We are surrounded by abandonment. The lack of attention towards the
world, towards ourselves, is the distinctive sign of this compressedtime, compressed into narrow coordinates and unable to see aperspective: of change, of liberation. Degradation attacks us, in thecities, in the countryside, on the roads; The fires spread, leavingbehind a black desert that creates a desolate and sad landscape; Wasteoverwhelms us, with its obstinacy and persistence it occupies everyspace, it sneaks in between the interstices; The water bombs hit aconcrete-soaked area, causing flooding and deaths. And where cleanlinessand precision are seen, it is only a superficial patina that tries tohide the surrounding ravages, even the invisible and intangible ones.All this is the result of carelessness, of a consumerist idea of theworld, of that disposable idea that seemed to make us absolute owners ofour destiny. And instead. Instead, even our bodies are now subject toconsumerist and commercial logic according to which everything can bemonetized and sold. Everything has a measure and a price: health likeany other need that we now categorically call a right. In this perverseand exhausting game, if we are all losers, someone believes that theyare the custodian of a destiny, the necessary architect of an immutableorder and of enjoying unlimited and well-deserved privileges, so theycontinue pushing towards the abyss, forcing a large part of the humanrace to a hard and miserable life.There was a moment in our recent past when all the distortions of thedominant system, founded on the exploitation of all natural and humanenergy, became evident and when it seemed that the incontrovertibilityof having to subvert everything had been understood. I am obviouslyreferring to the Covid 19 pandemic. However, once the storm has passed,what remains is a generalized feeling of helplessness that implies thecommon feeling and, paradoxically, the belief that science and power,despite Everything, they are capable of facing emergencies. So that wecan continue down the same path: carelessness after carelessness, leteveryone work hard and may the best win.However, there were those who, at the most acute moment of the syndemic- of that condition in which health, the environment, society, theeconomy are sinking into an increasingly dramatic and unsustainablesituation -, when widespread abandonment was taking its toll in thedeath and elimination of social relations, he reacted not coincidentallyby remembering the condition opposite to the behavior of states andgovernments: care. Taking care of oneself, one's own body, theenvironment, and human relationships appeared - and appears - as theonly way out of the devastation and anguish of profit and competition.This is how "The Manifesto for a Solidarity Society" was born, signed bydozens and dozens of associations and groups. Care, not as a simpleservice but as a political instrument of emancipation and socialtransformation, had already entered feminist reflection in the 1970s.And precisely as a political concept it was taken up in that manifesto.In the preamble it was said: "A virus has put the entire world incrisis: Covid 19 has spread in a very short time throughout the planet,has led half of the world's population to self-imprisonment, hasinterrupted productive activities, commercial and social. and culturalactivities, and continues to claim victims. Within the health and socialemergency we have all experienced the precariousness of existence, thefragility and interdependence of human and social life.[...]Decades ofpolicies of cuts, privatization and corporatization of healthcare, ofprofit-driven globalization, have transformed a serious epidemiologicalproblem into a massive tragedy[...]The pandemic has highlighted how asystem based on thought only market and on profit, on predatoryanthropocentrism, on the reduction of all living beings to a commodity,is not capable of guaranteeing protection to anyone. The pandemic isproof of the ongoing systemic crisis, the main evidence of which isdetermined by the dramatic climate crisis, caused by global warming, andby the gigantic social inequality, which has reached unprecedentedlevels.[...]Nothing can be like before, for the simple reason that itwas precisely the first one that caused the disaster. Today more thanever we must oppose a system that subordinates everything to the economyof profit to the construction of a society of care, which is care ofoneself, of others, of the environment, of the living, of the commonhome and of generations to come."The manifesto therefore hoped for theovercoming of the capitalist system and the affirmation of a societybased on solidarity and mutualism that care, the distinctive historicaland anthropological character of women, would support and innervate.What happened to all this? Unfortunately in today's public debate thatintuition is completely overtaken by the usual issues that occupy dailyinformation: the war, the PNRR, the budget law, the stability pact, etc.Without having a minimally critical approach to these topics, on thecontrary they are presented as the only horizon within which we canmove. However, it is probably also true that proposing a radicaltransformation of the dominant model would have required consequentaction, constancy and mobilization capable of permeating increasinglylarger strata of the population, of directing them towards a totalrejection of mercantile logic. This did not happen, and it did nothappen also because that project limited itself to enunciatingprinciples which paradoxically should have been implemented by thoseagainst whom they were aimed: the governmental and non-governmentalinstitutions, with their legal apparatus, their rigidities, theircompromises. . In the absence of even the attempt to create pressurefrom below, which was real and not supposed and superficial, which wouldactivate some reformist process.Now, after this summer of 2023 which has continued to record peaks ofheat together with extreme atmospheric phenomena, in which thesenselessness of war and all the daily tragedies - migration, poverty,injustices - are mechanically repeated, the "care" of our lives and whatsurrounds us is increasingly necessary. But what fights should we haveand how should we conduct them? Perhaps choices should be made,priorities put in place. Does it make sense to engage in a de factoreformist path that ends up reproducing the circuit of consumption andthe market? The struggles for wages, to guarantee the so-called rights(limited and compromising), to ensure the so-called social mobility, orthose to carve out a niche of well-being, healthy eating, respect forthe environment, the protection of minorities make sense, do they have afuture? And not only in the face of an irreversible climate crisis thatwould seem to lead us towards disaster. Mechanisms and methods should berethought to ensure that we are able to present an overall vision inwhich the issues are linked to each other and we can imagine (and beginto practice) a change conducted from below and capable of renewingsociety at its roots. Revolutions and social upheavals cannot be plannedon the drawing board but having awareness and clarity could be helpful.Angelo Barberihttps://www.sicilialibertaria.it/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten