According to certain nationalists, immigration is responsible for all
evils. Sometimes she would endanger the French language, sometimes sheis accused of stealing "jobs" or of being profitable; it depends on thetime. We are therefore not surprised that some politicians point thefinger at immigration as the main cause of the housing crisis.Designating a scapegoat is a recipe used many times. It allows attentionto be diverted from the catastrophic management of various governmentswhich for 40 years have left the "invisible hand" of the market andspeculators in charge of a right as important as it is elementary asthat of housing. When governments intervene, it is often to cut fundingor soften (or even abolish) certain regulations for the well-being ofowners.Boosting the fiber of identity and nationalism also makes it possible toconceal the growing inequalities and to exonerate those who are trulyresponsible, that is, this minority of owners who exploit the majorityof people. But it seems that the "angry" PQ members are jubilant andasking for more. Unfortunately, the next few years are likely to bedifficult. We have not finished hearing the speeches about our so-called"reception capacity". As the ecological and migratory crisis worsens,the social and political situation risks getting dangerously worse.Immigration and the movement of populations are not new phenomena in thehistory of humanity. But today, the departure of these people fleeingdroughts, floods or even rising waters is not completely unrelated tothe most deadly dynamics of global capitalism. These people pushed ontomigratory routes are the main victims: "of international division, ofaccess to work, wealth, resources but also of exposure to ecologicalnuisances" (Madelin, p.257). Advanced capitalist countries are primarilyresponsible for the majority of CO2 emissions since the industrialrevolution. They therefore have a moral responsibility to provideassistance and shelter to these climate refugees.If we do not get out of this deadly logic and do not begin a necessarydecline, there are three scenarios that are emerging for us according toPierre Madelin, the author of The Ecofascist Temptation, namely: greencapitalism is the bet of the CAQ and the PLC which are investingmassively in the development of renewable energies, such as theNorthvolt project and which are generating unbridled extractivism todevelop a renewable energy network.The second scenario is carbofascism, a concept that is analyzed by theZetkin collective in the book Fossil Fascism: The Far Right, Energy andClimate. It consists of a headlong rush coupled with a contempt forenvironmental issues. Today it represents important political andelectoral forces. We only have to think of Bolsonaro's Brazil andTrump's USA which have promoted openly ecocidal policies: deforestation,industrialization, expansion of intensive agriculture, unconditionaldefense of fossil fuels, mining, etc. (Madelin, p.221 ) Canada is notleft out with the "common sense" of Pierre Poilievre and all the trashtalkers, the populist columnists and the Éric Duhaimes of this world whocome to the defense of motorists and the northern way of life. American.This headlong rush could lead to the third scenario by aggravating theconsequences linked to the ecological crisis: "The more we experiencethe destructive effects of warming [of 2 degrees or even 3 degrees], themore the democratic and emancipatory options will diminish and theextreme solutions may become necessary. » (Madelin, p.17).If today the nationalist project linked to fossil fuels remainshegemonic, it could be different in the more or less near future. Alayer of green could be added to the traditional anti-immigrationdiscourse of the far right. Although it is currently marginal,"ecofascism risks inspiring governments and political regimes in themore or less distant future" (Madelin, p.25). This ideology is alreadyclaimed by certain actors, notably the Finnish naturalist Pentti Linkola(died in 2020) or the terrorists of Christchurch (2019, New Zealand) andEl Paso (2019, USA). The El Paso terrorist wrote in his manifesto: "Ilove the people of this country [...], but damn you are too stubborn tochange the way you live. In this condition, the next step is to reducethe number of people consuming resources in America. If we can get ridof enough of it, then our lifestyle can become a little more sustainablein the long term. » (Madelin, p.208).It is therefore not a question here of fundamentally changing theeconomic paradigm but of rationalizing or limiting, or even sacrificing"superfluous" or "supernumerary" populations so that the privilegedgroup, following ever more exclusive ethnic and racial criteria, cancontinue to appropriate nature as it sees fit.Ecofascism is for the moment only one of the possible futures.Nevertheless, it demonstrates the need to link environmental strugglesto struggles against capitalism, racism and colonialism.Bibliography:Pierre Madelin, The eco-fasist temptation: ecologist and extreme right,Écosociété, Montreal, 2023, p.257 by Collective Emma Goldmanhttp://ucl-saguenay.blogspot.com/2024/02/capitalisme-vert-carbofascisme-et.html_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.caSPREAD THE INFORMATION
Any information or special reports about various countries may be published with photos/videos on the world blog with bold legit source. All languages are welcome. Mail to lucschrijvers@hotmail.com.
Autobiography Luc Schrijvers Ebook €5 - Amazon
Search for an article in this Worldwide information blog
Abonneren op:
Reacties posten (Atom)
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten