WORLD WORLDWIDE RUSSIA UKRAINE News Journal Update - (en) Russia, AIT: Peace in the huts - War in the palaces - War is peace" (George Orwell) (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 The invasion of Russian troops in Ukraine was a shock to all those who

are not suffering from the disease of patriotism, at least in its last
fatal phase. But those who do not suffer from ideological amnesia well
remember that the wars in the so-called post-Soviet space have not
stopped for more than 30 years. They began with a creeping and then
legally secure division of the Union between rival factions and clans of
the ruling oligarchy, and since then there has hardly been a single year
that at either end of this vast corner of the world, an armed conflict
has not flared up and blood is flowing.
Even then, three decades ago, it was clear that the bandits in power,
who shared the vast territories and resources of one-sixth of the
planet, would not rest on what they had captured, and a struggle savage,
fierce and merciless would begin between them for the redistribution of
already demarcated "hunting grounds" where they can freely torture,
oppress and exploit their subjects. As usual, after enclosing their
possessions and formalizing them into states, the ruling circles began
to design and build nations, that is, to rally the subject slaves, to
unify the governed, to train them in the spirit of unity with their own
leaders and respect for their masters, while persecuting, excluding and
discriminating all those who,

States created and carved up the nation, using the national ideas
suggested and hammered into people's heads. Savage and brutal
nationalism has become a magnificent means of maintaining and
legitimizing the rule of the ruling castes and a universal means of
mobilizing the popular masses, preparing them to kill and die for their
lords. This image, typical of any state formation, at least in the last
200 or 300 years, we have been able to observe on the ruins of a divided
Union in all successor countries, regardless of the form of government
behind which they were hiding - democratic or openly authoritarian - and
of the ideology they proclaimed.

The infighting of rulers, like the wars of medieval feudal barons, is
always accompanied by pride in their own slaves and serfs for the
"right" to fight and die for the master - against the ruler's slaves and
serfs neighbor. In today's society, such "pride" takes the form of
patriotism. Oppressed and exploited workers must think that it is not
their masters who are fighting for the redistribution of possessions,
power, property and resources, but a "national" or "ethnic" conflict, an
"imperial capture" or "National Liberation Resistance" continues...

I repeat: the inhabitants of the famous planet "one-sixth" have seen
enough of these bloody battles of the oligarchic bourgeois-nomenklatura
elites with all their despicable effects: in Karabakh and Abkhazia, in
Ossetia and Transnistria, in Tajikistan and Chechnya, in Transcaucasia,
Donbass, Crimea ... and many other places and "occasions". There was
almost no post-Soviet state that was not embroiled in one or another
armed conflict during those decades. So, unfortunately, there is nothing
new for us in this regard in the Russian-Ukrainian war. And,
nevertheless, for the first time, two largest states entered into open
armed conflict - two most powerful parasitic apparatuses that sprouted
like poisonous mushrooms from the ruins of the former Soviet Union. For
the first time, a war between ruling factions has assumed such
proportions and is accompanied by such extensive bloodshed.

The state-legal approach proclaims that whoever fired the first shot,
i.e. "attacked" and "committed aggression" is always to blame in a war.
But for those who understand that the law is only the interests of the
ruling classes molded into laws and treaties, the situation is much more
complicated. Of course, there is no excuse for whoever caused the
situation to escalate and pulled the trigger first. However, this does
not mean that the other side of the "defensive" state is innocent. Any
state is a parasitic growth that serves the interests of those who hold
political and economic power. Every state, by its very nature, aims to
expand its power and control and strives to achieve such expansion, as
much as he can. Another question is that sometimes he does not have such
forces - yet.

In wars between states, there are not and cannot be "rightists" - there
are only culprits: the ruling circles of all the belligerent states,
both "attackers" and "respondents ". It is their desire to expand or
retain the lands, resources, assets and power they control that gives
rise to wars. And it is precisely these advantages and privileges that
they defend, forcing ordinary people to shed their blood - their own and
that of others. The oppressed and exploited workers, in the final
analysis, really do not care what language their master, master or boss
speaks and in what capital he sits. So it was everywhere and always.
This was the case during the First and Second World Wars.

Today's Russian-Ukrainian war - if considered at the regional level - is
only a continuation of the struggle between the ruling castes of the
post-Soviet states for the redrawing of the post-Soviet space. Contrary
to popular myth, the collapse of the Soviet Union was not the result of
popular liberation movements, but of the actions of part of the ruling
nomenklatura, which divided territories and areas of influence between
them, when the usual and established methods of his reign were in
crisis. From the time of this initial partition, which was based on the
balance of power at the time, a continuous struggle for the
redistribution of territories and resources unfolded, which leads to
constant wars throughout the post-Soviet region. At the same time, the
ruling classes of all post-Soviet states (all, to one degree or another,
descended from the Soviet nomenklatura or their successors) embraced
militant nationalism in ideology, neoliberalism in economics and
authoritarian management methods in politics. And in their methods of
forced 'nation-building', of bringing about unification and cutting off
minorities, all these states seem to be looking at themselves in a
mirror: that the Kremlin, declaring the 'Russian people' a
'state-former' (and everything else, respectively, second-class people),
that Kiev, carrying out violent "Ukrainization", that the Baltic states,
depriving the civil rights of a third or more of the population, the
so-called. "Russian-speaking", etc. Some want to save the captured and
looted for today. Others - to multiply it, since the opportunity arose.
And here, it's not all about international legal standards, who attacked
who first or who provoked who in the first place. The interests of those
who make the decisions in any state and hierarchical society are always
essentially predatory. There is a redistribution of what is stolen from
us, of what is expelled and expelled from the workers. it's not all
about international legal standards, who attacked who first or who
provoked who first. The interests of those who make the decisions in any
state and hierarchical society are always essentially predatory. There
is a redistribution of what is stolen from us, of what is expelled and
expelled from the workers. it's not all about international legal
standards, who attacked who first or who provoked who first. The
interests of those who make the decisions in any state and hierarchical
society are always essentially predatory. There is a redistribution of
what is stolen from us, of what is expelled and expelled from the workers.

However, the issue is not limited to this. Wars on the "periphery" of
the capitalist world-system have always been fought by the most powerful
powers in the capitalist "center". And today a fierce struggle for
hegemony in the post-Soviet space unfolded on "one-sixth." Russia, as
the strongest state in the region, claims to be a regional power and
considers all post-Soviet territories as an area of its hegemonic
interests. Everything is used - from economic penetration and diktat by
manipulating the prices of energy supplies to pushing claims to
downright delirious references to the conquests made centuries ago by
the Russian Empire, which has long since fallen into disrepair.
'oversight. The absurdity of such an argument is easy to understand when
one imagines how modern Mongolia will demand control of, say, all of
Asia, or modern Italy - of the entire Mediterranean basin. Again,
references to misunderstood history are meant to cover up claims based
on sheer power.

But the powers of the "center" of the world system are not at all
inclined to recognize the hegemonic claims of the Kremlin. Western bloc
states (although the interests and aspirations of the United States and
individual European states of NATO and the EU may, in turn, not
completely and not always coincide) believe that they have won the
confrontation with the Soviet Union and now wish, by the same "winner's
right", to control the post-Soviet lands themselves. It's their trophy!
As a result, both sides seek to establish their economic and political
control over the countries of the former Soviet Union. Hence the clash
between the enlargement of NATO to the East and the Kremlin's desire to
secure these countries under its influence. In the political systems of
these countries, which are increasingly becoming satellites of
"conservatives" from Moscow, Washington or European capitals, there is a
stubborn will,

However, that is unfortunately not all. What is happening must be seen
in the context of a new stage of the global capitalist system, which is
sweeping over us like an avalanche, right before our eyes, here and now.
You can call it "later capitalism" or whatever you want - the essence of
it will not change in any way. The systemic problems of capitalism, with
all the external "welfare", sneezing economic growth and showcasing
abundance at the "center" of the World-System, are getting worse and
worse, and neither the Keynesian model nor the neoliberal cannot save .
A monstrous concentration of wealth, gigantic social inequalities, an
artificial maintenance of demand by inflating financial, debt and credit
"bubbles",

This research is still ongoing, and far from it, all the features and
characteristics of the "brave new world" are clear today. But some of
its main contours are already clearly visible in the haze of the
present-future: the nightmarish oligarchic and caste system, the erosion
and disintegration of society, the growing "austerity" for workers, the
precariousness of relations labor and employment, "green" energy, the
even greater fusion of state and business, total control through
information technology (poor Orwell has none never dreamed of!),
management with the help of intimidation and "sanitary dictatorship",
the increasing introduction of emergency elements, the restriction of
rights and freedoms... This creeping fascism of the modern world can be
summed up quite simply by a simple formula: control + "plague" + war.
And this is not happening because of the "bad will" of a small group of
cunning "globalists", but in full compliance with the very logic of
capitalist competition: the circles and ruling classes of all states
observe the actions from each other, diligently borrowing those elements
of the new order which seem effective and efficient to them, and
developing them further, striving to outflank and outstrip competitors.
It has been so with the "covid-dictatorship", it seems to be happening
with the "social rating" and the electronic surveillance of society.
This creeping fascism of the modern world can be summed up quite simply
by a simple formula: control + "plague" + war. And this is not happening
because of the "bad will" of a small group of cunning "globalists", but
in full compliance with the very logic of capitalist competition: the
circles and ruling classes of all states observe the actions from each
other, diligently borrowing those elements of the new order which seem
effective and efficient to them, and developing them further, striving
to outflank and outstrip competitors. It has been so with the
"covid-dictatorship", it seems to be happening with the "social rating"
and the electronic surveillance of society. This creeping fascism of the
modern world can be summed up quite simply by a simple formula: control
+ "plague" + war. And this is not happening because of the "bad will" of
a small group of cunning "globalists", but in full compliance with the
very logic of capitalist competition: the circles and ruling classes of
all states observe the actions from each other, diligently borrowing
those elements of the new order which seem effective and efficient to
them, and developing them further, striving to outflank and outstrip
competitors. It has been so with the "covid-dictatorship", it seems to
be happening with the "social rating" and the electronic surveillance of
society. And this is not happening because of the "bad will" of a small
group of cunning "globalists", but in full compliance with the very
logic of capitalist competition: the circles and ruling classes of all
states observe the actions from each other, diligently borrowing those
elements of the new order which seem effective and efficient to them,
and developing them further, striving to outflank and outstrip
competitors. It has been so with the "covid-dictatorship", it seems to
be happening with the "social rating" and the electronic surveillance of
society. And this is not happening because of the "bad will" of a small
group of cunning "globalists", but in full compliance with the very
logic of capitalist competition: the circles and ruling classes of all
states observe the actions from each other, diligently borrowing those
elements of the new order which seem effective and efficient to them,
and developing them further, striving to outflank and outstrip
competitors. It has been so with the "covid-dictatorship", it seems to
be happening with the "social rating" and the electronic surveillance of
society. the ruling circles and classes of all states are watching each
other's actions, diligently borrowing those elements of the new order
that seem effective and efficient to them, and developing them further,
striving to outflank and get ahead of competitors. It has been so with
the "covid-dictatorship", it seems to be happening with the "social
rating" and the electronic surveillance of society. the ruling circles
and classes of all states are watching each other's actions, diligently
borrowing those elements of the new order that seem effective and
efficient to them, and developing them further, striving to outflank and
get ahead of competitors. It has been so with the "covid-dictatorship",
it seems to be happening with the "social rating" and the electronic
surveillance of society.

It was in this context that war broke out on the eastern periphery of
Europe, reflecting the aggravated contradictions of the global
transition to a new model of capitalism. It is no coincidence that
modern Russia is called "an appendage of the gas pipeline and the oil
pipeline". Today it plays on the world market, first of all, the role of
supplier of energy resources, gas and oil. The predatory and deeply
corrupt ruling class, purely parasitic in essence, has not invested in
diversifying the economic structure, settling for the super profits of
gas and oil supply. Meanwhile, Western capital and states are embarking
on the path of a new energy structure, the so-called "green energy",
aimed at reducing gas and oil consumption in the future. For Russian
capital and its economy, this will mean the same strategic collapse,
which was caused in due time for the Soviet economy by the fall in oil
prices. Therefore, the Kremlin seeks either to prevent this energy
reversal, or to slow it down, or at least to create more favorable
conditions in the redistribution of the energy market. For example,
looking for long-term supply contracts and better prices, weeding out
competitors, etc. If necessary, this also involves direct pressure on
the West in various forms. It is no coincidence that the worsening of
relations between the Kremlin and European states was preceded by energy
problems in the fall of 2021. However, having now decided to go
bankrupt, the Kremlin stands to lose: its actions could, on the
contrary, accelerate the European Union's rejection of Russian gas and
oil supplies in the future. But here it's really "who doesn't take risks
- doesn't drink champagne". Therefore, the Kremlin seeks either to
prevent this energy reversal, or to slow it down, or at least to create
more favorable conditions in the redistribution of the energy market.
For example, look for long-term supply contracts. it's really "who
doesn't take risks - doesn't drink champagne". Therefore, the Kremlin
seeks either to prevent this energy reversal, or to slow it down, or at
least to create more favorable conditions in the redistribution of the
energy market. For example, look for long-term supply contracts. it's
really "who doesn't take risks - doesn't drink champagne". Therefore,
the Kremlin seeks either to prevent this energy reversal, or to slow it
down, or at least to create more favorable conditions in the
redistribution of the energy market. For example, look for long-term
supply contracts.

It is very important not to lose sight of the main inter-imperialist
contradiction in the world today - between the main capitalist
superpowers, the retreating United States and the rising China, around
which political blocs are forming. allies, vassals and satellites. The
two countries are now vying for world hegemony. For China, with its "one
belt, one road" strategy, its gradual conquest of the economies of Asia,
Africa, Latin America and its penetration into Europe, Russia is an
important junior partner. The response of the United States and its
Western allies is the expansion of NATO towards the East, approaching
through Ukraine and Georgia the Near and Middle East and its resources.
It is also a kind of "belt" project. It is meeting resistance from
imperialist rivals - China and Russia, which are increasingly dependent
on it. And in this regard, Russia and Ukraine ultimately stand as
suppliers of "cannon fodder" for the major players who prefer not to
engage in direct combat themselves. This has been happening since the
1960s, when the American and Soviet blocs clashed over the hands of
their vassals in Third World countries. This is happening, in a sense,
even now. Russia and Ukraine are ultimately as suppliers of "cannon
fodder" to the major players who prefer not to engage in direct combat
themselves. This has been happening since the 1960s, when the American
and Soviet blocs clashed over the hands of their vassals in Third World
countries. This is happening, in a sense, even now. Russia and Ukraine
are ultimately as suppliers of "cannon fodder" to the major players who
prefer not to engage in direct combat themselves. This has been
happening since the 1960s, when the American and Soviet blocs clashed
over the hands of their vassals in Third World countries. This is
happening, in a sense, even now.

However, the Russian and Ukrainian ruling oligarchy, and even the ruling
circles of the West, have enough internal reasons and motives to
organize and prolong a "limited" war in the backyards of the
world-system. The so-called "COVID" crisis has revealed a deep internal
instability of the political, economic and social structure in all
countries of the world. This also applies to Western countries, Russia
and Ukraine. The deterioration of living conditions, the growth of high
prices and social inequalities, the massive indignation of the
population at the coercive and dictatorial measures and bans have led to
widespread discontent in society. In some places this has already
increased political instability - or, with a very high probability,
could increase in the very near future. And in such situations, the
ruling classes have always resorted to proven methods, allowing to
restore the famous "national unity" and the population's confidence in
the authorities: to create the image of an enemy and to stir up hysteria
military, until a "small victorious war". Especially if, as in NATO
countries, this does not come with the risk of direct participation in
hostilities, but it will also bring huge new profits to arms
manufacturers and suppliers, whose flows do not than fueling the fire of
a conflicting army. But the Kremlin and Bankovaya diverged mightily and
forcefully ... whose currents only fuel the fire of military conflict.
But the Kremlin and Bankovaya have diverged with might and main ... the
currents of which only fuel the fire of military conflict. But the
Kremlin and Bankovaya diverged mightily and forcefully ...

Given all this disgusting and nauseating intersection and interweaving
of global trends and conflicts, and indeed the very oppressive nature of
any state as such, there is not the slightest reason for social
revolutionary activists to take party in this war - except for the side
of ordinary people, who are always and everywhere victims of wars and
conflicts between the ruling factions of all countries. There is not a
single reason to sympathize either with the owner of the Kremlin and his
administration, or with the Ukrainian authorities. Their neo-liberal
policies have led to a veritable collapse of the province's health,
education, pensioner and public sector worker poverty systems. The
salaries in the countries are monstrously low, the workers' movement is
practically paralyzed... The suffocating nationalism sows hatred and
makes people struggle in paroxysms, lose human form. The victors of the
war will receive even more power, privileges, money and control, will
achieve the strengthening of their regime and, of course, will hasten
the implementation of the imperialist plans of the protecting powers.
But we don't care who it is. The winners, the losers in this war, as in
any other war, are always us, the ordinary people. And it is no
coincidence that the oligarchic juntas in Moscow and Kiev already now,
when the conflict has acquired a long positional character, use the
situation to "tighten the screws", pass cannibalistic bills, for mass
arrests and retaliation, crush all dissent and strangle civil liberties.
Under the roar of the cannonade in the two belligerent countries inflate
the prices. In Ukraine, draconian anti-worker legislation is also
hastily approved; in Russia, it is likely that this is yet to come: at least

We are not naïve pacifists. We are well aware that wars will continue as
long as the very institution of the state and of capitalism as an
economic system is preserved. Like all major problems shaking the world
today, conflicts, including their military "form", are precisely
systemic. And the only way to solve these problems is to destroy the
social system that creates them.

What does that mean? This is how the internationalist anarchists
answered this question when they published the famous manifesto against
the First World War in 1915. War, he said, is "the natural consequence
and the inevitable and fatal result of a society based on the
exploitation of the workers, a society based on savage class struggles
and forcing the workers to submit to domination. of a parasitic minority
that has seized political and economic power". It makes no sense to
"reject all responsibility to this or that government", because "none of
the belligerent parties has the right to speak in the name of
civilization nor to declare themselves in a position of forced defense".
The causes of war "must be sought solely in the fact of the existence of
the state, which is a political form of privilege". "The role of
anarchists in the current tragedy, - the text underlined, - in any
situation, to release their propaganda, saying that there is only one
type of war for freedom: it is a war waged in all countries by the
oppressed against their oppressors. Our task is to call on the slaves to
revolt against their masters. Anarchist agitation is called "to struggle
for the weakening and destruction of all States; it must cultivate the
spirit of resistance and arouse the discontent of peoples and armies.
War and its hardships will inevitably provoke social upheavals: "We must
take advantage of all movements of revolt, of general discontent,
provoke an uprising and organize a revolution which, we hope, will put
an end to all social injustices" and destroy States, wars and militarism
forever. It was a question of transforming the imperialist war into a
social revolution. - in any situation, take out their propaganda saying
that there is only one type of war for freedom: it is a war waged in all
countries by the oppressed against their oppressors. Our task is to call
on the slaves to revolt against their masters. Anarchist agitation is
called "to struggle for the weakening and destruction of all states; he
must cultivate the spirit of resistance and arouse the discontent of
peoples and armies. War and its trials will inevitably cause social
upheavals: "We must take advantage of all movements of revolt, of
general discontent, provoke an uprising and organize a revolution which,
we hope, will put an end to all social injustices" and destroy states,
wars and militarism forever. It was a question of transforming the
imperialist war into a social revolution. - in any situation, take out
their propaganda saying that there is only one type of war for freedom:
it is a war waged in all countries by the oppressed against their
oppressors. Our task is to call on the slaves to revolt against their
masters. Anarchist agitation is called "to struggle for the weakening
and destruction of all states; he must cultivate the spirit of
resistance and arouse the discontent of peoples and armies. War and its
trials will inevitably cause social upheavals: "We must take advantage
of all movements of revolt, of general discontent, provoke an uprising
and organize a revolution which, we hope, will put an end to all social
injustices" and destroy states, wars and militarism forever. It was a
question of transforming the imperialist war into a social revolution.
that there is only one kind of war for freedom: it is the war waged in
all countries by the oppressed against their oppressors. Our task is to
call on the slaves to revolt against their masters. Anarchist agitation
is called "to struggle for the weakening and destruction of all states;
he must cultivate the spirit of resistance and arouse the discontent of
peoples and armies. War and its trials will inevitably cause social
upheavals: "We must take advantage of all movements of revolt, of
general discontent, provoke an uprising and organize a revolution which,
we hope, will put an end to all social injustices" and destroy states,
wars and militarism forever. It was a question of transforming the
imperialist war into a social revolution. that there is only one kind of
war for freedom: it is the war waged in all countries by the oppressed
against their oppressors. Our task is to call on the slaves to revolt
against their masters. Anarchist agitation is called "to struggle for
the weakening and destruction of all states; he must cultivate the
spirit of resistance and arouse the discontent of peoples and armies.
War and its trials will inevitably cause social upheavals: "We must take
advantage of all movements of revolt, of general discontent, provoke an
uprising and organize a revolution which, we hope, will put an end to
all social injustices" and destroy the states, wars and militarism
forever. It was a question of transforming the imperialist war into a
social revolution. Our task is to call on the slaves to revolt against
their masters. Anarchist agitation is called "to struggle for the
weakening and destruction of all states; he must cultivate the spirit of
resistance and arouse the discontent of peoples and armies. War and its
trials will inevitably cause social upheavals: "We must take advantage
of all movements of revolt, of general discontent, provoke an uprising
and organize a revolution which, we hope, will put an end to all social
injustices" and destroy states, wars and militarism forever. It was a
question of transforming the imperialist war into a social revolution.
Our task is to call on the slaves to revolt against their masters.
Anarchist agitation is called "to struggle for the weakening and
destruction of all states; he must cultivate the spirit of resistance
and arouse the discontent of peoples and armies. War and its trials will
inevitably cause social upheavals: "We must take advantage of all
movements of revolt, of general discontent, provoke an uprising and
organize a revolution which, we hope, will put an end to all social
injustices" and destroy states, wars and militarism forever. It was a
question of transforming the imperialist war into a social revolution.
War and its trials will inevitably cause social upheavals: "We must take
advantage of all movements of revolt, of general discontent, provoke an
uprising and organize a revolution which, we hope, will put an end to
all social injustices" and destroy states, wars and militarism forever.
It was a question of transforming the imperialist war into a social
revolution. War and its trials will inevitably cause social upheavals:
"We must take advantage of all movements of revolt, of general
discontent, provoke an uprising and organize a revolution which, we
hope, will put an end to all social injustices" and destroy states, wars
and militarism forever.

This was announced in 1915. After 2-3 years, mass dissatisfaction with
the war and its hardships caused a social explosion in many countries
and ended the worldwide massacre.

Let's be realistic: today the new 1917 or 1918 is still a long way off.
The conflict has just broken out and, unfortunately, there is no end in
sight. But what social-revolutionary militants on both sides of the
front line can do now is not howl with the wolves. Do not support any of
the belligerents, expose their predatory, exploitative and oppressive
plans, demonstrate their inhuman, anti-human and cannibalistic nature.
Don't fall into justifying "own country" actions (what is "own country"
to an oppressed and exploited worker in general!?) or "defensiveness" -
not helping the bosses prisons the system has put us in, prisons called
states. Everywhere and always, where and as soon as possible to resist
the poisonous wave of patriotism, nationalism and militarism. Explain,
to whom and why this war is beneficial - and all wars in general. Do not
assist or support a war effort. Do not go to war and persuade your
relatives, friends and acquaintances not to. Help those who refuse to
fight, refugees and civilians. Disseminate the idea of a genuine social
revolutionary alternative to war. Prohibit any "class peace" under the
pretext of "national unity" and "mobilization of all forces for
victory". Defend your rights and interests. Hit. Do not assist or
support a war effort. Do not go to war and persuade your relatives,
friends and acquaintances not to. Help those who refuse to fight,
refugees and civilians. Disseminate the idea of a genuine social
revolutionary alternative to war. Prohibit any "class peace" under the
pretext of "national unity" and "mobilization of all forces for
victory". Defend your rights and interests. Hit. Do not assist or
support a war effort. Do not go to war and persuade your relatives,
friends and acquaintances not to. Help those who refuse to fight,
refugees and civilians. Disseminate the idea of a genuine social
revolutionary alternative to war. Prohibit any "class peace" under the
pretext of "national unity" and "mobilization of all forces for
victory". Defend your rights and interests. Hit. Prohibit any "class
peace" under the pretext of "national unity" and "mobilization of all
forces for victory". Defend your rights and interests. Hit. Prohibit any
"class peace" under the pretext of "national unity" and "mobilization of
all forces for victory". Defend your rights and interests. Hit.

Let us remember: their (high) war is not our war, and their victory is
not our victory. We have not yet won our victory in the struggle - and
not in the trenches, but in the streets and squares, in the factories
and in the neighborhoods. When their time has passed and our time has
come. Peace to the huts - war to the palaces!

Oa Kekki

July 2022

https://telegra.ph/Peace-at-the-huts---War-at-the-palaces-08-08-3

?? admin ? 08/12/2023 - 11:20 French antimilitarizm ???? - ?.?.?.

https://aitrus.info/node/6142
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca