This January 25, the Constitutional Council censored 32 of the 86measures of the Darmanin-RN law. So much the better. But it would beextremely dangerous to believe that such a "legal shield" couldsustainably contain the rising nationalist fury. Popular mobilization isour bulwark, not the Constitution. ---- This is all politicalmaneuvering. It must be remembered that the president himself,overwhelmed by his right, had seized the Constitutional Council as alast resort, in order to clear himself of having passed one of the worstlaws in decades in terms of repression and racism. The ConstitutionalCouncil therefore played the role of safeguard by removing the worstfrom the law, but nothing is finished. The reasons for censorship by theCouncil are based on form and not on substance. They are not rejected asnot being in conformity with the Constitution and nothing would preventthese same hideously racist measures from being taken up in another textof law.Among the remaining racist measures:- forfeiture of nationality for French dual nationals guilty of murderof a person holding public authority;- non-issuance or non-renewal of the residence permit in the event of"non-compliance with the principles of the republic";- the end of collegiality of asylum application judgments;- the exclusion of children of foreign origin from social assistance forchildren (ASE) subject to an OQTF when they reach the age of majority.This law, in its different versions, marks a certain turning point, offascistization of our society, of a president ready to inscribe nationalpreference and the loss of nationality by allying with the RN, of aradicalization of the government towards The extreme right and a filthyracism that spills onto TV sets, to talk about "couscous anti-Semitism",the way high school girls should dress, or even the justification ofdeaths at the hands of the police.The impunity of the police officer responsible for the rape of Théo addsto the spectacle. Faced with this, political mobilization will not havebrought as many people as the seriousness of this law would imply.However, it is crucial not to settle into the demobilizing idea that theConstitutional Council is a "safety net" which will always be there toblock the authoritarian drift of a future nationalist government. Aconstitutional framework can be broken; part of the police and the army,whose putschist inclinations are known, ask only for this.Popular, united, massive mobilization is the best defense to dissuade them.Libertarian Communist Union, January 28, 2024https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?lois-racistes-la-mobilisation-populaire-est-notre-rempart-pas-la-Constitution_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
SPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten