<< I have spoken with the Holy Father about decent work >> (Second Vice President
of the Government) ---- During the Great Recession of 2008, the hegemonicdynastic parties, PSOE and PP, carried out labor and pension reforms to fulfillthe Stability Plan issued by Brussels. This apart from trepanning article 135 ofthe constitution at the initiative of the socialist government, in order toguarantee the payment of the debt generated by the financial rescue. Bothmodifications of the Workers' Statute were answered with general strikes, the onedirected to the Executive of Rodríguez Zapatero on September 29, 2010 beingespecially seconded, regulations approved thanks to the abstention of the PNV.The protests against the adjustments and cuts to retirees and pensioners,however, had a different fate. While there was a common trade union front infront of Mariano Rajoy's (he introduced a sustainability factor to correct lifeexpectancy and the reduction of the rate of revaluation of perceptions to 0.25%),that of the PSOE was blessed by CEOE, CCOO and UGT,despite introducing structuralchanges that aggravated the remuneration system in the future. Relevant data,that tripartite consensus was forged after Valeriano Gómez was co-opted asMinister of Labor, a Ugetista leader who a month earlier had led the march forthe repeal of the PSOE labor reform. In this way, plunged into the situation ofexceptionality derived from the crisis, the status of the labor and pensionmarket was altered for the worse.When the vote of no-confidence against Rajoy won in 2019, a new progressivepolitical cycle began. And one of the first things the incoming left-wingcoalition government did was bury everything related to Zapatero's injuries inthe labor and pension field . Although ethically reprehensible, it was logicalfrom the point of view of the prevailing pragmatism. It did not seem consistentthat the new Executive, made up of the PSOE of Pedro Sánchez and the United We ofPablo Iglesias, began its days under the stigma of that inheritance received.Incidentally, a burden to which the new Socialist General Secretary hadcontributed by voting in his favor at the time as a disciplined party deputy .The focus of the complaint, then,he focused only on what was perpetrated by thePP in these matters. And as an emblem of commitment to the grassroots, the repealof the PP labor reform was registered in block letters in point 1.3 of thebipartite Common Program. CCOO and UGT, for their part, forgot that 2010 generalstrike as old fashioned, settling in the new stage as the only social agents ofunion reference.In this context emerges the figure of the Minister of Labor Yolanda Díaz, whofrom the moment of taking office publicly recalled that she was there toeliminate the labor reform of the PP . A challenge that he would repeat adnauseam where there was a sufficient audience to summon the media, his laststaging being the public-private visit to Pope Francis to talk about "decentwork." Weeks before he had posed at the closing of the Congress of Workers'Commissions brandishing the same motto: << we will repeal the labor reform of thePP >>. With this saturnal of opulence and fertility, the legend of a charismaticleader was cooked who, after stopping the destruction of jobs by the pandemicwith the ERTE of force majeure (a tool in the arsenal of the contested PP laborreform), but even seemed capable to impose its will on the European Commission.Only his Galician countrymen were skeptical of such a brilliant "assault on theskies." Perhaps because they remembered that in the autonomic past the presenceof Díaz in the electoral campaign of the tides had decisively contributed to thedefeat of those who came to dominate the mayoralties of A Coruña, Santiago andFerrol.If it were not because it has become stale from so hackneyed, it could be arguedthat the repeal of the repeal undertaken by Díaz as a new labor reform is anothertwist of the vaunted << change something so that everything remains the same >> .A move from the ethics of conviction that means his steadfast commitment to<repeal the labor reform of the PP >> to that of the responsibility of that birthof the mountains because less gives a stone. The labor reform of the self-styledsocial agents has placed conditions on temporary hiring and toughened thepenalties for their violation (but it has not ended the temporary or interim);ended with the abuse of ultraactivity; YReturned to the principle of primacy ofstate agreements in the salary aspect over company or autonomous ones (for thisreason, subcontracting fraud will be problematic from now on).Apart from that, the prohibition of ERE in the public sector is striking ( a newform of dual employment? ) And that ERTE has become structural through theNetwork Mechanism for Flexibilization and Stabilization of Employment (MRFE). Thelatter slang to hide the fact that, when macroeconomic situations are unfavorablefor business, the State will bear the cost of the temporary unemployment of theemployee, while exonerating the employer from part of the social contributionsuntil it clears (and of course without stranded workers are included inunemployment statistics).That is the fundamental of what is repealed in Yolanda Díaz's labor encyclical.The substantive that gave the UGT and CCOO reasons to go out on the streets in2010 remains unscathed. Internal and external flexibility is maintained; Article41, which makes it easier for the company to modify working conditions, is nottouched; nor the 40 on geographic mobility; the cost of dismissal is maintainedat 20 days per year for the unfair and 33 for the from; neither are theprocessing salaries recovered; nor the administrative authorization in collectivedismissals (judicial deregulation). In short, a tangana to convert the CEOEbosses and the CCOO and UGT official centrals into the omnivorous foremen of theunion world, and potential beneficiaries of the European Funds. The proof of thisoligopolistic ambition reappears in the attempt to increase state levelagreements over regional ones, an enclave where these << social agents >> lackroots in important productive sectors.Hence, the BNG, the PNV and Bildu (whichthe May 20, 2020 signed with PSOE and UP the << complete repeal of the laborreform promoted by the PP >>) have spoken of treason and announced that they willvote against the draft when it reaches Congress. But it has been the only sonicdiscrepancy to date.Civil society remains demobilized without knowing which cardto stay with before the repeal that never existed proclaimed by << one of ours >>.Along with the indulgence of compliments and congratulations with which thepress, radio and television, left and right, have received the Christmas laborreform of 2021 (<< a historic day for the workers and workers of our country >>,to say of the own Díaz), there have been flagrant absences. The unusual andexaggerated fact that it was the first labor reform agreed in the last fortybetween the Government, CEOE and CCOO and UGT stands out. But it is obvious thatalso never in the recent history of our democracy Moncloa had 140,000 millioneuros to distribute among social agents in its environment and institutions suchas salomonic ointment from Fierabrás.Harder to assimilate is the fact that almost at the same time that the good newsof the birth of the jibarizada labor reform was produced, new cases of corruptionwere known that impacted on the water line of the undersigned .The leader of UGTMadrid has resigned after revealing an alleged fraud with the Salary GuaranteeFund (FOGASA) for an amount of several million euros, and a judge has justprosecuted 37 senior officials of the previous Andalusian Board, that ofsocialism rociero. Appeals in a separate piece of the ERE scandal for collectingovercommissions on the compensation policies for workers in situations ofdismissal and early retirement.A mess wrapped in a deception that the post-conciliar communist Yolanda Díazspeakingex-chairhas titled as << a new paradigm >>.Rafael Cidhttps://www.cgt-lkn.org/blog/archivos/13979_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten