SPREAD THE INFORMATION

Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages ​​are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.

Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog

woensdag 17 augustus 2022

#WORLD #WORLDWIDE #ITALY #ANARCHISM #News #Journal #Update - (en) Italy, Galatea FAI: How did it happen that in the 21st century women find themselves once again having to fight for the right to have an abortion? I. (1/3) USA (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 In the post "Abortion in Russia" we translated the 4th Chapter of Anna

Sidorevich's essay. ---- After more than a month, we decided, thanks to the helpand translation of Evgeny, to publish this essay in its entirety, dividing itinto three distinct parts. ---- How did it happen that in the 21st century womenfind themselves once again having to fight for the right to have an abortion? Whyis this happening all over the world - and also in the West? We tell you about itin as much detail as possible. ---- On June 24, the US Supreme Court overturnedthe case of "Roe v. Wade",[with which abortion was]constitutionally recognized.Now the procedure can become illegal in most states. Millions of women[1]will beforced to move to neighboring states or to abort illegally. This scenario wasmade possible by the fault of the Supreme Court judges - (six out of nine) - areconservative -[who]traditionally advocate the abortion of the right to abortion.But the right to abortion has for many years been a tool of political strugglenot only in the United States, but also in other countries. About how thishappened, Meduza asked Anna Sidorevich, a researcher in the field of feminism andgender at the Center for the History of the Paris Institute of Political StudiesSciences Po, to tell.Contrary to popular belief that abortion is dangerous to women's life and health,this is not the case. Approximately 73 million abortions are performed each yearworldwide .[2]With their help, six out of ten unplanned pregnancies areterminated. The procedure is so common that the WHO classifies it as a "simple(and therefore most often safe) medical intervention" that can be effectivelyperformed by specialists.WHO considers abortion to be safe when supervised by qualified personnel who arefamiliar with the methods recommended by the organization . According to USstatistics from 2013 to 2018, the mortality rate for safe abortions performedaccording to WHO recommendations was only 0.4 cases per 100,000 abortions, i.e.out of 200,000 women who aborted, only one died (in the last 50 years mortalitywas reduced).[2]At the same time, according to the WHO, more than seven million women end up inhospital due to complications after "unsafe" abortions. Such abortions usuallyinclude procedures performed at a later date, in unsanitary conditions or bypeople without specialized medical training. Such practices are much morecommon[3]in countries where women's rights to abortion are severely restricted.State restrictions make abortion dangerous for women: high costs, stigmatization,delay in the procedure. It is above all a legal prohibition. Feminists have beentrying to explain this problem to society and politicians for years and arecalling for changes, but abortion laws that prohibit or allow abortion in severalcountries have historically almost never been related to women's health.Chapter 1: A sensitive topic in the United States[As of]the spring of 2022, the issue of abortion in the United States has becomemuch more discussed than ever. It turned out that in a country where the right toabortion seemed long overdue, millions of women could have lost it in a few months.The crisis began in September 2021 when the state of Texas passed a "heartbeat"law banning abortions after the sixth week (with no exceptions for cases ofviolence and incest). Previously, the period after which abortion was not allowedwas 20 weeks.The authors of the law, conservative , believe that it is in the sixth week thatthe fetus has recognizable cardiac activity, which means that abortion after thisperiod[4]should be prohibited.In response to the adoption of the Texas law, women's marches took place in 660cities in several states. They were organized by an alliance of 200 human rightsorganizations in the country. The largest protest took place in the US capital,Washington: thousands of women marched through the city to the US Supreme Courtbuilding with posters and slogans: "Take care of your uterus" and "L 'abortion isa personal choice ".  March to Washington against new Texas law severely restricting abortion rights.October 2, 2021"The issue of the right to abortion has never been just about abortion itself,"the New York Times wrote in September 2021 . Reporters reported how conservativeAmerican citizens' attitudes towards abortion have changed over the years. If in1971 the resolution of the Southern Baptist Convention[5]recommended abortion incase of rape, incest, serious developmental disorders of the fetus or threat tothe health of the mother; already the resolution adopted in 2021 definesabortion[as]"the murder of an unborn child" and a "crime against humanity" whichshould be prosecuted by law, without exception.According to historian Jefferson Cowie , today, among adherents to the abortionban in the United States, there is a minority of those who care about religiousreasons. Abortion has become part of the political stalemate, Cowie told the NewYork Times. The stance on the prohibition of abortion, together with the racialquestion and the opinion on vaccination against covid, has become a clear sign ofbelonging to one side or the other. However, this was not always the case.The first movement against the right to abortion in the United States appeared inthe mid-19th century; previously the procedure was widespread and did not causeconviction . Formally, abortion was banned, but only later, after the woman beganto feel the movement of the fetus, in the fourth - sixth month. Women oftenturned to healers and midwives and[not]to medical professionals. Then, in thefight[for]the patients, doctors called for stricter legislation . According toanother version, the United States simply repeated the laws of Great Britain .Nonetheless, at the beginning of the 20th century, abortion was completely bannedand became a criminal offense in all states.The ban was in effect until the 1960s, when demands for the legalization ofabortion began to resonate actively in the United States, even within theemerging second-wave feminist movement[6].March of feminists demanding the universal right to abortion and equal workingconditions. Boston, March 8, 1970In the late 1960s, Texas resident Norma McCorvey was unable to obtain the rightto abortion because the state only allowed abortion for incest and rape. Thewoman tried to deceive the court and said the child was conceived as a result ofrape, but it could not be proved. Then McCorvey, under the pseudonym Jane Roe,filed a lawsuit for violating her constitutional rights in the Texas FederalDistrict Court; District Attorney Henry Wade became the defendant in the case.The court ruled in favor of the woman, but did not ban the current legislation.Hence the case "Roe v. Wade "came to the Supreme Court of the United States,which in 1973 made a historic decision , confirming that the right to privacyguaranteed by the constitution includes a woman's right to have an abortion ofher own accord, which means that no state law can limit it. The Supreme Courtverdict effectively legalized abortion across the country.At that time the issue of abortion was not yet so politicized. In 1984, supportfor "pro-choice" (ie, a conscious choice between pregnancy and abortion) amongsupporters of the Republican and Democratic parties differed by only 6% - in 2020this difference was already 48%. The issue of abortion began to be actively usedby conservative US politicians only in the early 1980s to mobilize voters andattract the most dubious to their side. Republicans tried to get out of thecircle of voters who did not support the civil rights movement[7], which foughtagainst racial discrimination. The subject of abortion was convenient as it alsointerested those people who were not interested in the racial question.Conservatives in various states have repeatedly tried to ban abortion or makeaccess to the procedure more difficult for women; but the sentence "Roe v. Wade"has been coming to the rescue for years. For example, in 2016, the Supreme Courtfound a Texas anti-abortion bill to restrict the operation of abortion clinicsunconstitutional.Norma McCorvy (1947-2017), the plaintiff in the famous case «Roe v. Wade, "andher attorney Gloria Allred on the steps of the US Supreme Court, where anothermajor abortion rights case was heard. Washington, April 26, 1989But the so-called heartbeat law, passed in September 2021, was designed to getaround the "Roe v. Wade " . Usually, in American practice, to challenge a law itis necessary to bring a lawsuit against the authority responsible for itsimplementation.However, if previous anti-abortion laws were to be enforced by governmentofficials, to circumvent the constitution in Texas, it was decided thatenforcement[of these]would not be the responsibility of the authorities but ofthe citizens concerned: according to state law, from 2021 anyone can start atrial against those who "assist" (aide and accomplice) in the execution of an"illegal" abortion. Defendant who loses the case will have to pay each applicantat least $ 10,000 .An attempt by the federal government to challenge the law in early 2022 failed .Other states have begun to follow the precedent. So, on May 3, the governor ofneighboring Oklahoma, Republican Kevin Stitt, signed a bill drawn up on the modelof the Texas law.Such a legislative change was possible thanks to Donald Trump, who appointedthree conservative judges to the Supreme Court - and Republicans were themajority of the court , while Democrats, who opposed the criminalization ofabortion, lost it. While Democratic President Joe Biden opposes Texas law, thefederal government's ability to legislate at the state level is limited and theattempt to legislate on the right to abort, as proposed by the Democratic Party,has failed . Following a vote in the Senate in late February, the project wasrejected.[8]Furthermore, in May 2022, the historic decision "Roe v. Wade "was attacked. OnMay 3, 2022, the media published a draft decision of the US Supreme Court ,proposing to overturn the 1973 verdict. On June 24, the Supreme Court overturnedthe decision and now states will be able to freely regulate abortion at the levelof local legislation. According to the Gutmacher Institute for ReproductiveHealth, 26 states could ban abortion, 13 of them in the near future - and seventhe abortion ban went into effect soon after the Supreme Court decision.[9]Ifthis happens, the number of legal abortions will decrease by at least 14%and manywomen who have lost access to clinics will be forced to abort their pregnancyclandestinely.In response to the publication of the draft decision in May, thousands ofAmericans demonstrated against the changes , supported by members of the rulingDemocratic Party.Abortion has already become one of the most important points in attractingcitizens to the congressional elections, which will be held in November 2022.Democrats are trying to lure voters to the polls by turning the vote for seats inCongress into a referendum on "Ro and v. Wade " .Yes, the Democrats won't be able to bring the decision back into effect, but ifthey have a majority, they can make a federal abortion law.This strategy has received support. According to polls, one in two Americans(even before the June 24 decision) believed the 1973 decision should not berepealed completely , and among those who thought so were both Democrats andundecided (and even some Republicans). ). If at least a part of the undecidedpopulation votes for the Democrats, the party will be able to win a majority.It is true that if the Democrats manage to win and then influence anti-abortionlegislation (i.e. pass a law that will enshrine the right at the federal level),enforcement will come only six months later. While hundreds of thousands of womenwill be left without the opportunity to have an abortion right now.This baffles the democratic ranks and activists who help women . Mallory Schwatz,executive director of Pro-Choice Missouri[10], says the federal government is notdoing enough. "Waiting for the elections to take action is cowardly," theactivist said in an interview with Politico.The restrictions mainly harm the most socially vulnerable groups: the poor,minors, minorities; those who do not have the money to travel to another statewhere abortion is cheaper or those who do not have access to information oncontraception and abortion.The Biden administration is trying to ensure that women have access to the carethey need. For example, the Federal Food and Drug Administration has legalizedthe mailing of abortion pills (mifepristone and misoprostol) , thus giving womenaccess to home abortions; but this is practically the end of the relief measures.The main force that helps women is other women.Activist organizations help obtain necessary documents or reach clinics inneighboring states or countries.Continue in Part TwoNotes[1]In this passage, the word "woman" is often used to refer to the abortioner.Although this term is still used in the literature and academic articles, wewould like to point out that it is not inclusive and excludes those who do notassociate with this gender, but who may be directly affected by abortion law.[2]This figure is often calculated based on the number of deaths per 100,000procedures. According to US statistics from 2013 to 2018, deaths due to safeabortions performed according to WHO guidelines were only 0.4 per 100,000abortions, meaning that only one in 200,000 women who had an abortion died (withone decrease in deaths in the last 50 years).Unsafe abortions kill women at a much higher rate. According to WHO estimates, indeveloped countries the figure reaches 30 women per 100,000 interventions, whilein developing countries it is even higher: 220 per 100,000.Sources- "TABLE 15. Number of deaths and case-fatality rates * for abortion-relateddeaths reported to CDC, by type of abortion - United States, 1973-2018 †"Link: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr /volumes/70/ss/ss7009a1.htm#T15_down- "Abortion"Link: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion[3]According to a study published in 2017 in the authoritative medical journalThe Lancet, in countries where the right to abortion is not limited, the numberof safe abortions can reach 90%. The stricter the legislation, the higher therisks for women. In countries where abortion is practically prohibited, thenumber of "unsafe" and "less safe" abortions can reach 70%.Source"Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety,2010-14: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model"Link: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31794 -4/ fulltext[4]The problem is that at this stage many women don't even realize they arepregnant. The pregnant woman has about a week, at best, to make a decision andfind the money, the right clinic and a convenient time to see a doctor. More thanhalf of all miscarriages occur after the sixth week of pregnancy.[5]The largest Baptist group in the United States, organized in Augusta, Georgia,in 1845 by Southern Baptists who disagreed with the anti-slavery views andactivities of Northern Baptists. By the end of the 20th century, the Conventionhad abandoned its support for racial segregation and had become one of the mostethnically diverse Protestant groups in North America.[6]Conventional name for a number of feminist ideologies and for the women'srights activist movement in the West in the 1960s and 1970s. The first wave offeminism is considered the women's movement for political, especially electoralrights, between the second half of the 19th and the beginning of the 20thcentury. Second-wave feminists drew on a broader conception of rights, notlimited to the political component. In particular, second-wave feminists activelycampaigned for the right to abortion and for the right to control one's own body.[7]Mass movement against racial segregation and discrimination of blacks in theSouthern states, which reached national prominence in the mid-1950s. Althoughslavery was abolished in the United States in 1865 following the Civil War, asystem of racial segregation (the "Jim Crow Laws") was in place in the South. Thecivil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s relied on non-violent protest. Theresult was the passing of civil rights laws in 1964 and 1965, which abolishedsegregation.[8]Republicans also have a majority in the Senate. There are now 50 Republicans,48 Democrats, and two independent senators. The law on the protection of women'shealth was rejected because it did not obtain the minimum of 50 votes necessaryto continue the hearing. Forty-six senators voted against, 48 in favor and theothers abstained.[9]These are the states where abortion laws immediately went into effect:Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.[10]Human rights organization that helps women have abortions and defends thisright in Missouri, a state that intends to ban abortion altogether after therepeal of Roe v Wade.https://gruppoanarchicogalatea.noblogs.org/post/2022/08/10/come-e-successo-che-nel-xxi-secolo-le-donne-si-ritrovano-di-nuovo-a-dover-combattere-per-il-diritto-di-abortire-prima-parte/_________________________________________A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten