The particularly tense energy context of this winter was an opportunity to see
what a Liberal government had to offer once at the foot of the energy wall. Wewill only remember a remarkable scam that would be laughable if the stakes werenot so high. ---- If our society's dependence on fossil fuels is a known fact,this winter is a painful reminder of the daily implications of such dependence.Since the oil shocks of the 1970s, France has nevertheless sought to ensure itsenergy sovereignty by multiplying its sources of fossil fuel imports, but aboveall by basing its electricity mix on nuclear energy. We can only note a failureon this side with a large number of inactive reactors forcing the reopening ofthe Saint-Avold coal-fired power plant and the import of German electricalenergy. The government has also put in place a tariff shield to limit the impactof the crisis on the economy.On the energy producer side, the situation is simple. If you are EDF, a publicactor, you must sell your energy at a loss to competitors. Unsurprisingly, theselosses put EDF in a critical financial situation, leading the State to acquirethe shares it lacked in the capital of the public company. This acquisitionraises fears of a new attempt at dismantling after the failure of the Herculesproject - we will appreciate the irony when we know that the competitors to whomEDF had to sell its shares came from the dismantling of the public service. If,on the other hand, you are a private actor, the State gives you all the money youneed so that you can take full advantage of the crisis and increase your rate ofprofit. State intervention to favor big capital is nothing new, it is one of thebases of neoliberalism, but the indecency of the approach is terrible.Public sectors always sacrificedThis indecency was criticized even in the ranks of the petty bourgeoisie. Energybills at times of +150% have indeed put artisans in difficulty who had beenpushed into debt to acquire ever more energy-intensive equipment. The smallestcompanies were able to benefit from the tariff shield but this is not the casefor other (still) public sectors. In Alsace, we saw the university close for aweek to curb expenses and hospitals had to improvise, stuck between thedilapidated premises, budgetary constraints and the need to provide decentconditions to patients.Faced with this difficult context, the government acted by seizing the " sobriety" put forward by several environmental associations. Too bad he took theopportunity to interpret the word in his own way. Exit therefore the reasoned useof energy or the cessation of polluting activities. Instead, we will ask peopleto make eco-gestures. Many associations have rightly criticized the objectives ofsuch measures, which are pathetic given the stakes. We can also blame the missedopportunity that this sequence was for renewable energies, but it is difficult toexpect anything from a minister whose family benefits from the oil industry.Above all, we can hate seeing our leaders strutting around in expensiveturtlenecks asking us to make an effort for the planet and then go back and forthin private jets. They do not even pretend to believe the salads they tell.The management of the energy crisis was akin to a bad farce of which we would bethe clowns. Far from solving the problems raised, the general policy is to giveto big capital while running public services. What a shameful nerve to come andthen ask us to die at work longer so that we can reinvest in the school or thehospital. The global energy context forces us to anticipate an upcoming energycrisis and we already know that it will be an opportunity for a new expression ofthe violence of the ruling class without any margin for the most deprived.Corentin (UCL Alsace)https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Energie-Plan-de-sobriete-morale-pour-le-gouvernement_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten