If it is true that the environmental issue seems to be at the center ofpublic debate, in reality it seems that every day the problem confusespublic opinions more and more. In the positions of politicians anddecision-makers we move from irrationalism, to denialism, to,conversely, blind catastrophism: even those who still try to follow theevolution of this debate have no real perception of what is about tohappen. ---- We all know that, for at least four decades, the climatehas been in a vortex of unstoppable changes. Those who still rememberremember that already in the 1980s, studies on the effects of greenhousegases had left the rooms of the academy and began to be part of thepublic debate. We talked about it at school, during science lessons. Itwas talked about every now and then on the news. And the firstpredictions began to circulate about what we should expect in the moreor less immediate future. For the entire southern Mediterranean area,there was immediate talk of a progressive reduction in rainfall up to afrightening percentage of 30%: an environment that was already in a veryprecarious state of equilibrium, with dry summers, a place close to veryfew hundreds of kilometers to the largest desert on the planet, thisalready unhappy land would undergo an almost apocalyptic change.Forty years after those predictions, we have arrived at the point.Despite a certain delay compared to the times indicated for the foreseenscenarios, probably linked to the inertia of the climatic systems of themare nostrum. If, in fact, in the northern regions the climate changehas been devastating for twenty years already, with the Alpine glaciersin very rapid retreat (some have lost half their volume) mainly due tounprecedented summer temperatures for those latitudes, in the south upuntil the ten of the year 2000, we had had a relative respite: justenough rainy winters, even heavy snow like we hadn't seen for a longtime (just think of the Arctic waves of 2015, 2017, 2019). But it was atemporary effect which among other things made us understand, if it werestill necessary, the difference between meteorological events andclimate cycles: if for one, two, three years, but even ten, it rainsmore or snows more ( or less) nothing matters compared to longer-termaverages, specifically thirty-year climatology.And then it turns out that those scientists, who forty or more years agospoke to us about the greenhouse effect, were right, indeed: if we takethe climate annals of the stations in internal Sicily as a reference wecan record an increase of three degrees in the average, minimum valuesand maximums. That's right, three degrees, because an increase of justone degree in the average global temperature can mean an increase ofeven five degrees or more in the average temperatures of individualareas. So it's still going well, but unfortunately we have time to seeworse. In fact, 2021 seems to have all the characteristics to mark a newleap forward in the Mediterranean climate crisis: from 2021 until thelast summer of 2023, we are witnessing the definitive affirmation of thenew Mediterranean climate. First of all, the new European heat recordwas established in Sicily, the 48.8 degrees of 11 July 2021 in theSyracuse area. But ultimately these peaks have always been there. Whatis changing the nature of our climate is instead the phenomenon ofpersistence. One of the most studied effects of climate change is infact related to the slowdown of currents, both atmospheric and marine,with the consequent establishment of the same meteorologicalconfigurations for weeks and even months in the same areas. Inparticular, the European summer is now prey to a new type ofanticyclone, with a strong Saharan origin, triggered by the descent intothe nearby Atlantic of those cold influxes which in the past flowedquickly at high latitudes and which now sink slowly, calling us, dayafter day, increasingly warmer air. Well, precisely since that terriblesummer of 2021, the phenomena just described trigger values at altitude(measured by specific aerial surveys in the free atmosphere, at analtitude of approximately 1500 meters above sea level) of 28-30 degreescompared to 25 in the worst hot waves before warming, and, above all, apersistence that if in the past was 3-7 days now reaches 12-17 days.With what effects? We have seen it: daytime temperatures of 38 degreesat 1000 meters above sea level for weeks, uninterruptedly, and valuesabove 44-45 degrees in the valley bottoms (it should be noted that theseheat waves, due to the phenomenon of compression of the air masseslinked to very high pressure values cause proportionately higher valueson the mountains than on the coasts).The summers of 2022 and 2023 were no different, after all. Last summer,for example, despite there being no new absolute records, wascharacterized by the longest hot wave ever recorded since the existenceof a modern network of weather stations in Sicily, lasting 18 days.During these episodes, trees lost up to half of their leaves even thoughthey were very resistant to drought, not to mention the suffering of thehigh altitude beech forests.Faced with this scenario, even abundant rainfall, even abundant snowwhich is still not lacking, can do little to guarantee the survival ofecosystems. In fact, summer is the season that decides the long-termclimate trend, not winter; even cold and rainy autumns and winterscannot guarantee ecosystems in the presence of summers that last untilNovember and with daytime values that have gone from thirty to fortydegrees in a short time. Imagine if, at the same time, rain and snowdecrease, as is happening for example this year and as will continue tohappen. Yet we knew it, they told us, and they said it based preciselyon the study of the greenhouse effect, demonstrating that the warming isof an anthropic nature, because it is manifesting itself in the wayspredicted by simulations on the anthropic alteration of the gasespresent in the atmosphere , not of who knows what other naturalvariables (which may exist).We must then remember our duties, Vittorini would say. On the one handit is essential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions immediately, withinevitable sacrifices and costs, which however should not always burdenonly the weak links in the value chains. We must do it first andcertainly not take as an alibi the behavior of the so-called bigpolluters such as China and India, who in fact are not easy to ask notto do what we have always done for centuries. And on the other hand wemust think about surviving, preparing actions to mitigate the effects ofthese changes which, even if we utopistically stopped putting gases intothe atmosphere tonight, will now be triggered for decades or centuries.Global warming is already revolutionizing our lives, the products ofMediterranean agriculture are less and less abundant, the olive tree, asymbolic plant of our culture, produces less and less. We must notchange by thinking about 2050 or 2100, but simply about last August,when the energy distribution networks were liquefying in Sicilian cities.Always remembering that we live a few hundred kilometers from thelargest desert in the world.Luca Alercihttps://www.sicilialibertaria.it/_________________________________________A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C EBy, For, and About AnarchistsSend news reports to A-infos-en mailing listA-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten