In Catania (the place is not accidental), the prime minister defined taxes
as "state lace". From anarchist communists and historic enemies of thestate, understood as the business committee of the ruling classes. Weshould be happy and agree with you, but we are not. We have learned sincethe birth of the welfare state that the role of institutions is and can bevery different in various contexts, enriching the theoretical analysis ofthe state that was carried out by Bakunin, highlighting its role in theexercise of capitalist and bourgeois domination, as manager of conflictsand war against peoples. Let it be clear our struggle against the liberaland class state remains, We are aware that the Welfare State, with thecorollary of the State-entrepreneur, represents the mode of management ofthe contemporary State in democratic capitalist countries and we are wellaware that this presence is generally accompanied by an attitude ofintervention and direction in economic life, both legislative level, boththrough economic planning and programming, and through public enterprises.It is certain that in such a system neither exploitation nor inequalitiesdisappear, but we also know that to carry out these tasks resources areneeded which can only be found by obtaining resources from the richest inorder to redistribute them.Well, in this scheme of social organization, the collection of taxes is theonly instrument through which to finance these services and it is for thisreason that we consider the collection of taxes appropriate and necessary.They do not constitute the state protection money, as the premier hasdefined them, but the insufficient and unequal instrument for distributingwell-being and implementing solidarity. We rather criticize theeffectiveness of taxes in rebalancing wealth and we maintain who it is thattaxation should be progressive and much more effective than when it occurs,as indeed the republican constitution itself maintains.Pizzo, we well know, is a sum of money extorted to repay the "protection"granted by a friend and arises from a relationship of power, a violenceimposed by force, also resorting to murder: nothing comparable despite,every rhetorical effort, to taxes understood as a manifestation ofsolidarity and as payment of the tribute of everyone in society.We are convinced that even in a society that tends towards anarchy andtherefore towards equality in freedom, to give to everyone according totheir needs (this is communism!), forms of redistribution of resources willbe necessary to achieve this goal, yes call them taxes or social solidaritycontributions.This is why the statements of the Prime Minister seem unacceptable even tous, enemies of the bourgeois and liberal state, of a state that is aninstrument of capital to achieve its objectives. Having said that, thediscussion should be moved to the merits of each tax for which payment isrequested, but this is a political and social struggle that prescinds fromresorting to equating it with the mafia practice. From this point of view,tax evaders are enemies of the community no more or less than those whosquander, steal, disperse, perpetrate the proceeds that come from taxes.Finally, there remains the contradiction constituted by defining either theState as a mafia association which demands and extorts from whoever theState should represent and is at the top of the Government. We leave thisproblem to those who manage power and thus define themselves as part, orrather the head, of a mafia association, perhaps thinking of the politicalorganization they preside over.http://www.ucadi.org/2023/06/19/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-pizzo-di-stato/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten