The flop of the Albania operation, wanted by Meloni, is there for all to
see. Given the results, the approximately one million euros spent to setup the Shengj hotspot and the Gjader detention facility could have been
better used, for example to strengthen the health service, as the
opposition suggests. The government, afflicted by ineptitude and
arrogance, and by that obtuse, incompetent, stupid, former midwife, who
heads the Brussels Commission, could have paid more attention to the
jurisprudence of the European Court before launching into praise of the
"Albanian solution."
: Whatever an increasingly incompetent, alcoholic and confused Minister
of Justice says (who in justification of his ineptitude insinuates that
the magistrates did not fully understand the ruling of the European
Court because it is in French!), he does not seem to realize that the
magistrates of the Court of Rome have done nothing but follow an
obligatory path, which was the one traced by the rulings of the European
Court of Justice on the criteria for identifying safe countries, most
recently that of 4 October 2024 of the Court of Justice of the European
Union which defined a country as safe where in a general and uniform
manner there is no persecution (defined by Article 9 of Directive
2011/95/EC), nor torture, nor inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, nor threats of indiscriminate violence. in situations of
international or internal armed conflict. The ruling also states that
the safety conditions, in order for the country of origin to be
considered as such, must be met throughout the territory (and many of
the countries designated by Italy in the cards drawn up by the Farnesina
are not at all); the second is that the judge is required to assess in
concrete terms whether the applicant's country of origin is safe. And
how can we blame the European judges considering that one of the
countries that the government considers safe is Egypt, which has
distinguished itself for having a police force of torturers, as
demonstrated by the Regeni case, and for having
imprisoned Patrick Zaki and many others for crimes of opinion.
To react to the short circuit caused by the ruling of the Court of Rome,
the Council of Ministers has issued by decree a list of countries
considered safe, which from now on should be authoritative. This way of
proceeding has been challenged before the Council of Europe by the
opposition, which has requested the opening of an infringement procedure
against
Italy, earning the government majority the accusation of boycotting
every initiative of the government. It should be added that none of the
current legislative texts and not even the new regulations on asylum
seem to allow an application of Union law outside the territory (or
borders) of the Member States at least in the ways and
times desired by the Government.
However, regardless of this development of the story, it should make us
reflect on the fact that 16 migrants were chosen, presumably identified
on the basis of a screening for forced sending to Albania not regulated
by any law, not even of secondary rank, as if it were normal to
implement the rules on the basis of a simple practice or a mere
administrative decision, not even being able to understand who among the
migrants were minors and who were in poor health conditions. Hence the
decision to send them, at the modest cost of 18,000 euros per head, to
Albania. To do this you have to be an imbecile who wallows in the media
circle born around the now very well-known Meloni restaurant in Gjader.
All the procedures that have been foreseen appear to be aimed at making
it difficult for those confined in Albania to consult an Italian lawyer,
to communicate in a language understood by both the emigrant and the
lawyer, without a trusted interpreter, without a cell phone in
accordance with the new rules introduced by the security decree, and
this is just to mention some of the difficulties of the imprisoned migrant.
Emigration and reception as a real problem
This does not change the fact that the migration problem is complex and
that the parliamentary left is very guilty, dating back to the much
glorified choices of the former minister Minniti, in agreement with the
Libyan bandits of the coast guard, lavishly financed even though they
tortured the migrants, willing to release them in exchange for the
payment of a ransom requested from their families. Out of pure
hypocrisy, the institutional left did not want to look favorably upon
and did not sufficiently support initiatives such as those of Riace and
many other municipalities in Calabria and beyond, which have adopted
inclusive initiatives for the integration of migrants, even without much
fanfare, making it possible for migrants to be introduced into the
social fabric of the country. The Albanian flop and a serious migration
policy
The flop of the Albania operation, wanted by Meloni, is there for all to
see. Given the results, the approximately one million euros spent to set
up the Shengj hotspot and the Gjader detention facility could have been
better used, for example to strengthen the health service, as the
opposition suggests. The government, afflicted by ineptitude and
arrogance, and by that obtuse, incompetent, stupid, former midwife, who
heads the Brussels Commission, could have paid more attention to the
jurisprudence of the European Court before launching into praise of the
"Albanian solution."
: Whatever an increasingly incompetent, alcoholic and confused Minister
of Justice says (who in justification of his ineptitude insinuates that
the magistrates did not fully understand the ruling of the European
Court because it is in French!), he does not seem to realize that the
magistrates of the Court of Rome have done nothing but follow an
obligatory path, which was the one traced by the rulings of the European
Court of Justice on the criteria for identifying safe countries, most
recently that of 4 October 2024 of the Court of Justice of the European
Union which defined a country as safe where in a general and uniform
manner there is no persecution (defined by Article 9 of Directive
2011/95/EC), nor torture, nor inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment, nor threats of indiscriminate violence. in situations of
international or internal armed conflict. The ruling also states that
the safety conditions, in order for the country of origin to be
considered as such, must be met throughout the territory (and many of
the countries designated by Italy in the cards drawn up by the Farnesina
are not at all); the second is that the judge is required to assess in
concrete terms whether the applicant's country of origin is safe. And
how can we blame the European judges considering that one of the
countries that the government considers safe is Egypt, which has
distinguished itself for having a police force of torturers, as
demonstrated by the Regeni case, and for having
imprisoned Patrick Zaki and many others for crimes of opinion.
To react to the short circuit caused by the ruling of the Court of Rome,
the Council of Ministers has issued by decree a list of countries
considered safe, which from now on should be authoritative. This way of
proceeding has been challenged before the Council of Europe by the
opposition, which has requested the opening of an infringement procedure
against
Italy, earning the government majority the accusation of boycotting
every initiative of the government. It should be added that none of the
current legislative texts and not even the new regulations on asylum
seem to allow an application of Union law outside the territory (or
borders) of the Member States at least in the ways and
times desired by the Government.
However, regardless of this development of the story, it should make us
reflect on the fact that 16 migrants were chosen, presumably identified
on the basis of a screening for forced sending to Albania not regulated
by any law, not even of secondary rank, as if it were normal to
implement the rules on the basis of a simple practice or a mere
administrative decision, not even being able to understand who among the
migrants were minors and who were in poor health conditions. Hence the
decision to send them, at the modest cost of 18,000 euros per head, to
Albania. To do this you have to be an imbecile who wallows in the media
circle born around the now very well-known Meloni restaurant in Gjader.
All the procedures that have been foreseen appear to be aimed at making
it difficult for those confined in Albania to consult an Italian lawyer,
to communicate in a language understood by both the emigrant and the
lawyer, without a trusted interpreter, without a cell phone in
accordance with the new rules introduced by the security decree, and
this is just to mention some of the difficulties of the imprisoned migrant.
Emigration and reception as a real problem
This does not change the fact that the migration problem is complex and
that the parliamentary left is very guilty, dating back to the much
glorified choices of the former minister Minniti, in agreement with the
Libyan bandits of the coast guard, lavishly financed even though they
tortured the migrants, willing to release them in exchange for the
payment of a ransom requested from their families. Out of pure
hypocrisy, the institutional left did not want to look favorably upon
and did not sufficiently support initiatives such as those of Riace and
many other municipalities in Calabria and beyond, which have adopted
inclusive initiatives for the integration of migrants, even without much
fanfare, making it possible for migrants to be introduced into the
social fabric of the country.
In the few blue-collar work sites where professional labor is still
required, such as bricklayers, carpenters, joiners, in workshops where
turners and specialized workers and so on are needed, such as in
agricultural activities, on farms, on livestock farms, in the harvest
fields of intensive crops, the workers involved are also mostly
immigrants, and this while industrialists report increasing difficulties
in finding the necessary labor. Accidents at work, such as the one in
Florence, during the construction of a supermarket, have shown how all
the workers present on the construction site were largely made up of
migrants, with different contracts and belonging to different companies,
managed by different bosses: they worked together on the same
construction site, even though they did not know each other and did not
know what one did and what the other did. Hence the fatal accident at
work. It is therefore necessary that a serious intervention, relating to
the regulation of emigration, bring with it a profound revision of the
laws on labor, restoring those guarantees of protection of workers,
farmers and employees that were the fruit of a season of profound
struggles and that were destroyed by a rapacious and greedy capital,
which only wanted to obtain ever greater profits from the progressive
lowering of the cost of labor, proof of which is that today the wages
paid in Italy are the lowest in all of Europe and in any case those that
have not grown but decreased. This is the main difficulty of a serious
and decisive intervention on the problem of immigration, since it should
bring with it the renunciation by employers of a policy of hoarding
resources through the undervaluation of the wage item, as part of the
production factors, to dedicate themselves instead to investments,
technology, innovation, the search for more appropriate markets, in
order to support and fuel business profits. Such a policy is in clear
contradiction with the economic and social choices of this government
that aims to increase profits, that has taken fiscal inequality as a
characteristic feature of its policy, that aims to maintain high profit
margins through the exploitation of labor, considered as the lowest-cost
factor of the entire production process.
As long as the government persists in this choice, exclusively
repressive policies against the migratory phenomenon are inevitable and
constitute the logical consequence of deeper choices that require a
radical revision of the economic and social policies of the governments
of the various countries at this time.
G. C.
https://www.ucadi.org/2024/10/30/il-flop-albanese-e-una-seria-politica-migratoria/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten