Two hours of alluvial rain were enough to submerge the plain from Prato
and Campi Bisenzio to Pistoia with water and mud, inundating land madeimpervious by excessive construction, in which the rivers and streamsthat run through it were embedded in conducted forced by the narrowingand subtraction of the riverbeds, of the areas of respect for thewaterways, by a building and urban planning policy which, in order togain building areas has gone beyond all rules for the protection of theterritory, making it the third area with the most high land consumptionin Italy.The Ombrone Pistoiese in Quarrata, the Furba, Bardena, Stella, Bure,Fermulla streams, as well as the Bisenzio, overflowed. Calenzano, whichhas composition basins, was saved but both in Prato, Campi Bisenzio andQuarrata the rivers overflowed: the embankments essentially held, butthe riverbeds, substantially intubated and narrow in their bed, were notin able to contain the influx of water. Yet, the land managers we aretalking about should have learned something from the flood that hitFlorence and the same area of the Arno basin in 1966. Instead, ifpossible, the situation has worsened and we have continued to build andcement and we still want to go in this direction, carrying out thewidening of the runway of the Florence airport which has alreadycontributed so much to waterproofing the territory of this area. If theproject were carried out to please the management clique, another 140would be added to the existing 100, and all this despite the shortdistance and the greater safety guarantees offered by Pisa airport.Faced with the catastrophic event, there was once again talk of anabsolutely unpredictable storm, but it is not true that the damagedepends only on the exceptional nature of the event because everythingwas done to increase the risks, doing exactly the opposite of whatlogic, the adoption of necessary precautions, the basin plans, providefor this type of areas: all of this, in violation of the laws, of thepromises of politicians of all colours, who have stood by and haveactually facilitated the growth pollution and soil sealing.The choices regarding the location of public services were disastrous,such as those relating to the concession of areas for industrialsettlements, proof of which is that it was not only the hospitals thatwent under water, but a large part of the textile laboratories andfactories of the district that constitute one of the diamond points ofthe textile industry in Italy. Not only the Region, the metropolitancity, the municipal administrations, but also the Arno consortium, whichsteals a bribe from the pockets of the inhabitants of the plain which itredistributes according to clientelistic and without taking into accountthat hydraulic/hydrogeological risks are no longer just those of 30years ago, that its risk projections are no longer adequate to currentsituations, persisting in denying or in any case ignoring the effects ofclimate change, which would require a revisiting of probabilisticcalculations with "the expansion of the "delta" for the T.R. (returntimes) ten-year, thirty-year and two-hundred-year Q(Tr200), with naturaldigression of the rivers and streams within their natural riverbeds, andneighboring areas of respect, obviously with the addition of appropriateexpansion tanks" as has long been required by the Environmentalistcommittees of the citizens of the plain which on November 2nd issued apress release in this regard, warning that the worst is yet to come ifthe airport is enlarged and the "planned landfill of Via dell'Osmannorowith a daily transit of over 30,000 vehicles, right in the vicinity ofthe Fosso Reale, which will obviously be affected by the two concretebarriers (the runway and the anti-noise dune facing the Polo and 12meters high) can only be the prelude to new disasters."The sack of FlorenceWhat happened today has distant origins: we must go back to thebeginning of the 1990s, when an entrepreneurial business group of"communists" (?) and Christian Democrats stormed the city of Florence,directing its expansion towards the plain , led by the Fiat Fondiaria group.Opposing the project, which was barely intuited, was a small class unionof the University, the SNU-CGIL, which, although perhaps unconsciously,fought the battle against the building speculation that used theUniversity, but was defeated, left alone in the face of too large andstrong adversaries, with the sole support of the Chamber of Labor ofFlorence.A careful analysis of the building policy of the University and the citywas produced and widely disseminated. There was a temporary setback inthe project which, however, soon restarted, identifying a young andunscrupulous politician of Catholic origin who, elected President of theProvince, ascended the Municipality and at the same time the Party untilhe became its secretary and then landed the Presidency of the Council.The choice to expand the city into the plain led to the crisis of thethen city PCI and the resignation of its entire leadership, required theintervention of the then national secretary of the party who blocked theproject for a short time, but ended with victory of speculators. At thesame time, the "sack of Florence" served as a springboard for the rapidrise of a hedonistic adventurer who, despite having fallen victim to hisegocentrism, managed to ensure the success of the operation, the effectsof which we still collectively suffer on the whole territory.New political balances were formed in the city and the relocation of theUniversity to Novoli and the Sesto plain was carried out; the studentswere outsourced like the inhabitants of the city, expelled from thehistoric center.At the same time, the airport was enlarged, extending the impossiblerunway, narrow in a valley with already very strong buildingconstruction. Since then, speculation in Florence and in the plain hasmade giant strides: the construction of the tramway, the eradication ofthe city's greenery, the upheaval of its current urban and roadstructure, are the unclean fruits of that choice which attracted andcontinues to attract capital speculative activities in the city, of suchan extent that perhaps we need to go back to the destruction of thewalls and the investment of the Piedmontese in Florence in thepost-unification years to find aspeculation of such an extent.Alongside the urban transformation of the city, it was inevitable that aprofound change developed in its economic and social structure, whichsaw the transformation of the historic centers into fast foodrestaurants and hotel hospices for (rich) tourists which is the Florenceof today. The same could be said of the other numerous speculations inwhich the city is currently involved, such as those concerning theLeopolda area, the Cascine, the former tobacco factory, therestructuring of the San Salvi area, and yet it is in the profits, fruitof these enterprises, which lies the economic strength of a well-knownactor in Italian politics, Matteo Renzi, who as President of theProvince first, then as Mayor, and again as secretary of the PD and asprime minister has drawn the maximum profit from all this and laying theroots of his personal and political fortunes. Next to and around him isa group of maintenance workers who have now managed to attract capitalfrom the international market to continue and if possible intensifyspeculation: all this while the subsoil of Florence, with its extremelydelicate balance, is being drilled for the construction of the railwaylink , with possible disasters on the static stability of the territoryand dangers for the aquifers.Today. the sack of the plain continues, bringing with it the interestsof small entrepreneurs who have occupied the areas bordering rivers andstreams, building their warehouses there, with a frenzied buildingdevelopment, which has scattered the inhabitants of the metropolitancity across the plain, so that Florence could transform into areceptacle for hotels and tourist activities that leave the city emptyat night, open to tourists, but where Florentines no longer live. It istherefore not surprising if today nature takes revenge, remembering thatrivers and streams have the right to flow, that water needs to fall andthat, if their course is regimented and restricted, water, a way toflow, he must find it. The struggle of the environmentalist committeesof the plain, although it is generous and has led courageous battles andcarried out micro environmental recovery interventions which haveimproved the quality of life and have been some obstacle to theexcessive power of speculators, has not managed to break down the wallof connivance in support of building, territorial and environmentalspeculation.Missed helpHaving said this briefly about the causes, in the face of the disasterand the sudden flooding, the help and assistance of the national civilprotection was lacking, leaving the burden of intervention solely to thelocal forces and especially to the volunteers. The inhabitants of Pratoand Campi Bisenzio had to roll up their sleeves and shovel mud anddebris, as the inhabitants of Emilia-Romagna had to do.To demonstrate the importance of the presence of a factory in the area,with the men and women workers lining up on class positions, the GKNsite and its men and women workers were one of the nerve centers of theaid given by the volunteers. Here brooms and shovels were collected,here the teams were organised, here the rescue efforts were coordinatedwith the influx of young inhabitants of the plain and anyone who wantedto find a point of reference to act and help: the greatest difficultiescame from the impossibility to dispose of the water that has accumulatedin the face of waterproofed ground that does not absorb anything andwith clogged and insufficient pipes. It was necessary to wait six daysbefore a negligible number of soldiers arrived in the countries coveredby water to lend a hand and the intervention numbers tell us howmarginal their help was.In this institutional void it must also be said that another point ofreference for the organization of relief efforts aimed above all at thepeople and assets of the approximately 9,000 Chinese immigrant familiesliving in Prato and the surrounding areas. These people turned to"Ramunion Italia" - a civil protection-type structure, in which bothChinese and Italians are registered - which depends on the Chinesegovernment, also because not many Chinese know the language andtherefore are able to send the request for help to 112. The associationsent its SOS on WeChat - the social media similar to WhatsApp used inChina - which from there gave instructions to Italy for the sending offood, water and rescue interventions with inflatable boats; it ispresumable that, given that the Chinese know little of the language, arenot experts in carrying out bureaucratic procedures, but are endowedwith a spirit of community and solidarity, it will happen with thearrival of the refreshments. It is a safe bet that grants, low-rateloans and aid to rebuild the destroyed laboratories, stocks, floodedwarehouses and even to provide support to the many illegal workers whowork in these companies will come first and exclusively from Beijing,rather and by the Italian government, thus accelerating the takeover ofthe Chinese and their partners in the textile activities with theabsorption of the companies to be rebuilt.As for the compensation, it is safe to bet that the aid will be slow incoming, as in Emilia Romagna and in the other flooded areas alsobecause, let's face it, "many administrations are red", but for how muchlonger?R.P.https://www.ucadi.org/2023/11/26/nel-fango/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten