Always and in any case on the skin of migrants. The tragedy of Cutro shook
spirits for a few days, filled the pages of newspapers and television news, andbecame an opportunity for the government, which got away with it despite somedifficulties, to strengthen its security policy. So once the storm has passed andthe normal routine has resumed, the daily dripping of migrants tossed along theroutes of the Mediterranean, even dying there, can continue without causing anyscandal, just a mention in the media. ---- But the terrible shipwreck of Cutro isactually the faithful and at the same time distorting mirror of the hypocrisy, ofbad faith, of the sneaky interests that govern our lives and that consider thedeath of migrants, like workers - national or foreign, it makes no difference - ,a mere accident. And when they are alive a profitable function in the logic ofprofit and production.Right from the start, the right and the government did their utmost to place allresponsibility on smugglers and human traffickers, opening a real hunt withsketches and arrests, and pointing them out as the new monsters of all theturpitudes committed in the Mediterranean. Willingly ignoring that the plot ofclandestine migrations is much more intricate and that, if there is a need toidentify those responsible, they should be sought in Europe, in places very closeto them. Instead, all the vulgar paraphernalia of racism and nationalism has beenpulled out: from defending borders to helping them at home, which is a way ofdisguising neocolonialist aspirations. In fact, in his impetus as a faithfulservant of the country, Minister Piantedosi went so far as to reproach themigrants for their irresponsible and reckless behaviour; while an example of howthe government intends to give concrete support to the countries of origin of themigrants occurred on the occasion of the visit of the prime minister to theUnited Arab Emirates, when all the bodies of the migrants drowned in front of thebeach of Cutro had not yet been recovered . The visit served to restore normaltrade relations with the important Persian Gulf country, which had been hamperedfor some time by the revocation, at the time of the second Conte government, ofthe authorizations to export arms; revocation in part already revised in 2021.Now, however, new opportunities are opening up to be able to do business, asForeign Minister Tajani triumphantly declared. In fact "there are over 600Italian companies in the country ... active mainly in the construction .. energy... security / defence ... banking ... aerospace sectors" , as an article in theSole 24 Ore reports with satisfaction. The population of Yemen, for years forcedto suffer a war also fueled by weapons produced in Italy and sold to the UnitedArab Emirates and other countries, can thank Meloni and Tajani for theirdiligence. How can they thank, but without any irony, Eni, Finmeccanica,Leonardo, and similar companies, for the activism of Italian governments insupporting the economic initiatives of these giants in some of the Africancountries most tormented by political, social and economic crises. And from whichthe desperate ones leave in search of a better landing place.Meanwhile the government, in its own time, went to Cutro, but not like Henry IVto Canossa to humble itself and ask for forgiveness, rather with the arrogance ofthe powerful to impose its rules. The so-called "Cutro decree" came out whichtightens the prison for the imaginary smugglers, provides for the increase ofrepatriation centers with the aim of having at least one for each region, reducesthe chances of obtaining special protection, intends to remodulate the flowdecree to allow for more legal arrivals for work reasons. Apparently, arms areneeded in some sectors: seasonal agricultural workers and in tourism, in particular.On the other hand, what would pass for being the left of the institutionalline-up has distinguished itself for having criticized the government not onlyfor the lack of assistance, but also for the lack of human sensitivity shown. Themigratory phenomenon is certainly complex and difficult, it is the thesis of theleft (right), however it cannot be faced with repression, with the closure ofborders, with rejections, with the criminalization of NGOs. This thought is wellexpressed by one of his most accredited champions on the intellectual side, thedirector of La Stampa who writes in his editorial of last March 5, addressingMeloni directly: "Like her, we too are convinced that in tackling the dossierimmigration, Europe has sinned by cynicism and selfishness, from the DublinTreaty of 2003 until today[...] But unlike you, we think that all this comeslater and has nothing to do with the primary and inalienable duty [...] to savehuman lives. [...] Compared to 2022, migratory flows tripled in the first twomonths of 2023. They must be managed, not exorcised or criminalised". LikeGiannini, many other political or intellectual exponents of our local left haveinsisted on the need to govern the migratory phenomenon, however no one hasbothered to explain precisely what they mean by this statement, if notgenerically saving migrants at sea, guaranteeing hypothetical humanitariancorridors, foreseeing a flow decree more in line with the requests of businesses.Is there really a difference between this position and the imaginative let's helpthem at home or not let them leave the right? Especially since no Europeangovernment of the right or left has so far proposed anything other than givingmoney to African or Middle Eastern states to detain migrants in theirterritories: Turkey, Libya and now Tunisia, as the Italian government would like.It is a story that has been repeating itself for more than twenty years: withevery striking episode that finds the limelight in the media, controversies rage,proclamations rain down, a sense of humanity is invoked, but above all diversionsare activated. In an article that appeared in Internazionale on 27 April 2015,the journalist Gwynne Dyer wrote: "And so it turned out that the problem is notthe refugees who flee from war-torn places like Syria or Somalia, from crueldictatorships like the Eritrea or from poor areas of West Africa. They are theevil traffickers, the "new slavers" as the Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzicalled them, who lure migrants away from home by charging two thousand dollarsper person for a place on a makeshift boat bound for Europe".Now how many governments, political oppositions, intellectuals and opinionleaders are willing to identify the true origins of forced migration in wars,neocolonial policies, environmental devastation? On the contrary, I correctmyself, certainly everyone will agree that there are the causes of the newexoduses, but then once the conscience of their own intellectual honesty has beenappeased, they will continue to provoke and support wars and depredations, makingus believe that they are phenomena that transcend and overwhelm us.Angelo Barberihttps://www.sicilialibertaria.it/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.caSPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten