In the debate and in the development of the center-left parties and withgreater emphasis in the development of the largest trade unionorganization, the CGIL, the defense of the Constitution was taken on asa central element of the opposition to the center-right government ofGiorgia Meloni. A call that is not new in Italian political dialecticswhich develops hand in hand with the call to anti-fascism and to anamarcord of times, situations and men from other eras.Yet this supporting structure of democracy appears insufficient tocounteract the drift that the latest electoral rounds have recorded,bringing to the leadership of the country the party that has its rootsin that past that the Constitution and Resistance should have erased.Faced with this observation, we could say, as we often feel, that it isthe consequence of an exasperated individualism and a stubborn influenceand conditioning of the media.Such reasoning does not actually take us a step forward in understandingthe social phenomena that have developed in recent decades, remaining onthe terrain of simple observation. The how, the why, theresponsibilities, the errors, are not analyzed and the idea is tocounteract the right-wing drift with an appeal to the "sacred union" ofall the heterogeneous forces that in various ways oppose the Governmentteam.How many times in recent years have we heard trade union leaders at alllevels regretting that workers do not participate, do not strike, do notshow solidarity, and these considerations were not and are not posed toask ourselves why, "how come", but they sound as a tired absolvingreminder of the ineffectiveness of one's action.How many times have we heard that young people have no ideals, that theyare closed in their daily hedonism, that they have neither a past nor afuture. And from time to time the faults are identified in the absenceof the family, in the lax school, in the lack of discipline.Social evolution or involution, the balance of power between classes,feelings of solidarity or selfishness, the radicality of the newgenerations, chauvinism and racism, rampant misogyny, all this in theabsence of a critical and self-criticism of the past and in the absenceof an elaboration of memory that links the past to the present into onemakes all of this appear to be an inexplicable phenomenon, events thatgenerate themselves and which therefore relieve us of any responsibility.The real country is absent from all this.Yet the data on youth unemployment, the data on precarious work, theevidence of a job which, stripped of all rights, increasingly takes theform of a new slavery, would be enough.Yet it would be enough to remember decades and decades of exaltation ofwhat in the 80s of the last century was defined as yuppism, that is,that figure of a rampant young male who had as his sole purpose in lifework to make money and squander it to satisfy his own unbridledegocentrism in luxury purchases and frequenting fashionable clubs.Every desire for radical transformation of the existing was branded asutopianism and political infantilism. To the courage of an action thataimed at a society of free and equal people, the only choice that couldbreak the system of rampant corruption and disarticulate the mix betweenstate power and mafia power, the only one that could give meaning towork as a constitutive element of people's dignity and not just fatigueand submission, the only choice that could open a process in whichgender differences and sexual inclinations could develop freely withoutexclusions, judgments, prejudices and violence; compromise was preferredto courage. The protection of wages was opposed by the need forsacrifices and subordination to the company and capital.A process of expansion of democracy was contrasted with decisionism.Concertation, consociativism, clientelism and recommendation were putbefore conflict.The current situation is based on these facts.Although Italy is the eighth world economic power and the tenth worldmilitary power, public bodies such as Istat or private bodies such asCensis and Caritas record significant phenomena of poverty and socialhardship.The "Values" then, if they are unable to give concrete answers to dailylife, appear sterile and often experienced by young people and not onlyby them as empty rhetoric; the substance of these "Values" disappearsand meaningless words remain.The numbers, in their coldness, give us a reality which, if assumed,could and should move consciences much more concretely than generic appeals.Istat records around two million families in absolute poverty (1), or5.6 million people, in percentage terms 10% of the overall population. Aconstantly worsening situation given that in 2005 3.3% of the residentpopulation in Italy found themselves in these conditions.To confirm this fact which shows how the wealth produced is unable tocounteract the strong social hardship, there is the expatriationsituation which keeps Italy a country of emigrants. A statement which,if associated with the incessant propaganda on the "invasion" ofmigrants, may appear exaggerated, but once again the data tells theharsh reality of a country incapable of guaranteeing a future for manyof its citizens and in particular for the new generations.CENSIS tells us that Italians currently emigrating, as shown in the AIREregister (Registry of Italians Resident Abroad), are 5.9 million, whileimmigrants in Italy reach 5 million. In the last year alone, 82,014Italians expatriated, of which 36,125 were between 18-34 years old,young people who also expatriate with their family and their minors,reaching approximately 50,000 people, i.e. 60% of expatriations concernyoung people.We could list many other data to tell of a country that struggles toprovide responses to emergencies which, over the years, go fromoccasional episodes to structural problems generating daily suffering.The same is true for healthcare where we are witnessing a progressiveretreat of the public fence or for the environmental situation where thefeared disasters are not postponed to a hypothetical future, but arealready making their effects felt today like the damage of air pollutionwhich, as is happening these days, it condemns entire cities to lockthemselves at home to avoid dangerous respiratory diseases.If the things described so far are part of a problematic situation, thereference to the Constitution as Deus ex machina appears completelyineffective. Ineffective because the fundamental law of the State, bythe will of the "Constituents" has only a procedural value of directionand its articles cannot immediately assume binding value.Of course, having articles of the Constitution that affirm fundamentalconcepts in defense of the dignity of the person such as article 3 (2)which in particular in the second paragraph states that it is the dutyof the Republic to remove obstacles of a social and economic naturewhich in fact limit freedom and The equality of citizens is important,but over 80 years after its formulation this principle has failed totranslate into current practice, but not only that, its potential scopeof reference and direction has been completely canceled by theconstitutional amendment of the art. 81, Monti Government 2012, withwhich the balanced budget was introduced. (3) A modification which, byproviding for the balance between income and expenditure year by year,limits the possibility of economic interventions aimed at achievingbalance in an entire economic cycle, one of the key elements ofKeynesian economics. That is, a path has been precluded which, althoughnot moving outside the context of the capitalist economy, in the longhistory of recurring crises of capital has managed to provide answers,albeit partial, to the working masses.Many other articles would deserve reflection and a comparison betweenthe statement and current reality, think of art. 32 in reference tohealth (4) which already expresses a contradiction in the statementbecause while the right to health is proclaimed for every individual itis stated that treatment must be free only for the indigent, a conceptwhich was partly superseded by law 833 which in the second paragraph ofarticle 3 states that the levels of healthcare services, established bylaw by the State, must, in any case, be guaranteed to all citizens. Butboth the constitutional provisions and law 833/78 in today's realityappear to be unattainable chimeras if, according to ISTAT, in 2020, 7%of the population renounced necessary healthcare services because theywere considered too expensive or because waiting lists were too long. (5)The same as in the art. 36 (6), so often referred to in the trade uniondebate which indicates fair pay as the means to guarantee a free anddignified existence, clearly clashes with the spread of situations ofpoverty even in the context of employment relationships.And today in a situation which sees the world moving rapidly towards awar of global dimensions, the rejection of war which should besanctioned by Article 11 of the Constitution is reduced to a pale veilbehind which the war is supported, nourished and often it's done.The statement of the president emeritus of the Consulta Cesare Mirabelliis emblematic and clarifying , clearing the field of the possibility ofinvoking what was put in black and white by our founding fathers, tostop the sending of defense material to Ukraine: «What is written in thearticle 11 has the character of a general statement - explains Mirabelli- and must be read as the repudiation of the war of aggression orunderstood as an instrument for resolving international disputes. Butaccording to the Charter, war exists. It can be decided by Parliamentand proclaimed by the President of the Republic."(7)It is not the purpose of this short article to examine the scope of theconstitutional provisions, but rather simply to underline that the mainroad to follow in trying to counteract a dangerous right-wing drift inour country necessarily involves the reversal of the balance of powerbetween capital and work, from the ability to start mobilizations thatimpose a distribution of wealth in favor of the less well-off classes,essentially giving centrality to living conditions and the satisfactionof needs.We must start again from here and not from the nostalgic memory thatdominates the network made up of quotes and aphorisms of men who areresponsible for these decades of ideological disarmament of the workingclass and of illusion in the chimeras of class concertation andcollaboration.It is these "leaders" who, thanks to their influence on the workers'movement, have "slowed down" and extinguished the social conflict.The historical compromise, national salvation, the pact betweenproducers, represent the harbingers of the current situation. Thesolution is not in the past. Not in the "leaders" of the Italian leftwho from Nenni, Togliatti, Craxi to Berlinguer worked to disperse everytrace of a classist approach in favor of a national idea, not in thetrade union leaders from Lama to Trentin who suffered the egalitarianwave of 60s and 70s, but they worked to break class solidarity bydebasing wage demands and sponsoring the myth of professionalism.Nor do we think that the revival of a "statist communism" as it wasachieved over the last century can today represent a useful point ofreference that can be taken as a model for a rebirth of an idea of a newsociety founded on solidarity and not on exploitation, on freedom andnot on submission.Capital and the state apparatus that supports it have proven to be moreflexible and capable of adapting to new productive and social conditionsthan the old theorists of the workers' movement, both Marxist andanarchist, thought and than we ourselves thought. youthful years we thought.The progressive role of the bourgeoisie that Marx, not without reason,identified, has disappeared and the tumultuous development of capitalismcoexists both in the so-called democratic regimes, the capitalist West,but also with obscurantist regimes such as the Arab countries or indictatorial regimes such as China.We need to start again from here. The lessons of the past provide uswith some analytical tools, give us a road paved with good intentions,but transformed into just as many tragic errors, leave us as a legacymoments of exhilarating construction of a possible new society which,however, lasted too short and were limited to specific areas. limitedterritories, this is the baggage to work with. Baggage that if itbecomes Manichaeism and nostalgia turns into ballast that nails us tothe mere function of pathetic testimony." In seeking the impossible, man has always realized and known thepossible, and those who have wisely limited themselves to what seemedpossible have never advanced a single step." (8)This phrase by Bakunin, taken up in the French May of 1968, in theslogan "We are realists, we ask for the impossible" precisely because itescapes a rational approach better than many analyses, helps us tounderstand what is necessary today to develop a true process of socialtransformation . Today, talking about the overthrow of present realityin order to create a society in which human activity can self-determineand in which equality and individual and collective freedom isguaranteed is unrealistic, even utopian. But a real analysis of theexisting shows us that only a radical change of the existing can put anend to the current misery. What appears impossible is the only path toreal change.*Ovid "Metamorphoses"Note1) Families and people who cannot afford the minimum expenses to leadan acceptable life are considered to be in absolute poverty .https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/2897242)https://www.senato.it/associazione/la-costruttura/principi-fondamentali/article-33)https://www.senato.it/associazione/la-costruttura/parte-ii/titolo-i/sezione-ii/article-814)https://www.senato.it/associazione/la-costruttura/parte-i/titolo-ii/article-325) https://www.collettiva.it/speciali/insieme-per-la-coposizione/quattro-milioni-di-italiani-rinunciano-alle-cure-m5d05bcs6)https://www.senato.it/associazione/la-costruttura/parte-i/titolo-iii/article-367)https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/perche-l-oncino-armi-kiev-e-linea-la-coposizione-italiana-AEH7dxKB8) from Philosophical considerations on the divine ghost, the real worldand man. M. Bakunin. Translation by Edy Zarro, La Baronata, Lugano 2000http://alternativalibertaria.fdca.it/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
SPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten