In the information on international politics and in particular on the
events concerning the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, two "cheerful
geese" play an important role - among the many experts passed off as
neutral and objective in their analyses - who regularly appear on
various television networks and dominate the mainstream information in
our country. We are referring to the director of a well-known institute
of political studies that, although presenting itself as a scientific
and research body, is in reality a propaganda tool of the most orthodox
and biased Atlanticist West and to another researcher from the same
institute who is also a member of the European Leadership Network (ELN),
particularly violent and biased in expressing her hatred.
Among the many experts who are used, our attention focuses on these for
two reasons: first, they tend to represent themselves as bearers of
objective, scientific analyses, supported by knowledge and study of the
facts and events of international politics, as "experts", but they
develop an extremely biased analysis, without declaring it, indeed doing
everything to present their arguments and conclusions as objective.
Their belonging to the female gender is used, by them and by those who
use them, to convey particularly biased and violent contents, presented
under an aspect of common sense and reasonableness, which would belong
to the logic and balanced opinions of good mothers, and this in order to
make the statements supported credible and objective.
We have nothing against, of course, experts of different political
stripes bringing their analyses to the attention of public opinion -
convinced as we are that knowledge arises from the comparison of
opinions - but when their positions are biased and preconceived, even if
not declared as such, these self-styled analysts would do well not to
call themselves neutral, political scientists, they would do well to
declare their biased position, even when the statements they make, the
theses they support are clearly so.
The fact is that these people have given themselves the role of the
geese of the Capitol who, seeing and sensing the enemy's arrival, quack,
so as to raise the alarm to induce those they believe to be the attacked
to react: they are geese inserted in a war perspective that play a
precise and paid role on behalf of the war propaganda of the political
area to which they belong.
The fact is that the real existence of the enemy is yet to be
demonstrated because it must be explained how and why Russia, a country
with an immense territory, very rich in raw materials, poor in
population, barely 150 million inhabitants, should invade Europe with a
population of 450 million inhabitants to dominate but without energy
resources and raw materials and therefore to support.
Unable to explain this contradiction, the brilliant analysts are careful
not to pose the problem and to try to give a minimally rational answer,
but they commit themselves with the complicity of a battalion of
comrades, men and women journalists who are also biased, to provide
information aimed at influencing public opinion, by definition made up
of a shapeless mass of imbeciles who would allow themselves to be
oriented and directed towards the most abject and irrational objectives
by individuals nested in the columns of La Stampa or Corriere della Sera
as well as La Repubblica.
If these geese and their cronies are so concerned about the fate of the
European peoples and their freedom, they should be consistent: yes, they
should arm themselves and leave for the front, ready to go down into the
trenches to defend beloved Ukraine and its illiberal, oligarchic and
corrupt regime, just like the Russian one or the neo-Nazi-Zionist
criminals who are exterminating the Palestinians. It is too easy to stay
in the rear and incite others to take up arms, to go down into the field
and fight, risking their lives in defense of the so-called values of the
West, a reheated, indigestible and indigestible soup, to be fed to fools
to mask a policy of domination of the people.
https://www.ucadi.org/2025/06/22/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-le-oche-giulive/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
events concerning the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, two "cheerful
geese" play an important role - among the many experts passed off as
neutral and objective in their analyses - who regularly appear on
various television networks and dominate the mainstream information in
our country. We are referring to the director of a well-known institute
of political studies that, although presenting itself as a scientific
and research body, is in reality a propaganda tool of the most orthodox
and biased Atlanticist West and to another researcher from the same
institute who is also a member of the European Leadership Network (ELN),
particularly violent and biased in expressing her hatred.
Among the many experts who are used, our attention focuses on these for
two reasons: first, they tend to represent themselves as bearers of
objective, scientific analyses, supported by knowledge and study of the
facts and events of international politics, as "experts", but they
develop an extremely biased analysis, without declaring it, indeed doing
everything to present their arguments and conclusions as objective.
Their belonging to the female gender is used, by them and by those who
use them, to convey particularly biased and violent contents, presented
under an aspect of common sense and reasonableness, which would belong
to the logic and balanced opinions of good mothers, and this in order to
make the statements supported credible and objective.
We have nothing against, of course, experts of different political
stripes bringing their analyses to the attention of public opinion -
convinced as we are that knowledge arises from the comparison of
opinions - but when their positions are biased and preconceived, even if
not declared as such, these self-styled analysts would do well not to
call themselves neutral, political scientists, they would do well to
declare their biased position, even when the statements they make, the
theses they support are clearly so.
The fact is that these people have given themselves the role of the
geese of the Capitol who, seeing and sensing the enemy's arrival, quack,
so as to raise the alarm to induce those they believe to be the attacked
to react: they are geese inserted in a war perspective that play a
precise and paid role on behalf of the war propaganda of the political
area to which they belong.
The fact is that the real existence of the enemy is yet to be
demonstrated because it must be explained how and why Russia, a country
with an immense territory, very rich in raw materials, poor in
population, barely 150 million inhabitants, should invade Europe with a
population of 450 million inhabitants to dominate but without energy
resources and raw materials and therefore to support.
Unable to explain this contradiction, the brilliant analysts are careful
not to pose the problem and to try to give a minimally rational answer,
but they commit themselves with the complicity of a battalion of
comrades, men and women journalists who are also biased, to provide
information aimed at influencing public opinion, by definition made up
of a shapeless mass of imbeciles who would allow themselves to be
oriented and directed towards the most abject and irrational objectives
by individuals nested in the columns of La Stampa or Corriere della Sera
as well as La Repubblica.
If these geese and their cronies are so concerned about the fate of the
European peoples and their freedom, they should be consistent: yes, they
should arm themselves and leave for the front, ready to go down into the
trenches to defend beloved Ukraine and its illiberal, oligarchic and
corrupt regime, just like the Russian one or the neo-Nazi-Zionist
criminals who are exterminating the Palestinians. It is too easy to stay
in the rear and incite others to take up arms, to go down into the field
and fight, risking their lives in defense of the so-called values of the
West, a reheated, indigestible and indigestible soup, to be fed to fools
to mask a policy of domination of the people.
https://www.ucadi.org/2025/06/22/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-le-oche-giulive/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten