At the start of 2024, where are we with the anti-Olympic struggles inFrance and elsewhere? This short summary will be biased and incomplete.It was written by members of Saccage 2024, a collective which has beenfighting since 2020 against the preparation and holding of the Olympicand Paralympic Games, whether for 2024 in Paris or elsewhere. ---- Weare six months before the start of the Olympic and Paralympic Games(JOP) in Paris. A month ago, the International Olympic Committee (IOC)announced that the candidacy of the French Alps (Auvergne-Rhône-Alpesand PACA region) was the only serious one for hosting the 2030 WinterGames - which does not leave no respite from the anti-Olympic fight inFrance for the next few years. The hoarding of water for artificial snowand the construction of several Olympic villages and infrastructuresfavoring devastating tourism and gentrification of cities are alreadyhitting hard the regions of Milano and Cortina d'Ampezzo in Italy, whichare hosting the JOPs winter in 2026. In Los Angeles (United States),"your face, your ticket" advertisements announce the deployment ofsurveillance technologies for the 2028 Olympic Games.Anti-JOP strugglesThe Olympic and Paralympic Games seem to run like a steamroller. Everytwo years, a host city or region becomes a giant playground for realestate speculators, construction industries, security technologycompanies, multinational sponsors and elected officials seekingpopulation control, of nationalist pride or just corrupt, all this underthe aegis of the IOC mafia and with the complicity of governments. Butthe unstoppable appearance of the Olympic mega-machine is deceptive:each edition of the JOP has provoked resistance and victoriousstruggles. Some took place before the choice of the candidacy, such asthe large mobilizations in the Pyrenees-Catalonia mountains organized byStop JJOO (1) in 2021 which pushed Spain to withdraw the candidacy forthe 2030 winter JOPs, or the counter-propaganda work carried out in 2015by Nolympia Hamburg (2) which led to a "no" in the municipal referendumon hosting the 2024 Olympic Games. Other victories, often more bitter,were carried out after the choice of the host city. This is the case forthe few families who managed to counter the expulsions in the favelas ofRio de Janeiro in 2016, or, more distantly, the rebellion of thepopulation of Denver in 1976 which succeeded in removing the JOP from Ather place.Today, several collectives are fighting in France against the JOP 2024and the Alps' candidacy for the JOP 2030. Where the devastation of theJOP 2024 is strongest, in Seine-Saint-Denis, Marseille and Tahiti,mobilizations are underway. In Marseille, which hosts the sailingevents, the Marseille Counter Olympics Coordination is organizing inparticular against the gentrification of the city and the socialcleansing caused by Airbnb, when the Prado Swimmers defend the publicbeaches of Marseille against their privatization. In Tahiti, it ismainly the infrastructures under construction linked to surfing eventswhich are provoking resistance from local associations andorganizations, in particular the new judges' tower which risksdestroying the corals of Teahupo'o (3). In the Alps, NO JO (4) hasalready been campaigning for several years against the candidacy,through anti-Olympic sports weekends, roundabout blockages, publicpresentations, skiing on asphalt, etc. Last December's decisionregarding this candidacy created a new wave of mobilizations in severaltowns in the French Alps.The collective, progress reportThese different struggles feed off each other and are part of a broaderanti-Olympic story of which Saccage 2024 is also a part. A shortpresentation of this collective and its history will allow both tosituate the subject and to begin to tell the story of existing strugglesagainst the JOP 2024. The collective was formed in November 2020 inSeine-Saint-Denis, first in the form of a coalition of different localstruggles against JOP 2024 projects. Its first actions were toxic tourorganized regularly in the different places concerned and by the peoplefighting on site: the inhabitants of the ADEF home in Saint-Ouenthreatened with expulsion, the parents of students at the Anatole FranceSchool in Saint-Ouen Denis who fought against the construction of amotorway interchange with five ramps just above their children's school,the members of Notre Parc N'est Pas à Vente who defended the Parc de laCourneuve against the construction of the village media, the gardenersof the Collective for the Defense of the Jardins des Vertus(Aubervilliers)... This coalition of collectives was able to rely on thework that had already begun with No to the Olympic Games in Paris, whichwas already fighting in 2015 against the candidacy, and the JO St DenisVigilance Committee which closely followed the urban transformations ofthe city.The first year was therefore marked by investigative work on the variousconstruction projects, dissemination of this information via the media,social networks, leaflets, collages, demonstrations and disruptions ofpublic events. Numerous legal appeals were launched, occupations tookplace, notably for several months in the Aubervilliers gardens, andconstruction site blockades were organized. Only two local struggleswere (partially) successful: the shooting event was moved toChâteauroux, in an already existing structure, instead of concreting andprivatizing a new part of the Parc de la Courneuve; and the solariumconstruction project, attached to the JOP training pool and going toconcrete part of the Aubervilliers allotment gardens, was abandonedfollowing a court decision. Of all the legal procedures, it is the onlyone to have resulted favorably, undoubtedly thanks to the strongmobilization created around the occupation of the gardens and otherforms of associated struggles. The other scandalous constructions wereonly delayed by the struggles.At the end of 2021, Saccage 2024 underwent two big changes, notablybecoming a collective in its own right and no longer just a coalition.The beginnings were very focused on construction and the associatedecological issues, and there was a movement towards other types ofdestruction of the JOP 2024 which were beginning to be seen. Also,Rampage 2024 has begun to assert a clearly anti-Olympic position. Thiswas not the case at the beginning, because certain collectives whichwere part of it did not support this line (especially for strategicreasons). By doing this, the collective became internationalized, in thesense that it became an active member of the international anti-Olympicmovement. It hosted the second meeting of the international movement inSeine-Saint-Denis during a weekend in May 2021 (5).The investigative and counter-propaganda work is still continuing,trying to disseminate the anti-Olympic arguments beyond Paris and 93.This is undoubtedly what takes the members of the collective the mosttime. We thought this work would be done by larger organizations -associations or unions - but we realized quite quickly that this wouldnot be the case. Among them, only the Asso and 93 branch of Solidaires,and the CNT are officially against the 2024 JOP. The associations, evenenvironmental ones, have not spoken out. For what? For some, it is the"popular" side of the Games that is blocking them. For others, andthat's most of them, it's the fear of seeing public subsidies withdrawn.Another line of struggle is to support as much as possible the actionsand mobilizations which arise around the JOPs, in a clearly anti-Olympicline, or simply as a pretext to obtain something else. This was the caseduring the movement against the pension reform in 2023, where thecollective supported several blockages and intrusions into JOP siteswith unions or mobilized collectives, in the wave of the slogan "nowithdrawal, no Olympic Games." This is also the case in the context ofthe struggle of undocumented workers on JOP construction sites andelsewhere. In October 2023, a one-day strike on the Aréna Porte de laChapelle construction site, supported by around a hundred people fromundocumented migrant collectives and supporters, gave rise tosignificant concessions from Bouygues and subcontractors for theregularization of undocumented immigrants on the construction site.Pressure continues for regularization and against the Darmanin law, andthe JOP can form an important lever for these struggles. Inspired byother anti-Olympic resistances before us, it seems important to us tomake links with broader struggles on the territory. Because it is notthe Olympic and Paralympic Games that invented gentrification, the riseof security, transphobia or capitalism, but we are fighting against thembecause it is a mega-event that gives a boost to all these developments:because it plays on an image (sport-washing) but it is a pretext forother political and economic agendas, because its international scopeunlocks public and private money for projects which were beginning towaste their breath (like the Grand Paris Express), and because itinvolves exceptions to common law, such as that of local democracy butalso labor law.For six months there has also been an inter-organization against thedevastation of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. It brings togethercollectives, associations and unions once a month with the aim ofcreating a common anti-racist, feminist, anti-validist andanti-capitalist front a few months before the JOP. The objective is tocoordinate on respective actions, and also to create jointmobilizations, in connection with the collectives fighting in Marseille,in the Alps and in Milan-Cortina. Two national days of decentralizedactions were organized on December 2, 2023 and January 6, 2024. The nextone will take place on February 6 to support the collectives in strugglein Italy. At the same time, the Reverse of the Medal (6), bringingtogether associations and NGOs, was formed and is lobbying institutionsto limit the social damage of the 2024 JOPs.What are the prospects for the future?the final decision of the IOC which would confirm the hosting of the JOP2030 by the Auvergne Rhône Alpes and PACA regions will be taken duringthe summer. Mobilization against this candidacy and any support for NOJO Alpes is therefore a priority for the coming months, as we know thatit is difficult to fight after the signing of the host city contract.Especially since succeeding in having this candidacy abandoned wouldleave the IOC without another candidate, which would be a big shake-upin the continuing history of the JOP...several collectives organize sports events in opposition to the valuesof Olympicism, such as in Marseille or Montreuil. Working on closer tieswith amateur sports collectives in different cities in France ahead ofthe Olympic Games would be important to counter the ideology ofcapitalist, competitive and non-inclusive sport.strengthening the international movement is an important dimension ofthe struggle. It is thanks to exchanges with past struggles that we wereable to deconstruct recurring Olympic propaganda speeches ("it willcreate jobs", "these will be the greenest Games in history", "there willhave social housing", etc.), and have ideas for action and advice.what will happen just before the JOP and during it will be even harderto live with for many people, expulsions, arrests, police and militaryviolence are to be expected, and it is now that we should try toorganize specific support networks.Collectif Saccage 2024, January 2024News from Île-de-FranceA sports festival?The Olympics have lost much of their popularity because of the priceswhich make them inaccessible to the majority of the population whom theauthorities had previously lured with false promises. In particular, thedraws left many disappointed. Add to this that, on the other hand, theyreport a lot of hassle: endless work which greatly disrupts daily life,particularly in 93, public transport already disrupted even though weare far from being there, increase in prices in perspective... Absoluteparadox for a so-called sports festival: the activities of some of thesports associations are hampered. For example, the Montreuil swimmingpool, selected to his great pride as a training pool, is 10 centimetersshort of being the Olympic regulation size. It is therefore closed forwork and the local swimming clubs no longer have a swimming pool... Tomy knowledge, no compensation is planned. And there are many such examples.What mobility?I don't know if you followed, but the Canard chainé launched a bit ofhumor that part of the Ile-de-France population was going to be confinedduring the games (in fact, the prefecture has already asked not to movearound too much and not to take too much transport). This wasimmediately taken up as serious information, including by major media,and everyone believed it to the point that the prefecture had to publisha denial. This says a lot about how games are perceived. And despite thedenial, we are not at peace.Expulsion of the poorIn fact, the "Olympic Games, accelerators of the future" (officialslogan for me) are indeed an accelerator of gentrification and the worksthat accompany Greater Paris. In 93, there is so much work that we haveto use the GPS to get to the neighboring town. It is a formidable toolin the service of this project of expulsion of the poor. Until thewinter break, the rate of expulsion of squats was impressive. There wasat least one call for mobilization per day, and even then I only followlocal calls. The hunt for homeless people, particularly along highways,has intensified. If the government had to back down on the expulsion ofstudents from CROUS accommodation, the hotels where social services putthe poorly housed are emptied in preparation for the games. In short, wecannot say that the Olympics are responsible for gentrification, butthey rush us towards this hell very quickly, leaving no time for theslightest attempt at resistance to organize.Undocumented immigrants on construction sitesThere also remains the question of undocumented immigrants. You don'tneed to be a great cleric to guess that there are many of them toilingon construction sites that must be completed on time. In fact, if anundocumented migrant working for the Olympic Games individually requestsregularization through a union, they have it quite easily. The risk istoo great for the authorities to fall behind. The problem is that thereis a cascade of subcontractors, that undocumented immigrants arescattered across numerous construction sites, which makes collectivestruggle complicated to organize. Hence the importance of the actionwhich was carried out on October 17 to occupy the ARENA constructionsite, Porte de la Chapelle, which is to host Olympic and Paraolympicevents this summer. It was not the work of the workers on this site. Butthe occupation of an emblematic construction site made it possible tocreate a balance of power, to attract media attention to the employmentof undocumented immigrants and to obtain progress in regularization. Theorganizers of the Olympic Games visibly fear a spotlight on theemployment of undocumented immigrants. But in these times of ruthlessrepression and fascistization of the political arena, the fight isdifficult.Sylvie, 93, January 2024Notes(1) https://stopjjoo.cat/(2) https://www.nolympia-hamburg.de/(3) https://www.change.org/p/faatura-ia...(4) ) https://no-jo.fr/ni-ici/(5) Thanks to the work of Non aux JOs, we very quickly had links withcollectives who had fought against the JOPs in their region in pastyears, London, in Rio, in Tokyo, in Hamburg, and who fought against theJOP for the following years, notably in Los Angeles, and against thecandidacies of Sapporo and the Catalan Pyrenees. Several moved. Therecordings and reports from this weekend are available here:https://saccage2024.noblogs.org/arc... .(6) https://lereversdelamedaille.fr/http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4072_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten