(en) France, Alternative Libertaire AL #246 - Elections in
the Public Service: The balances are maintained (fr, it, pt) [machine
translation]
The first general elections in professional Public Service December 4, 2014 were under
high tension with the revelations of the "case" Lepaon, which marred the CGT trade
unionism and all the struggle. Maintaining balances should not prevent to return to some
developments. ---- Professional elections Public Service December 4 were first marked by
numerous failures, whatever the voting procedures. This now becomes a habit and it is not
surprising that governments want to undermine the legitimacy of representative bodies, but
it is not a reason not to remember. Participation remains at just over 50%. ---- On the
results, overall balances are maintained: CGT decrease in each side of the public service
(State, local, hospital) but is the first organization on the whole (23.1%, or -2.3),
Partners progresses to the state and in the territorial, back in the hospital collects
6.8% in total (0.2), the FSU accounts for 8% on all but loses much in its "strong"
sectors[1]. UNSA (+1), FO (0.5), CFDT (0.1) rose slightly. These findings are also worth
roughly for elections to the RATP, Orange, Post and EDF. No "push FO" as some media have
been able to proclaim, or very localized, finally, the CFDT is far to go first and remains
at 4% behind the CGT. Given the difficulties of the current period, it would almost be
satisfactory.
Progression field teams
Details of local votes, however, shows that where the employee-es are in contact with
militant union teams, there is a progression, but this vote can be very different from the
national vote. Clearly, if certain employee-es expressed a distrust of trade unionism in
general struggle unionism in particular or confederation CGT Lepaon, they continue to vote
for the Union activists who fight locally. This suggests that the case was finally Lepaon
had little impact where union teams are closer to the employee-es. One element to move
forward in the discussions that are going through the CGT: it is indeed easy to shoot on
sight confederal bureaucracy without questioning the mandates to local management and
middle or on the functioning of trade union teams.
About FSU, any union filed left struggling to maintain themselves in the period, but this
is not enough to explain such a decline. First of corporatism is seen as a dead end by
part of the employee-es-es that are mobilized to recent years. FSU tried to get by first
claiming to embody a union redial pole and then widening to the entire state civil
service, two failures. So she has neither proposed nor reason to exist. However, it should
relativize its decline: it remains the largest union in many areas.
Solidarity is maintained or increased in a number of sectors where unions are not called
"South"[2], showing that should not be reduced to the single issue of the future name of
the trade union Solidarity union and South unions, ongoing debate in this organization.
Finally, note the expression of a frankly reactionary wage labor, with an increase of FO
and SNALC (National Union of secondary schools) in Education, the CFTC in higher education
and research. The collective Racine (National Front in education) has managed to
politicize this by calling for a vote SNALC and FO, which sparked a lousy FO response
simply recalling its political independence. The CFTC was in turn supported by the
Kingdom[3] logo on professions of faith.
Gregory (AL Orl?ans)
[1] - 4% in the primary - 6% in secondary and higher education.
[2] Public Finance, Weather, Water and Forestry.
[3] National Inter-University Union, bringing together personal and extreme right students.
http://www.alternativelibertaire.org/?Elections-dans-la-fonction
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten