Irish Anarchist Review #7 - Brazilian anarchism interview on the Crisis, World Cup, Especifismo by Paul Bowman

In a wide ranging interview Paul Bowman talked to Felipe Corr?a (FC) a Brazilian 
anarchist who is member of Organiza??o Anarquista Socialismo Libert?rio [Libertarian 
Socialist Anarchist Organization] (OASL) about anarchist orgainising in Brasil, just how 
global the crisis really is and the forthcoming World Cup. ---- IAR: First of all could 
you tell us a little about yourself and your involvement with Brazilian anarchism and how 
you came to be involved? ---- FC: I became an anarchist in the end of the 1990s, in the 
wave of what people used to call the ?anti- globalization movement?, after a past of 
Marxist affinities, both with reformists and revolutionaries. I knew about anarchism in 
the ?counter-cultural? movement ? ie.

I used to be straight edge ? and then started to get involved with collectives in? S?o 
Paulo that were very active in the resistance movement against neoliberalism, like A??o 
Local por Justi?a Global [Local Action for Global Justice] and Centro de M?dia 
Independente [Indymedia Center]. I also got in touch with anarchist social/ cultural 
centers, both Centro de Cultura Social [Social Cultural Center] (CCS) and Instituto de 
Cultura e A??o Libert?ria [Institute of Libertarian Culture and Action] (ICAL).

Later I was part of an anarchist collective called Terra Livre [Free Land], that still 
exists as a library (Biblioteca Terra Livre). During this process, I had some contacts 
with S?o Paulo especifistas of an organization called Luta Libert?ria [Libertarian 
Struggle] (LL), that after became Organiza??o Socialista Libert?ria [Libertarian Socialist 
Organization] (OSL). After some conflicts concerning the model of anarchist organization 
and its role, I left Terra Livre and started to get involved with Federa??o Anarquista do 
Rio de Janeiro [Anarchist Federation of Rio de Janeiro] (FARJ), in which I was integrated 
as an organic member and developed some interesting work by 3 or 4 years. As I was living 
in S?o Paulo, and as I had to go frequently to Rio de Janeiro to work with FARJ 
activities, we decided to start a process of reorganization in S?o Paulo (LL/OSL had 
ceased to exist) and then we organized the process that culminated in what is today OASL. 
Parallel to these works I was directly involved in the foundation and management of Fa?sca 
Publica??es [Spark Publications] and other anarchist projects.

?Now, I?m part of the Communitarian Front of the organization and the current Political 
Education Secretary.

IAR: Here in Europe we have a very self- centred view of world such that if we sneeze we 
think the world has a cold. Here we speak of "The Crisis" in referring to all that has 
happened since 2008 and assume that the way it is affecting us must make it a global 
catastrophe. But what has been the experience of the last five years from a Brazilian 
perspective?

I think this is common to Europeans. If you see the history of anarchism, at the same time 
we had great experiences in Americas (mainly Latin America), Africa and Asia, the books 
always discusses, mainly, European experiences!!! So it?s kind of normal the Europeans 
generalize their reality as it was the world?s reality.

I think this crisis shows a change in the correlation of world forces. Brazil is, at least 
apparently and until now, relatively ?safe? from the crisis. The government is investing 
in the expansion of the credit system and in social programs, trying to stimulate the 
economy. The analysts are divided. Some of them maintain that this shows Brazil?s new 
reality as a world power, others say that the crisis is just arriving.

According to our Relationship Secretary, who is most involved with this discussion, ?both 
of these analyses are correct. Brazil, thanks to historical facts, did not completely 
liberalize its financial system and healed its public debts in the beginning of the 2000s. 
So, the global financial crisis has not directly reached Brazil. But, in the measure that 
the crisis is aggravating and impacting the real economy, with recession in production and 
consumption, this will make the commodity prices of Brazilian exports to fall, and the 
country will be without external savings to develop the projects that are guaranteeing the 
small rates of growth we?re having. So, crisis will arrive, but, for secondary effects, 
it?s not here yet.?

Anyway, the point is that: - it?s difficult to deal with a reality where people, in 
general, think they?re living better; - we are not ?catastrophists? and we do not maintain 
that a crisis will necessarily lead to something better; - so, we think our aim is to 
continue our work through our anarchist organizations inserted in social struggles and to 
reinforce our mass strategy, because, for us, any change, smaller or bigger, to 
approximate our revolutionary and socialist long-term objectives, has to be strongly 
permeated with a class culture based in self-organization practices, democratic 
initiatives, combative movements and so on. Any movement, whether motivated by a crisis or 
not, to approximate our aims, has necessarily to count on these ?libertarian? features.

IAR: Is the imminent arrival of the World Cup in Brazil next year creating any tensions or 
struggles over land and resources?

Sure! Like a lot of other countries that received the World Cup, Brazil is also facing 
these kind of problems. It?s possible to indicate two of them: the first, a priority of 
investment by national and local governments in projects that will only have any function 
during the World Cup; the second, some social ?consequences? of the World Cup, especially 
evictions and attempts to mask Brazilian poverty and social issues.

I think that this priority of governments is completely improper, taking into account the 
social problems we still facing in Brazil and the public who will really make use of the 
works that are being done for the World Cup... This will not be a popular event, in our 
class sense of the word.

In terms of the social consequences, a lot of communities are mobilizing against 
evictions, in places that will be used for works and the whole left is denouncing the 
attempts to hide our poverty; every place where tourists will pass are being ?cleaned? in 
a process that some specialists are calling ?gentrification?.

IAR: I guess you must get tired of being asked this all the time by people from outside of 
Latin America, but still our readers would never forgive us if we didn't ask you: what is 
Especifismo?

FC: No way! It?s always a pleasure to expose our project of which I?m a huge enthusiast! I 
think that ?especifismo? is a word that we use to express a set of anarchist positions.

Especially our mass strategy, that is focused in building and participating in popular 
movements (syndicalism, communitarian, rural/peasant and students movements) with some 
clear positions: its class struggle and combative positions; the position against 
?ideologization? of the movements (for us, similarly to classical revolutionary 
syndicalists, popular movements should not be anarchist, marxist or something like); the 
clear defense of class autonomy and independence from political parties, State, and other 
institutions that push back against what we call popular movements ?protagonism?; the 
defense of the necessity to reinforce democratic features of the movements, with decisions 
being taken by the grassroots militants, with self management and federalism serving as 
the main tools of organization; the revolutionary aims of the movement, reinforcing that 
we seek a social change in which the main agents are the popular movements, even when we 
are struggling for reforms ? that?s what But mainly, especifismo is related with our 
conception of anarchist political organization, or anarchist ?specific? organization.

We maintain that anarchists should be organized on two levels: as workers, in the popular 
movements, and as anarchists, in the anarchist organizations. We defend what could be 
called a ?programmatic model of organization?. Basically, we think that there are lots of 
differences and contradictions among those who consider themselves anarchists and the 
solution for that is to create a strong organization with huge political affinity among 
its members to intervene in an adequate way in the mass struggles, before, during and 
after the revolution. We also defend a self-managed and federalist organization, with its 
?organicity? well defined, with equivalent rights and duties, self-discipline and 
responsibility, unity in terms of ideological, theoretical and strategic/practical issues, 
trying to use consensus, but using majority vote when necessary.

IAR: When you spoke about the recent history of especifismo in Brazil at the St. Imier 
Congress last year, you mentioned that at a certain point in your recent history you made 
a transition from a "traditional" style of anarchist grouping, which you characterised as 
based on allegiance to an "abstract" politics, to a new model of organising. Can you tell 
us something about when and how that transition took place and the change of philosophy 
and practice it led to?

This is basically the way we see anarchist recent history in Brazil. In the 1980s, at the 
end of the military dictatorship, anarchism re-emerged, mainly focused in cultural centers 
and affinity groups, investing, we could say, almost all of their time in cultural work 
(lectures, editions and so on). Although we consider this ?first phase? really important, 
we also see its main limitations.

In the middle of the 1990s, when our current started to develop in Brazil, influenced by 
some Brazilian experiences and the contact established with Federa??o Anarquista Uruguaia 
[Uruguayan Anarchist Federation] (FAU), the main issue was: this cultural work could be 
interesting, and even very relevant, but we saw that in the field of the social struggles 
anarchism did not exist. In our analysis, one of the reasons that all popular movements of 
that time were involved with the Partido dos Trabalhadores [Workers Party] (PT) and/or 
adopting authoritarian forms of organization, was that anarchism was not a political force 
in these movements.

So, what we?ve been doing since then is to do, what we have called, ?to reinsert anarchism 
in the social struggles?, the place where anarchism came from and should never be 
separated from.

To use another expression we like here, we think that anarchism has to ?regain its social 
vector?, that is, a concrete and effective mass line. I think, not without lots of 
problems, we have been able to develop this project a lot since then.

IAR: Again in Europe part of our political landscape is a bipartisan neoliberal consensus 
between centre-left and centre- right political parties. But in Brazil for over ten years 
now, and more recently in other Latin American countries, you have governments that come 
from the anti- neoliberal left and promote a "progressive" line against neoliberalism, at 
least in words. How does this affect your work of social insertion, for e.g. in MST, do 
you find problems with support for the PT government amongst popular organisations, based 
on past loyalties?

I think Brazilian PT experience have to be studied, because we can find some interesting 
things. PT was formed in the 1980?s, basically by the unions, communitarian movements 
(linked, in lots of places, to Liberation Theology) and exiled militants that participated 
in the armed struggle against the dictatorship. In the beginning, it was a party with a 
huge mass base and a radical democratic proposal to enter into parliament, with 
politicians ?responding? to the grassroots positions of the movements. Something like the 
?Greens? in Germany. But the political process since then showed something that we, 
anarchists, sustain since Bakunin. The state is not a ?neutral? institution, it?s an 
institution of domination. And the process of institutionalization that occurred with the 
PT is showing that, doing that, the party adapts more to the system it proposes to change, 
instead of the contrary.

A great part of the social movements and left unions are today linked to PT. So, this is 
something we have to deal and the defense of class autonomy and independence is a banner 
that we constantly defend in these movements; we try to show that State bureaucracy is our 
class enemy, not a possible ally. But sure we point it in the same time that we try to 
reinforce these movements; so it?s not a sectarian position or just a radical discourse. 
We are part of these movements and we still use a phrase that we also like a lot: ?it?s 
better to take one step with a thousand, than to take a thousand steps with one?.

IAR: From the outside it looks as if there has been something of a renaissance of 
anarchism across Latin America in the last ten years. Is this the case? What do you make 
of the prospects for the movement over the next ten years?

Coms, at the same time that I?m a great enthusiast of anarchism, I also know that we?re 
doing a long term job. Looking for our last 20 years, at least in Brazil, we?ve started 
from small and sporadic cultural activities to a stage that we are present in almost 10 
states of our country, with our Brazilian Anarchist Coordination (CAB), that aims to be a 
national organization in some years.

We are now is some popular movements: unions, landless movements, peasant movements, 
communitarian movements, homeless movements, student?s movements, involved with lots of 
struggles. Even as a minor force, anarchism starts again to reappear in these spaces and 
also to be respected by other political forces. Things are going in this direction. But we 
have a lot of work to do...

So, by my point of view, in the next 10 years, the objective, at least in Brazil, is to 
continue firmly growing in terms of our anarchist organization and its ?social insertion? 
in the struggles. If we can deepen this, I think it will be great.

IAR: Do you have any final words or some tips to our comrades that want to know more about 
Especifismo and its theory and practice in Brazil?

I would like to thank you very much for this opportunity and I also put here some links 
where people can find some material in English:

Links at: http://www.anarkismo.net/article/25409

? CAB. Declaration of Principles
? CAB. Organization that Make up the CAB
? CAB. Libertarian Socialism Magazine
? FARJ. Social Anarchism and Organization
? ZACF Interview of FARJ
? FAG. Message to the Founding Congress of the CAB
? NEFAC Interview FAG
? Adam Weaver. Especifismo: The Anarchist Praxis of Building Pop~ular Movements and 
Revolutionary Organization in South America

Interview by: Paul Bowman.

?* Felipe Corr?a (FC) is a Brazilian anarchist who is member of Organiza??o Anarquista 
Socialismo Libert?rio [Libertarian Socialist Anarchist Organization] (OASL), which is part 
of Coordena??o Anarquista Brasileira [Brazilian Anarchist Coordination] (CAB).

Related Link: http://www.wsm.ie/c/brazilian-anarchism-interview-world-cup-especifismo