the upcoming parliamentaryelections.VOTING IS NOT PUBLIC PARTICIPATIONBy voting for the candidate government managers, we neither participate indecision-making, nor co-shape the ways of solving social problems. Instead,through voting we entrust a body of representatives to decide on our behalf.Voting and electing a government means renouncing the commons, renouncing myactive involvement in the problems of social life and transferring the managementof my life to the responsibility of others.Looking even deeper, we should reflect on what is the very content of thedecisions on which a government is called upon to take a position. A governmentof a bourgeois capitalist state is the administrator of critical politicaldecisions concerning the terms of operation of the economy, society and state.That is, it decides on an already established framework of social relations whichis expressed on economic relations of inequality (the many work but the few getrich), political unfreedom (the many vote but the few decide) and socialenslavement (if you resist, your masters will they crush you by loosening theinstruments of repression).Therefore, before we elect the administrator of inequality, unfreedom andenslavement, we might first ask ourselves whether it is worth compromising andsubmitting to these established social and class relations. To reflect andultimately decide whether we agree with the existing economic model (capitalism),the existing social organization (state) and the present government (bourgeoisparliamentary democracy). Only in this way, the decision will be critical andconscious and only in this way will the formation of opinion be self-willed andnot propagandistically shaped by the ideological mechanisms of the regime.TO RESIST THE CRIMINALS OF THE PARTIES IN POWERA decade ago the expression of popular anger had taken on such a character thatit made the political staff tremble. Politicians who voted for memorablyanti-social measures to "save the economy" (that is, the capitalist economy) werehunted down wherever they appeared. How did it happen, so many years later, thatNew Democracy survives despite its crimes, that SYRIZA MPs have the audacity toappear in demonstrations, and that PASOK reappears as a government partner?We must not forget that New Democracy is the party of the rich, of big capital,of the big interests of this place. PASOK is on the same wavelength. With thedifference that as a "social democratic" party it is more intertwined with an eraof party state and of course intertwined with eras of indecency, sleaze andswindling. Both ND and PASOK are parties with a long history: in scandals andanti-people crimes.If you are a worker, unemployed or low-pensioner, if you are a young person whodoes not come from wealthy families, voting for the right, i.e. the faction ofthe rich, is like consciously signing your slow death. But also by voting leftand centre-left, that is, the factions of the rich who invoke the poor by name,you are again doing exactly the same thing. After all, as Popi Tsapanidou statedwith too much honesty, "SYRIZA and ND do not differ on the critical issues".Enriching the statement of the press representative of SYRIZA, we would say that"all the parties that claim the management of bourgeois power, that is, themanagement of this rotten economic and political system that impoverishes us,will not differ on the critical issues". This finding can also be verifiedthrough our experience,Through the government change necessary for the system, SYRIZA became the usefulreserve of the big bosses of the place. He who undertook on their behalf, to pullthe snake out of the hole by signing the 3rd and 4thmemorandum at a time when thesocial majority had revolted and the right could not manage the popular uprisingsand resistances. The anti-social and anti-people measures that SYRIZA voted forwere not voted by all the previous memorandum governments until then. And this,because with the people in the streets, they wouldn't be able to. Only thedeception of the people by a left social democratic government could ensure thesocial and class peace that the system needed to continue unabated the violentimpoverishment and impoverishment of the labor forces for the interests of thepowerful.THEN LET'S VOTE SMALL PARTIESWhat does "small party" mean? And how small will it remain if we all go togetherand vote for it? There is no more apolitical, more incoherent and more systemiclogic than that which says "vote for a small party".It is apolitical because each party has a name, positions and declared goals.Voting blindly, unaware of what this "minor party" is, is actually an apoliticalvote.It is incoherent (not only because it is the logic that brought Leventis andVelopoulos to the parliament) but because the mass recruitment of the "smallparty" leads prospectively to its electoral growth, thus also to thedeconstruction of the original argument on the basis of which it was voted. Such"small parties" both from the right (like LAOS and ANEL), as well as from the"center" (POTAMI) and the left (DIMAR) have played a very dirty role in the lastdecade, as pillars of the political system, either from positions of power byparticipating in government formations or by voting on memoranda. Somethingsimilar can happen with MERA25, which throughout the previous period wasfervently seeking pre-election programmatic convergence with the "progressive"parties in power (SYRIZA,It is systemic, because the logic "we vote for a small party" tries in every wayto shrink abstinence and discredit in the political system and its goal is,through ridiculous arguments, to squeeze and trap in urban politics, those whoare not party members enlisted and intended not to vote. In addition, asmentioned above, these so-called small parties are actually useful reserves andcrutches of the system that, after fulfilling their systemic role, shrink anddisappear from the political map, and at the same time, they are oftenassimilated into the ruling parties, supplying them with cadres.THERE IS NO ANTI-SYSTEM VOTEEvery vote in municipal elections is systemic. Every party that claims power,claims to manage the system.The logic of that "anti-systemic vote" is what brought the systemic dogs offascism and Nazism to the political fore. Those people who wash away capital bysaying that poverty is the fault of the poor, who want a war-loving andtotalitarian state of control, mass executions and imprisoning dissidents, whodream of killing those they perceive as "different".This logic is reproduced over and over again in this pre-election period throughthe systemic media with their constant references to the "anti-systemic vote" forthe party of neo-Nazi Kasidiaris, essentially advancing the profile he wants tobuild. So to finish, with this narrative and the entrapment between the"controversy" of fascism and democracy, we should understand that fascists andneo-Nazis are not anti-systemic. It is the long arm of systemic brutality. And itis time to consign them, as well as nationalism, racism and every misanthropicidea inherent in bourgeois democracy and the existing regime, to the dustbin ofhistory once and for all.HOW SHOULD WE TURN TO THE KKE?The despotic socialist states of the previous century were the best evidence ofthe anarchist critique of Marxism. They neither led to classless and freesocieties nor changed the quality of life of the working class. Authoritariansocialism, as opposed to the libertarian, revolutionary socialism of theanarchists, is the other side of the same coin in reproducing inequalities andunliberties for the people and the working classes.The KKE as a representative of Marxism-Leninism and the "dictatorship of theproletariat" advocates an oppressive state of social unfreedom and hierarchiesthat has historically failed. The party itself is neither an enemy nor anopponent of the bourgeois society, but one more, stable pillar of the bourgeoispolitical system and its course has proved it all these years.HOW CAN WE VOTE TO THE LEFT OF THE KKE?There is no one to the left of the KKE. The remaining formations of the communistleft, the various graphic offshoots, represent the same failed authoritarianprograms. With the difference that many of them, such as e.g. ANTARSYA, arenothing more than pots of social democracy, i.e. informal allies of SYRIZA intheir attempt to climb into the elections.The workers' revolutionary ideology is libertarian and not authoritarian and hasnothing to do with communist parties. The revolutionary ideology of the workersis anarchism and not Marxism, which in all its historical variations bankruptedand perpetuated, within the socialist states, the same social and class problems.The hope for a classless egalitarian society is embedded in the anarchistpropositions that communist parties in the last century fought with gun in hand,slaughtering and imprisoning libertarian movements across the land.IF ELECTIONS CHANGED THE WORLD THEY WOULD BE ILLEGALAlthough the upcoming election is expected to be ambiguous, the only fact at themoment, apart from a shocking prospect, is the participation of PASOK in the newgovernment structure, in the possibility of a non-self-supporting governmentneither in the first nor in the second ballot. In other words, by voting forMitsotakis or Tsipras, you get a gift from Androulakis and re-legitimize a partythat for years was at the helm of power and whose governance is synonymous withbankruptcy and subjection to the people-killing and worker-killing memoranda andtherefore, with the most dramatic moments of violent looting social wealth andlabor rights in recent decades.New Democracy, SYRIZA and PASOK are enemies of the people and not allies inimproving our lives. Every vote to support them is a vote to perpetuate ourplunder and is a vote to brutally insult our dignity and memory.Conversely, voting for the communist left arms the party apparatuses of bankruptproposals, which in the name of the working class, want to install dictatorialregimes, of authoritarian enforcement. It is time to finish with them andorganize the libertarian movement of the workers that will fight for theemancipation of the labor forces outside the failed programs of authoritariansocialism-communism, with a strategic goal of a classless-aggressive society.Finally, let's crush the neo-Nazis and the system that gives birth to them andnurtures them without any trust in civil justice and democracy which, while dailymurdering refugees and immigrants at seas and borders, at the same time declaresitself as an alleged enemy of fascists and Nazis.Against the dominant system, the upcoming elections and the new government, weoppose:NOT WITH THE PARTIES OF THE BOURGIES AND DEMOCRACY, NOR WITH THE AGGITATORS OFTHE SOCIALIST STATE, NOR WITH THE FASCISTS THE LONG HAND OF THE SYSTEMWITH ANARCHISMINITIATIVE OF ANARCHIST SAINTS ANRGYRO - KAMATEROUhttps://protaanka.espivblogs.net/2023/05/02/6-1-logoi-yper-tis-eklogikis-apochis/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten