Greece, From idotikopoiisi of public assets in the equity of the State: the perpetual bonds and other ideas by group of libertarian communists

I'll start by saying that personally , I am not part of this anarchy sees SYRIZA enemy. 
With some partners (yes, comrades!) SYRIZA unite many common struggles, many sleepless 
nights, many trechamata many tears from the tear eyes .... generally many. I can not see 
them as an enemy, even if they are statists or "regime". If this makes "Soviet anarchist," 
I accept. Nobody is perfect - I'm not sure. And because I'm a little reformas, considered 
to be potential good that SYRIZA won the elections. There are some of our fellow human 
beings, for whom small (a small one, because it can be shown and big) difference of 
SYRIZA-ANEL from ND-PASOK may be the d ; between having or not having house example, or to 
have or not to have a current or food. I look a bit like this saying Goldman when he made 
??propaganda against the eight hours he was reformism (then it was called so): the old man 
approached a worker and told her "you're right, but I can not catch the revolution, not 
live the remaining years of my stay as a man? ". Both are needed: the small step 
improvement (short and as a compromise) and the great revolutionary (long term but not in 
the Greek calends).

Much of the area think that shares my position, and it reflects that anarchist 
abstentionist campaign this year was much more subdued than usual. I could even say that 
the anarchists were treated much more well SYRIZA (not supported him, but not the very 
skylovrisan) than the rest brought the left (who swore in chorus, to an extent wonder if 
promotarei ND).

So that they were doing or will do so or not. If you do one of the ten have said, evil 
does. The question is what about the other nine. And the other hundred we want extra.
So yesterday, Mr. Varoufakis, threw a bomb (?) To replace debt with perpetual bonds and a 
second bomb about whether it is good or bad idea epanoikoiopoiisi by the state, the 
already privatized enterprises. These two, in my opinion is a significant change not at 
regular but heading level in the political firmament. Let me explain:

A common position left - social anarchy in Greece, was, at least the last 15 years, that 
public utilities and public goods must be under public scrutiny and to seek public benefit 
(okay: on the left the word public is identified with the word state, but that's another 
conversation, we rediscuss here: [ http://eleftheriakoi.blogspot.gr/2014/07/blog-post.html 
]). Hospital, Schools, Infrastructure Seashore etc. Should belong to all the people and 
serve the interests of all the people.

With these statements, if applicable (because even SYRIZA not yet crushed parrots / 
distorting of MassMedia as he said that he would do) the Varoufakis, THAT:

- either for technical reasons or for reasons of principle, the pursuit of popular 
sovereignty on public property is no longer a matter of principle and objective of the 
government.

- The replacement of the requirement for mowing a debt that went into private pockets 
with this conversion into perpetual Bonds *, hope for future generations go walk, and now 
the possibility of kedoskopon drink the blood of the people of Greece enters the Next 
Level , since the ability to receive dividends are given in perpetuity, as if it is the 
debt capital invested in SA stock exchange, without longer possible future apoliromis. So 
the "will pay us and children's debts Olympiad" we said in 2004, pass the "will pay for 
everything," now institutionalized.

And here triumphantly verified by Naomi Klein and the Doctrine of Shock (which in all 
cases mentioned in the book, the final stage of the destructive process is the rotation of 
the repressive government with a progressive but which is unable to intervene in the 
economic sector for the benefit of people, thus consolidating the sack). It also verifies 
and Durruti, saying the knowledge of scorched earth left behind of the bourgeoisie and the 
workers who will rebuild. The issue, however, is that the side which battled the Durruti 
lost. And he lost because instead of proceeding to the revolution, the time of the crisis 
moderated its demands, hoping to ypostirixi the bourgeoisie in other countries. As doing 
now SYRIZA.
Giorgis

http://eleftheriakoi.blogspot.fr/2015/02/blog-post.html