French,OCL,Courant Alternatif #247 February 2015 Content + Editorial (fr)

OCL - Courant
Alternatif #247 February 2015 Content + Editorial (fr) [machine
translation]

Content ---- page 3 editorial ---- society ---- page 4 To be or not to be Charlie? The 
question is not really there anymore ---- ecology ---- Page 7 RTE yet still nuclear! ---- 
pages 10, 11 big brother ---- ecology ---- page 12 An expansion of the wolf in France 
inevitable? A report to the territory and the political ---- social movements ---- Page 16 
A collective of precarious of Education in Haute-Garonne ---- Page 18 Struggles for 
housing: where are we in Lyon? ---- International ---- page 20 Technical Assistance to the 
interntional Development: The other name of capitalist exploitation ---- Page 22 Belgium: 
General strike once! ---- The Movement ---- page 22 antigestionnaire Communist Network - 
Winter meetings balance ---- 25 pages A reading: Invisible Committee - our friends ---- 
About 26 pages of revolutionary Affinities (Besancenot - L?wy)

page 27 To open the discussion on Making children a new right? (About the book Escudero)

point of view

pages 30 Polemics and cartoons about self-determination referendum in Scotland and Catalonia

page 32 Economy in brief on

EDITORIAL

Deadly attacks on 7-8 January in Paris, and the dimension of the President goes back to 21 
points. Incredible, is not it? Sure he will have to shake to keep this capital of sympathy 
that his liberal social policy assumed he had lost. We will not cut new security laws such 
as the strengthening of the foregoing to protect, defend our freedoms, our shared values, 
on of the most Republican. "Socialists" are not the French "social democrats" Norwegian 
who, after double bombing in 2011 (77 dead), refused to change anything in their 
legislative arsenal as attacking the " democratic freedoms "it was falling into the trap 
set by Breivik, the far-right killer. "Get used to live with terrorism," said Valls, 
understood, agree to be increasingly fliqu?s that we were protecting you. The definition 
of terrorism is a State monopoly. It is he who decides who is a terrorist and who is not, 
and in this case it is never the one that says that is. His definition of terrorism is 
extensive and does not stop with the vision that have the 3.5 million people who took to 
the streets on 11 January. The whim of the state, the terrorist may be grocer on the 
Millevaches or Irish in Vincennes - the proof of guilt is the bomb that police filed in 
their apartment. However, it is not about terrorism when his "services" are committing a 
deadly attack against the Rainbow Warrior, or when its armed forces torturing Kanak 
villagers to make them confess where entrenched themselves hostage takers Ouvea which will 
all be slaughtered, including prisoners. There is no question when managing events is to 
physically punish protesters injuring them, maiming, killing them.

Even if there was no "anti-Arab" hysteria "anti-Muslim" after the attacks, racist attacks 
have multiplied against Muslims or supposed (both in eight days during last year), and 
they are still the main victims of the repressive forces. So by returning to the murders 
of January 7 and 8 and what ensued as we open this number AC .

In the vast staging of national unity, the dream of all world leaders, that magic moment 
when the class struggle is forgotten and where everyone will united (s) behind the one who 
knows what is good for them and for them, what to do to reassure them, protect them. 
During this unit fa?ade, the liberal policy that makes the rich richer and the poor poorer 
progresses without influencing its course. E. Macron finalizing its law, that which is 
said: "In the Macron law, everything is good for bosses. "A little over two months after 
the vote in parliament of the law on the energy transition, the government says its plans 
for nuclear power. We had not had any illusions about the willingness of Holland and its 
governments to limit a little bit the production of nuclear energy. It was understood that 
the closure of Fessenheim was a promise made to attract the votes of environmentalists, 
but it would be delayed as late as possible so that he certainly would not be possible to 
keep it. Today, with the statements of S. Royal, things are clear: it will stop if the 
reactors can be replaced by others of a new generation (EPR for example - see "Nuclear: 
the government's intentions bright "). As for the energy transition, it is actually only 
adding to other sources of nuclear energy. There is no question of replacing nuclear power 
with renewable energy: we will have more nuclear power wind turbines, turbines, etc., and 
to link everything, new EHV lines (see "electricity transmission network yet Always 
nuclear! ").

If these prospects are not as fun, it is clear that some (s) do not give up. So those who 
are struggling to provide shelter to those who do not (read "Struggles for housing: where 
are we in Lyon"); or precarious of Education Haute-Garonne who for a year have been a 
collective struggle and information, but also for meeting, allowing each one to regain 
confidence. They fight, but without illusions because, as they say, "only a break with 
capitalism change school" (see "A collective of precarious of Education in 
Haute-Garonne"). There is still some way to go, but one thing is certain is that only 
struggle pays.

OCL-Lyon on 01/24/2015

http://oclibertaire.free.fr/spip.php?article1638