WORLD WORLDWIDE ITALY News Journal Update - (en) Italy, UCADI #172 - The return of the race (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

 In the strategy of formatting values implemented by the neo-fascist

party, the restoration of the idea of nation plays an absolutely central
role. Reformulating it, the term nation becomes synonymous with homeland
and is described as "the natural society that prescinds from any
convention, similar to the family". From this statement that belongs to
the premier it logically follows that being part of it has as its
primary presupposition the belonging of blood, the genetic bond, in
other words belonging to it is an essentially and primarily biological
fact, proof of which is that from the premier and president of the party
the nation it is assimilated to the "family as a natural society". And
again it follows that only the biological family is considered as a
family so that the two definitions go hand in hand as part of a
"package" of values that summarizes the narrative developed by the right
in government.
That these are not occasional and peregrine statements is testified by
the fact that these concepts have been repeatedly expressed by the prime
minister and by exponents of her party and which in turn refer to the
notion of lineage (that is, of family origin or lineage, in as connected
with nobility and the importance of house) or lineage (that is, a group
of unilineal descent referring to a known apical ancestor who may be
matrilineal or patrilineal, depending on whether traced through mothers
or fathers, respectively). or, more simply, taking up the definition
that Giorgio Almirante, editorial secretary of the magazine "The defense
of the race", gave of nation in his columns.

Extinguish the flame by realizing the values it holds

The return to these meanings of values in the intentions of the right
must act as a polar star to transform the cultural climate of the
country, making it involve the rediscovery of values attributable to the
narration of history and the vision of life elaborated during the
Fascist period which was a regime of totalitarian government - as
Mussolini himself recognized - certainly reactionary, aimed at restoring
a set of values that have always been shared and supported by the ruling
classes in support of a hierarchical and class society that has
inequality as its objective and that the conflict between capital and
labor opposes corporatism as a social and economic doctrine. In other
words, the narrative that the right is making today makes an equation
its own: how fascism was the answer to the request for innovation and
social transformation that characterized the Red Biennium 1919-1921 in
Italy and the revolutionary post-war period in the 1920s, today the
re-proposition of those values is the response to the "breakdowns"
introduced in culture, customs and social values by the struggles that
began in 1968-69.
This choice tends to remove the cultural and political climate that
banned and marginalized in social feeling and customs, with the search
for equality, freedom and solidarity, the cult of force,
authoritarianism, the obtuse conservation of values of tradition, the
repression of sexual and emotional freedom, the cult of the force of
violence and war which had been the distinctive characteristics of fascism.
The restoration desired and pursued by the right can take place by
updating, updating and re-proposing with a new language a structure of
corporative, classist society, characterized by strong institutional
elements of dirigisme, which delegates the management of politics and
society to a democracy. That is why this narration is accompanied by the
institutional reforms which, essentially designing a new institutional
framework, put an end to the Republic born of the Resistance and allow
the stipulation of a new constitutional pact which aims to be the real
moment of peace for the post-fascist right national because it would
make it possible to erase what was the fruit of the defeat of fascism.
 From the right's analysis of the international political situation, it
derives the conviction that the conditions exist today to implement this
project, as evidenced by the growth throughout the world and above all
in Europe of right-wing parties and movements which are the bearers of
identical demands , albeit in different social contexts, which give life
to democrature which transform the parliamentary republics of a liberal
constitutional orientation into regimes managed by autocrats, which
collect the popular mandate in the face of a non-existent government
proposal and a crisis of perspectives and values of the "reformist left".
The project has global reach and dimensions and as far as the EU is
concerned it should materialize with the electoral success of the
conservatives and an alliance of these with the center in order to
strengthen and further re-launch this process in individual countries.
At the level of individual states, the feared entry of Ukraine into the
EU should strengthen the vision of Europe as a set of homelands, i.e.
states, highly autonomous, but linked by common interests, which set
themselves up as custodians of values and as a guarantee of identities,
to ensure in the unity of interests the diversity contained within a
common basket of values which refers to the traditional values of God,
country and family supported by tradition.

The reformist response

It hardly needs to be said, and in any case it is quite evident, that
the reformist parties of Europe have not understood what the right's
project is, indeed in their arrogance, considering themselves custodians
of progress and a supposed cultural superiority, they systematically
underestimate it and all this, in reality, to hide the fact that they
have no answer to give, no strategic proposal to oppose. They observe
the development of events, astonished and powerless, they struggle in
the coils of empty elaborations aimed at interpreting the possible
developments of capitalism, in the illusion of temper their inequalities
and violence, actually ending up perfecting their instruments of
domination, lacking their own strategy and a reading of history, a
convincing narrative, which can enlighten the masses and make them
understand what is being prepared.
The fact is that these parties have lost their identity, crushed by
their role as interpreters of the interests of the turbo capitalism that
they have fed and favored in all possible and imaginable ways, to the
detriment of the classes and classes they said they wanted to represent.
This means that even when they adopt even timidly progressive measures,
they end up losing the consent of the popular classes whose needs and
interests they no longer know. In particular, there is a lack of an
overall analysis of the capital development strategy and therefore,
consequently, of a political project to contrast these trends.
There is an inability to read the new geostrategic order of the world
and this causes the political proposals that these parties formulate to
be completely ineffective and lacking in concreteness. Their ability to
manage the economy is particularly lacking, they are unable to give
convincing answers to technological innovation, to the spread of
robotics, information technology and telematics and consequently to
understand how the world of work has changed, organization and
production, distribution of goods. This inability to read the
transformations of the world is reflected in a dramatic absence of
proposals, while the division between rich and poor grows, inequalities
within states and between classes and outside them in the world, between
rich and poor countries, In this dramatic picture, a fundamental role is
played by war not only as an event of destruction of goods to accumulate
profits and benefit from reconstruction, investing in the misery and
death of people, but also to settle inevitable conflicts between the
different areas of power and economic interests that characterize today
a world that is organizing itself by plates and is assuming a multipolar
dimension that is based on unstable and problematic equilibriums, always
on the verge of a possible nuclear conflict, judged today as a possible
and acceptable event.
In this misery of reason and politics, it is necessary to put one's hand
to a reading of the world and of values that can guarantee a real and
clear class autonomy with respect to the objectives of both economic,
industrial and financial capital, as well as of its foolish servants who
manage the institutions policies and government having it clear that it
cannot be the revolutionaries - i.e. those who deem necessary a total
reversal of economic relations and a radical transformation of
political-social relations in an egalitarian sense - who construct a
strategy for those who limit themselves at best to chasing the reformist
chimera.

Our answer

A response from us is therefore necessary, which also starts from the
definition of the basic principles and concepts that must guide our
action so that the men and women of the planet see a perspective, move
and fight to satisfy their real interests and to a better world and a
more just and egalitarian society which places happiness on earth at the
center of its objectives, the full realization of relationships of
economic equality, realizes emotional freedom, cultivates art and beauty
as values, frees itself from that junk of traditions that constitute a
heavy burden on the shoulders of humanity, starting with seeking in a
god and in a transcendent life the solution to unhappiness and
inequality "freedom is our law" and therefore "wherever an exploited
person rebels he will find a world of brothers"; is therefore that by
rejecting conflicts and wars between peoples we who are
internationalists and supportive, propose ourselves as the forerunners
of the human nation.
It follows that the first objective of our action is the rejection of
war however motivated and the search for peace by building relationships
of cooperation and coexistence that see the birth on the territory of
self-managed and self-governing communities that pursue the values we
have recalled.
The political challenge starts with making clear what is happening and
what the plans of the class enemy are and this in order to counter and
defeat them in order to proceed at the same time with the development of
the strategy and tactics necessary to create the conditions for starting
the construction of the society we want. To achieve it we cannot do
other than fielding our role as militants in the class struggle by
working in order to build together with everyone, and with participation
and discussion, the alternative for a better world.

G. L.

http://www.ucadi.org/2023/06/19/il-ritorno-della-razza/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca