The recent events that are shaking the land of Palestine and inparticular the Gaza Strip force us once again to deal with theJudenfrage, the Jewish question, which since the existence of the Stateof Israel has cyclically returned to peep out in the cultural debate andleft-wing politician. Faced with the suffering of the Palestiniansconfined to Gaza and the West Bank, one certainly cannot remainindifferent and any attempt to minimize that tragedy, to diminish theabyss that is consuming (and has been perpetuating for years) in thosecursed disputed lands is intolerable , occupied by the State of Israelwith the connivance of the European powers at the dawn of the 20thcentury. However, this awareness serves us to keep the bar of historystraight, without slipping and being tempted by easy and simplisticanti-Jewish regurgitations.Anti-Semitic sentiments have been resurrecting in Europe for severalyears and at times we witness, even on the left, anti-Zionist rhetoricwhich - in tone and arguments - opens up to openly anti-Semiticconclusions. It is therefore useful to refresh our memory and go back tothe origins of the Zionist movement, theorized by the Jew Theodor Herzl,and above all to remember what the reaction of the Jewish communitieswas when faced with the prospect of a return to the Holy Land:surprisingly, it was the most orthodox Jews from the point of view froma religious and doctrinal point of view to be opponents of Zionism, andnot for political reasons.Since the foundation of political Zionism in the 1890s, the majority ofHaredim Jews, i.e. one of the most conservative and orthodox fringes,immediately opposed a return to the Holy Land: it contradicted theScriptures themselves (in particular the Talmud of Babylon) as the Statepromised to the Jews by their God could not be established through thepolitical intervention of men and nations, but had to coincide with thereturn of the Messiah of the house of David: replacing the Most High andpolitically exploiting the Scriptures constituted for the heredim a veryserious sacrilege. The issue became more complicated after theestablishment of the State of Israel when some ultra-Orthodoxcollaborated in its establishment, however Jewish anti-Zionism continuedto survive under other acronyms and organizations. Among these we canremember the group Neturei Karta (Aramaic name translatable as Guardiansof the city), founded in 1938, which considers the state of Israel to betotally illegitimate, arguing that the Israelis must return the entirestate to the Palestinians. The group also demonstrated alongside theArabs waving the Palestinian flag, some members were consultants toYasser Arafat's government and had relations with Iran. The motivationsthat drive the Neturei Karta are, once again, of a religious andspiritual nature: Jewish belonging identifies a religious group, not apolitical community. Breaking the promise with God by anticipating thereturn to the Holy Land would therefore be an unforgivable sacrilege.In less extreme forms, some Jewish communities not resident in Israelhave also harshly criticized his policies. Significant is the letterthat, in 1948, several Jewish intellectuals living in the United States(including Albert Einstein and Hannah Arendt) sent to the New York Timesin which they harshly criticized the visit of Menachem Begin, primeminister of Israel, in search of funds and contacts with the US Zionistmovement, defining the methods of his party as fascist.Even today, organized anti-Zionist groups continue to exist, such as thegroup True Torah Jews, whose stated mission "is to inform the world thatthe State of Israel does NOT represent Jews or Judaism." The reasonsgiven are the same as the previous movements. On their official websitehttps://www.truetorahjews.org we can read: "we are in exile by divinedecree, and from it we can only re-emerge through divine redemption. Allhuman efforts to alter a metaphysical reality are doomed to fail and endin bloodshed. (...) Zionism (...) has created a pseudo-Judaism thatplaces our essence in secular nationalism. (...) We are not supported bypolitical convictions, but by our interest in the peace and security ofall the peoples of the world (...)". Probably, for once, religion seemsto be more reasonable than politics.Zoro Astra.https://www.sicilialibertaria.it/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten