SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

zaterdag 18 november 2023

WORLD WORLDWIDE FRANCE News Journal Update - (en) France, OCL CA #334 - Postmodern lures against the social reality of women - Vanina (Acratie, October 2023) (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 This book is written by a libertarian communist activist. Its main axis

is a critique of "queer theory" and intersectional analyses, fashionablein far-left and even libertarian activist currents. Currently, anycriticism of "queer" tends to be voluntarily assimilated to the extremeright, justifying acts of violence against those who make it. Vaninatherefore knows that she risks experiencing "inconvenience". And it istherefore a salutary militant book from a comrade who has been part ofthe anarchist movement since the mid-1970s. She does not claim todevelop theoretical aspects but rather, posing a militant materialistpoint of view, to develop his personal view on different axes associatedwith "queer theory" in order to encourage reflection with the aim ofbetter fighting against "the capitalist and patriarchal system".For Vanina, capitalism and patriarchy are two different systems, but thefirst relies on the second and they must therefore be fought together.On this basis, she returns to the currently dominant so-called feministmovement, its theoretical frameworks, its vocabulary. The chapters ofthe book are thematic. It is very easy to read because the speech givenclearly recalls the evolution of political and social relations.Furthermore, the text is embellished with a multitude of quotationswhich, analyzed in a lucid and intelligible manner, give substance toreasoning that is often too abstract in other works.The first chapter reviews the history of the feminist movement with itsdifferent currents. Vanina recalls that at the beginning of the 1970s"men and women are[considered as]two categories which make up humansociety and which are distinguished by their sexual organs. It is fromthis physiological difference that the system of patriarchal oppressionhas established the domination of men over women." Chapter 2 returns topostmodernism, a school of thought where it is discourse that shapesreality, and therefore discourse must be deconstructed to redefinereality. Through a historical and political reading, Vanina shows theconvergence of views between postmodernism and neoliberalism: thepostmodernist current criticizes any large-scale political project,sacrificing social class to the individual, reasoning therefore centerson the person and his emotions, forgetting social structures and socialclasses; consequently, the objective becomes to improve the existingsituation rather than to disrupt it. The third chapter poses a critiqueof intersectionality as practiced today. If intersectionality is rightto consider that multiple relationships of oppression coexist insociety, this theoretical framework reinforces in its activist practicethe atomization which prevents a collective consciousness of protestagainst capitalist social structures. The fourth returns to thetheoretical developments of Butler for whom gender constructs sex.Butler's goal is to blur gender and sexual identities, a founding theoryof what will become "queer thought." Vanina presents a nuanced andintelligible critique of what Butler exposes. The following two chapterstherefore question "queer theory". For the latter, the enemy becomesheteronormativity. "Queer", which is difficult to define as this term isappropriated in different ways, refers in some way to a citizenistreformism under the pretext of a new insurrectionalism. Indeed, thetransgressions, claimed to be radical, driven by "queer" through thedeconstruction of gender, are intended to be the lever for a radicaltransformation of society, but are ultimately quite harmless inmodifying social relations. This current, essentially made up ofintellectuals or people from the middle classes, tends to ignore theimportance of sexuality and procreation in the oppression of women. Allthe vocabulary is modified because today, even at the institutionallevel, a man becomes "woman" ("transwoman") by simple feeling anddeclaration. There is no longer sexual bipolarity, we are on a sexual"continuum" and everyone can define themselves according to their desireon this continuum: man, woman, agender, non-binary, pansexual... Socialquestions are reduced to individual identity recognitions. Vaninatherefore poses a critique of this dilution of the social into acomposite, fluid and infinitely extensible whole. From there, chapters 7 and 8 summarize what "transidentity" is in theworld, allowing a broad and clear look. The "woke" current and the"cancel culture" are then discussed with all the critical eye that wemust bring to them. The book then takes a turning point: chapter 9develops the concrete facts of GPA in today's world and thecommodification of poor women's wombs; chapter 10 is an updated andwelcome synthesis of the reality of oppression and exploitation of womenon the socio-economic field; Chapter 11 offers an overview of feministmovements around the world, with all their social and politicaldisparities. In the last chapter, the author questions the limits ofattempts at convergence between materialism and intersectionality,Marxism and "queer".Controversial poster from Planned Parenthood on "pregnant men"The conclusion is a call to go beyond the postmodern theories in voguetoday. It should be noted that the gaze is always social and political,so Vanina does not criticize the individual choice of a person whodecides to "transition" to another "gender identity", but questions thesocial and political dynamics behind these individual acts. Theideological regression that postmodernism marks is part of a socialregression since the 1980s. Intersectional analyzes have put the classstruggle in the background. "Queer theory" "has recycled the notion ofgender into a formidable instrument against women" because it "does notanalyze anything in terms of social relations. She rightly points outthe invisibility of the heterosexual norm, but without worrying aboutthe hierarchical social structures which impose this norm. However, "thefight against patriarchy requires identifying the relationships existingbetween the State, the economy and material (family, school, business,medicine[...]) and ideological power structures". The atomization ofindividuals favors the search for individual identities and thus allowsus not to question the fundamental problems of our society, which arestructural. Today, "being "revolutionary" seems to consist of adding upthe "antis" (we are anti-racist + anti-sexist + anti-fascist +anti-colonialist, etc.) without necessarily trying to have an overallview." All these postmodern theories "largely reflect the self-centeredand consumerist aspirations and modes of operation dear to the "middleclasses"". Vanina recalls that "it is because of their biological sexthat most women are oppressed and doubly exploited in the private andpublic spheres; and it is "social sex" renamed "gender" that we mustre-attack." Categorizing "women" for men who feel like "women" becausethey assimilate to feminine codes does not serve the cause of women inany way, quite the contrary, because such an approach reinscribes womenin the normative straightjacket of "social sex". If we must combat theoppression suffered by men who do not conform to masculine norms, thisshould not lead us to deny biological sex at the source of sexistoppression. "The problem with postmodernists is that they brandishindividual freedoms to "settle" social questions, only want to see thesequestions through the prism of these freedoms, and too often claim to be"silent" who does not give in to their wishes."In conclusion, Vanina believes that "we will not resolve the issue offemale oppression by eliminating that of economic exploitation. Thefight against capitalism cannot, on its own, overcome patriarchy; but,without it, feminism will remain in the impasse of postmodern lures."VRP.-S.To order the book from Acratiehttp://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article3977_________________________________________A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten