Almost a month has passed since thousands of colleagues filled the most central
streets of Madrid asking for the acquittal of the 6 of Gijón and waiting for theappeal to the Supreme Court to be admitted, today it is in the admission room ofthe Supreme Court, but the prosecutor's office has issued an unfavorable reportto prevent it from going ahead, now the Supreme Court has to decide whether toadmit it or not. ---- At this point, the terms can be from days or up to twomonths, the situation of the 6 companions of Gijón depends on whether the SupremeCourt admits the appeal for processing, where it could wait a year to issue aruling, favorable or not.In the case of not admitting it, the situation of the 6 of Gijón becomes verycritical, our compañeras would once again fall into the hands of the judge andanti-worker LINO RUBIO MAYO, the sentence would be final and the accusation andthe prosecution could ask for the execution of the sentence, so the judge wouldhave a term to execute it of 10 days from the request.COMPAÑERAS CAN ENTER JAIL IN A MATTER OF DAYSThe Prosecutor's Office in its report states that it should be inadmissible forlack of foundation and for going against the proven facts.That is why it is resorted to, because the proven facts do not correspond to reality.Because the only interest at the beginning of the union conflict was and is thedefense of the rights of a worker. But the proven facts are only thebusinessman's version, alluding to the fact that he was subjected to tremendouspressure that forced him to close the business. A business that was advertised ona real estate portal for sale long before the start of the conflict.What pressure can a person with so many contacts suffer, that after eachdemonstration he sent the police to identify the participants in the protest evendays later.Who do you think this businessman has been forced into a forced closure and as aconsequence forced to file a request for a declaration of voluntary insolvency, abusinessman who hires JAVIER GÓMEZ BERMÚDEZ, former president of the CriminalChamber of the National High Court, as a lawyer .Our compañeras were leaders of the union, they requested a meeting with abusinessman, in a negotiation the withdrawal of a complaint was requested andgiven the impossibility, that claim was abandoned; In fact, that complaintprospered and was judged.90% of the concentrations were communicated and approved by a governmentdelegation and those that were not communicated were not illegal either, since inall of them there was a police presence and there was never any intervention ontheir part.In a region like Asturias we are accustomed and accustomed to a trade unionismfor men for the sectors where they are the majority, where by culture there hasalways been a presence, sectors such as mining, metal, naval... But tradeunionism is also ours , Women's; and we women also defend ourselves and positionourselves and this hurts the patriarchy and capitalism a lot, they haveunderestimated us but we women have always been there, in the strikes and in thecuts, but our and our compañeras have done what any would do worker with mutualsupport and organization but that several women request a meeting and negotiatein a conflict has not been assumed and has been persecuted.Because trade unionism is not a crime. But if this conviction goes ahead, it mayset a precedent. 3 1/2 years for asking to meet with a businessman and holding upa banner.How many times have we done that? Can we do it again without going to jail?Right now, the freedom of the 6 of Gijón hangs by a thread. We will not let themfall.Trade unionism, direct action and mutual support are not a crime.https://www.cnt.es/noticias/estamos-en-alerta-pendientes-de-un-hilo-pero-no-nos-rendimos/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten