Europe is the region of the world in which the guarantees of rights are highest
and where one can enjoy the highest standard of living, but it is at the sametime the most affected by the demographic crisis: it is for this reason that agrowing flow of migrants from all over the world. In its territory, the elderly(65 years old) are higher in percentage than fifteen year olds, while globally aquarter of the world population is under 15 years old. In the last decade, thecontinent's population has decreased, while deaths have exceeded births in manycountries, so much so that Eurostat predicts that 190,000 fewer children will beborn in 2030 than in 2020, if we look at the eighth Report on EuropeanTerritorial Cohesion (European data journalism network). This even if not allMember States will close the decade with a negative balance.However, the demographic decline is not uniform and nine out of 27 EU states haverecorded an increasing fertility rate. Among these Hungary, which has increasedfrom 1.25 to 1.59 children per woman and the Czech Republic, which has risen from1.51 to 1.83, equaling the record historically held by France, whose figure, inrecent years , is declining. There is also an improvement in Germany, anothercountry with major historical problems of falling birth rates, where thefertility of women has gone from 1.39 to 1.58 children (but which has enjoyed anincrease in population thanks to massive emigration).There are only three countries that ended 2021 with a higher birth rate than in2010: Germany (+15.7%), Hungary (+7.8%) and Austria (+2 .1%) and. however, thisis not enough to avoid a decline in the number of their respective inhabitants.Net of migratory phenomena, in order to have a stable population, a fertilityrate higher than 2 would be needed, which has not happened in Europe since 1975in any country.As far as Italy is concerned, ours is one of the least fertile countries inEurope, together with Spain and Malta, with less than 1.3 children per woman inlast place for birth rate, the lowest in the EU in 2021, equal to 6.8 births forevery thousand residents, against a European average of 9.1. The average age ofmothers at the birth of their first child in Italy is 33.1 years, against an EUaverage which, albeit growing, stands at 29.4 years, as confirmed by Istat in 2021.The structural consequences of demographic declineThe demographic decline is not without consequences, in fact, by changing theratio between people aged over 65 and young people of working age, the number ofactive people decreases and therefore the possibility of supporting pensions andsocial status for the entire population. States have therefore need to increasethe number of active people and this can only happen in a short period throughimmigration. Therefore it becomes a structural necessity, justified and supportedby economic reasons and by the need of the production systems; that is why themigratory problem must be tackled today from a new point of view, which must takeinto account the growing and pressing demands of companies and country systemsthat ask for a greater availability of manpower to face the needs of productionand the world of work. Today this need is there for all to see, it is enough torefer to the pressing requests that come from the various production chainswhich, short of the personnel necessary for production, demand a massive entry ofimmigrants capable of satisfying their needs.However, it is not a question of an undifferentiated request for manpower andpeople, because the requests concern workers with specific professional skills,capable of responding to the needs of the productive sectors. Therefore, a changeof pace in the organization of emigration would be necessary, providing for theselection and preventive training of the people who are allowed to enter thecountry, so that they can provide a functional contribution to the needs of theproductive world; all of this totally contrasts with the current structure of thelaws that regulate the migratory phenomenon since these are police laws that havethe main purpose of preventing and hindering emigration up to blocking it.Furthermore, these laws are affected by the specific problems and characteristicsthat migrations to different countries possess, as each country has its ownspecificity. In order to analyze the complexity of the phenomenon, it isnecessary to examine the problems and characteristics of the various countries inorder to be able to realize which may be the most suitable solutions to theoverall problem, such as specific and common interventions.For the sake of analysis, we will therefore proceed to divide the continent intodifferent areas in order to grasp the different specificities.A first classificationWe distinguish between a Spanish and Portuguese-speaking area characterized bythe existence of a large emigration basin towards Latin America and in any casetowards other continents which constitutes a reservoir for a possible returnemigration, made up of populations who speak the same language as the country andare children of the same culture.If this emigration were to take place - and to the extent that it already takesplace - it is a return migration which allows for an easy reintegration of themigrants into the economic and social fabric of the country, which certainlypresents less difficulty when they come from countries of the same culture,habits, language, religion and ethnicity. When this does not happen, integrationis certainly more difficult and presents specificities that we will examine inthe continuation of our analysis and the necessary integration tools become thosecommon to many countries.In the same way we can speak of a return immigration as far as France isconcerned, which not only benefits from a colonial past which allows the countryto draw on a French-speaking basin, but has disseminated a presence with its ownculture and language of community linked to the mother country in vast areas ofthe world. In fact, it is no coincidence that the country is the preferreddestination for much of the immigration from Africa and especially from NorthAfrica, so much so that migrants from this area today constitute a notinsignificant part of the citizens of the metropolitan area of France.The same can be said and for the same reasons for England, which is also able todraw population from numerous territories and which also has an exchange ofpopulations with Australia and New Zealand, as well as with the United States andCanada. The vastness of its imperial domain and the resulting "linguisticcolonization" make it a favorite destination for many migrants. The migratoryphenomenon relating to the United Kingdom will be analyzed in its specificitywith specific criteria.The case of the other European countries is still different. Germany hasimplemented a migration policy which in the first phase was nourished by theblood law, i.e. the law which allowed the return to Germany of thoseGerman-speaking populations scattered throughout Eastern Europe and which in thepast had been the reason for the attempt to territorial expansion of the country.In reality, since the end of the Second World War, Germany has gradually beenable to benefit from a return flow of German populations to the countries ofEastern Europe and then, subsequently, after 1989, it has benefited from theunification of the country which has allowed progressive expansionof its population.Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that Germany has remedied the demographiccrisis following the defeat in the Second World War by integrating its populationwith a migratory flow from other European countries for work reasons, absorbingworkers from the most diverse parts; and in fact real enclaves have been createdon its territory such as the Turkish one in Rhur or in the city of Berlin, wherethere is a vast Turkish community. This also happened for many Italian workerswho emigrated to Germany for work reasons.Subsequently, in more recent years and above all after unification, the Germangovernment has pursued a policy of expanding temporary and seasonal emigrationwith the countries of the East, establishing almost stable relations which havegiven rise to periodic migratory flows, with populations placed immediatelyacross the country's border, who used their work in Germany as seasonalwork.[1]When these conditions partially changed, Germany allowed the massiveentry of populations from the Middle East, implementing a preventive selection oftheir professional skills and education, arranging literacy courses, distributingnew arrivals throughout the territory, organizing further training and jobplacement activities, which explains the breadth, scope and success of the anoperation desired by Merkel which involved Syrian migrants on account in Germanyin a number close to one million thanks to an accurate prior preparation of thismassive entry of active working population.Migrations to the countries of Northern Europe were instead mainly necessitatedby political persecutions. In the past years, these have mainly been refugees whowere fleeing persecution in their own countries, in search of spaces in whichhuman rights were guaranteed. To this flow, over time. an economic migration hasbeen added which, however, today is badly tolerated in these countries due to thegrowing weight that the presence of this segment of the population exerts on theneeds of the welfare state.Some European countries and in particular Poland, Hungary, Czechia, Slovakia haveimplemented a policy of systematic and scientific rejection of migration,preferring to adopt policies to boost the birth rate by making their own, under amore general profile, xenophobic-type security policies which allowed them topush back the mass migration that has swept across Europe.We cannot speak of a migration to the Balkans because this area was devastated bythe civil war and the population movements concerned the territorialrearrangement of their distribution on the territory on the basis of ethnic andlinguistic criteria which in any case left unresolved in many cases the problemsof peaceful coexistence between similar populations. Therefore, we must not speakof this area as an immigration area but instead as a migration area, mainlytowards other European countries. In this panorama, the case of Italy remains tobe analysed, to which it is necessary in this context to devote specific attention.The same applies to countries such as Romania (Moldova, whose citizens often alsopossess a Romanian passport) and Bulgaria, these countries of massive emigrationof a permanent nature in the West.Migration policy in ItalyItaly has always been a country of emigration. Immediately after the unificationit was the inhabitants of the north of the country, residents of the poorestareas who migrated to the United States and South America. Then it was the turnof the inhabitants of the south, who provided the necessary arms for thedevelopment of the United States and for emigration to the world by populatingthe territories of Latin America, above all Argentina and Brazil. The post-warperiod saw the recovery of the phenomenon with a migration mainly directedtowards European countries, in Germany, Belgium and France; significant issymptomatic to understand the nature and purpose of this migratory flow the workof Italian immigrants in the mines of Belgium, The turnaround occurredplastically on August 8, 1991 when the 20,000 refugees from Vlora who werefleeing from Albania landed in Bari. On that occasion, the town, and above allthe inhabitants of Puglia, mobilized to welcome the refugees, demonstrating thatthey remembered the town's experience in migratory activity.A lot of time has passed since then and with the collapse of the Eastern Europeancountries, migration to Italy has been enriched by the contribution coming fromthese countries with a migration which, as far as some of them are concerned, hasreached decidedly considerable dimensions; this is the case of the one comingfrom Romania which over the years has seen the Romanian community growin Italy until it becomes the largest in the country.Alongside this flow of migrants has developed that coming from Africa, initiallyfrom and through Libya and then from the other Maghreb countries and Egypt. Tothis migration have been added migrants from the Far East, from the Middle East,from Iraq, devastated by the wars unleashed by the United States, whileat the same time the flow coming from central Africa grew, as the Africanpopulation grew and at the same time the desertification of the territoriesincreased due to the change in the climate, the rural subsistence economy wasdestroyed due to the growing exploitation by multinationals and economicinterventions of the former colonial states, which replaced the directexploitation of the territory's resources with the indirect one through and withthe support of the local elites.As far as Italy is concerned, in 2000 the Bossi Fini law intervened to try tocontain the phenomenon, which closed the country to legal immigration andestablished an absurd mechanism for entry into the country which required theexistence of a prior stipulated work contract in the migrant's country of originso that the migrant can legitimately migrate to the country and obtain thenecessary residence and work permits. In the face of this law, the result couldonly be to make the phenomenon of illegal migration grow exponentially.The law responded to the spread of increasingly xenophobic sentiments andattitudes, fueled by the political propaganda especially of the League, whichintercepted the growing unease caused by competition on a precarious job marketlacking the protection of the underpaid work offered by migrants, forced byclandestinity to find the minimum means of subsistence in undeclared work. TheLeague was thus able to intercept the fruits of a situation that it had helped tocreate by deciding to exploit the migration problem politically to gain consensusand lock up the workers of the most developed and richest part of the country,fearful of seeing their own positions undermined . relative well-being from thegrowing number of people looking for work under all conditions.Alongside the structural and systemic shortcomings of the labor market ingeneral, the country was unprepared for the new phenomenon and did not grasp theproblems it brought with it; above all the forces of the left were unable to facethe problems posed by the integration into Italian society of people from othercultures, possessing other habits and traditions in many ways incompatible withthose of the native population.We are referring to the problems that the population from Islamic countriesbrought with them, which is characterized by habits and customs that arecertainly distant from those of a part of the country, while the problems ofintegration for the populations and migrants from Eastern Europe, which have theelement of differentiation above all in their religious affiliation, even if theyare still populations of mainly Orthodox Christian traditions. Theincontrovertible and deep-rooted presence of a component of the population ofRomanian origin, to which new Italian citizens are added, is a fact today. albeitto a lesser extent from other Eastern European countries, also predominantlyOrthodox such as Moldavia Bulgaria, This completely new structural element of theItalian population has not been the subject of attention as regards the need toimplement cultural and human integration policies necessary to make relationsbetween the different components of the country's population cohesive, with theresult of seeing to grow racist and xenophobic behaviors and to see theintegration process thwarted, which even public schools and voluntaryassociations and only minimally the institutions have laboriously tried topromote in order to allow the cohesion of the country.The union organizations and certainly the political parties have often been missing.Migration and asylum lawBut alongside migration for economic reasons there is another which takes placeregardless of the will of the people involved and is the result of a necessaryand imposed choice. These are the populations and people forced to migrate inorder to enjoy the human rights of freedom not only economic, but social,political, gender, ethnic and belonging to a social and human group.The imperialist policies of recent years, the dictatorships that arose incountries just free from colonial rule, the theocratic states formed and managedby fundamentalist religious formations in the Islamic world, but not only, havecreated a situation of strong and intense repression of social and human rights,produced the loss of political rights, generated racial, gender, ethnicpersecutions, civil wars, subjection of entire peoples, which have produced awidespread exodus of people and of fleeing men and women. This has resulted inthe exponential growth of requests for asylum and humanitarian reception which isputting the right to asylum in crisis.It should be noted that this is a human right, guaranteed by the 1951 GenevaConvention, built on the status of refugees, drawn up on the basis of the UnitedNations Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights approved on 10December 1948 by the General of the United Nations who affirmed the principlethat men, without distinction, should enjoy human (and women's) rights andfundamental freedoms, and that they should be guaranteed the exercise of theserights to the greatest extent possible and put finalized the statute of refugeesto be applied on the basis of the broadest meaning of the principle of solidarity.The right to asylum is therefore guaranteed by many constitutions, including theItalian one; from this derives a commitment to welcome refugees who cannot in anyway be equated - as the Italian government actually does - to migrants,especially if they are irregular. In fact, they have the right to be welcomedinto the territory of the State, when their fundamental rights are denied. Theattribution to them of the status of illegal immigrants therefore constitutes aclear violation of international law and that of the State, sanctioned by law inthe States that have signed the Geneva Convention, as did the Italian State, which,Demographic crisis and emigrationThe demographic crisis of the European territories is, therefore, anincontrovertible fact, which cannot be remedied only through an increase in thebirth rate which takes a long time for obvious reasons. It follows that thecontribution that emigration can make to the problem cannot be avoided, but thatthe problem must be tackled by developing a strategy to solve the problemsassociated with integration. Not only that, but the combined effect of economicemigration and the growing weight of refugees for humanitarian reasons as aresult of the application of the right of asylum, create many problems that wouldneed careful examination, adequate solutions from which the methods with whichthe migration problem is addressed, as a whole, Policies of inclusion capable ofallowing for an albeit gradual integration of the newcomers into the hostsocieties would therefore be necessary, through the transmission of the valuesthat are proper to these societies; it would be appropriate to create structuresin which newcomers should receive the essential elements of inclusion in thesociety through the illustration of the rights and duties that belong tocitizens; training and job placement policies would be needed; appropriateplanning of the settlement of newcomers in the territories, so that the newpresences are functional to the repopulation of areas now without inhabitants toallow a better and more rational use of the territories and available spaces. Theabandonment of the territories and the lack of care and their maintenanceproduces a progressive degradation that cannot be stemmed due to the everincreasing rarefaction of the inhabitants in the area. The country from the newpopulation settlements, if implemented in a rational way, would therefore have alot to gain.Instead, the choices made go in a completely different direction and we arewitnessing in all European countries a entrenchment in defensive positions andthe adoption of policies of exclusion which tend to keep the newcomers away,through police measures which are so radical and cruel, when ferocious, in thedetermination to violate any more natural relationship of solidarity. Proof ofthis is the policies adopted by many countries, not least the one adopted by theBritish government which intends to deport migrants via an airlift to Rwanda,placing them in a life ban on entering the territories of the kingdom .So much barbarism is just the litmus test that demonstrates the failure of socialinclusion policies and at the same time that Europe is an old continent, unableto look to the future, obsessed by the nightmare of "ethnic replacement" anddestined to succumb in comparison with other areas of the world in terms ofdevelopment of society, rights, culture and quality of life.[1]G. Cimbalo, Germany. The reasons for a system crisis. UCADI, Political GrowthNewsletter, Number 99 - October 2017[2]The Orthodox question in Europe, Ucadi, Political Growth Newsletter, Number162 - August 2022, The Orthodox we are talking about belong to Churches with astrong identity and linked to traditional and regressive values. They resent thefact that they have operated in closed and illiberal societies, they have astrong connection to the state which they support with their ethical heritage inmatters of family, gender relations, the role of women, quality of life andend-of-life issues, palliative care , etc. They tend to claim the role ofassistance through structures they manage and finance by the State, they promotethe confessional school and claim its funding, they ask for religious teaching inpublic schools and the adaptation of its programs to the values they support .Furthermore, the entry of countries with an Orthodox majority into the Union onlymakes possible a "natural" convergence with those fundamentalist Catholiccomponents which are subversive of the Community aequis and which operate inPoland, promoting strongly repressive legislation on the rights of minorities andwomen on the 'termination of pregnancy and managing one's body; Hungary wheresimilar measures are adopted; of Croatia where the Catholic component has pushedthe Constitutional Court to promote the protection of the rights of the fetus; ofSlovakia which follows similar policies on family and gender relations. bypromoting strongly repressive legislation on the rights of minorities and womenon abortion and the management of one's body; Hungary where similar measures areadopted; of Croatia where the Catholic component has pushed the ConstitutionalCourt to promote the protection of the rights of the fetus; of Slovakia whichfollows similar policies on family and gender relations. by promoting stronglyrepressive legislation on the rights of minorities and women on abortion and themanagement of one's body; Hungary where similar measures are adopted; of Croatiawhere the Catholic component has pushed the Constitutional Court to promote theprotection of the rights of the fetus; of Slovakia which follows similar policieson family and gender relations.The editorial staffhttp://www.ucadi.org/2023/03/22/la-fortezza-europa/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten